Homological Perturbation Theory and Mirror Symmetry
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Received:
Accepted:
- 101 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
We explain how deformation theories of geometric objects such as complex structures, Poisson structures and holomorphic bundle structures lead to differential Gerstenhaber or Poisson algebras. We use homological perturbation theory to construct A∞ algebra structures on the cohomology, and their canonically defined deformations. Such constructions are used to formulate a version of A∞ algebraic mirror symmetry.
Keywords
Homological perturbation theory Mirror symmetryMR (2000) Subject Classification
55P62 53D17 53Z05Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Yau, S. T. ed.: Essays on mirror manifolds. International Press, Hong Kong, 1992Google Scholar
- 2.Bershadsky, M., Cecotti, J., Ooguri, H., Vafa, C.: Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes. Comm. Math. Phys., 165(2), 311–427 (1994)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bershadsky, M., Sadov, D.: Theory of Kähler gravity. Internat. J. Modern Phys. A, 11(26) 4689–4730 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 4.Goldman, W. M., Millsos, J. J.: The homotopy invariance of the Huranishi space. Illinois J. Math., 34(2), 397–368 (1990)Google Scholar
- 5.Cao, H. D., Zhou, J.: DGBV algebras and mirror symmetry, First International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians, Beijing, 279–289, 1998Google Scholar
- 6.Cao, H. D., Zhou, J.: Frobenius manifold structure on Dolbeault cohomology and mirror symmetry. Comm. Anal. Geom., 8(4), 795–808 (2000)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cao, H. D., Zhou, J.: Identification of two Frobenius manifolds. Math. Res. Lett., 6(6), 17–29 (1996)Google Scholar
- 8.Cao, H. D., Zhou, J.: Formal Frobenius manifold structure on equivariant cohomology. Commun. Contemp. Math., 1(4), 535–582 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Cao, H. D., Zhou, J.: On quasi-isomorphic DGBV algebras, Math. DG/9904168Google Scholar
- 10.Stasheff, J. D.: Homotopy associativity of H-spaces II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 108, 293–312 (1963)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 11.Schlessinger, M., Stasheff, J.: The Lie algebra structure of tangent cohomology and deformation theory. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 38(2–3), 313–322 (1985)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kimura, T., Stasheff, J., Voronov, A.: Homology of moduli of curves and commutative homotopy algebras, in The Gelfand Mathematical Seminars, 1923–1995, 152–170, Gelfand Math. Sem., Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1996Google Scholar
- 13.Gugenheim, V. K. A. M., Lambe, W. A., Stasheff, J. D.: Algebraic aspects of Chen’s twisting cochain. Illinois J. Math., 34(2), 485–502 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Chen, K. T.: Iterated path integrals. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 83(5), 831–879 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gugenheim, V. K. A. M.: On a perturbation theory for the homology of the loop-space. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 25(2), 193–205 (1982)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 16.Gugenheim, V. K. A. E., Stasheff, J. D.: On perturbations and A ∞-structures. Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. Sér. A, 32 (1966), 837–246 (1984)Google Scholar
- 17.Huebschmann, J., Stasheff, J. D.: Formal solution of the master equation via HPT and deformation theory, Math. AG/9976066Google Scholar
- 18.Hain, R.: Twisting cochains and duality between minimal algebras and minimal Lie algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 277(1), 397–111 (1983)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Chen, K. T.: Extension of C ∞ function algebra by integrals and Malcev completion of π1. Advances in Math., 23(2), 181–310 (1977)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 20.Getzler, E., Jones, J. D. S.: A ∞-algebras and the cyclic bir complex. Illinois J. Math., 85(2), 856–223 (1990)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 21.Penkava, M.: L ∞ algebras and their cohomology, q-alg/9518005.Google Scholar
- 22.Brown, R.: The twisted Eilenberg-Zilber theorem. in Celebrazioni Archimedee del secolo XX, Simposio di topologia, 34–37 (1967)Google Scholar
- 23.Shih, W.: Homologie des espaces fibrés. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math., 13 (1962)Google Scholar
- 24.Lambe, L., Stasheff, J.: Applications of perturbation theory to iterated fibrations. Manuscripta Math., 58(3), 363–376 (1987)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gugenheim, V. K., A. M., Lambe, L. A., Stasheff, J. D.: Perturbation theory in differential homological algebra II. Illinois J. Math., 35(3), 357–373 (1991)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Manin, Yu.: Frobenius manifolds, quantum cohomology, and moduli spaces. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 47. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1960)Google Scholar
- 27.Koszul, J. L.: Crochet de Schouten-Nijenhuis et cohomologie. The mathematical heritage of Élie Cartan (Lyon, 1982). Astérisque 1985, Numero Vors Serie, 257–571Google Scholar
- 28.Witten, E.: A note on the antibracket formalism. Modern Phys. Lett. A, 5(7), 487–494 (1990)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 29.Tian, G.: Smoothness of the universal deformation space of compact Calabi-Yau manifolds and its Petersson-Weil metric, in Mathematical aspects of string theory (San Diego, Calif., 1986), 629–646, Adv. Ser. Math. Phys., 1, Singapore, World Sci. Publishing, (1987)Google Scholar
- 30.Todorov, A. N.: The Weil-Petersson geometry of the moduli space of SU(n ≥ 3) (Calabi-Yau) manifolds I. Comm. Math. Phys., 126(2), 325–346 (1989)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 31.Kontsevich, M.: Homological algebra of mirror symmetry, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Zürich 1974), 120–139, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1295.Google Scholar
- 32.Kuranishi, M.: Deformations of compact complex manifolds. Séminaire de Mathématiques Supýrieures, No. 39 (Été 1969). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Que. (1971)Google Scholar
- 33.Vafa, C.: Extending mirror conjecture to Calabi-Yau with bundles. Commun. Contemp. Math., 1(1), 65–70 (1999)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 34.Barannikov, S., Kontsevich, M.: Frobenius manifolds and formality of Lie algebras of polyvector fields. Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 8, 201–315 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 35.Bogomolov, F. A.: Hamiltonian Kählerian manifolds. Soviet Math. Dokl., 19(6), (1918) 1462–1465 (7979)Google Scholar
- 36.Candelas, P., de la Ossa, X. C., Green, P. S. and Parkes, L.: A pair of Calabi-Yau manifolds as an exactly soluble superconformal theory. Nuclear Phys. B, 359(6), 24–84 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 37.Dubrovin, B.: Geometry of 2D topological field theories, in Integrable systems and quantum groups (Montecatini Terme, 1993), 320–348, Mect. Notes in Math., 1620, Springer, Berlin, 1996Google Scholar
- 38.Fukaya, K.: Morse homotopy, A ∞-category, and Floer homologies, Prozeedings of GARC Workshop on Geometry and Topology ’93 (Seoul, 1951), 1–104, Lecture Notes Sel., 18, Seoul Nat. Univ., Seoul (1993)Google Scholar
- 39.Gerstenhaber, M.: The cohomology structure of an associative ring. Ann. of Math., 78(2), 267–281 (1953)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 40.Greene, B. and Yau ed., S. T.: Mirror Symmetry II, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 1. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; International Press, Cambridge, MA, (1998)Google Scholar
- 41.Griffiths, P., Harris, J.: Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Pure and Apptied Mathematics. Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York (1978).Google Scholar
- 42.Kodaira, K., Spencer, D. C.: Existence of complex structure on a differentiable family of deformations of compact complex manifolds. Ann. of Math., 90(2), 145–166 (1959)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 43.Kontsevich, M., Soibelman, Y.: Homological mirror symmetry and torus fibrations, Math. SG/1011041Google Scholar
- 44.Merkulov, S. A.: Strong homotopy algebras of a Kähler manifold. Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 14, 727–733 (1998)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 45.Merkulov, S. A.: Frobenius∞ invariants of homotopy Gerstenhaber algebras I. Duke Math. J., 201(7), 614–461 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 46.Zhou, J.: Hodge theory and A ∞–structures on cohomology. Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 2, 71–78 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003