Advertisement

Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation

  • Sven Lautenbach
  • Anne-Christine Mupepele
  • Carsten F. Dormann
  • Heera Lee
  • Stefan Schmidt
  • Samantha S. K. Scholte
  • Ralf Seppelt
  • Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen
  • Willem Verhagen
  • Martin Volk
Review

Abstract

Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.

Keywords

Operationalization Stakeholder involvement Good modeling practice Quantitative review Off-site effects Trade-offs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the manuscript.

Funding information

The work has been funded by the EU-FP7 project OPERAs under grant agreement number FP7-ENV-2012-308393.

Supplementary material

10113_2018_1457_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (337 kb)
ESM 1 Temporal trends in the five critical facets of ecosystem service research (PDF 337 kb)
10113_2018_1457_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (50.8 mb)
ESM 2 Spatial pattern of ecosystem service research facets (PDF 52010 kb)
10113_2018_1457_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (728 kb)
ESM 3 References of the papers in the sample (PDF 728 kb)
10113_2018_1457_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (636 kb)
ESM 4 The ecosystem service categories used in the manuscript. (PDF 635 kb)

References

  1. Baker J, Sheate WR, Phillips P, Eales R (2013) Ecosystem services in environmental assessment—help or hindrance? Environ Impact Assess Rev 40:3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmford A, Fisher B, Green RE, Naidoo R, Strassburg B, Turner RK, Rodrigues ASL (2011) Bringing ecosystem services into the real world: an operational framework for assessing the economic consequences of losing wild nature. Environ Resour Econ 48:161–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9413-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balvanera P, Daw TM, Gardner TA, Martín-lópez B, Norström AV, Speranza CI (2017) Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems : a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society ( PECS ) perspective. Ecol Soc 22:14.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08826-220114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banse M, van Meijl H, Tabeau A, Woltjer G (2008) Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural and food markets. In: 107th EAAE Seminar, Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies. Sevilla, SpainGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateman IJ, Mace GM, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K (2011) Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ Resour Econ 48:177–218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baveye PC (2017) Quantification of ecosystem services : beyond all the guesstimates, how do we get real data? Ecosyst Serv 24:47–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett ND, Croke BFW, Guariso G, Guillaume JHA, Hamilton SH, Jakeman AJ, Marsili-Libelli S, Newham LTH, Norton JP, Perrin C, Pierce SA, Robson B, Seppelt R, Voinov A, Fath BD, Andreassian V (2012) Characterising performance of environmental models. Environ Model Softw 40:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh BN, Geijzendorffer IR, Krug CB, Lavorel S, Lazos E, Lebel L, Martín-López B, Meyfroidt P, Mooney HA, Nel JL, Pascual U, Payet K, Harguindeguy NP, Peterson GD, Prieur-Richard A-H, Reyers B, Roebeling P, Seppelt R, Solan M, Tschakert P, Tscharntke T, Turner B, Verburg PH, Viglizzo EF, White PC, Woodward G (2015) Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts SG (2013) Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol Evol 28:230–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bondeau A, Smith PC, Zaehle S, Schaphoff S, Lucht W, Cramer W, Gerten D, Lotze-Campen H, Müller C, Reichstein M, Smith B (2007) Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob Chang Biol 13:679–706.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01305.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borner J, Mendoza A, Vosti S (2007) Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: interrelationships and policy prescriptions. Ecol Econ 64:356–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Box GEP (1976) Science and statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 71:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruckner M, Fischer G, Tramberend S, Giljum S (2015) Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: a review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods. Ecol Econ 114:11–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buckley C, Hynes S, Mechan S (2012) Supply of an ecosystem service—farmers’ willingness to adopt riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Environ Sci Pol 24:101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell A, Doswald N (2009) The impacts of biofuel production on biodiversity: a review of the current literature. UNEP-WCMC, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Carpenter SR, Defries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ (2006) Millenium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science (80-) 314:257–258.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carreño L, Frank FC, Viglizzo EF (2012) Tradeoffs between economic and ecosystem services in Argentina during 50 years of land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 154:68–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC (2006) Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol 4:e379.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christie M, Fazey I, Cooper R, Hyde T, Kenter JO (2012) An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies. Ecol Econ 83:67–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Comberti C, Thornton TF, de Echeverria VW, Patterson T (2015) Ecosystem services or services to ecosystems? Valuing cultivation and reciprocal relationships between humans and ecosystems. Glob Environ Chang 34:247–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cord AF, Bartkowski B, Beckmann M, Dittrich A, Hermans-Neumann K, Kaim A, Lienhoop N, Locher-Krause K, Priess J, Schröter-Schlaack C, Schwarz N, Seppelt R, Strauch M, Václavík T, Volk M (2017a) Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies : Main concepts , methods and the road ahead. Ecosyst Serv 28:264–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cord AF, Brauman KA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Huth A, Ziv G, Seppelt R (2017b) Priorities to advance monitoring of ecosystem services using earth observation. Trends Ecol Evol 32:416–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cordier M, Pérez Agúndez JA, O’Connor M, Rochette S, Hecq W (2011) Quantification of interdependencies between economic systems and ecosystem services: an input–output model applied to the Seine estuary. Ecol Econ 70:1660–1671.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux DJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A, Farrell PJO (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:9483–9488.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706559105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1890/080025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dale VH, Polasky S (2007) Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 64:286–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KM a, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Grêt-Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spierenburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8812–8819.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Delgado LE, Marín VH (2015) Ecosystem services : where on earth ? Ecosyst Serv 14:24–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly C, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A (2015) A Rosetta Stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biol 13:e1002040.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dittrich A, von Wehrden H, Abson DJ, Bartkowski B, Cord AF, Fust P, Hoyer C, Kambach S, Meyer MA, Radzeviciute R, Nieto-Romero M, Seppelt R, Beckmann M (2017) Mapping and analysing historical indicators of ecosystem services in Germany. Ecol Indic 75:101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dormann CF, Purschke O, Marquez JR, Lautenbach S, Schroder B, García Márquez JR, Schröder B (2008) Components of uncertainty in species distribution analysis: a case study of the Great Grey Shrike. Ecology 89:3371–3386.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1772.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Durham E, Baker H, Smith M, Moore E, Morgan V (2014) BiodivERsA Stakeholder Engagement Toolkit. BiodivERsA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (1981) Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2010a) The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 47:377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2010b) Error propagation associated with benefits transfer-based mapping of ecosystem services. Biol Conserv 143:2487–2493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eijgelaar E, Thaper C, Peeters P (2010) Antarctic cruise tourism : the paradoxes of ambassadorship , “ last chance tourism ” and greenhouse gas emissions. J Sustain Tour 18:337–354.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003653534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fischer J, Gardner TA, Bennett EM, Balvanera P, Biggs R, Carpenter S, Daw T, Folke C, Hill R, Hughes TP, Luthe T, Maass M, Meacham M, Norström AV, Peterson G, Queiroz C, Seppelt R, Spierenburg M, Tenhunen J (2015) Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social-ecological systems perspective. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:144–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Förster J, Barkmann J, Fricke R, Hotes S, Kleyer M, Kobbe S, Kübler D, Rumbaur C, Siegmund-Schultze M, Seppelt R, Settele J, Spangenberg JH, Tekken V, Václavík T, Wittmer H (2015) Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach. Ecol Soc 20.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07804-200331
  42. Gagic V, Tscharntke T, Dormann CF, Gruber B, Wilstermann A, Thies C (2011) Food web structure and biocontrol in a four-trophic level system across a landscape complexity gradient. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:2946–2953.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2645 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications and future research directions. Trans ASABE 50:1211–1250.  https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grêt-Regamey A, Celio E, Klein TM, Wissen Hayek U (2013) Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landsc Urban Plan 109:107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grêt-Regamey A, Rabe S-E, Crespo R, Lautenbach S, Ryffel A, Schlup B (2014) On the importance of non-linear relationships between landscape patterns and the sustainable provision of ecosystem services. Landsc Ecol 29:201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9957-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hamel P, Bryant BP (2017) Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: common challenges and practical responses. Ecosyst Serv 24:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hicks CC, Graham NAJ, Cinner JE (2013) Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers , scientists , and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 23:1444–1453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hilborn R (2013) Environmental cost of conservation victories. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:98195.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308962110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK (2006) Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resour Manag 21:35–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9039-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hossain S, Dearing JA (2016) Recent changes in ecosystem services and human well-being in the Bangladesh coastal zone. Reg Environ Chang 16:429–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0748-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hou Y, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J Environ Manag 127(Suppl):S117–S131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, Mace GM (2014) Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: a meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Glob Environ Chang 28:263–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hurley C (2012) gclus: Clustering Graphics. https://cran.r-project.org/package=gclus, R package, last accessed: 17.01.2018. https://cran.r-project.org/package=gclus
  55. Jacobs S, Wolfstein K, Vandenbruwaene W, Vrebos D, Beauchard O, Maris T, Meire P (2015) Detecting ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: a practice-oriented application in four industrialized estuaries. Ecosyst Serv 16:378–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jakeman AJ, Letcher RA, Norton JP (2006) Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environ Model Softw 21:602–614.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jessop J, Spyreas G, Pociask GE, Benson TJ, Ward MP, Kent AD, Matthews JW (2015) Tradeoffs among ecosystem services in restored wetlands. Biol Conserv 191:341–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kirchner JW, Hooperb RP, Kendall C, Neald C, Leavesley G (1996) Testing and validating environmental models. Sci Total Environ 183:33–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(95)04971-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kirchner M, Schmidt J, Kindermann G, Kulmer V, Mitter H, Prettenthaler F, Rüdisser J, Schauppenlehner T, Schönhart M, Strauss F, Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Schmid E (2015) Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes—the impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies. Ecol Econ 109:2014–2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kissinger M, Rees WE, Timmer V (2011) Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world. Environ Sci Pol 14:965–976.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Koch EW, Barbier EB, Silliman BR, Reed DJ, Perillo GM, Hacker SD, Granek EF, Primavera JH, Muthiga N, Polasky S, Halpern BS, Kennedy CJ, Kappel CV, Wolanski E (2009) Non-linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front Ecol Environ 7:29–37.  https://doi.org/10.1890/080126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Konarska K (2002) Evaluating scale dependence of ecosystem service valuation: a comparison of NOAA-AVHRR and Landsat TM datasets. Ecol Econ 41:491–507.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00096-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kragt ME, Robertson MJ (2014) Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices. Ecol Econ 102:147–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Landis DA, Gardiner MM, van der Werf W, Swinton SM (2008) Increasing corn for biofuel production reduces biocontrol services in agricultural landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:20552–20557.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804951106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Laniak GF, Olchin G, Goodall J, Voinov A, Hill M, Glynn P, Whelan G, Geller G, Quinn N, Blind M, Peckham S, Reaney S, Gaber N, Kennedy R, Hughes A (2013) Integrated environmental modeling: a vision and roadmap for the future. Environ Model Softw 39:3–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Billé R, Pirard R, Mermet L (2013) Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J Environ Manag 119:208–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, Seppelt R (2011) Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol Indic 11:676–687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lautenbach S, Volk M, Strauch M, Whittaker G, Seppelt R (2013) Optimization-based trade-off analysis of biodiesel crop production for managing an agricultural catchment. Environ Model Softw 48:98–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Lamarque P, Colace M-PP, Garden D, Girel J, Pellet G, Douzet R (2011) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol 99:135–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lavorel S, Bayer A, Bondeau A, Lautenbach S, Ruiz-Frau A, Schulp N, Seppelt R, Verburg P, Teeffelen AV, Vannier C, Arneth A, Cramer W, Marba N (2017a) Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches. Ecol Indic.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015
