Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe

  • Christian Levers
  • Daniel Müller
  • Karlheinz Erb
  • Helmut Haberl
  • Martin Rudbeck Jepsen
  • Marc J. Metzger
  • Patrick Meyfroidt
  • Tobias Plieninger
  • Christoph Plutzar
  • Julia Stürck
  • Peter H. Verburg
  • Pieter J. Verkerk
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
Original Article

Abstract

Assessments of land-system change have dominantly focused on conversions among broad land-use categories, whereas intensity changes within these categories have received less attention. Considering that both modes of land change typically result in diverse patterns and trajectories of land-system change, there is a need to develop approaches to reduce this complexity. Using Europe as a case study, we applied a clustering approach based on self-organising maps and 12 land-use indicators to map (1) land-system archetypes for the year 2006, defined as characteristic patterns of land-use extent and intensity, and (2) archetypical change trajectories, defined as characteristic changes in these indicators between 1990 and 2006. Our analysis identified 15 land-system archetypes, with low-intensity archetypes dominating (ca. 55 % coverage) followed by high-intensity archetypes (ca. 26 %). In terms of change, we identified 17 archetypical change trajectories, clustered in four broad categories. Stable land systems were most widespread (ca. 40 % of the EU27), followed by land systems characterised by land-use conversions (ca. 26 %), de-intensification trends (ca. 18 %), and intensification trends (ca. 15 %). Intensively used and intensifying land systems were particularly widespread in Western Europe, whereas low-intensity and de-intensifying land systems dominated in Europe’s east. Comparing our archetypes with environmental and socio-economic factors revealed that good accessibility and favourable topographic, climatic, and soil conditions characterised intensively managed areas. Intensification was also most common in these areas, suggesting an ongoing polarisation of intensification in favourable areas and de-intensification and abandonment trends in more marginal areas. By providing spatially and thematically improved maps of land-use patterns and changes therein, our archetypes could serve as useful inputs for more detailed assessments of ecosystem service demand and supply, as well as explorations of land-system change trade-offs, especially with regard to land-use intensity. Further, they could serve useful for identifying regions within which similar policy tools could be valuable to develop regionalised, context-specific land-management policies to steer European land systems onto desired pathways.

Keywords

Land-system change Land-use intensity Europe Land management Landscape Automated clustering 

Supplementary material

10113_2015_907_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3127 kb)
10113_2015_907_MOESM2_ESM.docx (3.2 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 3308 kb)
10113_2015_907_MOESM3_ESM.docx (3.6 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 3720 kb)

References

  1. Agarwal P, Skupin A (2008) Self-organising maps: applications in geographic information science. Wiley, New York, p 214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson K, Martin W, van der Mensbrugghe D (2006) Impact of global trade and subsidy policies on developing country trade. J World Trade 40(5):945–968Google Scholar
  3. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70(1–2):21–34. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown DG, Page S, Riolo R, Zellner M, Rand W (2005) Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(2):153–174. doi:10.1080/13658810410001713399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brus DJ, Hengeveld GM, Walvoort DJJ, Goedhart PW, Heidema AH, Nabuurs GJ, Gunia K (2012) Statistical mapping of tree species over Europe. Eur J For Res 131(1):145–157. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0513-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Core Team R (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies DL, Bouldin DW (1979) A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1(2):224–227. doi:10.1109/tpami.1979.4766909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donald PF, Pisano G, Rayment MD, Pain DJ (2002) The Common Agricultural Policy, EU enlargement and the conservation of Europe’s farmland birds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89(3):167–182. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00244-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duncker PS, Barreiro SM, Hengeveld GM, Lind T, Mason WL, Ambrozy S, Spiecker H (2012) Classification of forest management approaches: a new conceptual framework and its applicability to European forestry. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/es-05262-170451 Google Scholar
  10. Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6(8):439–447. doi:10.1890/070062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19(5):589–606. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x Google Scholar
  12. Erb KH, Haberl H, Jepsen MR, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Müller D, Verburg PH, Reenberg A (2013) A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(5):464–470. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Estel S, Kuemmerle T, Alcántara C, Levers C, Prishchepov A, Hostert P (2015) Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sens Environ 163:312–325. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAOSTAT (2015) FAOSTAT database (online). Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. http://faostat3.fao.org/download/F/FO/E. Accessed 12.02.2015
  15. Feranec J, Hazeu G, Christensen S, Jaffrain G (2007) Corine land cover change detection in Europe (case studies of the Netherlands and Slovakia). Land Use Policy 24(1):234–247. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer J, Hartel T, Kuemmerle T (2012) Conservation policy in traditional farming landscapes. Conserv Lett 5(3):167–175. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00227.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockstrom J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478(7369):337–342. doi:10.1038/nature10452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forest Europe, UNECE & FAO (2011) State of Europe’s forests 2011: status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Aas, Norway, p. 337Google Scholar
  19. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53(1):77–88. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0077:TIOLUL]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuchs R, Herold M, Verburg PH, Clevers JGPW, Eberle J (2015) Gross changes in reconstructions of historic land cover/use for Europe between 1900 and 2010. Glob Change Biol 21(1):299–313. doi:10.1111/gcb.12714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geist HJ, McConnell WJ, Lambin EF, Moran E, Alves D, Rudel T (2006) Causes and trajectories of land use/cover change. In: Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) Land use and land cover change. Local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gellrich M, Baur P, Koch B, Zimmermann NE (2007) Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: a spatially explicit economic analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118(1–4):93–108. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorton M, Hubbard C, Hubbard L (2009) The folly of European Union policy transfer: why the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) does not fit central and Eastern Europe. Reg Stud 43(10):1305–1317. doi:10.1080/00343400802508802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths P, Kuemmerle T, Baumann M, Radeloff VC, Abrudan IV, Lieskovsky J, Munteanu C, Ostapowicz K, Hostert P (2013a) Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites. Remote Sens Environ 151:72–88. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffiths P, Müller D, Kuemmerle T, Hostert P (2013b) Agricultural land change in the Carpathian ecoregion after the breakdown of socialism and expansion of the European Union. Environ Res Lett 8(4):045024. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F, Gaube V, Bondeau A, Plutzar C, Gingrich S, Lucht W, Fischer-Kowalski M (2007) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(31):12942–12947. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704243104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRG (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342(6160):850–853. doi:10.1126/science.1244693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hatna E, Bakker MM (2011) Abandonment and expansion of arable land in Europe. Ecosystems 14(5):720–731. doi:10.1007/s10021-011-9441-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hazeu GW, Metzger MJ, Mücher CA, Perez-Soba M, Renetzeder C, Andersen E (2011) European environmental stratifications and typologies: an overview. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142(1–2):29–39. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hengeveld GM, Nabuurs G-J, Didion M, van den Wyngaert I, Clerkx APPM, Schelhaas M-J (2012) A forest management map of European forests. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/es-05149-170453 Google Scholar
  31. Hill J, Stellmes M, Udelhoven T, Roder A, Sommer S (2008) Mediterranean desertification and land degradation mapping related land use change syndromes based on satellite observations. Glob Planet Change 64(3–4):146–157. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jepsen MR, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Erb K, Verburg PH, Haberl H, Vesterager JP, Andrič M, Antrop M, Austrheim G, Björn I, Bondeau A, Bürgi M, Bryson J, Caspar G, Cassar LF, Conrad E, Chromý P, Daugirdas V, Van Eetvelde V, Elena-Rosselló R, Gimmi U, Izakovicova Z, Jančák V, Jansson U, Kladnik D, Kozak J, Konkoly-Gyuró E, Krausmann F, Mander Ü, McDonagh J, Pärn J, Niedertscheider M, Nikodemus O, Ostapowicz K, Pérez-Soba M, Pinto-Correia T, Ribokas G, Rounsevell M, Schistou D, Schmit C, Terkenli TS, Tretvik AM, Trzepacz P, Vadineanu A, Walz A, Zhllima E, Reenberg A (2015) Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy 49:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan JO, Krumhardt KM, Zimmermann N (2009) The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat Sci Rev 28(27–28):3016–3034. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kastner T, Erb K-H, Haberl H (2014) Rapid growth in agricultural trade: effects on global area efficiency and the role of management. Environ Res Lett 9(3):034015. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kastner T, Erb K-H, Haberl H (2015) Global human appropriation of net primary production for biomass consumption in the European Union, 1986–2007. J Ind Ecol. doi:10.1111/jiec.12238 Google Scholar
  36. Kohonen T (2001) Self-organizing maps. Springer, Berlin, p 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuemmerle T (2008) Post-socialist land use change in the Carpathians. PhD thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2007) Post-socialist forest disturbance in the Carpathian border region of Poland, Slovakia, and Ukraine. Ecol Appl 17(5):1279–1295. doi:10.1890/06-1661.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, van der Linden S, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2008) Cross-border comparison of post-socialist farmland abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems 11(4):614–628. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9146-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuemmerle T, Erb K, Meyfroidt P, Müller D, Verburg PH, Estel S, Haberl H, Hostert P, Jepsen MR, Kastner T, Levers C, Lindner M, Plutzar C, Verkerk PJ, van der Zanden EH, Reenberg A (2013) Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(5):484–493. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuemmerle T, Kaplan JO, Prishchepov AV, Rylskyy I, Chaskovskyy O, Tikunov VS, Müller D (2015) Forest transitions in Eastern Europe and their effects on carbon budgets. Glob Change Biol 21(8):3049–3061. doi:10.1111/gcb.12897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) (2006) Land use and land cover change. Local processes and global impacts. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  43. Lambin EF, Rounsevell MDA, Geist HJ (2000) Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agric Ecosyst Environ 82(1–3):321–331. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00235-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Rindfuss RR (2006) Introduction: local processes with global impacts. In: Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) Land use and land cover change. Local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lefebvre M, Espinosa M, Gomez y Paloma S (2012) The influence of the Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural landscapes. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports Institute for Prospective Technological Studies—Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Seville, Spain, p 83Google Scholar
  46. Lerman Z, Csaki C, Feder G (2004) Evolving farm structures and land-use patterns in former socialist countries. Q J Int Agric 43(4):309–335Google Scholar
  47. Levers C, Verkerk PJ, Müller D, Verburg PH, Butsic V, Leitão PJ, Lindner M, Kuemmerle T (2014) Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe. For Ecol Manag 315:160–172. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Licker R, Johnston M, Foley JA, Barford C, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Ramankutty N (2010) Mind the gap: How do climate and agricultural management explain the ‘yield gap’ of croplands around the world? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19(6):769–782. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00563.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luyssaert S, Jammet M, Stoy PC, Estel S, Pongratz J, Ceschia E, Churkina G, Don A, Erb K, Ferlicoq M, Gielen B, Grunwald T, Houghton RA, Klumpp K, Knohl A, Kolb T, Kuemmerle T, Laurila T, Lohila A, Loustau D, McGrath MJ, Meyfroidt P, Moors EJ, Naudts K, Novick K, Otto J, Pilegaard K, Pio CA, Rambal S, Rebmann C, Ryder J, Suyker AE, Varlagin A, Wattenbach M, Dolman AJ (2014) Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature. Nat Clim Change 4(5):389–393. doi:10.1038/nclimate2196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maulik U, Bandyopadhyay S (2002) Performance evaluation of some clustering algorithms and validity indices. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(12):1650–1654. doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1114856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meeus JHA (1995) Pan-European landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 31(1–3):57–79. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)01036-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Metzger MJ, Bunce RGH, Jongman RHG, Mucher CA, Watkins JW (2005) A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14(6):549–563. doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2005.00190.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2011) Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36(1):343–371. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mücher CA, Klijn JA, Wascher DM, Schaminée JHJ (2010) A new European Landscape Classification (LANMAP): a transparent, flexible and user-oriented methodology to distinguish landscapes. Ecol Ind 10(1):87–103. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller D, Kuemmerle T, Rusu M, Griffiths P (2009) Lost in transition. Determinants of cropland abandonment in postsocialist Romania. J Land Use Sci 4(1–2):109–129. doi:10.1080/17474230802645881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Müller D, Leitao PJ, Sikor T (2013) Comparing the determinants of cropland abandonment in Albania and Romania using boosted regression trees. Agric Syst 117:66–77. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2012.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Müller D, Sun Z, Vongvisouk T, Pflugmacher D, Xu J, Mertz O (2014) Regime shifts limit the predictability of land-system change. Glob Environ Change 28:75–83. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Munteanu C, Kuemmerle T, Boltiziar M, Butsic V, Gimmi U, Lúboš H, Kaim D, Király G, Konkoly-Gyuró É, Kozak J, Lieskovský J, Mojses M, Müller D, Ostafin K, Ostapowicz K, Shandra O, Štych P, Walker S, Radeloff VC (2014) Forest and agricultural land change in the Carpathian region—a meta-analysis of long-term patterns and drivers of change. Land Use Policy 38:685–697. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Neumann K, Elbersen BS, Verburg PH, Staritsky I, Pérez-Soba M, de Vries W, Rienks WA (2009) Modelling the spatial distribution of livestock in Europe. Landsc Ecol 24(9):1207–1222. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9357-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neumann K, Verburg PH, Stehfest E, Müller C (2010) The yield gap of global grain production: a spatial analysis. Agric Syst 103(5):316–326. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Niedertscheider M, Erb K (2014) Land system change in Italy from 1884 to 2007: analysing the North-South divergence on the basis of an integrated indicator framework. Land Use Policy 39:366–375. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Niedertscheider M, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Erb K-H (2014) Exploring the effects of drastic institutional and socio-economic changes on land system dynamics in Germany between 1883 and 2007. Glob Environ Change 28:98–108. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Palang H, Printsmann A, Gyuro EK, Urbanc M, Skowronek E, Woloszyn W (2006) The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landsc Ecol 21(3):347–357. doi:10.1007/s10980-004-4313-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Piquer-Rodríguez M, Kuemmerle T, Alcaraz-Segura D, Zurita-Milla R, Cabello J (2012) Future land use effects on the connectivity of protected area networks in southeastern Spain. J Nat Conserv 20(6):326–336. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Plieninger T, van der Horst D, Schleyer C, Bieling C (2014) Sustaining ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Ecol Soc. doi:10.5751/ES-06159-190259 Google Scholar
  66. Plutzar C, Kroisleitner C, Haberl H, Fetzel T, Bulgheroni C, Beringer T, Hostert P, Kastner T, Kuemmerle T, Lauk C, Levers C, Lindner M, Moser D, Müller D, Niedertscheider M, Paracchini ML, Schaphoff S, Verburg PH, Verkerk PJ, Erb K-H (2015) Changes in the spatial patterns of human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in Europe 1990–2006. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0820-3 Google Scholar
  67. Ramankutty N, Foley JA, Olejniczak NJ (2002) People on the land: changes in global population and croplands during the 20th century. Ambio 31(3):251–257. doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.3.251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ripley BD (1996) Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press, Camebridge, p 416Google Scholar
  69. Rounsevell MDA, Pedroli B, Erb K-H, Gramberger M, Busck AG, Haberl H, Kristensen S, Kuemmerle T, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Lotze-Campen H, Metzger MJ, Murray-Rust D, Popp A, Pérez-Soba M, Reenberg A, Vadineanu A, Verburg PH, Wolfslehner B (2012) Challenges for land system science. Land Use Policy 29(4):899–910. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rozelle S, Swinnen JFM (2004) Success and failure of reform: Insights from the transition of agriculture. J Econ Lit 42(2):404–456. doi:10.1257/0022051041409048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seto KC, Fragkias M, Guneralp B, Reilly MK (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023777 Google Scholar
  72. Stellmes M, Röder A, Udelhoven T, Hill J (2013) Mapping syndromes of land change in Spain with remote sensing time series, demographic and climatic data. Land Use Policy 30(1):685–702. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sutcliffe LME, Batáry P, Kormann U, Báldi A, Dicks LV, Herzon I, Kleijn D, Tryjanowski P, Apostolova I, Arlettaz R, Aunins A, Aviron S, Baležentienė L, Fischer C, Halada L, Hartel T, Helm A, Hristov I, Jelaska SD, Kaligarič M, Kamp J, Klimek S, Koorberg P, Kostiuková J, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Kuemmerle T, Leuschner C, Lindborg R, Loos J, Maccherini S, Marja R, Máthé O, Paulini I, Proença V, Rey-Benayas J, Sans FX, Seifert C, Stalenga J, Timaeus J, Török P, van Swaay C, Viik E, Tscharntke T (2014) Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland. Divers Distrib 21(6):722–730. doi:10.1111/ddi.12288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Temme AJAM, Verburg PH (2011) Mapping and modelling of changes in agricultural intensity in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140(1–2):46–56. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson JR, Carpenter DN, Cogbill CV, Foster DR (2013) Four centuries of change in Northeastern United States forests. PLoS One 8(9):e72540. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Václavík T, Lautenbach S, Kuemmerle T, Seppelt R (2013) Mapping global land system archetypes. Glob Environ Change 23:1637–1647. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. van Asselen S, Verburg PH (2012) A land system representation for global assessments and land-use modeling. Glob Change Biol 18(10):3125–3148. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02759.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. van Eupen M, Metzger MJ, Pérez-Soba M, Verburg PH, van Doorn A, Bunce RGH (2012) A rural typology for strategic European policies. Land Use Policy 29(3):473–482. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van Vliet J, de Groot HLF, Rietveld P, Verburg PH (2015) Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 133:24–36. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Verburg PH, van de Steeg J, Veldkamp A, Willemen L (2009) From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. J Environ Manag 90(3):1327–1335. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Verkerk PJ, Levers C, Kuemmerle T, Lindner M, Valbuena R, Verburg PH, Zudin S (2015) Mapping wood production in European forests. For Ecol Manag 357:228–238. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46(1–3):3–14. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walesiak M, Dudek A (2014) clusterSim: searching for optimal clustering procedure for a data set. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=clusterSim. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  84. Wehrens R, Buydens LMC (2007) Self- and super-organizing maps in R: the kohonen package. J Stat Softw 21(5):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weissteiner CJ, Boschetti M, Bottcher K, Carrara P, Bordogna G, Brivio PA (2011) Spatial explicit assessment of rural land abandonment in the Mediterranean area. Glob Planet Change 79(1–2):20–36. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Westhoek HJ, van den Berg M, Bakkes JA (2006) Scenario development to explore the future of Europe’s rural areas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114(1):7–20. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Levers
    • 1
  • Daniel Müller
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Karlheinz Erb
    • 4
  • Helmut Haberl
    • 3
    • 4
  • Martin Rudbeck Jepsen
    • 5
  • Marc J. Metzger
    • 6
  • Patrick Meyfroidt
    • 7
    • 8
  • Tobias Plieninger
    • 9
  • Christoph Plutzar
    • 4
  • Julia Stürck
    • 10
  • Peter H. Verburg
    • 10
  • Pieter J. Verkerk
    • 11
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Geography DepartmentHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO)Halle (Saale)Germany
  3. 3.Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys)Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Institute of Social Ecology ViennaAlpen-Adria Universität KlagenfurtVienna, GrazAustria
  5. 5.Section of Geography, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  6. 6.School of GeoSciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, UK
  7. 7.Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life InstituteUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-La-NeuveBelgium
  8. 8.Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRSBrusselsBelgium
  9. 9.Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource ManagementUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  10. 10.Institute for Environmental StudiesVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  11. 11.Sustainability and Climate Change ProgrammeEuropean Forest Institute (EFI)JoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations