Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1713–1724 | Cite as

After the rubber boom: good news and bad news for biodiversity in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China

  • Jia-Qi Zhang
  • Richard T. CorlettEmail author
  • Deli ZhaiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The expansion of rubber plantations in northern Southeast Asia over the last 20 years displaced shifting cultivation and tropical forests. In Xishuangbanna, SW China, rubber occupied 22% of the area by 2010, reducing lowland forest to scattered fragments, with severe impacts on plants, animals, and ecosystem services. The rubber price has declined steeply since 2011, but consequences for forest biodiversity have not previously been explored. We use a new approach for vegetation mapping, combining phenological information with object-based classification, to produce land-use maps for 2002, 2010, 2014, and 2018. During 2002–2018, forest cover declined continuously, from 71 to 52% of the land area, while rubber increased from 11 to 24% by 2014, before declining to 21% by 2018. Other farmlands also declined while tea plantations increased. Forest patch number increased 8-fold during 2001–2014, while patch size decreased 10-fold, but these trends were partly reversed after 2014, with the loss of numerous small (< 1 ha) patches. Most larger (> 10 ha) patches in 2018 were forest throughout the study period, but many smaller patches are secondary. Currently, 20% of Xishuangbanna is in protected areas. Unprotected forest is disproportionately on steep slopes at high altitudes, while biodiversity is highest in valleys and at low altitudes, where only smaller patches remain, creating challenges for conservation planning. We recommend that all the largest patches are preserved, plus smaller patches selected for their biota, and that forest restoration is used to restore connectivity and buffer small patches of high conservation value.

Keywords

Deforestation Fragmentation Rubber plantations Biodiversity Conservation China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Xiao Song, Huafang Chen, Wenjun, Liu, and Liping Zhou for providing advice on data processing. We also appreciate the help of Zhiyong Li, Yingguo Miao, and Yupeng Liu with the collection of background information in Xishuangbanna. Jianchu Xu provided advice and assistance throughout the study.

Funding information

This work was supported by the 1000 Talents Program (WQ20110491035), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant/Award Number QYZDY-SSW-SMC014), Green Rubber project (Grant/Award Number CRP FTA), Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany (Grant/Award Number 13.1432.4-001.00).

Supplementary material

10113_2019_1509_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (12 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 12 kb)
10113_2019_1509_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (11 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 11 kb)
10113_2019_1509_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (116 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 115 kb)

References

  1. Ahrends A, Hollingsworth PM, Ziegler AD, Fox JM, Chen H, Su Y, Xu J (2015) Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods. Glob Environ Chang 34:48–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baccini A, Walker W, Carvalho L, Farina M, Sulla-Menashe D, Houghton RA (2017) Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358:230–234.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckschäfer P (2017) Obtaining rubber plantation age information from very dense Landsat TM & ETM+ time series data and pixel-based image compositing. Remote Sens Environ 196:89–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beng KC, Tomlinson KW, Shen XH, Surget-Groba Y, Hughes AC, Corlett RT, Slik JF (2016) The utility of DNA metabarcoding for studying the response of arthropod diversity and composition to land-use change in the tropics. Sci Rep 6:24965.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinck K, Fischer R, Groeneveld J, Lehmann S, Dantas De Paula M, Putz S, Sexton JO, Song D, Huth A (2017) High resolution analysis of tropical forest fragmentation and its impact on the global carbon cycle. Nat Commun 8:14855.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai Z-Q, Zhang Y-h, Yang C, Wang S (2018) Land-use type strongly shapes community composition, but not always diversity of soil microbes in tropical China. Catena 165:369–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.02.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao H, Liu J, Fu C, Zhang W, Wang G, Yang G, Luo L (2017) Urban expansion and its impact on the land use pattern in Xishuangbanna since the reform and opening up of China. Remote Sens 9:137.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang CH, Barnes ML, Frye M, Zhang M, Quan R-C, Reisman LMG, Levin SA, Wilcove DS (2017) The pleasure of pursuit: recreational hunters in rural Southwest China exhibit low exit rates in response to declining catch. Ecol Soc 22:43.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09072-220143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang X, Quan R-C, Wang L (2013) Bird conservation in extremely small tropical rainforest patches in Southwest China. Biol Conserv 158:188–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen C, Liu W, Wu J, Jiang X, Zhu X (2019) Can intercropping with the cash crop help improve the soil physico-chemical properties of rubber plantations? Geoderma 335:149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen H, Yi ZF, Dietrich SV, Antje A, Philip B, Christoph K, Sailesh R, Xu J (2016) Pushing the limits: the pattern and dynamics of rubber monoculture expansion in Xishuangbanna, SW China. PLoS One 11:e0150062.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiarelli DD, Rosa L, Rulli MC, D’Odorico P (2018) The water-land-food nexus of natural rubber production. J Clean Prod 172:1739–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clough Y, Krishna VV, Corre MD, Darras K, Denmead LH, Meijide A, Moser S, Musshoff O, Steinebach S, Veldkamp E (2016) Land-use choices follow profitability at the expense of ecological functions in Indonesian smallholder landscapes. Nat Commun 7:13137.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dayananda SK, Goodale E, Lee M-B, Liu J-J, Mammides C, Pasion BO, Quan R-C, Slik JF, Sreekar R, Tomlinson KW (2016) Effects of forest fragmentation on nocturnal Asian birds: a case study from Xishuangbanna, China. Zool Res 37:151.  https://doi.org/10.13918/j.issn.2095-8137.2016.3.151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dayananda SK, Mammides C, Lee MB, Liu JJ, Pasion BO, Sreekar R, Yasuda M, Quan RC, Slik JWF, Tomlinson KW (2017) Topography and soil type are critical to understanding how bird and herpetofaunal communities persist in forest fragments of tropical China. Biol Conserv 215:107–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng X, Uriarte M, González G, Reed S, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK, Murphy L (2018) Improving predictions of tropical forest response to climate change through integration of field studies and ecosystem modeling. Glob Chang Biol 24:e213–e232.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grogan K, Pflugmacher D, Hostert P, Mertz O, Fensholt R (2019) Unravelling the link between global rubber price and tropical deforestation in Cambodia. Nature Plants 5:47–53.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-035-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haddad NM, Gonzalez A, Brudvig LA, Burt MA, Levey DJ, Damschen EI (2017) Experimental evidence does not support the habitat amount hypothesis. Ecography 40:48–55.  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.k88h6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatfield JH, Orme CDL, Banks-Leite C (2018) Using functional connectivity to predict potential meta-population sizes in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16:215–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heinimann A, Mertz O, Frolking S, Christensen AE, Hurni K, Sedano F, Chini LP, Sahajpal R, Hansen M, Hurtt G (2017) A global view of shifting cultivation: recent, current, and future extent. PLoS One 12:e0184479.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hermans-Neumann K, Gerstner K, Geijzendorffer IR, Herold M, Seppelt R, Wunder S (2016) Why do forest products become less available? A pan-tropical comparison of drivers of forest-resource degradation. Environ Res Lett 11:125010.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu H, Liu W, Cao M (2008) Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ Monit Assess 146:147–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-0067-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83:195–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hurni K, Fox J (2018) The expansion of tree-based boom crops in mainland Southeast Asia: 2001-2004. J Land Use Sci 13:198–219.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2018.1499830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurni K, Schneider A, Heinimann A, Nong DH, Fox J (2017) Mapping the expansion of boom crops in mainland Southeast Asia using dense time stacks of Landsat data. Remote Sens 9:320.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kou W, Xiao X, Dong J, Gan S, Zhai D, Zhang G, Qin Y, Li L (2015) Mapping deciduous rubber plantation areas and stand ages with PALSAR and Landsat images. Remote Sens 7:1048–1073.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70101048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kremen C, Merenlender AM (2018) Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362:eaau6020.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lan G, Li Y, Wu Z, Xie G (2017) Impact of tropical forest conversion on soil bacterial diversity in tropical region of China. Eur J Soil Biol 83:91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laurance WF, Camargo JL, Fearnside PM, Lovejoy TE, Williamson GB, Mesquita RC, Meyer CF, Bobrowiec PE, Laurance SG (2018) An Amazonian rainforest and its fragments as a laboratory of global change. Biol Rev 93:223–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lennox GD, Gardner TA, Thomson JR, Ferreira J, Berenguer E, Lees AC, Mac Nally R, Aragão LEOC, Ferraz SFB, Louzada J, Moura NG, Oliveira VHF, Pardini R, Solar RRC, Vaz-de Mello FZ, Vieira ICG, Barlow J (2018) Second rate or a second chance? Assessing biomass and biodiversity recovery in regenerating Amazonian forests. Glob Chang Biol 24:5680–5694.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu J-J, Slik J (2014) Forest fragment spatial distribution matters for tropical tree conservation. Biol Conserv 171:99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu S, Yin Y, Li J, Cheng F, Dong S, Zhang Y (2018) Using cross-scale landscape connectivity indices to identify key habitat resource patches for Asian elephants in Xishuangbanna, China. Landsc Urban Plan 171:80–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu S, Yin Y, Liu X, Cheng F, Yang J, Li J, Dong S, Zhu A (2017) Ecosystem services and landscape change associated with plantation expansion in a tropical rainforest region of Southwest China. Ecol Model 353:129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06751-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu W, Hu H, Ma Y, Li H (2006) Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of increasing rubber plantations in Menglun township, Southwest China. Mt Res Dev 26:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2006)26[245:EASIOI]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
  36. Meng L-Z, Martin K, Weigel A, Liu J-X (2012a) Impact of rubber plantation on carabid beetle communities and species distribution in a changing tropical landscape (southern Yunnan, China). J Insect Conserv 16:423–432.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9428-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meng L-Z, Yang X-D, Martin K, Gan J-M, Liu Y-H, Gong W-C (2016) Movement patterns of selected insect groups between natural forest, open land and rubber plantation in a tropical landscape (southern Yunnan, SW China). J Insect Conserv 20:363–371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9869-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meng L-Z, Martin K, Liu JX, Burger F, Chen J (2012b) Contrasting responses of hoverflies and wild bees to habitat structure and land use change in a tropical landscape (southern Yunnan, SW China). Insect Sci 19:666–676.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2011.01481.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Min S, Bai J, Huang J, Waibel H (2018) Willingness of smallholder rubber farmers to participate in ecosystem protection: effects of household wealth and environmental awareness. Forest Policy Econ 87:70–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nghiem LT, Tan HT, Corlett RT (2015) Invasive trees in Singapore: are they a threat to native forests? Trop Conserv Sci 8:201–214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Niissalo MA, Leong-Škorničková J, Khew GS, Webb EL (2017) Very small relict populations suggest high extinction debt of gingers in primary forest fragments of a tropical city. Am J Bot 104:182–189.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roy DP, Wulder M, Loveland TR, Woodcock C, Allen R, Anderson M, Helder D, Irons J, Johnson D, Kennedy R (2014) Landsat-8: science and product vision for terrestrial global change research. Remote Sens Environ 145:154–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sarathchandra C, Dossa GG, Ranjitkar NB, Chen H, Deli Z, Ranjitkar S, de Silva KHWL, Wickramasinghe S, Xu J, Harrison RD (2018) Effectiveness of protected areas in preventing rubber expansion and deforestation in X ishuangbanna, Southwest C hina. Land Degrad Dev 29:2417–2427.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shen S, Xu G, Li D, Clements DR, Zhang F, Jin G, Wu J, Wei P, Lin S, Xue D (2017) Agrobiodiversity and in situ conservation in ethnic minority communities of Xishuangbanna in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 13:28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-017-0158-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pasion BO, Roeder M, Liu J, Yasuda M, Corlett RT, Slik JWF, Tomlinson KW (2018) Trees represent community composition of other plant life-forms, but not their diversity, abundance or responeses to fragmentation. Sci Rep 8:11374.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29635-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith IA, Hutyra LR, Reinmann AB, Marrs JK, Thompson JR (2018) Piecing together the fragments: elucidating edge effects on forest carbon dynamics. Front Ecol Environ 16:213–221.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sreekar R, Huang G, Zhao JB, Pasion BO, Yasuda M, Zhang K, Peabotuwage I, Wang X, Quan RC, Ferry Slik JW (2015) The use of species–area relationships to partition the effects of hunting and deforestation on bird extirpations in a fragmented landscape. Divers Distrib 21:441–450.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sturgeon JC (2010) Governing minorities and development in Xishuangbanna, China: Akha and Dai rubber farmers as entrepreneurs. Geoforum 41:318–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Takeuchi Y, Soda R, Diway B, Nakagawa M, Nagamasu H, Nakashizuka T (2017) Biodiversity conservation values of fragmented communally reserved forests, managed by indigenous people, in a human-modified landscape in Borneo. PLoS One 12:e0187273.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thellmann K, Blagodatsky S, Häuser I, Liu H, Wang J, Asch F, Cadisch G, Cotter M (2017) Assessing ecosystem services in rubber dominated landscapes in South-East Asia—a challenge for biophysical modeling and transdisciplinary valuation. Forests 8:505.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8:127–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warren-Thomas EM, Edwards DP, Bebber DP, Chhang P, Diment AN, Evans TD, Lambrick FH, Maxwell JF, Nut M, O’Kelly HJ, Theilade I, Dolman PM (2018) Protecting tropical forests from the rapid expansion of rubber using carbon payments. Nat Commun 9:911.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03287-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wulder MA, White JC, Goward SN, Masek JG, Irons JR, Herold M, Cohen WB, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE (2008) Landsat continuity: issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring. Remote Sens Environ 112:955–969.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xiao X, Hollinger D, Aber J, Goltz M, Davidson EA, Zhang Q, Moore B III (2004) Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest. Remote Sens Environ 89:519–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu H, Wu Y, Cao Y, Cao M, Tong W, Le Z, Lu X, Li J, Ma F, Liu L, Hu F, Chen M, Li Y (2018) Low overlaps between hotspots and complementary sets of vertebrate and plant species in China. Biodivers Conserv 27:2713–2727.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1564-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zeng L, Reuse G (2016) Holy hills: sanctuaries of biodiversity in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Asian sacred natural sites. Routledge. pp 204–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676272
  58. Zhai D, Dong J, Cadisch G, Wang M, Kou W, Xu J, Xiao X, Abbas S (2018) Comparison of pixel-and object-based approaches in phenology-based rubber plantation mapping in fragmented landscapes. Remote Sens 10:44.  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10010044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang J, Cao M (1995) Tropical forest vegetation of Xishuangbanna, SW China and its secondary changes, with special reference to some problems in local nature conservation. Biol Conserv 73:229–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)00118-A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang L, Dong L, Lin L, Feng L, Yan F, Wang L, Guo X, Luo A (2015) Asian elephants in China: estimating population size and evaluating habitat suitability. PLoS One 10:e0124834.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang M, Chang C, Quan R (2017) Natural forest at landscape scale is most important for bird conservation in rubber plantation. Biol Conserv 210:243–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhu H, Cao M, Hu H (2006) Geological history, flora, and vegetation of Xishuangbanna, southern Yunnan, China. Biotropica 38:310–317.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00147.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical GardenChinese Academy of SciencesMenglunChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory for Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of BotanyChinese Academy of SciencesKunmingChina
  4. 4.World Agroforestry CentreEast and Central Asia OfficeKunmingChina

Personalised recommendations