  71. Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Leitinger G, Kohler M, Schirpke U, Tappeiner U (2017b) Historical trajectories in land use pattern and grassland ecosystem services in two European alpine landscapes. Reg Environ Chang 17:2251–2264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1207-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lee H, Lautenbach S (2016) A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol Indic 66:340–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Legendre P, Legendre L (2003) Numerical ecology. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  74. Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, Defries R, Dietz T, Fu F, Hertel TW, Cesar R, Lambin EF, Li S, Martinelli LA, Mcconnell WJ, Moran EF, Naylor R (2013) Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol Soc 18(2).  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05873-180226
  75. Liu J, Yang W, Li S (2016) Framing ecosystem services in the telecoupled Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ 14:27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/16-0188.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Locher-Krause KE, Lautenbach S, Volk M (2017) Spatio-temporal change of ecosystem services as a key to understand natural resource utilization in Southern Chile. Reg Environ Chang 17:2477–2493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1180-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. MA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island PressGoogle Scholar
  78. Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Struyf A, Hubert M, Hornik K (2017) cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions, R package, last accessed: 16.01.2018Google Scholar
  79. Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquete C, Vihervaara P, Schägner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, La Notte A, Zulian G, Bouraoui F, Luisa Paracchini M, Braat L, Bidoglio G (2012a) Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst Serv 1:31–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Dunbar MB, Alkemade R (2012b) Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 155:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Maestre Andrés S, Calvet Mir L, van den Bergh JCJM, Ring I, Verburg PH (2012) Ineffective biodiversity policy due to five rebound effects. Ecosyst Serv 1:101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mandle L, Tallis H, Sotomayor L, Vogl AL (2015) Who loses? Tracking ecosystem service redistribution from road development and mitigation in the Peruvian Amazon. Front Ecol Environ 13:309–315.  https://doi.org/10.1890/140337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Martinez-Harms MJ, Bryan B, Balvanera P, Law E, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Wilson K (2015) Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biol Conserv 184:229–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González JA, Santos-Martín F, Onaindia M, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One 7:e38970.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Maskell LC, Crowe A, Dunbar MJ, Emmett B, Henrys P, Keith AM, Norton LR, Scholefield P, Clark DB, Simpson IC, Smart SM (2013) Exploring the ecological constraints to multiple ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity. J Appl Ecol 50:561–571.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28.  https://doi.org/10.1038/443027a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McDonough K, Hutchinson S, Moore T, Hutchinson JMS (2017) Analysis of publication trends in ecosystem services research. Ecosyst Serv 25:82–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Meyer D, Zeileis A, Hornik K (2016) vcd: visualizing categorical data. R package version 1.4–1.,https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vcd last accessed: 18.01.2018
  89. Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF (2010) Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:20917–20922.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014773107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Mingorrı S (2014) The oil palm boom : socio-economic implications for Q’ eqchi’ households in the Polochic valley, Guatemala. Environ Dev Sustain 16:841–871.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9530-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Miyake S, Renouf M, Peterson A, McAlpine C, Smith C (2012) Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: a review. J Rural Stud 28:650–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mouchet MA, Gos P, Byczek C, Lavorel S (2014) An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 28:298–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Mupepele A-C, Walsh JC, Sutherland WJ, Dormann CF (2016) An evidence assessment tool for ecosystem services and conservation studies. Ecol Appl 26:1295–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Neuwirth E (2014) RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer package, last accessed: 22.01.2018
  95. Norgaard RB (2010) Ecosystem services : from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ 69:1219–1227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, LG Simpson, Wagner MHHSand H (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4–5. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan last accessed: 21.12.2017
  97. Oleson KLL, Barnes M, Brander LM, Oliver TA, Van Beek I, Za B, Van Beukering P (2015) Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers : a discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Ecol Econ 114:104–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Orenstein DE, Groner E (2014) In the eye of the stakeholder: changes in perceptions of ecosystem services across an international border. Ecosyst Serv 8:185–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Pascual U, Palomo I, Adams W, Chan K, Daw T, Garmendia E, Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Mace G, Martin-Lopez B, Phelps J (2017) Off-stage ecosystem service burdens: a blind spot for global sustainability. Environ Res Lett 12.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7392
  100. Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5:9–13Google Scholar
  101. Polce C, Maes J, Brander L, Cescatti A, Baranzelli C, Lavalle C, Zulian G (2016) Global change impacts on ecosystem services: a spatially explicit assessment for Europe. One Ecosyst 1:e9990.  https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.1.e9990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Prather CM, Pelini SL, Laws A, Rivest E, Woltz M, Bloch CP, Del Toro I, Ho C-K, Kominoski J, Newbold TAS, Parsons S, Joern A (2013) Invertebrates, ecosystem services and climate change. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:327–348.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL https://www.R-project.org/ last accessed 21.12.2017
  104. Raffaelli D, White PCL (2013) Ecosystems and their services in a changing world. Adv Ecol Res 48:1–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417199-2.00001-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Renard D, Rhemtulla JM, Bennett EM (2015) Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:13411–13416.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502565112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S, Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S (2013) Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ 11:268–273.  https://doi.org/10.1890/120144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan- I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Bogdanski A, Gemmill-Herren B, Greenleaf SS, Klein AM, Mayfield MM, Morandin LA, Ochieng A, Viana BF (2008) Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett 11:499–515.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rieb JT, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Armsworth PR, Böhning-Gaese K, Turner MG, Bennett EM (2017) When , where , and how nature matters for ecosystem services : challenges for the next generation of ecosystem service models. Bioscience 67:820–833.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sabatier R, Meyer K, Wiegand K, Clough Y (2013) Non-linear effects of pesticide application on biodiversity-driven ecosystem services and disservices in a cacao agroecosystem: a modeling study. Basic Appl Ecol 14:115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2012.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Sagoff M (2011) The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 70:497–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sarkar D (2008) Lattice—multivariate data visualization with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  113. Schipanski ME, Barbercheck M, Douglas MR, Finney DM, Haider K, Kaye JP, Kemanian AR, Mortensen DA, Ryan MR, Tooker J, White C (2014) A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems. Agric Syst 125:12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Schirpke U, De Marco C, Tappeiner U (2014) Mapping beneficiaries of ecosystem services flows from Natura 2000 sites. Ecosyst Serv 9:170–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Schmidt S, Manceur AM, Seppelt R (2016) Uncertainty of monetary valued ecosystem services—value transfer functions for global mapping. PLoS One 11:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Schröter M, Kraemer R, Mantel M, Kabisch N, Hecker S, Richter A, Neumeier V, Bonn A (2017) Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: status, challenges and opportunities. Ecosyst Serv 28:80–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Schröter M, Koellner T, Alkemade R, Arnhold S, Bagstad KJ, Erb KH, Frank K, Kastner T, Kissinger M, Liu J, López-Hoffman L, Maes J, Marques A, Martín-López B, Meyer C, Schulp CJE, Thober J, Wolff S, Bonn A (2018) Interregional flows of ecosystem services: concepts, typology and four cases. Ecosyst Serv 31:231–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FVFV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol 48:630–636.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Seppelt R, Lautenbach S, Volk M (2013) Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sims C, Aadland D, Powell J, Finnoff DC, Crabb B (2014) Complementarity in the provision of ecosystem services reduces the cost of mitigating amplified natural disturbance events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:16718–16723.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407381111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevsky S (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob Chang Biol 9:161–185.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00569.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Tallis H, Mooney H, Andelman S, Balvanera P, Cramer W (2012) A global system for monitoring ecosystem service change. Bioscience 62:977–986.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.11.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Tilliger B, Rodriguez-Labajos B, Bustamante J, Settele J (2015) Disentangling values in the interrelations between cultural ecosystem services and landscape conservation—a case study of the Ifugao Rice terraces in the Philippines. Land 4:888–913.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land4030888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Wanger TC, Jackson L, Motzke I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Whitbread A (2012a) Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol Conserv 151:53–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand T, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batáry P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RM, Fründ J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis D, Laurance W, Lindenmayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012b) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 87:661–685.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Turner RK, Morse-Jones S, Fisher B (2010) Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1185:79–101.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05280.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. van Wilgen BW, Le Maitre DC, Cowling RM (1998) Ecosystem services, efficiency, sustainability and equity: South Africa’s Working for Water programme. Trends Ecol Evol 13:378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01434-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Verhagen W, Sturck J, Schulp C, Verburg PH (2014) Mapping ecosystem services. In: van Beukering PJH, Bouma J (eds) Ecosystem Services: From concept to practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–86Google Scholar
  129. Vieira L, Everard M, Shore RG (2014) Ecosystem services assessment at Steart Peninsula , Somerset, UK. Ecosyst Serv 10:19–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Vihervaara P, Rönkä M, Walls M (2010) Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. Ambio 39:314–324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wackernagel M, Schulz NB, Deumling D, Linares AC, Jenkins M, Kapos V, Monfreda C, Loh J, Myers N, Norgaard R, Randers J (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9266–9271.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142033699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Walz A, Grêt-Regamey A, Lavorel S (2016) Social valuation of ecosystem services in mountain regions. Reg Environ Chang 16:1985–1987.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1028-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumley T, Maechler M, Magnusson A, Moeller S, Schwartz M, Venables B (2016) gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data, https://cran.r-project.org/package=gplotslast accessed: 16.01.2018
  134. Weaver DB (2006) Sustainable tourism: theory and practice. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  135. Wei H, Fan W, Wang X, Lu N, Dong X, Zhao Y, Ya X, Zhao Y (2017) Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: a review. Ecosyst Serv 25:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Westman WE (1977) How much are nature’s services worth? Science (80-) 197:960–964.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.197.4307.960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wickham H (2007) Reshaping data with the reshape package. J Stat Softw 21:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v021.i12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH (2015) Mapping ecosystem services demand : a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol Indic 55:159–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K (2013) Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob Environ Chang 23:1178–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zaehle S, Bondeau A, Carter TR, Cramer W, Erhard M, Prentice IC, Reginster I, Rounsevell MD, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith PC, Sykes M (2007) Projected changes in terrestrial carbon storage in Europe under climate and land-use change, 1990–2100. Ecosystems 10:380–401.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9028-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Lautenbach
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anne-Christine Mupepele
    • 4
    • 5
  • Carsten F. Dormann
    • 4
  • Heera Lee
    • 2
    • 6
  • Stefan Schmidt
    • 3
  • Samantha S. K. Scholte
    • 7
  • Ralf Seppelt
    • 3
    • 8
    • 9
  • Astrid J. A. van Teeffelen
    • 7
  • Willem Verhagen
    • 7
  • Martin Volk
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Geography, GIScience Research GroupUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Agricultural Faculty, Institute for Geodesy and Geoinformation, Professorship for Land Use Modeling and Ecosystem ServicesUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  3. 3.Department for Computational Landscape EcologyUFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental ResearchLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Biometry & Environmental System AnalysisUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  5. 5.Nature Conservation & Landscape EcologyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  6. 6.Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate ResearchAtmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU)Garmisch-PartenkirchenGermany
  7. 7.Environmental Geography Group, Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM-VU), Faculty of ScienceVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  8. 8.Institute of Geoscience & GeographyMartin Luther-University Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
  9. 9.iDiv, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity ResearchLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations