Advertisement

Loss and Damage in the mountain cryosphere

  • Christian Huggel
  • Veruska Muccione
  • Mark Carey
  • Rachel James
  • Christine Jurt
  • Reinhard Mechler
Review

Abstract

The mountain cryosphere, which includes glaciers, permafrost, and snow, is one of the Earth’s systems most strongly affected by climate change. In recent decades, changes in the cryosphere have been well documented in many high-mountain regions. While there are some benefits from snow and ice loss, the negative impacts, including from glacier lake outburst floods and variations in glacier runoff, are generally considered to far outweigh the positive impacts, particularly if cultural impacts are considered. In international climate policy, there has been growing momentum to address the negative impacts of climate change, or ‘Loss and Damage’ (L&D) from climate change. It is not clear exactly what can and should be done to tackle L&D, but researchers and practitioners are beginning to engage with policy discussions and develop potential frameworks and supporting information. Despite the strong impact of climate change on the mountain cryosphere, there has been limited interaction between cryosphere researchers and L&D. Therefore, little work has been done to consider how L&D in the mountain cryosphere might be conceptualized, categorized, and assessed. Here, we make a first attempt to analyze L&D in the mountain cryosphere by conducting a systematic literature review to extract L&D impacts and examples from existing literature. We find that L&D is a global phenomenon in the mountain cryosphere and has been more frequently documented in the developing world, both in relation with slow and sudden onset processes. We develop a categorization of L&D, making distinctions between physical and societal impacts, primary and secondary impacts, and identifying seven types of L&D (including L&D to culture, livelihoods, revenue, natural resources, life, and security). We hope this conceptual approach will support future work to understand and address L&D in the mountain cryosphere.

Keywords

Mountain cryosphere Climate change impacts Loss and damage Risks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study has benefitted from information and discussions produced within the Proyecto Glaciares+ and the Sustainable Mountain Development for Global Change (SMD4GC) Programme of the Swiss Agency for Development and Coopeation (SDC), and the Project AguaFuturo funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (project no. 205121L_166272). A workshop on Loss and Damage held in May 2016 in Rotterdam with representatives from science, policy, and practice provided further input.

Supplementary material

10113_2018_1385_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 22 kb)

