Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 1703–1716 | Cite as

Land-use change in the Caucasus during and after the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

  • Matthias Baumann
  • Volker C. Radeloff
  • Vahagn Avedian
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
Original Article

Abstract

Socioeconomic shocks can shape future land-use trajectories. Armed conflicts are an extreme form of a socioeconomic shock, but our understanding of how armed conflicts affect land-use change is limited. Our goal was to assess land-use changes related to the 1991–1994 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the Caucasus region. We classified multi-temporal Landsat imagery, mapped land-use changes during and after the conflict, and applied matching statistics to isolate the effect of the conflict from other potential drivers of land change. In our study area, local land-use changes were dominated by high farmland abandonment rates of more than 60 % in the conflict zone. Concomitantly, we found a substantial displacement of agricultural activities into nearby Azerbaijani territory (>30 % of all abandoned land in the conflict zone was offset by new agricultural areas on Azerbaijani territory), likely as a consequence of refugee migrations. After the armed conflict ceased, only 17 % of the abandoned fields were re-cultivated, indicating that the land-use system may have transformed profoundly. Our results showed that an armed conflict can have substantial impact on land use. Spatially, our results indicated that armed conflicts may cause lasting land-use change in areas distant from the actual battlegrounds, representing an example of a distant linkage in land systems, in our case caused by refugee movements. Temporally, armed conflicts appear to be able to cause a transition of the land-use system into a new state, akin to other drastic socioeconomic shocks.

Keywords

Land-use change Landsat Coarsened exact matching Local and displaced land-use change Warfare Armed conflicts 

References

  1. Aide TM, Grau HR (2004) Ecology—globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science 305:1915–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcantara C, Kuemmerle T, Baumann M, Bragina EV, Griffiths P, Hostert P, Knorn J, Muller D, Prishchepov AV, Schierhorn F, Sieber A, Radeloff VC (2013) Mapping the extent of abandoned farmland in Central and Eastern Europe using MODIS time series satellite data. Environ Res Lett 8:035035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alix-Garcia J, Saah D (2010) The effect of refugee inflows on host communities: evidence from Tanzania. World Bank Econ Rev 24:148–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alix-Garcia J, Kuemmerle T, Radeloff VC (2012) Prices, land tenure institutions, and geography: a matching analysis of farmland abandonment in post-socialist Eastern Europe. Land Econ 88:425–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alix-Garcia J, Anne B, David S (2013) The landscape of conflict: forced migration and land use in darfur. J Econ Geogr 13(4):589–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alvarez MD (2003) Forests in the time of violence: conservation implications of the Colombian war. J Sustain For 16:49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Robalino JA (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16089–16094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andersson N, Dasousa CP, Paredes S (1995) Social cost of land mines in 4 countries—Afghanistan, Bosnia, Cambodia, and Mozambique. Br Med J 311:718–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Angelsen A, Kaimowoitz D (1999) Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. World Bank Res Obs 14(1):73–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumann M, Kuemmerle T, Elbakidze M, Ozdogan M, Radeloff VC, Keuler NS, Prishchepov AV, Kruhlov I, Hostert P (2011) Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Policy 28:552–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baumann M, Ozdogan M, Kuemmerle T, Wendland KJ, Esipova E, Radeloff VC (2012) Using the landsat record to detect forest-cover changes during and after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the temperate zone of European Russia. Remote Sens Environ 124:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G (2009) cem: coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J 9:524–546Google Scholar
  13. Brunborg H, Urdal H (2005) The demography of conflict and violence: an introduction. J Peace Res 42:371–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buhaug H, Gates S, Hegre H (2006) Global trends in armed conflict. Centre for the study of civil war, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (NOR), Oslo (PRIO), p 9. http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/kampanjer/refleks/innspill/engasjement/prio.html?id=492941
  15. Card DH (1982) Using known map category marginal frequencies to improve estimates of thematic map accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 48:431–439Google Scholar
  16. Cleveland WS (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ (1988) Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc 83:596–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornell SE (1999) The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Report no. 46, Department of east European Studies, Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornell SE (2002) Autonomy as a source of conflict—Caucasian conflicts in theoretical perspective. World Polit 54:245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Croissant MP (1998) The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict: causes and implications. Praeger, WestportGoogle Scholar
  22. Curtis GE (1995) Armenia: a country study—agriculture. Washington GPO for the Library of Congress. Available under: http://countrystudies.us/armenia/
  23. Dearing JA, Braimoh AK, Reenberg A, Turner BL, van der Leeuw S (2010) Complex land systems: the need for long time perspectives to assess their future. Ecol Soc 15(4):21Google Scholar
  24. Derouen KJ, Heo U (2007) Civil wars of the world: major conflicts since World War II. ABC Clio, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  25. Dudley JP, Ginsberg JR, Plumptre AJ, Hart JA, Campos LC (2002) Effects of war and civil strife on wildlife and wildlife habitats. Conserv Biol 16:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dyer C, Jones R (2010) Deserted villages revisited. University of Hertfordshire Press, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  27. El-Baz F (1992) Preliminary observations of environmental damage due to the Gulf War. Nat Resour Forum 16:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. El-Juhany L (2010) Degradation of date palm trees and date production in Arab countries: causes and potential rehabilitation. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4:3998–4010Google Scholar
  29. FAOSTAT (2014) Statistical database of the Food And Agricultural Organization. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/
  30. Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80:185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gasparri NI, Grau HR, Gutiérrez Angonese J (2013) Linkages between soybean and neotropical deforestation: coupling and transient decoupling dynamics in a multi-decadal analysis. Glob Environ Change 23:1605–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Geist HH, Lambin EF (2004) Dynamic causal patterns of desertification. Bioscience 54(9):817–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gellrich M, Baur P, Koch B, Zimmermann NE (2007) Agricultural land abandonment and natural forest re-growth in the Swiss mountains: a spatially explicit economic analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Giovarelli R, Bledsoe D (2001) Land reform in Eastern Europe. Report. Rural Development INstitute (RDI), SeattleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gleditsch NP, Wallensteen P, Eriksson M, Sollenberg M, Strand H (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: a new dataset. J Peace Res 39:615–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Global Land Project (2012). Land teleconnections in an urbanizing world. GLP report no. 5Google Scholar
  37. Gorsevski V, Kasischke E, Dempewolf J, Loboda T, Grossmann F (2012) Analysis of the impacts of armed conflict on the Eastern Afromontane forest region on the South Sudan—Uganda border using multitemporal landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 118:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gorsevski V, Geores M, Kasischke E (2013) Human dimensions of land use and land cover change related to civil unrest in the Imatong Mountains of South Sudan. Appl Geogr 38:64–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grau HR, Aide TM, Zimmerman JK, Thomlinson JR (2004) Trends and scenarios of the carbon budget in postagricultural Puerto Rico (1936–2060). Glob Change Biol 10:1163–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanson T, Brooks TM, Da Fonseca GAB, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Machlis G, Mittermeier CG, Mittermeier RA, John DP (2009) Warfare in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol 23:578–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Higuchi H, Ozaki K, Fijita G, Minton J, Ueta M, Soma M, Mita N (1996) Satellite tracking of White-naped crane migration and the importance of the Korean demilitarized zone. Conserv Biol 10:806–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoddie M, Smith JM (2009) Forms of civil war violence and their consequences for future public health. Int Stud Q 53:175–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hostert P, Kuemmerle T, Prishchepov AV, Sieber A, Lambin EF, Radeloff VC (2011) Rapid land use change after socio-economic disturbances: the collapse of the Soviet Union versus Chernobyl. Environ Res Lett 6:045201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hugo G (1996) Environmental concerns and international migration. Int Migrat Rev 30:105–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2009) cem: software for coarsened exact matching. J Stat Softw 30(9):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Polit Anal 20:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) (2008) Internal Displacement in Azerbijan. Map available under: http://www.internal-displacement.org/europe-the-caucasus-and-central-asia/azerbaijan/2008/internal-displacement-in-azerbaijan
  48. International Campaign to Ban Landmines (2012) Land Mine Monitor 2012. Report. ISBN 978-2-8399-1102-3. http://www.the-monitor.org/lm/2012/resources/Landmine_Monitor_2012.pdf
  49. Irons JR, Dwyer JL, Barsi JA (2012) The next landsat satellite: the landsat data continuity mission. Remote Sens Environ 122:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jeffrey SJ (1996) Antipersonnel mines: who are the victims? J Accid Emerg Med 13:343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. John KH, Youn YC, Shin JH (2003) Resolving conflicting ecological and economic interests in the Korean DMZ: a valuation based approach. Ecol Econ 46:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson DH (2012) The Heglig oil dispute between Sudan and South Sudan. J East Afr Stud 6:561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Joppa LN, Pfaff A (2009) High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4(12):e8273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim KC (1997) Preserving biodiversity in Korea’s demilitarized zone. Science 278:242–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kuemmerle T, Chaskovskyy O, Knorn J, Radeloff VC, Kruhlov I, Keeton WS, Hostert P (2009) Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sens Environ 113:1194–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lambin EF, Geist H (2006) Land-use and land-cover change. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:3465–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lerman Z (2009) Land reform, farm structure, and agricultural performance in CIS countries. China Econ Rev 20:316–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lerman Z, Sedik DJ (2010) Rural transition in Azerbaijan. Lexington books, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  60. Lerman Z, Csaki C, Feder G (2004) Evolving farm structures and land use patterns in former socialist countries. Q J Int Agric 43:309–335Google Scholar
  61. Liu JG, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Alberti M, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Ostrom E, Pell AN, Lubchenco J, Taylor WW, Ouyang ZY, Deadman P, Kratz T, Provencher W (2007) Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio 36:639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Machlis GE, Hanson T (2008) Warfare ecology. Bioscience 58:729–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Machlis GE, Hanson T, Spiric Z, McKendry (2011) Warfare Ecology: a new Synthesis for Peace and Security. Springer Science, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  64. Martin PS, Szuter CR (1999) War zones and game sinks in Lewis and Clark’s west. Conserv Biol 13:36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Masek JG, Huang C, Wolfe R, Cohen W, Hall F, Kutler J, Nelson P (2008) North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record. Remote Sens Environ 112:2914–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maystadt J-F, Verwimp P (2009) Winners and losers among a refugee-hosting population: consumption, economic activities, and agglomeration. HiCN working papers 60, Households in conflict networkGoogle Scholar
  67. Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF (2010) Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:20917–20922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mooradian M, Druckman D (1999) Hurting stalemate or mediation? The conflict over Nagorno–Karabakh, 1990–95. J Peace Res 36:709–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Müller D, Kuemmerle T, Rusu M, Griffiths P (2009) Lost in transition: determinants of post-socialist cropland abandonment in Romania. J Land Use Sci 4:109–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Niedertscheider M, Kuemmerle T, Müller M, Erb KH (2014) Exploring the roles of institutional and political shocks on land system change in Germany between 1883 and 2007. Glob Environ Change 28:98–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees [UNHCR] (2009) Azerbaijan: analysis of gaps in the protection of internally displaced persons (IDPs). ReportGoogle Scholar
  72. Olofsson P, Foody GM, Stehman SV, Woodcock CE (2013) Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation. Remote Sens Environ 129:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pearn J (2003) Children and war. J Paediatr Child Health 39:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Petschel-Held G, Block A, Cassel-Gintz M, Kropp J, Lüdeke MKB, Moldenhauer O, Reusswig F, Schellnhuber HJ (1999) Syndromes of global change: a qualitative modelling approach to assist global environmental management. Environ Model Assess 4:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Prishchepov AV, Radeloff VC, Dubinin M, Alcantara C (2012a) The effect of Landsat TM/ETM+ image acquisition dates on the detection of agricultural land abandonment in Eastern Europe. Remote Sens Environ 126:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Prishchepov AV, Radeloff VC, Baumann M, Kuemmerle T, Müller D (2012b) Effects of institutional changes on land use: agricultural land abandonment during the transition from state-command to market-driven economies in post-Soviet Eastern Europe. Environ Res Lett 7:024021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Prishchepov AV, Müller D, Dubinin M, Baumann M, Radeloff VC (2013) Determinants of agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia. Land Use Policy 30:873–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rey-Benayas JM, Martins A, Nicolau JM, Schulz JJ (2007) Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 2:1–14Google Scholar
  79. Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu JC, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob Environ Change Human Policy Dimens 15:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sanchez-Cuervo AM, Aide TM (2013) Consequences of the armed conflict, forced human displacement, and land abandonment on forest cover change in colombia: a multi-scaled analysis. Ecosystems 16:1052–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Santos KC, Tague C, Alberts AC, Franklin J (2006) Sea turtle nesting habitat on the US Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba: a comparison of habitat suitability index models. Chelonian Conserv Biol 5:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Scheffer M (2010) Foreseeing tipping points. Nature 467:411–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, Dakos V, Held H, van Nes EH, Rietkerk M, Sugihara G (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Seto KC, Reenberg A, Boone CG, Fragkias M, Haase D, Langanke T, Marcotullio P, Munroe DK, Olah B, Simon D (2012) Urban land teleconnections and sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:7687–7692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. SIPRI (2012) Stockholm international peace research institute yearbook 2012. Armaments, disarmaments and international security. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  86. Stevens K, Campbell L, Urquhart G, Kramer D, Qi J (2011) Examining complexities of forest cover change during armed conflict on Nicaragua’s Atlantic Coast. Biodivers Conserv 20:2597–2613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Suthakar K, Bui EN (2008) Land use/cover changes in the war-ravaged Jaffna Peninsula, Sri Lanka, 1984-early 2004. Singap J Trop Geogr 29:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sylvén M, Reinvang R, Andersone-Lilley Ž (2009) Climate change in southern caucasus: impacts on nature, people and society. Report, WWF NorwayGoogle Scholar
  89. Vaclavik T, Lautenbach S, Kuemmerle T, Seppelt R (2013) Mapping global land system archetypes. Global Environ Change 23:1637–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ware H (2005) Demography, migration and conflict in the Pacific. J Peace Res 42:435–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Waske B, van der Linden S, Oldenburg C, Jakimow B, Rabe A, Hostert P (2012) imageRF—a user-oriented implementation for remote sensing image analysis with Random forests. Environ Model Softw 35:192–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wendland KJ, Lewis DJ, Alix-Garcia J, Ozdogan M, Baumann M, Radeloff VC (2011) Regional- and district-level drivers of timber harvesting in European Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Global Environ Change 21:1290–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Westing AH (1975) Environmental consequences of the second Indochina war: a case study. Ambio 4:216–222Google Scholar
  94. Witmer FDW (2008) Detecting war-induced abandoned agricultural land in northeast Bosnia using multispectral, multitemporal Landsat TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29:3805–3831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Witmer GW, Lowney M (2007) Population biology and monitoring of the Cuban hutia at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Mammalia 71:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Witmer FDW, O’Loughlin J (2009) Satellite data methods and application in the evaluation of war outcomes: abandoned agricultural land in Bosnia-Herzegovina after the 1992–1995 conflict. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 99:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wulder MA, Masek JG, Cohen WB, Loveland TR, Woodcock CE (2012) Opening the archive: how free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sens Environ 122:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yamskov AN (1991) Ethnic-conflict in the trans-caucasus—the case of Nagorno-Karabakh. Theory Soc 20:631–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Yigini Y, Panagos P, Montanarella L (2013) Soil resources of mediterranean and Caucasus countries. Office for Official Publications of the Euroean Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  100. Zhu Z, Woodcock CE (2012) Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 118:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zoomers A (2010) Globalization and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. J Peasant Stud 37:429–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthias Baumann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Volker C. Radeloff
    • 1
  • Vahagn Avedian
    • 3
    • 4
  • Tobias Kuemmerle
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.SILVIS-Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Geography DepartmentHumboldt-University BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Department of HistoryLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.LundSweden
  5. 5.Integrative Research Institute on Transformations in Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys)Humboldt-University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations