Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 1343–1354 | Cite as

Regaining the traditional use of wildlife in wetlands on the coastal plain of Veracruz, Mexico: ensuring food security in the face of global climate change

  • Rosa María González-Marín
  • Patricia Moreno-CasasolaEmail author
  • Alejandro Antonio Castro-Luna
  • Alicia Castillo
Original Article


Wetlands play important roles that benefit social-ecological systems. They are threatened by climate change and human activities, i.e., raising livestock and wildlife hunting. The latter is essential for subsistence and for the food security of rural communities. To understand the traditional uses of wildlife, we examined the use of wildlife among people living within and outside of, but close to wetlands, in the communities located in four municipalities of Veracruz, Mexico, using open-ended interviews. We also analyzed the socioeconomic factors and environmental problems associated with the use of wildlife, and how these affect food security. People, especially those living within the wetlands, use wildlife mainly for food and trade. Wildlife is mainly used as food but also as pets, ornaments and medicine. The most useful species were black-bellied whistling duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis), nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) and Meso-American slider (Trachemys venusta). People living within the wetland make more intensive use of wildlife. The main problems causing decreasing wildlife populations were water pollution, hunting practices and deforestation. Local communities were aware of the importance of wetlands, their degradation and the need to preserve them. More research focused on socioecological systems is required to address both the need for biodiversity conservation and food security. Also, good local management plans that incorporate current knowledge about key species have to be drawn up with the participation of government and scientific institutions, citizens and local stakeholders.


Hunting Wetland loss Management Rural areas Traditional use Veracruz 



For their kindness and help in preparing this study, we thank the residents of the communities where we conducted the interviews. A. Juárez introduced us to the communities. B. Delfosse edited the English version of this manuscript. This study was made possible by a Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia doctoral fellowship (46372) awarded to the first author and funding from the International Tropical Timber Organization PD 349/05 Rev.2 (F) and PD RED-PD 045/11 Rev.2 (M), and from the Instituto de Ecología A.C. (902-17). We thank two anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10113_2016_955_MOESM1_ESM.doc (81 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 81 kb)
10113_2016_955_MOESM2_ESM.doc (120 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 120 kb)


  1. Aguirre G, Cázares E (2002) Tortugas dulceacuícolas del estado de Veracruz. Un recurso para conservar y aprovechar. Instituto de Ecología AC, VeracruzGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366. doi: 10.2307/3545823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apaza L, Wilkie D, Byron E, Huanca T, Leonard W, Pérez E, Reyes-García V, Valdez V, Godoy R (2002) Meat prices influence the consumption of wildlife by the Tsimane’ Amerindians of Bolivia. Oryx 36:382–388. doi: 10.1017/S003060530200073X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botello AV, Villanueva-Fragoso S, Gutierrez J, Rojas Galaviz JL (eds) (2010) Vulnerabilidad de la zonas costeras mexicanas ante el cambio climático. Gobierno del Estado de Tabasco. SEMARNAT-INE, UNAM-ICMyL, Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, CampecheGoogle Scholar
  5. Case M, Ardiansyah F, Spector E (2009) Climate change in Indonesia. Implications for humans and nature. WWF International climate change programme. Accessed 7 Dec 2011
  6. CONAPO (2010) Índice de Marginación por Entidad Federativa y Municipio 2010. Accessed 10 Nov 2015
  7. Conway-Gomez K (2008) Market integration, perceived wealth and household consumption of river turtles (Podocnemis spp.) in eastern lowland Bolivia. JLAG 1:85–108. doi: 10.1353/lag.2008.0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costanza R, Kemp M, Boynton W (1993) Predictability, scale, and biodiversity in coastal and estuarine ecosystems: implications for management. Ambio 22:88–96Google Scholar
  9. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2000) Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  10. Desbiez J, Keuroghlian A, Piovezan U, Bodmer R (2011) Invasive species and bushmeat hunting contributing to wildlife conservation: the case of feral pigs in a Neotropical wetland. Oryx 45:78–83. doi: 10.1017/S0030605310001304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición-ENSANUT (2012) Resultados por entidad federativa, Veracruz. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, CuernavacaGoogle Scholar
  12. Enríquez-Vázquez P, Méndez M, Retana-Guiascon O, Naranjo E (2006) Uso medicinal de la fauna silvestre en los altos de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 31:491Google Scholar
  13. FAO (1999) The state of food insecurity in the world. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford JD (2009) Vulnerability of Inuit food systems to food insecurity as consequence of climate change: a case study from Igloolik, Nunavult. Reg Environ Change 9:83–100. doi: 10.1007/s10113-008-0060-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. GFI-Global Financial Integrity (2011) Transnational crime in the developing world. GFI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. González-Jácome A (1999) Algunas cuestiones sobre el ambiente, la población y la economía en Veracruz central: Un ensayo etnohistórico. In: González-Jácome A, del Amo S (eds) Agricultura y sociedad en México: Diversidad, enfoques, estudios de caso. Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, pp 157–333Google Scholar
  17. González-Marín RM, Móntes R, Santos J (2003) Characterization of the units for the conservation, management and sustainable use of wildlife, in Yucatan, Mexico. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 2:13–21Google Scholar
  18. González-Marín RM, Moreno-Casasola P, Orellana R, Castillo A (2012) Palm use and social values in rural communities on the coastal plains of Veracruz, Mexico. Environ Dev Sustain 14:541–555. doi: 10.1007/s10668-012-9343-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guiling P, Brorsen BW, Doye D (2009) Effect of urban proximity on agricultural land values. Land Econ 85:262–284. doi: 10.3368/le.85.2.252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halsnæs K, Trærup S (2009) Development and climate change: a mainstreaming approach for assessing economic, social and environmental impacts of adaptation measures. Environ Manag 43:765–778. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9273-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman O (1994) Las llanuras costeras de Veracruz. Universidad Veracruzana-ORTOM, XalapaGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffmann O (2010) De “negros” y “afros” en Veracruz. In: Florescano E, Ortiz J (eds) Atlas del Patrimonio Natural, Histórico y Cultural de Veracruz, vol III. Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, pp 127–140Google Scholar
  23. INEGI (2014) Indicadores de bienestar por entidad federativa. Accessed 10 Nov 2015
  24. Infante D, Moreno-Casasola P, Madero-Vega C, Castillo-Campos G, Warner BG (2011) Floristic composition and soil characteristics of tropical freshwater forested wetlands of Veracruz on the coastal plain of the Gulf of Mexico. For Ecol Manag 262:1514–1531. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ippi S, Flores V (2001) Las tortugas neotropicales y sus áreas de endemismo. Acta Zool Mex (nueva serie) 84:49–63Google Scholar
  26. Jiménez G, Quechulpa S, Esquivel-Bazán E, Soto Pinto L, Reyes-Montes F, Ruiz M, Márquez-Rosano C (2010) Ganadería y cambio climático: mitigación y adaptación. Revista de Agroecología 26:9–11Google Scholar
  27. Junk WJ (2002) Long-term environmental trends and the future of tropical wetlands. Environ Conserv 29:414–435. doi: 10.1017/S0376892902000310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kingsford RT (2011) Conservation management of rivers and wetlands under climate change—a synthesis. Marine Freshw Res 62:217–222. doi: 10.1071/MF11029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Landgrave R, Moreno-Casasola P (2012) Evaluación cuantitativa de la pérdida de humedales en México. Invest Ambient 4(1):35–51Google Scholar
  30. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M (2007) Guidelines for critical review of qualitative studies. Accessed 4 Dec 2011
  31. Lion L, Hardesty LH (2002) Traditional tenure systems regulating forest product extraction and use by the Antanosy of Madagascar. J Ethnobiol 22:273–284Google Scholar
  32. Loreau M, Bouquet N, González A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:12765–12770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2235465100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human wellbeing: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Moreno-Casasola P (2008) Los humedales en México: tendencias y oportunidades. Cuadernos de Biodiversidad Universidad de Alicante, España. Accessed 10 Nov 2015
  35. Moreno-Casasola P, López Rosas H, Rodríguez-Medina K (2012) From tropical wetlands to pastures on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Pastos 42:185–217Google Scholar
  36. Naranjo EJ, Guerra MM, Bodmer RE, Bolaños JE (2004) Subsistence hunting by three ethnic groups of the Lacandon forest, Mexico. J Ethnobiol 24:233–253Google Scholar
  37. Ojasti J (1993) Utilización de la Fauna Silvestre en América Latina. Situación y Perspectivas para el Manejo Sostenible. Guía FAO Conservación No 25. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  38. Orams MB (2002) Feeding wildlife as a tourism attraction: a review of issues and impacts. Tourism Manag 23:281–293. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00080-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. PROFECO (2013) Precios de proteína animal: cerdo, pollo y res. Accessed 12 Nov 2015
  40. Ramsar Convention Secretariat (2007) Wise use of wetlands: a conceptual framework for the wise use of wetlands. Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, vol 1. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, GlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Restrepo S (2012) Carne de Monte y Seguridad Alimentaria: bases técnicas para una gestión integral en Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  42. Robinson J, Redford K (1991) Neotropical wildlife use and conservation. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  43. Schneider L, Ferrara CR, Vogt RC, Burger J (2011) History of turtle exploitation and management techniques to conserve turtles in the Rio Negro Basin of the Brazilian Amazon. Chelonian Conserv Biol 10:149–157. doi: 10.2744/CCB-0848.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shively G (1997) Poverty, technology and wildlife hunting in Palawan. Environ Conserv 24:57–63. doi: 10.1017/S0376892997000106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tarrés ML (2004) Observar, escuchar y comprender sobre la tradición cualitativa en la investigación social. FLACSO, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor SJ, Bogdan R (1984) Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados. Paidós, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  47. Turbay S, Gómez G, López AD, Álvarez O, Alzate C (2000) La fauna de la Depresión Momposina. Lealón, MedellínGoogle Scholar
  48. Velayudan SK (2007) Rural marketing: targeting the non-urban consumer. Sage Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  49. von Bertrab A (2010) Conflicto social alrededor de la conservación en la Reserva de la Biosfera de los Tuxtlas: un análisis de intereses, posturas y consecuencias. Nueva Antropología 23:55–80Google Scholar
  50. Weller MW (1999) Wetland birds: habitat resources and conservation implications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Winter TC (2007) The vulnerability of wetlands to climate change: a hydrologic landscape perspective. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:305–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04269.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woodrey MS, Rush SA, Cherry JA, Nuse BL, Cooper RJ, Lehmicke AJ (2012) Understanding the potential impacts of global climate change on marsh birds in the Gulf of Mexico region. Wetlands 32:35–49. doi: 10.1007/s13157-011-0264-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zamorano de Haro P (2009) La flora y fauna silvestres en México y su regulación. Estudios agrarios. Accessed 26 Nov 2013
  54. Ziervogel G, Nyong A, Osman B, Conde C, Cortés S, Downing T (2006) Climate variability and change: implications for household food security. AIACC Working Papers. Accessed 18 Mar 2012

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa María González-Marín
    • 1
  • Patricia Moreno-Casasola
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alejandro Antonio Castro-Luna
    • 1
  • Alicia Castillo
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto de Biotecnología y Ecología Aplicada (INBIOTECA)Universidad VeracruzanaXalapaMexico
  2. 2.Red de Ecología FuncionalInstituto de EcologíaXalapaMexico
  3. 3.Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y SustentabilidadUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMoreliaMexico

Personalised recommendations