References

  1. Allison EA (2015) The spiritual significance of glaciers in an age of climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6:493–508.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beniston M, Stoffel M, Hill Clarvis M, Quevauviller P (2014) Assessing climate change impacts on the quantity of water in alpine regions: foreword to the adaptation and policy implications of the EU/FP7 “ACQWA” project. Environ Sci Pol 43:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bindoff NL PA Stott, KM AchutaRao, MR Allen, N Gillett, D Gutzler, K Hansingo, G Hegerl, Y Hu, S Jain, II Mokhov, J Overland, J Perlwitz, R Sebbari and X Zhang (2013) Detection and attribution of climate change: from global to regional. In: Stocker TF D Qin, GK Plattner, M Tignor, SK Allen, J Boschung, A Nauels, Y Xia, V Bex and PM Midgley (ed) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 867–952Google Scholar
  4. Boyd E, James RA, Jones RG, Jones RG, Young HR, Otto FL (2017) A typology of loss and damage perspectives. Nat Clim Chang 7:723–729.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byg A, Salick J (2009) Local perspectives on a global phenomenon—climate change in eastern Tibetan villages. Glob Environ Change 19:156–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calliari E (2016) Loss and damage: a critical discourse analysis of parties’ positions in climate change negotiations. J Risk Res 0:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1240706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey M (2005) Living and dying with glaciers: people’s historical vulnerability to avalanches and outburst floods in Peru. Glob Planet Change 47:122–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carey M, McDowell G, Huggel C, Jackson M, Portocarrero C, Reynolds JM and Vicuña L (2014) Integrated approaches to adaptation and disaster risk reduction in dynamic socio-cryospheric systems. In: Snow and ice-related hazards, risks, and disasters. In: W. Haeberli, C. Whiteman, J.F.Shroder (Eds.). Hazards and Disasters Series. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp 221–261Google Scholar
  9. Carrivick JL, Tweed FS (2016) A global assessment of the societal impacts of glacier outburst floods. Glob Planet Change 144:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramer W, G.W. Yohe, M. Auffhammer, Huggel C, Molau U, Dias MAFS, Solow A, Stone DA, Tibig L (2014) Detection and attribution of observed impacts. In: Field CB, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 979–1037Google Scholar
  11. Diemberger H, Hovden A, Yeh ET (2015) The honour of the snow-mountains is the snow. Tibetan livelihoods in a changing climate. In: The High-Mountain Cryosphere, C. Huggel, M. Carey, J.J. Clague and A. Kääb (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 249–271Google Scholar
  12. Evans SG, Bishop NF, Smoll LF, Murillo PV, Delaney KB, Oliver-Smith A (2009) A re-examination of the mechanism and human impact of catastrophic mass flows originating on Nevado Huascarán, cordillera Blanca, Peru in 1962 and 1970. Eng Geol 108:96–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fankhauser S, Dietz S, Gradwell P (2014) Non-economic losses in the context of the UNFCCC work programme on loss and damage. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford JD, Pearce T (2010) What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: a systematic literature review. Environ Res Lett 5:014008.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haeberli W, Schaub Y, Huggel C (2017) Increasing risks related to landslides from degrading permafrost into new lakes in de-glaciating mountain ranges. Geomorphology 293:405–417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen G, Stone D (2016) Assessing the observed impact of anthropogenic climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6:532–537.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison S, Kargel JS, Huggel C, Reynolds JM, Shugar DH, Betts RA, Emmer A, Glasser N, Haritashya UK, Klimes J, Reinhard L, Schaub S, Wiltshire A, Regmi D, Vilimek V (2018) Climate change and the global pattern of moraine-dammed glacial lake outburst floods. Cryosphere 12:1195–1209.  https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1195-2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huggel C, Bresch D, Hansen G, James R, Mechler R, Stone DA, Wallimann-Helmer I (2016a) Attribution of irreversible loss to anthropogenic climate change. In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. p 8557Google Scholar
  19. Huggel C, Raissig A, Rohrer M, Romero G, Diaz A, Salzmann N (2015a) How useful and reliable are disaster databases in the context of climate and global change? A comparative case study analysis in Peru. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:475–485.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-475-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huggel C, Stone D, Auffhammer M, Hansen G (2013) Loss and damage attribution. Nat Clim Chang 3:694–696.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huggel C, Stone D, Eicken H, Hansen G (2015b) Potential and limitations of the attribution of climate change impacts for informing loss and damage discussions and policies. Clim Chang 133:453–467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1441-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huggel C, Wallimann-Helmer I, Stone D, Cramer W (2016b) Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 6:901–908.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huss M, Bookhagen B, Huggel C, Jackobsen D, Bradley RS, Clague JJ, Vuille M, Buytaert W, Cayan DR, Greenwood G, Mark BG, Milner AM, Weingartner R, Winder M (2017) Toward mountains without permanent snow and ice. Earths future 2016EF000514. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000514
  24. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  25. James R, Jones RG, Boyd E, Young HR, Otto FEL, Huggel C, Fuglestvedt JS (2018) Attribution: how is it relevant for Loss and Damage policy and practice? In: Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options. Mechler, R., Bouwer, L., Schinko, T., Surminski, S., Linneroth-Bayer, J. (Eds.). Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  26. James R, Otto F, Parker H, Boyd E, Cornforth R, Mitchell D, Allen M (2014) Characterizing loss and damage from climate change. Nat Clim Chang 4:938–939.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johannesson T, Raymond CF, Waddington ED (1989) A simple method for determining the response time of glaciers p 343Google Scholar
  28. Jurt C, Brugger J, Dunbar KW, Milch K, Orlove B (2015a) Cultural values of glaciers. In: The High-Mountain cryosphere, C. Huggel, M. Carey, J.J. Clague and A. Kääb (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, pp 90–106Google Scholar
  29. Jurt C, Burga MD, Vicuña L, Huggel C, Orlove B (2015b) Local perceptions in climate change debates: insights from case studies in the alps and the Andes. Clim Chang 133:511–523.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1529-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keating A, Venkateswaran K, Szoenyi M, MacClune K, Mechler R (2016) From event analysis to global lessons: disaster forensics for building resilience. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:1603–1616.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1603-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kraaijenbrink PDA, Bierkens MFP, Lutz AF, Immerzeel WW (2017) Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia’s glaciers. Nature 549:257–260.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Billé R, Pirard R, Mermet L (2013) Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. J Environ Manag 119:208–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lees E (2017) Responsibility and liability for climate loss and damage after Paris. Clim Policy 17:59–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1197095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mace MJ, Verheyen R (2016) Loss, damage and responsibility after COP21: all options open for the Paris agreement. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 25:197–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marzeion B, Cogley JG, Richter K, Parkes D (2014) Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes. Science 345:919–921.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marzeion B, Kaser G, Maussion F, Champollion N (2018) Limited influence of climate change mitigation on short-term glacier mass loss. Nat Clim Chang 8:305–308.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0093-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayring P (2014) Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173, Klagenfurt
  38. McDowell G, Stephenson E, Ford J (2014) Adaptation to climate change in glaciated mountain regions. Clim Chang 126:77–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1215-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mechler R, Bouwer LM (2015) Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: is vulnerability the missing link? Clim Chang 133:23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1141-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller D (2008) Global justice and climate change: how should responsibilities be distributed. Tann Lect Hum Values 28:1–128Google Scholar
  41. Morrissey J, Oliver-Smith A (2013) Perspectives on non-economic loss and damage. Understanding values at risk from climate change. Edited by Koko Warner and Sönke Kreft. United Nations University, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  42. Okereke C, Baral P, Dagnet Y (2014) Options for adaptation and loss & damage in a 2015 climate agreement. In: Working Paper. Agreement for Climate Transformation 2015 (ACT15), Washington D.C., p 19 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Paul F, Bolch T, Kääb A, Nagler T, Nuth C, Scharrer K, Shepherd A, Strozzi T, Ticconi F, Bhambri R, Berthier E, Benvan S, Gourmelen N, Heid T, Jeong S, Kunz M, Lauknes TR, Luckman A, Merryman Bonconi J, Moholdt G, Muir A, Neelmeijer J, Rankl M, VanLooy J, Van Niel J (2013) The glaciers climate change initiative: methods for creating glacier area, elevation change and velocity products. Remote Sens Environ 162:408–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rangecroft S, Suggitt AJ, Anderson K, Harrison S (2016) Future climate warming and changes to mountain permafrost in the Bolivian Andes. Clim Chang 137:231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1655-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rimal B, Zhang L, Keshtkar H, Sun X, Rijal S (2018) Quantifying the spatiotemporal pattern of urban expansion and hazard and risk area identification in the Kaski District of Nepal. Land 7:37.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land7010037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saldaña J (2015) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd edition. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Schauwecker S, Rohrer M, Huggel C, Endries J, Montoya N, Neukom R, Perry B, Salzmann N, Schwarb M, Suarez W (2017) The freezing level in the tropical Andes, Peru: an indicator for present and future glacier extents. J Geophys res atmospheres 2016JD025943. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025943
  48. Serdeczny O, Waters E, Chan S (2016) Non-economic loss and damage in the context of climate change. German development institute (DIE), BonnGoogle Scholar
  49. Serdeczny OM, Bauer S, Huq S (2018) Non-economic losses from climate change: opportunities for policy-oriented research. Clim Dev 10:97–101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1372268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stäubli A, Nussbaumer SU, Allen SK, Huggel C, Arguello M, Costa F, Hergarten C, Martínez R, Soto J, Vargas R, Zambrano E, Zimmermann M (2017) Analysis of weather- and climate-related disasters in mountain regions using different disaster databases. In: Climate Change, Extreme Events and Disaster Risk Reduction. S. Mal, R.B. Singh, C. Huggel (Eds.). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  51. Thorsteinsson T, Jóhannesson T, Snorrason Á (2013) Glaciers and ice caps: vulnerable water resources in a warming climate. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:590–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tschakert P, Barnett J, Ellis N, Lawrence C, Tuana N, New M, Elrick-Barr C, Pandit R, Pannell D (2017) Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: values, places, and experiences. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.476
  53. UNFCCC (2012) Slow onset events. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Technical paper, FCCC/TP/ 2012/7Google Scholar
  54. UNFCCC (2013) Non-economic losses in the context of the work programme on loss and damage. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Technical paper, FCCC/TP/ 2013/2Google Scholar
  55. Vanhala L, Hestbaek C (2016) Framing climate change loss and damage in UNFCCC negotiations. Glob Environ Polit 16:111–129.  https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vaughan DG JC Comiso, I Allison, J Carrasco, G Kaser, R Kwok, P Mote, T Murray, F Paul, J Ren, E Rignot, O Solomina, K Steffen and T Zhang (2013) Observations: cryosphere. In: Stocker TF D Qin, GK Plattner, M Tignor, SK Allen, J Boschung, A Nauels, Y Xia, V Bex and PM Midgley (ed) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 317–382Google Scholar
  57. Verheyen R (2012) Tackling loss & damage–a new role for the climate regime. Clim Dev Knowl NetwGoogle Scholar
  58. Verheyen R, Roderick P (2008) Beyond Adaptation–The legal duty to pay compensation for climate change damage. WWF-UK, Panda House, Weyside Park Godalming, Surrey GU7 1XRGoogle Scholar
  59. Vuille M, Carey M, Huggel C, Buytaert W, Rabatel A, Jacobsen D, Soruco A, Villacis M, Yarleque C, Timm OE, Condom T, Salzmann N, Sicart J-E (2017) Rapid decline of snow and ice in the tropical Andes – impacts, uncertainties and challenges ahead. Earth-Sci Rev 176:195–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallimann-Helmer I (2015) Justice for climate loss and damage. Clim Chang 133:469–480.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1483-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Warner K, van der Geest K (2013) Loss and damage from climate change: local-level evidence from nine vulnerable countries. Int J Glob Warm 5:367–386.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2013.057289 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Huggel
    • 1
  • Veruska Muccione
    • 1
  • Mark Carey
    • 2
  • Rachel James
    • 3
    • 4
  • Christine Jurt
    • 1
    • 5
  • Reinhard Mechler
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Robert D. Clark Honors College and Environmental Studies ProgramUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Change InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.Department of OceanographyUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  5. 5.Bern University of Applied SciencesBernSwitzerland
  6. 6.International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis IIASALaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations