Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 1751–1763 | Cite as

Characteristics and drivers of forest cover change in the post-socialist era in Croatia: evidence from a mixed-methods approach

  • Marin Cvitanović
  • George Alan Blackburn
  • Martin Rudbeck Jepsen
Original Article


Extensive forests in Croatia represent an important biological and economic resource in Europe. They are characterised by heterogeneity in forest management practices dating back to the socialist planned economy of the pre-1991 era. In this study we investigated the difference in rates of deforestation and reforestation in private- and state-owned forests during the post-socialist period and the causal drivers of change. The selected region of Northern Croatia is characterised by a high percentage of privately owned forests with minimal national monitoring and control. We used a mixed-methods approach which combines remote sensing, statistical modelling and a household-based questionnaire survey to assess the rates of forest cover change and factors influencing those changes. The results show that predominantly privately owned forests in Northern Croatia have recorded a net forest loss of 1.8 % during the 1991–2011 period, while Croatia overall is characterised by a 10 % forest cover increase in predominantly state-owned forests. Main factors influencing forest cover changes in private forests are slope, altitude, education structure, population age and population density. The results also show that the deforestation in private forests is weakening overall, mostly due to the continuation of the de-agrarisation and de-ruralisation processes which began during socialism.


Post-socialism Eastern Europe Forest management Deforestation Private forests Mixed-methods research 



This paper has been realised within the projects Environmental change and cultural Landscape as a Development Resource (supported by the Ministry of Science, Education and Sport of the Republic of Croatia) and CrorurisA scenario-based approach to discuss planning and development of Croatian rural areas (Project 4513 supported by the Croatian Science Foundation). The author would like to thank Dr. Erica Smithwick and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments during the reviewing procedure. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Antun Alegro and Karlo Beljan, mag. ing. silv., for their help.

Supplementary material

10113_2016_928_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (186 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 186 kb)


  1. Agnoletti M (2007) The degradation of traditional landscape in a mountain area of Tuscany during the 19th and 20th centuries: implications for biodiversity and sustainable management. For Ecol Manag 249:5–17. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.05.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alegro A (2000) Vegetacija Hrvatske. Botanički zavod PMF-a, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrušová L, Dobšinská Z, Sarvašová Z, Hricová Z, Šálka J (2015) Forest land ownership change in Slovakia. COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Report, European Forest Institute Central-East and South-East European Regional Office, Vienna. Accessed 5 Dec 2015
  4. Anić I, Meštrović Š, Matić S (2012) Značajniji događaji iz povijesti šumarstva u Hrvatskoj. Šumarski List 136:169–176Google Scholar
  5. Barbati A, Marchetti M, Chirici G, Corona P (2014) European forest types and forest Europe SFM indicators: tools for monitoring progress on forest biodiversity conservation. For Ecol Manag 321:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumann M, Ozdogan M, Kuemmerle T, Wendland KJ, Esipova E, Radeloff VC (2012) Using the Landsat record to detect forest-cover changes during and after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the temperate zone of European Russia. Remote Sens Environ 124:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CMHS Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service (2014) Retrieved from on 27th of August 2014
  8. Croatian Bureau of Statistics (2014) Retrieved from on 12th of January 2014
  9. Croatian Environmental Agency Database (2014) Retrieved from: on 17th December 2014
  10. Croatian Forests Database (2014) Retrieved from: on 9th of September 2014
  11. Croatian Ministry of Agriculture (2013) Strategija ruralnog razvoja RH 2008.-2013. Retrieved from on 11th of October 2014
  12. Croatian State Geodetic Administration Database (2014) Retrieved from: 11th of May 2014
  13. Čuka A, Magaš D (2003) Socio-geografska preobrazba otoka Ista. Geoadria 8:67–86Google Scholar
  14. Cvitanović M (2014a) Land-use and land-cover changes in the Krapina-Zagorje County from 1991 to 2011. Hrvatski geografski glasnik 76(1):41–59Google Scholar
  15. Cvitanović M (2014b) Promjene zemljišnog pokrova i načina korištenja zemljišta u Krapinsko-zagorskoj županiji od 1978 do 2011. Ph.D. Thesis, University of ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  16. Fady B, Cottrell J, Ackzell L, Alía R, Muys B, Prada A, González-Martínez SC (2015) Forests and global change: what can genetics contribute to the major forest management and policy challenges of the twenty-first century? Reg Environ Change. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0843-9 Google Scholar
  17. Filipčić A (2001) Razgraničenje Köppenovih klimatskih tipova Cf i Cs u Hrvatskoj. Acta Geogr Croat 35:7–17Google Scholar
  18. Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geist H, McConnel W, Lambin EF, Moran E, Alved D, Rudel T (2006) Causes and trajectories of land use/cover change. In: Lambin EF, Geist H (eds) Land-use and land-cover change. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geoghegan J, Pritchard JRL, Ognkva-Himmelberger Y, Chowdhury RR, Sanderson S, Turner BL II (1998) “Socializing the pixel” and “Pixelizing the social” in land-use and land-cover change. In: Liverman D, Moran EF, Rindfuss RR, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 51–69Google Scholar
  21. Geri F, Amici V, Rocchini D (2010) Human activity impact on the heterogeneity of a Mediterranean landscape. Appl Geogr 30(3):370–379. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glück P, Avdibegović M, Čabaravdić A, Nonić D, Petrović, N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M, Imoćanin S, Krajter S, Lozanovska N, Marić B, Milijić V, Mrkobrada A, Trninić S (2011) Private forest owners in the Western Balkans—ready for the Formation of the Interest Associations. European Forest Institute Research Report 25, European Forest InstituteGoogle Scholar
  23. Gracia M, Meghelli N, Comas L, Retana J (2010) Land-cover changes in and around a National Park in a mountain landscape in the Pyrenees. Reg Environ Change 11:349–358. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0138-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths P, Kuemmerle T, Baumann M, Radeloff VC, Abrudan IV, Lieskovsky J, Munteanu C, Ostapowicz K, Hostert P (2014) Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites. Remote Sens Environ 151:72–88. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halder P, Paladinić E, Stevanov M, Orlović S, Hokkanen TJ, Pelkonen P (2014) Energy wood production from private forests—nonindustrial private forest owners’ perceptions and attitudes in Croatia and Serbia. Renew Sust Energy Rev 35:515–526. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoshino S (1996) Statistical analysis of land-use change and driving forces in the Kansai District, Japan. IIASA Working Paper WP-96-120:1-40Google Scholar
  27. Jepsen MR, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Erb K, Verburg PH, Haberl H, Vesterager JP, Andrič M, Antrop M, Austrheim G, Björn I, Bondeau A, Bürgi M, Bryson J, Caspar G, Cassar LF, Conrad E, Chromý P, Daugirdas V, Van Eetvelde V, Elena-Rosselló R, Gimmi U, Izakovicova Z, Jančák V, Jansson U, Kladnik D, Kozak J, Konkoly-Gyuró E, Krausmann F, Mander Ü, McDonagh J, Pärn J, Niedertscheider M, Nikodemus O, Ostapowicz K, Pérez-Soba M, Pinto-Correia T, Ribokas G, Rounsevell M, Schistou D, Schmit C, Terkenli TS, Tretvik AM, Trzepacz P, Vadineanu A, Walz A, Zhllima E, Reenberg A (2015) Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy 49:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kissling-Näf I, Bisang K (2001) Rethinking recent changes of forest regimes in Europe through property-rights theory and policy analysis. For Policy Econ 3:99–111. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00059-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knorn J, Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC, Szabo A, Mindrescu M, Keeton WS, Abrudan I, Griffiths P, Gancz V, Hostert P (2012) Forest restitution and protected area effectiveness in post-socialist Romania. Biol Conserv 146:204–212. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krapina Zagorje County Spatial Plan (2002) Krapina, Croatia: Zavod za prostorno uređenje Krapinsko-zagorske zupanije. Retrieved from: on 14th Dec 2014
  31. Krč J, Pezdevšek Malovrh Š, Ficko A, Šinko M, Premrl T, Bogataj N, Udovč A (2015) Forest land ownership change in Slovenia. COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Report, European Forest Institute Central-East and South-East European Regional Office, Vienna. Accessed 6 Dec 2015
  32. Kristensen SP, Thenail C, Kristensen L (2001) Farmers’ involvement in landscape activities: an analysis of the relationship between farm location, farm characteristics and landscape changes in two study areas in Jutland, Denmark. J Environ Manag 61:301–318. doi: 10.1006/jema.2000.0409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Griffiths P, Rusu M (2008) Land use change in Southern Romania after the collapse of socialism. Reg Environ Change 9:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10113-008-0050-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuemmerle T, Chaskovskyy O, Knorn J, Radeloff VC, Kruhlov I, Keeton WS, Hostert P (2009) Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sens Environ 113:1194–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E (2003) Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:205–241. doi: 10.1146/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovrić M, Martinić I, Landekić M, Šporčić M (2009) Upravljanje privatnim šumama u Europi. Nova mehanizacija šumarstva 30:27–35Google Scholar
  37. Main-Knorn M, Hostert P, Kozak J, Kuemmerle T (2009) How pollution legacies and land use histories shape post-communist forest cover trends in the Western Carpathians. For Ecol Manag 258:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malić A (1983) Regionalne razlike i promjene površina kategorija iskorištavanja poljoprivrednog zemljišta SR Hrvatske. Hrvatski geografski glasnik 45:55–72Google Scholar
  39. Manthey M, Fridley JD, Peet RK (2011) Niche expansion after competitor extinction? A comparative assessment of habitat generalists and specialists in the tree floras of south-eastern North America and south-eastern Europe. J Biogeogr 38:840–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02450.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinić I, Dolenec A, Šporčić M (2006) Stajalište stanovništva Hrvatskog zagorja o općem značenju šume i šumarstva. Radovi (Hrvatski šumarski institut) 41:73–82Google Scholar
  41. Mather AS, Needle CL (1998) The forest transition: a theoretical basis. Area 30:117–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monteiro AT, Fava F, Hiltbrunner E, Della Marianna G, Bocchi S (2011) Assessment of land cover changes and spatial drivers behind loss of permanent meadows in the lowlands of Italian Alps. Landsc Urban Plan 100:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paladinić E, Vuletić D, Posavec S (2008) Pregled stanja privatnog šumoposjeda u Republici Hrvatskoj. Radovi (Hrvatski šumarski institut) 43:45–57Google Scholar
  44. Parviainen J (1999) Strict forest reserves in Europe—efforts to enhance biodiversity and strengthen research related to natural forests in Europe. In: Parviainen J, Little D, Doyle M, O’Sullivan A, Kettunen M, Korhonen M (eds) Research in forest reserves and natural forests in European Countries. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 7–33Google Scholar
  45. Peterson LK, Bergen KM, Brown DG, Vashchuk L, Blam Y (2009) Forested land-cover patterns and trends over changing forest management eras in the Siberian Baikal region. For Ecol Manag 257:911–922. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plutzar C, Kroisleitner C, Haberl H, Fetzel T, Bulgheroni C, Beringer T, Hostert P, Kastner T, Kuemmerle T, Lauk C, Levers C, Lindner M, Moser D, Müller D, Niedertscheider M, Paracchini ML, Schaphoff S, Verburg PH, Verkerk PJ, Erb K (2015) Changes in the spatial patterns of human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in Europe 1990–2006. Reg Environ Change. doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0820-3 Google Scholar
  47. Pretzsch H, Biber P, Schütze G, Bielak K (2014) Changes of forest stand dynamics in Europe. Facts from long-term observational plots and their relevance for forest ecology and management. For Ecol Manag 316:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prishchepov AV, Radeloff VC, Baumann M, Kuemmerle T, Müller D (2012) Effects of institutional changes on land use: agricultural land abandonment during the transition from state-command to market-driven economies in post-Soviet Eastern Europe. Environ Res Lett 7:1–3. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/2/024021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Richards JA, Jia X (1999) Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rounsevell MDA, Arneth A, Brown DG, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Ellis E, Finnigan J, Galvin K, Grigg N, Harman I, Lennox, J., Magliocca N, Parker D, O’Neil B, Verburg P H, Young O (2012) Incorporating human behaviour and decision making processes in land use and climate system models. GLP Report No. 7. GLP-IPO, São José dos CamposGoogle Scholar
  51. Sabadi R, Bijelić B, Jakovac H (1983) Gospodarski rezultati poslovanja u šumarstvu i problemi budućeg razvitka. Šumarski List 107:477–488Google Scholar
  52. Takhtajan A (1986) Floristic regions of the world. University of California Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  53. Teixeira Z, Teixeria H, Marques JC (2014) Systematic processes of land use/land cover change to identify relevant driving forces: implications on water quality. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1320–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change. A synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  55. Trinajstić I (1998) Fitogeografsko raščlanjenje klimazonalne šumske vegetacije u Hrvatskoj. Šumar List 122:407–421Google Scholar
  56. Turner II BL, Skole D, Sanderson S, Fischer G, Fresco L, Leemans R (1995) Land use and land-cover change science research plan. IGPB Report No. 35 and HDP Report No. 7. 132Google Scholar
  57. Uvalić M (2009) Investment and property rights in Yugoslavia: the long transition to a market economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Valožić L, Cvitanović M (2011) Mapping the forest change: using landsat imagery in forest transition analysis within the medvednica protected area. Hrvatski geografski glasnik 73(1):245–255Google Scholar
  59. Voća N (2012) Pregled podataka o korištenju zemljišta i promjenama u korištenju zemljišta u Republici Hrvatskoj. Agencija za zaštitu okoliša, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  60. Vresk M (1972) Socijalni ugar i drugi oblici napuštanja agrarne aktivnosti kao posljedica emigracije i socijalnog diferenciranja stanovništva. Hrvatski geografski glasnik 33:79–89Google Scholar
  61. Vukelić J (2012) Šumska vegetacije Hrvatske. Šumarski fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, DZZP, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  62. Vuletić D, Krajter S, Mrazek M, Ćorić A (2009) Nedrvni šumski proizvodi i usluge—koristimo li ih dovoljno? J For Soc Croatia 133:175–184Google Scholar
  63. Wood CH, Skole DL (1998) Linking satellite, census and survey data to study deforestation in the Brazilian amazon. In: Liverman D, Moran EF, Rindfuss RR, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 70–93Google Scholar
  64. Xie G, Li W, Xiao Y, Zhang B, Lu C, An K, Wang J, Xu K, Wang J (2010) Forest ecosystem services and their values in Beijing. Chin Geogr Sci 20:51–58. doi: 10.1007/s11769-010-0051-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Živojinović I, Weiss G, Lidestav G, Feliciano D, Hujala T, Dobšinská Z, Lawrence A, Nybakk E, Quiroga S, Schraml U (2015) Forest Land Ownership Change in Europe. COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Reports, Joint Volume. EFICEEC-EFISEE Research Report. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. Accessed 4 Dec 2015

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Lancaster Environment CentreLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  3. 3.Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations