Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 15, Issue 8, pp 1667–1678 | Cite as

Withdrawing, resisting, maintaining and adapting: food security and vulnerability in Jumla, Nepal

Original Article

Abstract

The food security discourse has shifted from a narrow focus on food supply to a greater consideration of access, entitlements and sustainability. An emphasis on vulnerability has coincided with increased recognition that the causes of food insecurity are the result of a complex interaction between ecological, social, political and economic events and processes. Understanding the strategies that people employ to respond to these risks is critical to identifying pathways for change towards greater food security. We explore people’s explanations of and responses in the context of changes to their livelihoods and the wider social–ecological system (SES) in which they are embedded. An integrated vulnerability framework, drawing on a SES approach, was applied to structure data collection, analysis and discussion in a food insecure region in Nepal. Using in-depth interviews, focus groups and historical data, we have examined negotiation processes, decision-making, actions and interactions within social–ecological practices. Four distinct narratives and responses emerge—those of withdrawal, resistance, maintaining and/or adapting to food insecure situations. These stories reveal the complexity of managing the lived experience of food insecurity. They highlight the need for adaptive policy responses and point towards pathways that are likely to contribute to greater food security.

Keywords

Food security Vulnerability Social–ecological systems Coping Adaptation Risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the people of Jumla who participated in this research for generously providing their time and sharing their views, practices and experiences. Thanks are also due to participants from Government and NGOs both within and outside Jumla for their time and knowledge. We would also like to thank AusAID and The University of Melbourne for funding field work.

References

  1. ABPSD (2010) Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture. Agri-business Promotion and Statistics Division (ABPSD), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 4:253–266. doi: 10.1023/a:1009601904210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett CR, Carter MR (2000) Can’t get ahead for falling behind: new directions for development policy to escape poverty and relief traps. Choices. http://farmdoc.illinois.edu/policy/choices/20024/2002-4-06.pdf. (Accessed 25 Sept 2012)
  5. Barua A, Katyaini S, Mili B, Gooch P (2013) Climate change and poverty: building resilience of rural mountain communities in South Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya, India. Reg Environ Chang 14(1):267–280. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0471-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beniston M (2003) Climatic change in mountain regions: A review of possible impacts. In: Diaz H (ed) Climate variability and change in high elevation regions: past, present and future. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Folke C (2000) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social–ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conserv Ecol 5(2):18. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art18. (Accessed 7 June 2013)
  9. Bishop BC (1990) Karnali under stress: livelihood strategies and seasonal rhythms in a changing Nepal Himalaya, the committee on geographical studies. The University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaikie P, Brookfield H (1987) Land degradation and society. Methuen, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Bohle HG, Downing TE, Watts MJ (1994) Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Glob Environ Chang 4(1):37–48. doi: 10.1016/0959-3780(94)90020-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burg J (2008) Measuring populations’ vulnerability for famine and food security interventions: the case of Ethiopa’s Chronic Vulnerability Index. Disasters 32(4):609–630. doi: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2008.01057.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byg A, Salick J (2009) Local perspectives on a global phenomenon—climate change in Eastern Tibetan villages. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):156–166. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CBS (2011) Preliminary results of national population census 2011. Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commission, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  17. CBS (2013) National sample census of agriculture 2011/12. Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commission, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  18. Chambers R (1989) Vulnerability: how the poor cope (editorial introduction). IDS Bull 20(2):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chambers R, Conway G (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for 21st century. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  20. DADO (2012) District agriculture development programs and statistics. District Agriculture Development Office, JumlaGoogle Scholar
  21. de Waal A (1991) Emergency food security in Western Sudan: What is it for? In: Maxwell S (ed) To cure all hunger: food policy and food security in sudan. Intermediate Technology, London, pp 66–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Denscombe M (1998) The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  23. Ericksen PJ (2008) What is the vulnerability of a food system to global environmental change? Ecol Soc 13(2):14. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art14/. (Accessed 15 Mar 2011)
  24. FAO (2011) The state of food and agriculture 2010–11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  25. FAO (2012) The state of food and agriculture 2011–12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford J (2009) Vulnerability of inuit food systems to food insecurity as a consequence of climate change: a case study from Igloolik, Nunavut. Reg Environ Chang 9(2):83–100. doi: 10.1007/s10113-008-0060-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ford JD, Beaumier M (2011) Feeding the family during times of stress: experience and determinants of food insecurity in an Inuit community. Geogr J 177(1):44–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00374.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaire K (2011) Grassroots women’s groups in Nepal: understanding their sustainability. Lambert Academic Publishing, SaarbruckenGoogle Scholar
  29. Gentle P, Maraseni TN (2012) Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal. Environ Sci Policy 21:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grobler WC (2014) Food insecure household coping strategies: the case of a low income neighborhood in South Africa. Mediterr J Soc Sci 5(13):100–106. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n13p100 Google Scholar
  31. Gunderson L, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Gurung O (2003) Notes on Lagi-Lagitya relations in Jumla. Occas Pap Sociol Anthropol 8:12–17Google Scholar
  33. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability part a: global and sectoral aspects contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  34. Lal M (2011) Implications of climate change in sustained agricultural productivity in South Asia. Reg Environ Chang 11(1):79–94. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0166-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lambert RJ (1994) Monitoring food security and coping strategies: lessons from information collection and analysis in Mopti, Mali. Disasters 18(4):322–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1994.tb00320.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maxwell S (1996) Food security: a post-modern perspectives. Food Policy 21(2):155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maxwell S (2001) The evolution of thinking about food security. In: Devereaux S, Maxwell S (eds) Food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. ITGD, London, pp 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McLaughlin P, Dietz T (2008) Structure, agency and environment: toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 18:99–111. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Williams L (2006) The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environ Dev Econ 11(2):159–178. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X05002755 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller F, Osbahr H, Boyd E, Thomalla F, Bharwani S, Ziervogel G, Walker B, Birkmann J, van der Leeuw S, Rockstrom J, Hinkel J, Downing T, Folke C, Nelson D (2010) Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecol Soc 15(3):11. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art11/. (Accessed 9 May 2011)
  41. Millstone E (2010) Chronic hunger: a problem of scarcity or inequity? In: Mehta L (ed) The limists to scarcity. Earthscan, London, pp 179–194Google Scholar
  42. NPC (2010a) The food security atlas of Nepal. National Planning Commission (NPC), Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  43. NPC (2010b) Millennium development goal needs assessment. National Planning Comission (NPC), Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  44. Osbahr H, Twyman C, Adger NW, Thomas DSG (2008) Effective livelihood adaptation to climate change disturbance: scale dimensions of practice in Mozambique. Geoforum 39(6):1951–1964. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quinn C, Ziervogel G, Taylor A, Takama T, Thomalla F (2011) Coping with multiple stresses in rural South Africa. Ecol Soc 16(3):1–20. doi: 10.5751/ES-04216-160302 Google Scholar
  46. Reid P, Vogel C (2006) Living and responding to multiple stressors in South Africa—glimpses from KwaZulu-Natal. Glob Environ Chang 16(2):195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Shields R (1991) Places on the margin: alternative geographies of modernity. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Shrestha A, Aryal R (2011) Climate change in Nepal and its impact on Himalayan glaciers. Reg Environ Chang 11(1):65–77. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0174-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stephen L, Downing TE (2001) Getting the scale right: a comparision of analytical methods for vulnerability assessment and household-level targeting. Disasters 25(2):113–135. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner BL, Kasperson I, Matson RE et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. UNDP (2009) Nepal human development report. United Nations Development Program, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  53. Vogel C, Moser S, Kasperson R, Dabelko G (2007) Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Glob Environ Chang 17(3–4):349–364. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker B, Carpenter SR, Anderies J, Abel N et al (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol 6(1):14. http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14. (Accessed 25 Oct 2012)
  55. Watts MJ, Bohle HG (1993) The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine. Prog Hum Geogr 17(1):43–67. doi: 10.1177/030913259301700103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Resource Management and Geography, Melbourne School of Land and EnvironmentThe University of MelbourneCarltonAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Environment and Geography, Faculty of Science, E7A BuildingMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations