Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 1165–1177 | Cite as

Predicting species dominance shifts across elevation gradients in mountain forests in Greece under a warmer and drier climate

  • Nikolaos M. Fyllas
  • Anastasia Christopoulou
  • Alexandros Galanidis
  • Chrysanthi Z. Michelaki
  • Christos Giannakopoulos
  • Panayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos
  • Margarita Arianoutsou
  • Manuel Gloor
Original Article


The Mediterranean Basin is expected to face warmer and drier conditions in the future, following projected increases in temperature and declines in precipitation. The aim of this study is to explore how forests dominated by Abies borisii-regis, Abies cephalonica, Fagus sylvatica, Pinus nigra and Quercus frainetto will respond under such conditions. We combined an individual-based model (GREFOS), with a novel tree ring data set in order to constrain tree diameter growth and to account for inter- and intraspecific growth variability. We used wood density data to infer tree longevity, taking into account inter- and intraspecific variability. The model was applied at three 500-m-wide elevation gradients at Taygetos in Peloponnese, at Agrafa on Southern Pindos and at Valia Kalda on Northern Pindos in Greece. Simulations adequately represented species distribution and abundance across the elevation gradients under current climate. We subsequently used the model to estimate species and functional trait shifts under warmer and drier future conditions based on the IPCC A1B scenario. In all three sites, a retreat of less drought-tolerant species and an upward shift of more drought-tolerant species were simulated. These shifts were also associated with changes in two key functional traits, in particular maximum radial growth rate and wood density. Drought-tolerant species presented an increase in their average maximal growth and decrease in their average wood density, in contrast to less drought-tolerant species.


Mediterranean mountainous forests Greece Forest gap models Modelling Drought Climate change Trait plasticity 


In areas surrounding the Mediterranean Basin, forests are an important element of the established vegetation, covering around 20–30% of the total land areas in the northern part and reaching up to 50% in Greece (Archibold 1995; Scarascia-Mugnozza et al. 2000). These forests are expected to experience warmer and drier conditions in the near future due to global warming (Giorgi and Lionello 2008; Gualdi et al. 2013), as well as potential shifts in fire frequency driven by both climatic and anthropogenic forcing (Barbero et al. 1990; Pausas 2004; Moriondo et al. 2006). Observational evidence of shifts in forest structure and function over the last century has started to accumulate and are frequently attributed to climatic changes. Tree growth changes related to temperature increase (Jump et al. 2006; Linares and Tíscar 2010), decline in precipitation (Sarris et al. 2011) and/or CO2 fertilisation (Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2008) have been documented at both lowland and upland Mediterranean regions. Forest dieback has been attributed to drought (Van Mantgem et al. 2009; Allen et al. 2010), and/or to pathogens outbreaks (Desprez-Loustau et al. 2006; Chrysopolitou et al. 2013), while drought-induced changes in species composition have also been reported (Allen and Breshears 1998; Peñuelas and Boada 2003). Furthermore, some studies report an increase in fire frequency associated with the recent warming, both in the north-western (Pausas and Fernández-Muñoz 2012) and the north-eastern (Koutsias et al. 2013) part of the Mediterranean Basin. The way these shifts will progress under future global change conditions is important in terms of nature conservation and climate change adaptation (Bonan 2008).

Mediterranean plants have evolved under low water availability and thus have developed a number of morphological and physiological adaptations that enable them to withstand prolonged drought periods (Sardans and Peñuelas 2013). Recent studies suggest that in a Mediterranean climate, there is a continuum of plant drought performance, ranging from fast-growing deciduous species with a high resource use and high drought vulnerability to conservative slow-growing evergreen species with low water use and high drought tolerance (Lopez-Iglesias et al. 2014). The two ends of the spectrum reflect a drought tolerance versus a drought avoidance strategy, and functional traits such as rooting depth per leaf area, relative growth rate and net carbon assimilation rate were found to be good predictors of seedling drought survival time (Lopez-Iglesias et al. 2014). Seedlings of fast-growing species were less drought-tolerant in contrast to slow-growing species that exhibited a higher drought tolerance. A similar (weak) trade-off between growth and survival has been reported for mature trees with wood density being a good (negative) predictor of relative growth rate (Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2010). The above suggest that based on their functional configuration, Mediterranean species are responding individualistically to drought and thus their distribution could be controlled by water availability (Piedallu et al. 2013).

Simulations from both local- and global-scale vegetation models suggest that forests established under a Mediterranean climate are particularly vulnerable to climate change (Morales et al. 2007; Fyllas and Troumbis 2009; Hickler et al. 2012), although the large climatic stochasticity of Mediterranean ecosystems (Blondel and Aronson 1999) could increase the uncertainty in such modelling exercises. Under climate change conditions, some typical Mediterranean forests dominated by species such as Pinus halepensis are projected to be more resilient than others that are mainly found in the temperate zone (Keenan et al. 2011). One of the key drivers of vegetation and/or productivity shifts in these predictions is the increased soil moisture deficits, following an increase in temperature and a decrease in precipitation under climate change (Morales et al. 2007). However, other factors, such as fire frequency and CO2 fertilisation, could also interact with water limitation, leading to complex ecosystem responses (Fyllas and Troumbis 2009; Keenan et al. 2011). Disentangling the role of water limitation, fire and CO2 in forest ecosystem processes is important in order for their current dynamics and future risks to be better understood. Field studies, specifically designed to constrain the way such processes are simulated in vegetation dynamics models, could increase our understanding of forest function under current conditions and enhance our confidence in the projections of their future state.

In addition to the above, the role of inter- and intra-specific functional trait variation has been recently highlighted as an important component that needs to be incorporated into vegetation dynamics model (Scheiter et al. 2013; Fyllas et al. 2014; van Bodegom et al. 2014; Sakschewski et al. 2015). Traditionally, parameterisation of species and/or plant functional types (PFTs) is based on the use of some “average” or “appropriate” mean trait value, for characteristics that have a direct effect on the regeneration, the growth and the mortality of the simulated species. For example, specific leaf area has been used as a parameter to differentiate the turnover rate of leaf biomass between PFTs (Sitch et al. 2008), or as a parameter to describe the architecture (in terms of foliage area/biomass) of different tree species (Bugmann 2001; Fyllas et al. 2007). The selection of one “average” trait value could lead to “static” model behaviour as the population variability in the response of species/PFTs is a priori restricted, just because of the constant value given to some key functional characters (Fyllas et al. 2012, 2014). Ignoring this intraspecific variability is not in agreement with what is observed in real plant communities and comprises a key element of natural selection and evolution. In addition, depending on the way vegetation dynamics models are built, variability in some functional characters could affect more than one simulated process, through either direct or indirect routes. For example, given that most vegetation dynamics models include a “carbon starvation” mortality term, the influence of a specific growth parameter on model behaviour could be manifested directly through growth and indirectly through mortality. Ignoring functional variation in simulated plant communities could be an important bias, especially when projecting vegetation dynamics under climate change conditions, where alternative “functional configurations” could lead to viable life strategies.

Individual-based modelling is a tool widely used to simulate vegetation dynamics (Grimm et al. 2006). Forest gap dynamics models are a special group of individual-based models that follow the life of each tree in a stand and simulate key processes of interest such as regeneration, competition and mortality (Bugmann 2001). Gap dynamics models have a long history in modelling forest ecosystems structure and function with applications all over the world (Shugart 1984; Bugmann 2001; Fyllas et al. 2007; Ngugi et al. 2013). Because these models are based on empirical equations of growth and mortality, they provide reasonable approximations of stand growth, succession and disturbance patterns. Furthermore, as these models focus on individual tree performance, they provide an excellent framework to consider intra-specific trait variability and explore the potential shifts in species- or community-level trait variation under changing environmental conditions. However, to our knowledge there is no study that incorporates trait variability in the widely used forest-gap dynamics modelling framework.

In this study, we combine the GREFOS forest gap dynamics model (Fyllas et al. 2007; Fyllas and Troumbis 2009) with a novel tree ring width and wood density data set to account for growth and mortality intraspecific variability in simulations of forest dynamics and to explore for potential shifts in species composition and functional traits under warmer and drier conditions. In particular, using the tree ring width data set, we initially derive species-specific diameter growth curves. We also use the observed inter- and intravariability in wood density to infer individual tree longevity. In addition, by combining the tree ring width and wood density data sets, we identify a growth versus longevity trade-off that is subsequently incorporated in the model by hardwiring a relationship between two key functional traits, i.e. the maximum diameter growth (Gm) and the wood density (DW). We then apply the model across three 500-m-long elevation gradients in three mountainous areas in Greece to:
  1. 1.

    Evaluate the predictive ability of the model and compare the “static” (single trait values) versus the “plastic” (varying trait values) model set-up under current climatic conditions.

  2. 2.

    Explore how the species composition and functional variation of these forests will respond to a gradually warmer and drier climate.


Materials and methods

Study sites and dominant tree species

Three study areas (Fig. 1) were selected to parameterise the model and validate its predictive ability. In each study area, three 30 × 30 m2 plots have been established as part of the Mediterranean Forests in Transition (MEDIT) project, where a suite of plant functional traits and tree ring width data have systematically been measured. Soil texture and depth are also available for each plot. In each plot, all trees above 1 m have been identified and the diameter at breast height has been measured for all trees above 1.3 m. In all areas, the plots are found across an elevation range of ca 500 m (Table 1). The first study area is located in the southern part of Mount Taygetos, Peloponnese. Pinus nigra and Abies cephalonica are the dominant tree species in this area, with the pine dominating the lower elevations and the more disturbed sites of the region. Soils are rather shallow with a high sand content (sandy loam). Mean annual temperatures range between 9.2 and 13.1 °C and annual precipitation between 850 and 950 mm. The second study area, the driest of the three, is located in the Agrafa region, Southern Pindos, and it is dominated by Quercus frainetto at lower elevations and Abies borisii-regis at higher elevations. At lower elevations, soil is sandy clay loam shifting to clay loam at higher elevation. Across this elevation, gradient mean annual temperature ranges from 10.3 to 14.2 °C and annual precipitation from 775 to 864 mm. The last study area, the wettest of the three, is found in the northern part of the Pindos range, and the dominant species are Pinus nigra and Fagus sylvatica, with the beech restricted at higher elevations. Soils are deeper here with higher silt content (sandy loam). Temperature ranges from 7.6 to 9.7 °C and precipitation from 926 to 962 mm per year. At Mt Taygetos in P. nigra-dominated stands, 11 surface fires have been recorded over the last 165 years (Christopoulou et al. 2013), while in P. nigra-dominated stands at Pindos North (Valia Kalda), fire frequency is likely lower with 8 fires recorded over a period of 815 years (Touchan et al. 2012).
Fig. 1

Location of the study sites

Table 1

Study site description

Study area

Mt Taygetos

Pindos South (Agrafa)

Pindos North (Valia Kalda)









Elevation range (m asl)




Average annual temperature (°C)




Total annual precipitation (mm)




Dominant species

P. nigra, A. cephalonica

Q. frainetto, A. borisii-regis

P. nigra, F. sylvatica

Model description

A detailed description of GREFOS model is provided elsewhere (Fyllas et al. 2007). The model has been developed, parameterised and used for forest species found in the north-eastern part of the Mediterranean area (Fyllas et al. 2007, 2010; Fyllas and Troumbis 2009; Kint et al. 2014). GREFOS takes into account the discrete life history strategies (LHS) of Mediterranean tree and shrub species (Pausas 1999), by assigning a distinct recruitment density and resprouting capacity to each LHS. Regeneration in the model is based on empirical relationships between stand-level LAI and recruitment density (Fyllas et al. 2008, 2010), where a maximum threshold of LAI “ceases” the establishment of saplings due to light limitation. Individuals are competing for light through a height-based hierarchy with taller trees shading all smaller ones. A daily soil water balance model is used to calculate relative water content (θ) and subsequently the annual drought duration in order to adjust growth (Granier et al. 1999; Fyllas and Troumbis 2009). Evaporation is estimated following the Priestley and Taylor (1972) method, while the pedotransfer functions of Wösten et al. (1999), along with site-specific soil texture and depth measurements, are used to calculate soil water retention and release parameters.

As in most forest gap dynamics models, annual tree growth is estimated through the concept of optimum diameter increment, i.e. the growth that an individual of a certain species and size can reach under no-resource limitation or competition (Moore 1989; Bragg 2001; Risch et al. 2005). The “actual” diameter increment is subsequently estimated by adjusting the optimum diameter growth, as a function of the abiotic (temperature and water availability) and biotic (shading) conditions that prevailed for a given time for each tree in the stand. Here we use a novel ring width data to estimate the parameters (and their variation) of a commonly used optimum growth equation (Zeide 1993), as described in “Optimum growth curve and intraspecific plasticity” section.

In GREFOS mortality has three components. The growth-related component (“carbon starvation”) estimated as a function of a tree’s past growth, the background (“intrinsic”) mortality representing species longevity and the fire-related mortality, which is linked to species LHS. Background mortality is usually estimated in forest gap models through species longevity or maximum size. Here we use wood density as a proxy for background mortality (Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2010). Intra- and inter-specific variation in wood density is incorporated in the model based on a novel wood density data set, as described in the “Background mortality” section. Species with a higher wood density generally have lower growth and mortality rates (Reich 2014). This growth versus survival trade-off has been incorporated in the model by hardwiring a relationship between maximum diameter growth rate and wood density based on the combined analysis of the tree ring width and wood density data sets (“Growth–longevity trade-off” section).

Optimum growth curve and intraspecific plasticity

In order to parameterise the diameter growth curve, a minimum of 30 cores were taken from trees of each dominant species at each study area (Fyllas et al. 2017). All cores were collected at breast height with a 5-mm increment borer. In the laboratory, the cores were glued on channelled wood, dried at room temperature and sanded with progressively finer-grade abrasive paper until cells were clearly visible under magnification. All samples were visually cross-dated using visual recognition of tree ring patterns and lists of marker years (those with narrow rings) (Yamaguchi 1991). Tree ring widths were measured to 0.01 mm using Time Series Analysis and Presentation (TSAP) software package and LINTAB measuring table. Raw ring width series were synchronised according to their Gleichläufigkeit score, which represents the overall accordance of two series t values, which are sensitive to extreme values such as marker years and the cross-date index (CDI), which is a combination of both (Rinn 2003). Finally, the COFECHA software was used to perform a data quality control and to evaluate the cross-dating (Grissino-Mayer 2001).

These data were subsequently used to estimate the parameters of an optimum growth curve (Zeide 1993). We considered optimum growth to be species specific, and thus, we estimated the parameters of the curve for each species using data from all available sites. As in Bragg (2001), we assume that individuals growing at the highest rate for a given diameter class provide an adequate estimate of size-specific optimal growth. In this version of the model, the optimum growth of an individual is described by the equation (Zeide 1993):
$$g = G_{\rm m} e^{{- 0.5\left({\frac{{\log \frac{D}{{D_{o}}}}}{{D_{b}}}} \right)^{2}}}$$
where Gm is the maximum radial growth rate (mm a−1) at the peak of the log-normal growth curve, Do is the diameter at breast height (D) associated with the maximum growth rate, and Db determines the width of the curve.
We fitted nonlinear least square regression models using the R programming language and the nls library (R Development Core Team 2015) to estimate the species-specific Gm, Do and Db along with their confidence intervals (Table 2). In order to account for intraspecific growth variability in the model (“plastic set-up”), a normal distribution is used to randomly assign the growth parameters for each tree of a certain species using the parameter estimates in Table 2. The first generation of simulated trees is randomly initialised based a normal distribution that follows our observations. Subsequent generations inherit growth characteristics from a normal distribution that is updated each year based on the parameters of the surviving trees.
Table 2

Growth curve parameter estimates along with their confidence intervals for each tree species


Gm (mm year−1)

Gm sd

Do (cm)

Do sd

Db (–)

Db sd

Abies borisii-regis







Abies cephalonica







Fagus sylvatica







Pinus nigra







Quercus frainetto







Background mortality

The background mortality component (ΠR) was parameterised based on the equation reported in Martínez-Vilalta et al. (2010), for tree species found in Spain under a similar range of climatic conditions:
$$\Pi _{R} = 0.51e^{{( - 3.56xD_{\text{W}} )}}$$
where wood density [DW (g cm−3)] is considered the main predictor of annual background mortality rate.
We collected stem wood samples from individuals within our study sites to estimate species-specific wood density values along with their confidence intervals. DW was calculated for each sample using the water displacement method. A container was filled with water and placed on a digital balance. A dried wood sample (48 h at 60 °C) that was weighted beforehand was then sunk into the container until completely immersed. The volume of the wood sample was estimated from the water displacement. Similar to growth, the inclusion of intraspecific variability for mortality in the model was applied through a species-specific normal distribution with mean equal to DW and standard deviation equal to DWsd (Table 3).
Table 3

Mean wood density estimates along with their confidence intervals for each tree species


DW (g cm−3)

DW sd

Abies borisii-regis



Abies cephalonica



Fagus sylvatica



Pinus nigra



Quercus frainetto



Growth–longevity trade-off

Species with higher wood density generally have lower growth and mortality rates (Reich 2014). This growth versus survival trade-off has been incorporated in the model by hardwiring a relationship between maximum radial growth rate and wood density, based on the analysis of the entire MEDIT data set (Fyllas et al. 2017). To derive the Gm = f(DW) relationship, we analysed tree ring width and wood density data for nine species in 35 plots across Greece. In this analysis, the optimum growth curve (Eq. 1) was fit with nonlinear least square regression models for all individual of a tree species at site. Then, the species- and site-specific Gm, Do and Db estimates were regressed against the average DW of each species at each site. A statistically significant relationship was identified only for Gm and DW (Fig. 2), with Gm decreasing with DW and supporting the hypothesis of a growth–longevity trade-off. It should be noted that this relationship holds only across species, as the number of samples available was not adequate to validate it within species.
Fig. 2

Relationship between wood density (DW) and the growth curve parameters for nine forest tree species found at different sites in Greece. A statistically significant relationship was only identified between maximum radial growth (Gm) and DW (Gm = 9.68–5.833DW, p = 0.004, R2 = 0.20)

Simulation set-up

At each study area, the model was set up to simulate stand dynamics along an elevation (500 m long) gradient, with an step of 50 m. Soil depth was set to 2.0 m in all study sites. All simulations started from bare ground and lasted for a 1000-year-long simulation period. In this study, the fire component of the model has been disabled in order to explore for merely the effects of drought. At each study site, only the two species known to occur abundantly are allowed to establish. It should be noted that these two species are the dominant elements of vegetation accounting for more than 80% of the total basal area in our study plots. Two climate scenarios were used, namely: (1) the baseline (BL) climate representing the current climatic conditions with the climate of the twentieth century at each study area randomly repeated for the simulation period and (2) the IPCC A1B climate change (CC) scenario with an approximately 3 °C increase in temperature and 20% reduction in precipitation taken as one of the intermediate projections cases from an ensemble regional climate model projections for the Mediterranean area (Gualdi et al. 2013). The baseline climate was extracted from the E-OBS gridded climatology (Haylock et al. 2008) for the time period between 1950 and 2013. Across the elevation gradients, temperature was corrected with a lapse rate of 6.5 °C km−1. Precipitation was assumed not to change with elevation. In both cases, a spin-up period of 500 years, during which the observed 1950–2013 climate was randomly replicated, was used until vegetation reached an equilibrium with climate. For the CC scenario during the spin-up period, climate was assumed to be similar to BL conditions, followed by a transient period of 100 years during which temperature and precipitation anomalies were linearly applied until climate stabilised after simulation year 600.

The model was applied following a “static” (no intraspecific variability) and “plastic” (with intraspecific variability) set-up, and 30 iterations were performed for each elevation and climate scenario. The steady-state (simulation year 600–1000) average basal area of each species under baseline conditions was estimated and compared with local observations. Changes in the species average values of the two key traits, Gm and DW, with time and climate scenario were also explored. Potential shifts in these traits indicate the way species could adapt to warmer and drier conditions, by adjusting the two traits that are directly linked to their growth and mortality.


Simulations under baseline conditions adequately captured the range of species distribution across the elevational gradient of the study sites. At Mt. Taygetos, P. nigra is more abundant at lower elevations, while A. cephalonica increases its contribution with elevation (Fig. 3—left panel). Simulated basal area was reasonably well estimated for P. nigra but underestimated for A. cephalonica in both the “static” and the “plastic” model set-up (Fig. SM1). The “static” model set-up yielded a higher P. nigra abundance compared to the “plastic” set-up across all elevations, while A. cephalonica achieved a higher basal area under the “plastic” set-up (Fig. SM1). Following the climate change scenario, the model simulated an uphill shift of P. nigra across the whole elevation gradient and a significant decrease in A. cephalonica using the plastic model set-up (Fig. 3—right panel). The decrease in A. cephalonica was stronger under the static model parameterisation (Fig. SM2).
Fig. 3

Simulated average basal area of the dominant forest species across the elevation gradient of Mt Taygetos under baseline climate conditions (left panel) and climate change conditions (right panel). The bars show the average basal area of 30 simulations, and the lines show the 95% confidence intervals. Triangles indicate P. nigra and diamonds A. cephalonica basal area field measurements at different elevations. The graph summarises simulations made using the plastic model set-up

At Agrafa in the southern part of Pindos, under BL conditions Q. frainetto is more abundant at lower elevations, but with increasing elevation, A. borisii-regis becomes the dominant element of vegetation (Fig. 4—left panel). Simulated basal area was reasonably estimated for both species especially under the “plastic” model set-up (Fig. SM3). The applied climate change scenario leads to a total replacement of the A. borisii-regis by Q. frainetto across the elevation gradient of this area using the plastic (Fig. 4—right panel) traits parameterisation. The inclusion of trait plasticity did not yield simulation of better A. borisii-regis performance under CC condition, and a complete replacement by Q. frainetto was also simulated (Fig. SM4).
Fig. 4

Simulated average basal area of the dominant forest species across the elevation gradient of Agrafa (Pindos South) under current climate conditions (left panel) and warmer and drier conditions (right panel). The bars show the average basal area of 30 simulations, and the lines show the 95% confidence intervals. Triangles indicate Q. frainetto and diamonds A. borisii-regis basal area field measurements at different elevations. The graph summarises simulations made using the plastic model set-up

At Valia Kalda in the northern part of Pindos, the observed vegetation transition with elevation was realistically replicated under BL conditions. P. nigra dominates the stands at lower elevations, while F. sylvatica is more abundant at elevations above 1350 m (Fig. 5). The steady-state standing basal area was accurately simulated for both species, with small differences between the static and the plastic parameterisation (Fig. SM5). At this region, CC simulations suggest a complete replacement of F. sylvatica by P. nigra across the simulated elevation gradient using both the plastic (Fig. 5) and the static model set-up (Fig. SM6).
Fig. 5

Simulated average basal area of the dominant forest species across the elevation gradient of Valia Kalda (Pindos North) under current climate conditions (left panel) and warmer and drier conditions (right panel). The bars show the average basal area of 30 simulations, and the lines show the 95% confidence intervals. Triangles indicate P. nigra and diamonds F. sylvatica basal area field measurements at different elevations. The graph summarises simulations made using the plastic model set-up

We additionally explored for potential shifts in the key traits that were used to predict growth and mortality of the four tree species, i.e. maximum growth rate (Gm) and wood density (DW). The long-term trends of the average Gm and DW for each study area across elevation is presented in Supplementary Material (Figs. SM7–SM12). In general, under current conditions, average species DW decreased and Gm increased with time, suggesting that individuals with greater growth are performing better and thus drive the average trait values of the stand. The same trend was also observed in CC simulations with some shifts in the average species trait values. The steady-state average values of Gm and DW under BL and CC conditions are summarised in Figs. 6, 7 and 8.
Fig. 6

Average maximum growth rate and wood density across the Mt Taygetos elevation gradient under current (black symbols) and climate change conditions (grey symbols). Continuous lines indicate smoothing splines under current climate conditions, and broken lines indicate smoothing splines under warmer and drier conditions. Grey areas indicate 95% confidence intervals

Fig. 7

Average maximum growth rate and wood density across Agrafa (Pindos South) elevation gradient under current (black symbols) and climate change conditions (grey symbols). Continuous lines indicate smoothing splines under current climate conditions, and broken lines indicate smoothing splines under warmer and drier conditions. Grey areas indicate 95% confidence intervals

Fig. 8

Average maximum growth rate and wood density across Valia Kalda (Pindos North) elevation gradient under current (black symbols) and climate change conditions (grey symbols). Continuous lines indicate smoothing splines under current climate conditions, and broken lines indicate smoothing splines under warmer and drier conditions. Grey areas indicate 95% confidence intervals

At Mt. Taygetos, P. nigra’s average wood density and maximum growth showed no clear trend with elevation (Fig. 6). Under climate change conditions, an overall small decrease in DW, associated with an increase in Gm for P. nigra, was simulated. For A. cephalonica, a small decrease in DW with elevation was simulated, especially under BL conditions. At Agrafa, DW increased and Gm decreased with elevation for the more drought-tolerant Q. frainetto under BL conditions. This trend was not as strong under CC conditions (Fig. 7). No clear trend in DW or Gm was simulated for A. borisii-regis although at higher elevations, the average DW value was smaller compared to lower altitudes. At Valia Kalda (Fig. 8), the elevational shifts of simulated DW and Gm were more pronounced. A lower Gm and a higher DW were achieved at higher elevation for the more drought-tolerant P. nigra, with the opposite trend found for F. sylvatica. Overall, Gm increased and DW decreased under CC conditions for the more drought-tolerant species, while the opposite was true (decreasing Gm and increasing DW) for the less drought-tolerant species across all sites.


This study presents the parameterisation of a forest gap model, with novel tree ring width and wood density measurements, aiming to better understand and to project the dynamics of typical mountainous forests in Greece. The inclusion of species-specific parameters leads to a realistic prediction of the distribution patterns and the basal area of the dominant tree species, observed in three study sites under current climate. In general, the predicted steady-state average basal area is accurately simulated for lower elevations and early successional species, but was slightly underestimated at higher elevation and late successional species. By accounting for intraspecific variability in growth and mortality through two functional traits (maximum growth rate and wood density), the model simulates a higher contribution of slow-growing species across all elevations. We suggest that vegetation dynamics models, and particularly those that are implemented at local scales, should be constrained with site-specific information that takes into account the variability of key functional traits.

The inclusion of growth and mortality plasticity is an important aspect of this work. Currently, there is great effort to include functional trait variation into vegetation dynamics models, in order to account for the potential plasticity in the ecosystems’ response to climate change (Scheiter et al. 2013; Fyllas et al. 2014; van Bodegom et al. 2014). In this study, we present a simple method to implement trait variation within existing forest gap dynamics models, based on the measured intraspecific variability in functional traits associated with tree growth and longevity. Our approach is based on the inclusion of a fundamental trade-off between growth and survival. Wood density is selected as the core trait to represent this trade-off. Lower wood density is related to higher growth and mortality rates both within and between the species of interest. On the other hand, higher wood density is associated with smaller maximum growth and mortality rates. By parameterising this theoretical trade-off with species-specific measurements of tree growth and wood density, the model adequately captures the vegetation dynamics in our three study sites. Additional axes of functional trait variation that represent ecophysiological trade-offs could be potentially integrated in this modelling framework in future studies. These could relate to species hydraulic properties and/or response to disturbance (Pausas 1999; Sánchez-Gómez et al. 2006).

In all study sites, CC simulations suggest an upward shift in the dominance patterns, with more drought-tolerant species (Pinus nigra and Quercus frainetto) increasing their contribution with elevation. The inclusion of trait plasticity does not significantly alter the CC simulations outcomes, with the only exception at Mt Taygetos, where the A. cephalonica was more persistent at higher elevations when trait plasticity was included. The overall trend of shifting dominance patterns with CC is related to the drought tolerance of the studied species. Compared to A. borisii-regis and F. sylvatica, the higher elevation dominant species at South and North Pindos, A. cephalonica is considered more drought tolerant, and thus, it maintains its contribution to the stand’s basal area under CC conditions. It should be noted that species response to drought is simulated in this version of the model by counting the number of days with water stress that feeds into a species-specific drought response function (Granier et al. 1999; Fyllas and Troumbis 2009). Hence, there is no direct effect of trait plasticity to a species and/or individual’s drought tolerance. Various studies suggest a relationship between cavitation resistance (Hacke et al. 2001) and drought tolerance (Poorter and Markesteijn 2008; Preston et al. 2006, but see Hoffmann et al. 2011) with DW, and thus, such a relationship could be implemented in future versions of this modelling framework.

In this study, simulated shifts in species dominance were also associated with changes in the two functional traits used to describe variation in growth and mortality. In all three study sites, the CC scenario resulted in higher Gm of the drought-tolerant species (P. nigra and Q. frainetto) and lower DW. Shifts in Gm and DW were not as clear for the less drought-tolerant species, with the exception of F. sylvatica at North Pindos, where a systematic decrease in Gm and increase in DW were simulated. These outputs suggest that across the studied elevation gradients, species that are able to tolerate longer dry periods could increase their growth rate in contrast to less drought-tolerant species. It should be noted that our modelling framework not only is taking into account the uncertainty of vegetation processes (Reyer et al. 2016) by including variation in growth and mortality, but also enables tree populations to shift their functional characteristics. This is particularly important in terms of adaptation to changing biotic and abiotic conditions.

Empirical evidence of species upward shifts (Peñuelas and Boada 2003; Moser et al. 2010; Pauli et al. 2012) has been documented, and modelling exercises identify the vulnerability of Mediterranean ecosystems to climate change (Morales et al. 2007; Fyllas and Troumbis 2009; Hickler et al. 2012). Simulations in this study suggest that climate change could lead to significant shifts of species distribution in mountainous Mediterranean forests. The importance of considering intraspecific variability for modelling purposes is highlighted here. Although in two of the study sites incorporating trait variability did not “enhance” the ability of the least drought-tolerant species to adapt to a changing climate, in Mt Taygetos the response of A. cephalonica to drier conditions was more gradual under the plastic model set-up. Such responses will be dependent on local environmental conditions as well as the ecophysiological ranges of species performance. Field studies that quantify these ranges as well as the way functional traits coordinate and interact to form fundamental ecological strategies could help us better parameterise models of vegetation dynamics.


This study presents the application of a forest gap dynamics model to explore the potential effects of drought on the dynamics of mountainous Mediterranean forests in Greece. Emphasis was given on incorporating intraspecific variability in growth and mortality. Simulations under climate change conditions suggest an upward shift of the more drought-tolerant species. These changes are also accompanied by intraspecific shifts in two key functional traits that express the growth and mortality patterns of the tree species. In general, populations of more drought-tolerant species increase their maximum radial growth and decreased their wood density in contrast to less drought-tolerant species. Incorporating trait variability and accounting for fundamental ecological trade-offs in vegetation dynamics models could increase the realism in projecting the fate of forest ecosystems under global change conditions.



We acknowledge the E-OBS data set from the EU-FP6 Project ENSEMBLES ( and the data providers in the ECA&D Project ( This work was financed by the “Mediterranean Forests in Transition/MEDIT” Grant to NF. The research project is implemented within the framework of the Action “Supporting Postdoctoral Researchers” of the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” (Action’s Beneficiary: General Secretariat for Research and Technology) and is co-financed by the European Social Fund (ESF) and the Greek State (PE10 (927)).

Supplementary material

10113_2016_1093_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2269 kb)


  1. Allen CD, Breshears DD (1998) Drought-induced shift of a forest–woodland ecotone: rapid landscape response to climate variation. PNAS 95:14839–14842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears D, Hogg EH (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archibold OW (1995) Ecology of world vegetation. Chapman & Hall Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbero M, Bonin G, Loisel R, Quézel P (1990) Changes and disturbances of forest ecosystems caused by human activities in the western part of the Mediterranean basin. Vegetatio 87:151–173. doi:10.1007/BF00042952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blondel J, Aronson J (1999) Biology and wildlife of the Mediterranean region. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449. doi:10.1126/science.1155121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bragg DC (2001) Potential relative increment (PRI): a new method to empirically derive optimal tree diameter growth. Ecol Model 137:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bugmann H (2001) A review of forest gap models. Clim Change 51:259–305. doi:10.1023/A:1012525626267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christopoulou A, Fulé PZ, Andriopoulos P, Sarris D, Arianoutsou M (2013) Dendrochronology-based fire history of Pinus nigra forests in Mount Taygetos, Southern Greece. For Ecol Manag 293:132–139. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chrysopolitou V, Apostolakis A, Avtzis D, Avtzis N, Diamandis S, Kemitzoglou D, Papadimos D, Perlerou C, Tsiaoussi V, Dafis S (2013) Studies on forest health and vegetation changes in Greece under the effects of climate changes. Biodivers Conserv 22:1133–1150. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0451-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desprez-Loustau M-L, Marçais B, Nageleisen L-M, Piou D, Vannini A (2006) Interactive effects of drought and pathogens in forest trees. Ann For Sci 63:597–612. doi:10.1051/forest:2006040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fyllas NM, Troumbis AY (2009) Simulating vegetation shifts in north-eastern Mediterranean mountain forests under climatic change scenarios. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:64–77. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00419.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fyllas NM, Phillips OL, Kunin WE, Matsinos YG, Troumbis AY (2007) Development and parameterization of a general forest gap dynamics simulator for the North-eastern Mediterranean Basin (GREekFOrest Species). Ecol Model 204:439–456. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fyllas NM, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Troumbis AY (2008) Regeneration dynamics of a mixed Mediterranean pine forest in the absence of fire. For Ecol Manag 256:1552–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fyllas NM, Politi PI, Galanidis A, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Arianoutsoy M (2010) Simulating regeneration and vegetation dynamics in Mediterranean coniferous forests. Ecol Model 221:1494–1504. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fyllas NM, Quesada CA, Lloyd J (2012) Deriving plant functional types for Amazonian forests for use in vegetation dynamics models. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 14:97–110. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fyllas NM, Gloor E, Mercado LM, Sitch S, Quesada CA, Domingues TF, Galbraith DR, Torre-Lezama A, Villanova E, Ramirez-Angulo H, Higuchi N, Neil DA, Silveira M, Ferreira L, Aymard GA, Malhi Y, Phillips OL, Lloyd J (2014) Analysing Amazonian forest productivity using a new individual and trait-based model (TFS v. 1). Geosci Model Dev 7:1251–1269. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-1251-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fyllas NM, Christopoulou A, Galanidis A, Michelaki CZ, Dimitrakopoulos A, Fulé PZ, Arianoutsou M (2017) Tree growth-climate relationships in mountainous Mediterreanean forests. Sci Total Environ (in review)Google Scholar
  19. Giorgi F, Lionello P (2008) Climate change projections for the Mediterranean region. Glob Planet Change 63:90–104. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granier A, Bréda N, Biron P, Villette S (1999) A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands. Ecol Model 116:269–283. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00205-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V, Giske J, Goss-Custard J, Grand T, Heinz SK, Huse G (2006) A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Model 198:115–126. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grissino-Mayer HD (2001) Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Res 57(2):205–221Google Scholar
  23. Gualdi S, Somot S, Li L, Li L, Artale V, Adani M, Belluci A, Braun A, Calmanti S, Carillo A, Dell’Aquila A (2013) The CIRCE simulations: regional climate change projections with realistic representation of the Mediterranean Sea. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94:65–81. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00136.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hacke UG, Sperry JS, Pockman WT, Davis SD, McCulloh KA (2001) Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia 126:457–461. doi:10.1007/s004420100628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haylock MR, Hofstra N, Klein Tank AMG, Klok EJ, Jones PD, New M (2008) A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J Geophys Res 113:D20119. doi:10.1029/2008JD010201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hickler T, Vohland K, Feehan J, Miller PA, Smith B, Costa L, Giesecke T, Fronzek S, Carter TR, Cramer W (2012) Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:50–63. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00613.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffmann WA, Marchin RM, Abit P, Lau OL (2011) Hydraulic failure and tree dieback are associated with high wood density in a temperate forest under extreme drought. Glob Change Biol 17:2731–2742. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jump AS, Hunt JM, Penuelas J (2006) Rapid climate change-related growth decline at the southern range edge of Fagus sylvatica. Glob Change Biol 12:2163–2174. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01250.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keenan T, Maria Serra J, Lloret F, Ninyerola M, Sabate S (2011) Predicting the future of forests in the Mediterranean under climate change, with niche-and process-based models: CO2 matters! Glob Change Biol 17:565–579. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02254.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kint V, Aertsen W, Fyllas NM, Trabucco A, Janssen E, Ozkan K, Muys B (2014) Ecological traits of Mediterranean tree species as a basis for modelling forest dynamics in the Taurus mountains, Turkey. Ecol Model 286:53–65. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koutsias N, Xanthopoulos G, Founda D, Xystrakis F, Foula N, Pleniou M, Mallinis G, Arianoutsou A (2013) On the relationships between forest fires and weather conditions in Greece from long-term national observations (1894–2010). Int J Wildland Fire 22:493–507. doi:10.1071/WF12003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linares JC, Tíscar PA (2010) Climate change impacts and vulnerability of the southern populations of Pinus nigra subsp. salzmannii. Tree Physiol 30:795–806. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpq052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez-Iglesias B, Villar R, Poorter L (2014) Functional traits predict drought performance and distribution of Mediterranean woody species. Acta Oecol 56:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.actao.2014.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez-Vilalta J, Adell N, López BC, Adell N, Badiella L, Busquets L, Ninyerola M (2008) Twentieth century increase of Scots pine radial growth in NE Spain shows strong climate interactions. Glob Change Biol 12:2868–2881. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01685.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martínez-Vilalta J, Mencuccini M, Vayreda J, Retana J (2010) Interspecific variation in functional traits, not climatic differences among species ranges, determines demographic rates across 44 temperate and Mediterranean tree species. J Ecol 6:1462–1495. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01718.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moore AD (1989) On the maximum growth equation used in forest gap simulation models. Ecol Model 45:63–67. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(89)90100-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morales P, Hickler T, Rowell DP, Smith B, Sykes MT (2007) Changes in European ecosystem productivity and carbon balance driven by regional climate model output. Glob Change Biol 13:108–122. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moriondo M, Good P, Durao R, Bindi M, Giannakopoulos C, Corte Real J (2006) Potential impact of climate change on fire risk in the Mediterranean area. Clim Res 31:85–95. doi:10.3354/cr031085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moser B, Temperli C, Schneiter G, Wohlgemuth T (2010) Potential shift in tree species composition after interaction of fire and drought in the Central Alps. Eur J For Res 129:625–633. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0363-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ngugi MR, Botkin DB, Doley D, Cant M, Kelley J (2013) Restoration and management of Callitris forest ecosystems in eastern Australia: simulation of attributes of growth dynamics, growth increment and biomass accumulation. Ecol Model 263:152–161. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pauli H, Gottfried M, Dullinger S, Abdaladze O, Akhalkatsi M, Alonso JLB, Coldea G, Dick J, Erschbamer B, Calzado RF, Ghosn D, Holten JI, Kanka R, Kazakis G, Kollár J, Larsson P, Moiseev P, Moiseev D, Molau U, Mesa JM, Nagy L, Pelino G, Puşcaş M, Rossi G, Stanisci A, Syverhuset AO, Theurillat J-P, Tomaselli M, Unterluggauer P, Villar L, Vittoz P, Grabherr G (2012) Recent plant diversity changes on Europe’s mountain summits. Science 336:353–355. doi:10.1126/science.1219033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pausas JG (1999) Mediterranean vegetation dynamics: modelling problems and functional types. Plant Ecol 140:27–39. doi:10.1023/A:1009752403216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pausas JG (2004) Changes in fire and climate in the eastern Iberian Peninsula (Mediterranean basin). Clim Change 63:337–350. doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000018508.94901.9c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pausas JG, Fernández-Muñoz S (2012) Fire regime changes in the Western Mediterranean Basin: from fuel-limited to drought-driven fire regime. Clim Change 110:215–226. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0060-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peñuelas J, Boada M (2003) A global change-induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Glob Change Biol 9:131–140. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00566.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piedallu C, Gégout J-C, Perez V, Lebourgeois F (2013) Soil water balance performs better than climatic water variables in tree species distribution modelling. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 22:470–482. doi:10.1111/geb.12012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poorter L, Markesteijn L (2008) Seedling traits determine drought tolerance of tropical tree species. Biotropica 40:321–331. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00380.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Preston KA, Cornwell WK, DeNoyer JL (2006) Wood density and vessel traits as distinct correlates of ecological strategy in 51 California coast range angiosperms. New Phytol 170:807–818. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01712.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon Weather Rev 100:81–92. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:OTAOSH>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria.
  51. Reich PR (2014) The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economic spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol 102:275–301. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reyer CP, Flechsig M, Lasch-Born P, van Oijen M (2016) Integrating parameter uncertainty of a process-based model in assessments of climate change effects on forest productivity. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1694-1 Google Scholar
  53. Rinn F (2003) TSAP-Win: time series analysis and presentation for dendrochronology and related applications. Version 0.55 user reference: RinnTechGoogle Scholar
  54. Risch AC, Heiri C, Bugmann H (2005) Simulating structural forest patterns with a forest gap model: a model evaluation. Ecol Model 181:161–172. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sakschewski B, von Bloh W, Boit A, Rammig A, Kattge J, Poorter L, Peñuelas J, Thonicke K (2015) Leaf and stem economics spectra drive diversity of functional plant traits in a dynamic global vegetation model. Glob Change Biol 21:2711–2725. doi:10.1111/gcb.12870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sánchez-Gómez D, Valladares F, Zavala MA (2006) Performance of seedlings of Mediterranean woody species under experimental gradients of irradiance and water availability: trade-offs and evidence for niche differentiation. New Phytol 170:795–806. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01711.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sardans J, Peñuelas J (2013) Plant–soil interactions in Mediterranean forest and shrublands: impacts of climatic change. Plant Soil 365:1–33. doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1591-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sarris D, Christodoulakis D, Körner C (2011) Impact of recent climatic change on growth of low elevation eastern Mediterranean forest trees. Clim Change 106:203–223. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9901-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Oswald H, Piussi P, Radoglou K (2000) Forests of the Mediterranean region: gaps in knowledge and research needs. For Ecol Manag 132:97–109. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00383-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scheiter S, Langan L, Higgins SI (2013) Next-generation dynamic global vegetation models: learning from community ecology. New Phytol 198:957–969. doi:10.1111/nph.12210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shugart HH (1984) A theory of forest dynamics: the ecological implications of forest succession models. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8748-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sitch S, Huntingford C, Gedney N, Levy PE, Lomas M, Piao SL, Betts R, Ciais P, Cox P, Friedlingstein P (2008) Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Glob Change Biol 14:2015–2039. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01626.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Touchan R, Baisan C, Mitsopoulos ID, Dimitrakopoulos AP (2012) Fire history in European black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) forests of the Valia Kalda, Pindus mountains, Greece. Tree-Ring Res 68:45–50. doi:10.3959/2011-12.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Bodegom PM, Douma JC, Verheijen LM (2014) A fully traits-based approach to modeling global vegetation distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:13733–13738. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304551110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Byrne JC, Daniels LD, Franklin JF, Fule PZ, Harmon ME, Larson AJ, Smith JM, Taylor AH (2009) Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323:521–524. doi:10.1126/science.1165000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wösten JHM, Lilly A, Nemes A, Le Bas C (1999) Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma 90:169–185. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(98)00132-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yamaguchi DK (1991) A simple method for cross-dating increment cores from living trees. Can J For Res 21:414–416. doi:10.1139/x91-053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zeide B (1993) Analysis of growth equations. For Sci 39:594–616Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaos M. Fyllas
    • 1
  • Anastasia Christopoulou
    • 1
  • Alexandros Galanidis
    • 2
  • Chrysanthi Z. Michelaki
    • 2
  • Christos Giannakopoulos
    • 3
  • Panayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos
    • 2
  • Margarita Arianoutsou
    • 1
  • Manuel Gloor
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Systematics, Faculty of BiologyNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Biodiversity Conservation Laboratory, Department of EnvironmentUniversity of the AegeanMytileneGreece
  3. 3.Institute for Environmental Research and Sustainable DevelopmentNational Observatory of AthensAthensGreece
  4. 4.Ecology and Global Change, School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations