Knowledge and Information Systems

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 183–198 | Cite as

Developing actionable trading agents

Regular Paper

Abstract

Trading agents are useful for developing and back-testing quality trading strategies to support smart trading actions in the market. However, most of the existing trading agent research oversimplifies trading strategies, and focuses on simulated ones. As a result, there exists a big gap between the deliverables and business needs when the developed strategies are deployed into the real life. Therefore, the actionable capability of developed trading agents is often very limited. This paper for the first time introduces effective approaches for optimizing and integrating multiple classes of strategies through trading agent collaboration. An integration and optimization approach is proposed to identify optimal trading strategy in each category, and further integrate optimal strategies crossing classes. Positions associated with these optimal strategies are recommended for trading agents to take actions in the market. Extensive experiments on a large quantity of real-life market data show that trading agents following the recommended strategies have great potential to obtain high benefits while low costs. This verifies that it is promising to develop trading agents toward workable and satisfying business needs.

Keywords

Trading agent Trading strategy Optimization Integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Capital Markets CRC: http://www.cmcrc.com
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Trading Agent Competition: http://www.sics.se/tac/
  6. 6.
    Trading Agent Design and Analysis: http://www.sics.se/tada05/
  7. 7.
    Cao L, Zhang C (2006) Fuzzy genetic algorithms for pairs mining. In: Proceedings on PRICAI2006, LNAI. Springer, Berlin, pp 711–720Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cao LB (2007) Multi-strategy integration for actionable trading agents. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE Computer Science Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao LB, Zhang CQ (2007) The evolution of KDD: towards domain-driven data mining. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 21(4): 677–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao LB, Zhang CQ (2007) Two-way significance of knowledge actionability. Int J Bus Intell Data MinGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cao LB, Zhang CQ (2007) F-Trade: an agent-mining symbiont for financial services. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cao LB, Luo C, Zhang CQ (2007) Developing actionable trading strategies for trading agents. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE Computer Science Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao LB, Luo C, Zhang CQ (2007) Agent-mining interaction: an emerging area. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on AIS-ADM. Springer, Berlin, pp 60–73Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao LB, Zhang CQ, Zhou MC (2008) Engineering open complex agent systems: a case study. IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C: Applications and ReviewsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cao LB, Luo C, Luo D, Zhou MC (2008) Domain driven actionable trading evidence extraction. IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part BGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chan T (2001) Artificial markets and intelligent agents. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dasgupta P, Hashimoto Y (2004) Multi-attribute dynamic pricing for online markets using intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, New York, pp 277–284Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S (2002) Protocols and strategies for automated multi-attribute auctions. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, New York, pp 77–85Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    David E, Azoulay-Schwartz R, Kraus S (2003) Bidders’ strategy for multi-attribute sequential English auction with deadline. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, New York, pp 457–464Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin L, Cao LB (2008) Mining in-depth patterns in stock market. Int J Intell Syst Technol ApplGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Madhavan A (2000) Market microstructure: a survey. J Financ Markets, 205–258Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wan HA, Hunter A (1997) On artificial adaptive agents models of stock markets. Simulation 68: 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wellman MP et al (2001) Designing the market game for a trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Comput 5(2): 43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Information TechnologyUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Finance and EconomicsUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations