Socio-environmental implications of process-based restoration strategies in large rivers: should we remove novel ecosystems along the Rhône (France)?
- 274 Downloads
River restoration efforts require interdisciplinary approaches involving fluvial geomorphology, hydraulic engineering, ecology, sedimentology, chemistry, social geography, and sociology. We investigated the functioning of artificial structures called “Casiers Girardon” (groyne fields) in the Rhône River. We assessed potential benefits and risks linked to removing the Rhône groyne fields in a restoration context, with particular focus on the potential for increased bank erosion. Hydraulic, morphological, chemical, ecological, and social issues resulting from dismantlement were studied for terrestrialized and aquatic Casiers Girardon. Only 10% of Casiers Girardon have maintained their aquatic features, whereas most of the Casiers are terrestrialized. Our results help to confirm the effectiveness of restoration actions; however, they also indicate uncertainties and additional knowledge needs, especially in regard to potential incompatibilities between Casier restoration and conservation. Then, an interdisciplinary conceptual model was developed to identify interventions to be considered in Casiers Girardon, according to their terrestrialization rate and physiochemical characteristics (connectivity, amount of gravel vs. fine sediment, contamination level). This model synthetizes scientific results and expert judgment and provides management recommendations based on ecological and sociological expectations about the restoration of Casiers Girardon. The model highlights high heterogeneity in functioning and ecological potential between terrestrialized and aquatic Casiers. Dismantling of terrestrialized Casiers has strong potential to provide multiple benefits, whereas aquatic Casiers could be maintained as valuable backwaters. The managing guidelines for the Casiers Girardon of the Rhône River should be adapted according to local conditions, as well as expected benefits and needs, and conducted in co-ordination with all actors involved in and affected by the restoration.
KeywordsRiver restoration Risk analysis Infrastructure removal Interdisciplinary assessment
The authors thank Agence de l’Eau Rhône-Méditerrannée & Corse and Compagnie Nationale du Rhône (CNR) for their financial support and collaboration. We also thank Groupe de Recherche Rhône Alpes sur les Infrastructures et l’Eau (GRAIE) and Zone Atelier Bassin du Rhône (ZABR), and in particular, Anne Clemens. Thanks to Antonin Vienney, Lucille Priour, Patrick Modrak, Oriane Villet and Cécile Claret for their support on field work and sample analysis.
This work was funded by the Labex DRIIHM, French programme “Investissements d’Avenir” (ANR-11-LABX-0010) which is managed by the ANR, within the Observatoire Hommes-Milieux Vallée du Rhône (OHM VR).
- Comby E, Le Lay YF, Piegay H (2014) How chemical pollution becomes a social problem. Risk communication and assessment through regional newspapers during the management of PCB pollutions of the Rhone River (France). Sci The Total Environ 482:100–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv2014.02.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cottet M, Rivière-Honegger A, Piégay H (2010) Mieux comprendre la perception des paysages de bras morts en vue d’une restauration écologique : quels sont les liens entre les qualités esthétique et écologique perçues par les acteurs? Norois 216:85–103. http://norois.revues.org/3408
- Cottet M. (2013) Caractériser les valeurs environnementales au cours du temps : une étape indispensable à la gestion des patrimoines naturels : Le cas de la restauration des bras morts de l’Ain et du Rhône, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement. http:// vertigo.revues.org/13558. Accessed 30 May 2013
- Habersack H, Piégay H (2007) 27 River restoration in the Alps and their surroundings: past experience and future challenges. In: Rinaldi M, Habersack H, Piégay H (ed) Gravel Bed Rivers VI: From Process Understanding to the Restoration of Mountain Rivers 11: 703–735Google Scholar
- Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00212.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kloesch M, Liedermann M, Habersack H (2011) Riverbank erosion processes within a major bank restoration project. In: Habersack H, Schober B, Walling D (ed) International conference on the status and future of the world’s large rivers, april 11–14, 2011, Vienna, Austria, Abstract Book, 287Google Scholar
- Mika S, Hoyle J, Kyle G, Howell T, Wolfenden B, Ryder D, Keating D, Boulton A, Brierley G, Brooks AP, Fryirs K, Leishman M, Sanders M, Arthington A, Creese R, Dahm M, Miller C, Pusey B, Spink A (2010) Inside the “Black Box” of river restoration: using catchment history to identify disturbance and response mechanisms to set targets for process-based restoration. Ecol Soc 15(4):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mourier B, Desmet M, Van Metre PC, Mahler BJ, Perrodin Y, Roux G, Bedell JP, Lefèvre I, Babut M (2014) Historical records, sources, and spatial trends of PCBs along the Rhône River (France) Sci Total Environ 476–477:568–576. doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.026
- Nicolas Y, Pont D (1997) Hydrosedimentary classification of natural and engineered backwaters of a large river, the lower Rhône: possible applications for the maintenance of high fish biodiversity. River Res Appl 13:417–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199709/10)13:5<417::AID-RRR466>3.0.CO;2-E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Olivier JM, Dole-Olivier MJ, Amoros C, Carrel G, Malard F, Lamouroux N, Bravard JP (2009) Introduction to European rivers. In: Tockner K, Robinson CT, Uehlinger A (ed) Rivers of Europe, 1st edn, Academic Press, London, pp 1–22Google Scholar
- Paillex A, Dolédec S, Castella E, Mérigoux S, Aldridge DC (2013) Functional diversity in a large river floodplain: anticipating the response of native and alien macroinvertebrates to the restoration of hydrological connectivity. J Appl Ecol 50:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pont D, Piegay H, Farinetti A, Allain S, Landon N, Liebault F, Dumont B, Richard-Mazet A (2009) Conceptual framework and interdisciplinary approach for the sustainable management of gravel-bed rivers: the case of the Drôme River basin (SE France). Aq Sci 71:356–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-009-9201-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stella JC, Piégay H, Riddle JD, Gruel C, Räpple B (2015) Riparian forest impacts and dynamics on large rivers managed for multiple uses; insights from the Sacramento (California, USA) and Rhône (France). Proceedings of the Second Integrative Sciences and Sustainable Development of Rivers (IS Rivers) Conference, Lyon, France, 22–26 June 2015.Google Scholar
- Van de Wolfshaar KE, Middelkoop H, Addink E, Winter HV, Nagelkerke LAJ (2011) Linking flow regime, floodplain lake connectivity and fish catch in a large river-floodplain system, the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain (Russian Federation). Ecosystems 14:920–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9457-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar