Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 16, Issue 7, pp 2045–2058 | Cite as

Institutional capacity for long-term climate change adaptation: evidence from land use planning in Albay, Philippines

  • Sining C. Cuevas
  • Ann Peterson
  • Catherine Robinson
  • Tiffany H. Morrison
Original Article

Abstract

Mainstreaming climate change adaptation (CCA) into plans and programs is still a new approach in adaptation and thus there is limited information on how to operationalize it on-ground. This paper addresses this gap by investigating the challenges in mainstreaming CCA into the local land use plans in the province of Albay, Philippines. Specifically, this paper developed 20 quantitative “mainstreaming indicators” to assess the state-of-play and the challenges for local mainstreaming. These indicators were classified under three groupings, namely, the information, institutional, and resource capacities of systems. Qualitative analysis of the indicator scores suggested that developing the institutional capacities of local governments is crucial in the local mainstreaming process. Likewise, the results highlighted the “institutional issues” indicator as the primary barrier in operationalizing the approach. These institutional issues are: fragmented laws and regulations; overlapping policy requirements; and the lack of guidelines for mainstreaming CCA into the local land use plans. Meanwhile, the “leadership” indicator, as signified by a climate change champion in Albay, was evaluated as an opportunity for local mainstreaming. The champion effectively led the CCA efforts because the existing institutional mechanisms supported the champion’s capacity to influence the behavior of people and produce collective action towards CCA.

Keywords

Mainstreaming challenges Adaptation indicators Barriers Opportunities Institutions 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support of the CSIRO-UQ INRM PhD Scholarship is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Adger WN (2000) Institutional adaptation to risk under the transition in Vietnam. Ann Assoc Am Geog 90(4):738–758. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawala S, van Aalst M (2006) Bridging the gap between climate change and development. In: Agrawala S (ed) Bridge over troubled waters: linking climate change and development. OECD, Paris, pp 133–153Google Scholar
  4. Amadore LA (2005) Crisis or opportunity, climate change impacts and the Philippines. Greenpeace Southeast Asia. http://www.greenpeace.org/seasia/ph/Global/seasia/report/2006/3/crisis-or-opportunity.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2013
  5. Ayers J, Huq S, Wright H, Faisal AM, Hussain ST (2014) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development in Bangladesh. Clim Dev 6(4):293–305. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2014.977761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajracharya B, Childs I, Hastings P (2011) Climate change adaptation through land use planning and disaster management: Local government perspectives from Queensland. Paper presented at the 17th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference Climate change and property: Its impact now and later, pp 16–19 January 2011, Gold Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson C (2009) Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development: Challenges and experience in the Philippines. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies/the ProVention Consortium, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Bettini Y, Farrelly M, de Haan FJ, Brown RR (2012) Achieving water sensitive cities: Institutions as building blocks of collective action. Proceedings of the 7th international water sensitive urban design conference, 21–23 February 2012, Melbourne, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  9. Brondizio ES, Ostrom E, Young OR (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Ann Rev Environ Res 34:253–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.020708.100707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryan E, Behrman J (2013) Community–based adaptation to climate change: a theoretical framework, overview of key issues and discussion of gender differentiated priorities and participation. CAPRi Working Paper No. 109. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Burch S (2010) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Change 20:287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jager J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8086–8091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CCC (2011) National climate change action plan: 2011–2028. Climate Change Commission (CCC), Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  14. Chevallier R (2012) Political barriers to climate change adaptation implementation in SADC. In: Masters L, Duff L (eds) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation implementation in Southern Africa. Africa Institute of South Africa, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  15. Corpuz A (2012) Land use policy impacts on human development in the Philippines. HDN Discussion Paper Series, PHDR Issue 2012/2013 No. 1. Human Development Network, Quezon City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  16. Cuevas SC (2011) Climate change, vulnerability, and risk linkages. Int J Clim Change Strat Manage 3(1):29–60. doi: 10.1108/17568691111107934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cuevas SC (2012) Examining climate change adaptation measures: an early warning system in the Philippines. Int J Clim Change Strat Manage 4(4):358–385. doi: 10.1108/17568691211277719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuevas SC, Peterson A, Morrison T (2014) An analytical framework for investigating complex institutions in climate change adaptation: The Institutional Environment Matrix. In: Leal W (ed) Handbook of climate change adaptation. Springer, Berlin. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40455-9_18-1 Google Scholar
  19. Cuevas SC, Peterson A, Robinson C, Morrison TH (2015) Challenges in mainstreaming climate change adaptation into local land-use planning: evidence from Albay, Philippines. Int J Clim Change Impacts Responses 7(3):45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. David CPC, Racoma BAB, Gonzales J, Clutario MV (2013) A Manifestation of climate change? A look at typhoon Yolanda in relation to the historical tropical cyclone archive. Sci Diliman 25(2):78–85Google Scholar
  21. Dick L, Meinzen-Dick R (2011) The Congregational commons. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of International Association for Study of the Commons, 10–14 January 2011, Hyderabad, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Duff L (2011) Introduction. In: Masters L, Duff L (eds) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation implementation in Southern Africa. Africa Institute of South Africa, Pretoria 0001, South Africa, pp xxiii–xxxGoogle Scholar
  23. Enemark S, McLaren R, van der Molen P (2010) Land governance in support of the Millennium Development Goals: A new agenda for land professionals. FIG Publication No. 45. International Federation of Surveyors, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  24. Espinas A (2013) Geography and public planning: Albay and disaster risk management. HDN Discussion Paper Series, PHDR Issue 2012/2013. Human Development Network, Quezon City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans A, Steven D (2009) An institutional architecture for climate change: a concept paper. Department for International Development, UKGoogle Scholar
  26. Evasco KE, Alejandro BR IV (2010) Disaster management in the high risk barangays in Albay Province, Philippines. Paper presented at the 4th Asian Rural Sociology Association (ARSA) International Conference, Legazpi City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  27. Gliem JA, Gliem RR (2003) Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Gotis MQ (2008) Introduction to the rationalized planning system. Presentation at the 5th National CBMS Conference, January 28–February 1, 2008, Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  29. HLURB (2001) Planning strategically: Guidelines for the application of the strategic planning process in the preparation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and important urban areas issues and problems. Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  30. HLURB (2006) CLUP Guidebook: a guide for comprehensive land use plan preparation, vol 1. Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  31. Inderberg TH, Eikeland PO (2009) Limits to adaptation Analyzing institutional constraints. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 433–447. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511596667.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones R, Young C, Handmer J, Keating A, Mekala G, Sheehan P (2013) Valuing adaptation under rapid change. NCCARF Publication 56/13. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein RJT, Schipper ELF, Dessai S (2005) Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ Sci Policy 8(6):579–588. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klein RJT, Midgley GF, Preston BL, Alam M, Berkhout FGH, Dow K, and Shaw MR (2014) Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 899–943Google Scholar
  35. Lasco RD, Delfino RJ, Sanchez PA (n.d.) Local government initiatives to climate change adaptation: a case study of Albay, Philippines. World Agroforestry Centre and Centre for Initiatives and Research on Climate Adaptation Philippines. http://outputs.worldagroforestry.org/record/4486/files/PO08105.PDF. Accessed 28 April 2013
  36. Lasco RD, Delfino RJ, Pulhin FB, Rangasa M (2008) The role of local government units in mainstreaming climate change adaptation in the Philippines. AdaptNet Policy Forum 08-09-P-AdGoogle Scholar
  37. Lasco RD, Pulhin FB, Jaranilla-Sanchez PA, Delfino RJP, Gerpacio R, Garcia K (2009) Mainstreaming adaptation in developing countries: the case of the Philippines. Clim Dev 1(2):130–146. doi: 10.3763/cdev.2009.0009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lebel L, Li L, Krittasudthacheewa C, Juntopas M, Vijitpan T, Uchiyama T, Krawanchid D (2012) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development planning. Adaptation Knowledge Platform and Stockholm Environment Institute, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  39. Mangoyana RB, Thomsen DC, Smith TF, Preston BL, Heinz S, Maloney M, Withycombe G, Armstrong I (2012) Prioritizing coastal adaptation development options for local government: Literature review of adaptation to climate change in the coastal zone. Australian Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  40. McFadden L, Priest S, Green C (2010) Introducing institutional mapping: A guide for SPICOSA scientists, SPICOSA Project Report. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  41. McGinnis M (2011) An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: a simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):169–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 16(8):889–909. doi: 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meijer PC, Verloop N, Beijaard D (2002) Multi-method triangulation in a qualitative study on teachers’ practical knowledge: an attempt to increase internal validity. Qual Quant 36:145–167. doi: 10.1023/A:1014984232147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mercado ES (2011) Integration of CCA and DRMM into local land use plans: Issues and challenges and way forward. Adaptation to climate change and conservation of biodiversity (ACCBio) in cooperation with the LGU Planning Synergy Product Environment and Rural Development Program (EnRD)/Decentralization Program (DP) and Inventory of Methods for CCAGoogle Scholar
  45. Mukheibir P, Ziervogel G (2007) Developing a municipal adaptation plan (MAP) for climate change: the city of Cape Town. Environ Urban 19(1):143–158. doi: 10.1177/0956247807076912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nambi AA, Prabhakar SVRK (2011) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in agriculture and water sectors in India: current status, issues and barriers. Asian J Environ Disaster Manag 2(4):443–451. doi: 10.3850/S179392401100085X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. NDRRMC (2014) NDRRMC update: Updates re the effects of typhoon “YOLANDA” HAIYAN. National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) Quezon City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  48. NSCB (2013) Poverty statistics—data and charts: Table 1. Annual Per Capita Poverty Threshold, Poverty Incidence and Magnitude of Poor Families, by Region and Province: 1991, 2006, 2009 and 2012. Philippine Statistics Authority. http://www.nscb.gov.ph/poverty/dataCharts.asp. Accessed 04 August 2015
  49. NSCB (2014) Concepts and definitions: local government units. Philippine Statistics Authority. http://www.nscb.gov.ph/activestats/psgc/articles/con_lgu.asp. Accessed 15 July 2014
  50. NSO (2010) 2010 Census of population and housing. Philippine Statistics Authority. http://census.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/hsd/pressrelease/Bicol.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2015
  51. OECD (2006) Executive summary. In: Agrawala S (ed) Bridge over troubled waters: linking climate change and development. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 15–21Google Scholar
  52. OECD (2009) Policy guidance on integrating climate change adaptation into development co-operation. Paper read at Joint high-level meeting of the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and the Environment Policy Committee (EPOC), 28–29 May 2009Google Scholar
  53. Orindi VA, Eriksen S (2005) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in the development process in Uganda. In: Wakhungu JW (ed) Ecopolicy Series, no. 15. African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS) Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom E (2007) Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process, 2nd edn. Westview Press, Colorado, pp 21–64Google Scholar
  55. Ostrom E (2011) Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Persson A, Klein RJT (2008) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change into official development assistance: integration of long-term climate concerns and short-term development needs. Stockholm Environment Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  57. Pini B, River SW, McKenzie FMH (2007) Factors inhibiting local government engagement in environmental sustainability: case studies from rural Australia. Aust Geog 38(2):161–175. doi: 10.1080/00049180701399985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ratner BD, Meinzen-Dick R, May C, Haglund E (2013) Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: an analytical framework. Int J Commons 7(1):183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. RDC XII (2012) RDC XII Resolution No. 69, series of 2012: Requesting NEDA central office to fast track the completion of the reference manual on mainstreaming disaster risk reduction/climate change adaptation in the comprehensive land use plans. Regional Development Council (RDC) XII General Santos City, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  60. Resurreccion BP, Sajor EE, Fajber E (2008) Climate adaptation in Asia: Knowledge gaps and research issues in South East Asia: Full report of the South East Asia Team. ISET-International and ISET-NepalGoogle Scholar
  61. Roberts D (2008) Thinking globally, acting locally—institutionalizing climate change at the local government level in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban 20(2):521–537. doi: 10.1177/0956247808096126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudd MA (2004) An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecol Econ 48:109–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Salceda JS (2012) Adaptation practices of Albay. Presentation at the training workshop climate change for national and local governments in Southeast Asia and South Asia, 11–12 February 2012, Metro Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  64. Salceda JS, Rangasa NC (2011) A model Philippine climate change adaptation initiatives 2011. Local Climate Change Adaptation for Development, AlbayGoogle Scholar
  65. Serote EM (2004) Property, patrimony and territory: foundations of land use planning in the Philippines. University of the Philippines, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  66. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):282–292. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang Z, Hussey CM, Wei T (2009) Assessing local land use planning’s awareness, analysis, and actions for climate change. Int J Clim Change Strat Manag 1(4):368–381. doi: 10.1108/17568691211200236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tavakol M, Dennick R (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2:53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Theesfeld I, Schleyer C, Hagedorn K, Callois J-M, Aznar O, Olsson JA (2010) The institutional dimension in policy assessment. In: Ittersum MV, Brouwer FM (eds) Environmental and agricultural modeling: integrated approaches for policy impact assessment. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. UNDP-UNEP (2011) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development planning: A guide for practitioners. UNDP-UNEP Poverty-Environment FacilityGoogle Scholar
  71. Uy N, Takeuchi Y, Shaw R (2011) Local adaptation for livelihood resilience in Albay, Philippines. Environ Hazards 10(2):139–153. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2011.579338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Waters E, Barnett J, Puleston A (2014) Contrasting perspectives on barriers to adaptation in Australian climate change policy. Clim Change 124:691–702. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1138-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. World Bank (2013) Turn down the heat: climate extremes, regional impacts, and the case of resilience. A Report for the World Bank by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Climate Analytics. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  74. Yin RK (2014) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sining C. Cuevas
    • 1
  • Ann Peterson
    • 1
  • Catherine Robinson
    • 2
  • Tiffany H. Morrison
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Geography, Planning and Environmental ManagementThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationDutton Park, BrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.James Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations