Age-class disequilibrium as an opportunity for adaptive forest management in the Carpathian Mountains, Romania

Regional Environmental Change volume 15, pages 1557–1568 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Biomass and species composition of a forest district in the North-Eastern Carpathian Mountains were simulated until 2100 using the forest landscape model LandClim, driven by climate data from three general circulation models that projected the local climate change under the A1B emission scenario. Four different management scenarios were used: business as usual and three adaptive management scenarios characterized by an intensification of interventions: more intense thinnings and shorter rotations. The total biomass at the end of the simulation differed greatly according to the climate scenario but was comparatively much less influenced by the management scenarios. Forest biomass was projected to increase markedly under the model which forecast the lowest climate change (CCSM3), remained approximately constant in the intermediate climate model (ECHAM5) but decreased severely in the hypothesis of the largest climate changes (HadCM3). Our results showed that developments in species composition differed much more between climate change scenarios than between management scenarios. Under moderate and intermediate climate scenarios, changes in species composition occurred principally in harvested stands, while stands not harvested did not display species replacements. Under extreme climate change (HadCM3) on the other hand, the species change occurred even before harvest. The model projections highlight the inadequacy of some species for the new growing and regeneration conditions that accompany the extreme climate scenario. Harvesting can be seen as a chance to undergo active adaptation with respect to species composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Bigler C, Bräker OU, Bugmann H, Dobbertin M, Rigling A (2006) Drought as an inciting mortality factor in Scots pine stands of the Valais. Switz Ecosyst 9(3):330–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boden S, Kahle HP, Wilpert KV, Spiecker H (2014) Resilience of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) growth to changing climatic conditions in Southwest Germany. For Ecol Manag 315:12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouriaud L, Nichiforel L (2010) When forest private ownership turns into collective-choices property rights. Span J of Rural Dev 1(2):59–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouriaud L, Nichiforel L, Weiss G, Bajaktari A, Curovic M, Dobsinska Z, Glavonjic P, Jarský V, Sarvasova Z, Teder M, Zalite Z (2013a) Governance of private forests in Eastern and Central Europe: an analysis of forest harvesting and management rights. Ann For Res 56(1):199–215

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouriaud O, Ştefan G, Flocea M (2013b) Predictive models of forest logging residues in Romanian spruce and beech forests. Biomass Bioenergy 54:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouriaud L, Coşofreţ C, Nichiforel L, Mutu M, Dănilă I (2014) Perceptions and attitudes of private forest owners regarding forest management adaptation to the climate change. Paper presentation to the conference adaptation in forest management under changing framework conditions, IUFRO Units 3.08.00 “Small-scale forestry” and 4.05.00 “Managerial economics and accounting”, 19–23th of May, Sopron, Hungary

  7. Bugmann H (1997) Sensitivity of forests in the European Alps to future climatic change. Clim Res 8:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bugmann H (2001) A review of forest gap models. Clim Change 51:259–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bugmann H, Cramer W (1998) Improving the behaviour of forest gap models along drought gradients. For Ecol Manag 103:247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chrysopolitou V, Apostolakis A, Avtzis D, Avtzis N, Diamandis S, Kemitzoglou D, Papadimos D, Perlerou C, Tsiaoussi V, Dafis S (2013) Studies on forest health and vegetation changes in Greece under the effects of climate changes. Biodivers Conserv 22:1133–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins M, Booth B, Harris G, Murphy J, Sexton D, Webb M (2006) Towards quantifying uncertainty in transient climate change. Clim Dyn 27:127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombaroli D, Henne PD, Kaltenrieder P, Gobet E, Tinner W (2010) Species responses to fire, climate and human impact at tree line in the Alps as evidenced by palaeo-environmental records and a dynamic simulation model. J Ecol 98:1346–1357. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01723.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duduman ML, Isaia G, Olenici N (2011) Ips duplicatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) distribution in Romania. Preliminary results. Buletin of University Transilvania Braşov, series II 4(53):19–27

  14. Elkin C, Gutiérrez AG, Leuzinger S, Manusch C, Temperli C, Rasche L, Bugmann H (2013) A 2 C warmer world is not safe for ecosystem services in the European Alps. Glob Change Biol 19:1827–1840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farrell E, Fuhrer E, Ryan D, Andersson F, Huttl R, Piussi P (2000) European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past. For Ecol Manag 132:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galiano L, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lloret F (2010) Drought-induced multifactor decline of Scots pine in the Pyrenees and potential vegetation change by the expansion of co-occurring oak species. Ecosystems 13(7):978–991

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Granier A, Bréda N, Biron P, Villette S (1999) A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands. Ecol Model 116(2–3):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gutsch M, Lasch P, Suckow F, Reyer C (2011) Management of mixed oak-pine forests under climate scenario uncertainty. For Syst 20:453–463

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE (2012) Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat Clim Change 3(3):203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Henne PD, Elkin C, Colombaroli D, Samartin S, Bugmann H, Heiri O, Tinner W (2013) Impacts of changing climate and land use on vegetation dynamics in a Mediterranean ecosystem: insights from paleoecology and dynamic modeling. Landsc Ecol 28:819–833. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9782-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hickler T, Vohland K, Feehan J, Miller PA, Smith B, Costa L, Giesecke T, Fronzek S, Carter TR, Cramer W, Kühn I, Sykes MT (2012) Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(1):50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kjellström E, Nikulin G, Hansson U, Strandberg G, Ullerstig A (2011) 21st century changes in the European climate: uncertainties derived from an ensemble of regional climate model simulations. Tellus A 63:24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Körner C, Sarris D, Christodoulakis D (2005) Long-term increase in climatic dryness in the East-Mediterranean as evidenced for the island of Samos. Reg Environ Change 5(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lévesque M, Saurer M, Siegwolf R, Eilmann B, Brang P, Bugmann H, Rigling A (2013) Drought response of five conifer species under contrasting water availability suggests high vulnerability of Norway spruce and European larch. Glob Change Biol 19(10):3184–3199. doi:10.1111/gcb.12268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. MAPPM (2000a) Norme tehnice pentru amenajarea padurilor (technical norms for forest management planning). Ministry of Water, Forests and Environment protection, Bucharest [in Romanian]

  27. MAPPM (2000b) Norme tehnice pentru îngrijirea şi conducerea arboretelor (technical norms for tending operation in forest stands). Ministry of Water, Forests and Environment protection, Bucharest [in Romanian]

  28. Marini L, Ayres MP, Battisti A, Faccoli M (2012) Climate affects severity and altitudinal distribution of outbreaks in an eruptive bark beetle. Clim Change 115(2):327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Morán-López T, Poyatos R, Llorens P, Sabaté S (2013) Effects of past growth trends and current water use strategies on Scots pine and pubescent oak drought sensitivity. Eur J For Res 133:369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mutu M, Duduman C, Bouriaud L, Nichiforel L (2014) Perceptions of forestry engineers on vulnerabilities and risks of forest ecosystems in the context of climatic changes. Bucovina Forestiera 14(1):51–59 [in Romanian]

  31. Nichiforel L (2011) Marketing and industrial demand influencing standing wood price (Cercetari privind fundamentarea pretului lemnului pe picior in diferite conditii de comercializare si industrializare). PhD dissertation, Universitatea Stefan cel Mare. [in Romanian]

  32. Olenici N, Duduman ML, Olenici V, Bouriaud O, Tomescu R, Rotariu C (2011) The first outbreak of Ips duplicatus in Romania. In: Delb H, Pontuali S (eds.) Biotic risks and climate change in forests. Proceedings of the working party 7.03.10 methodology of forest insect and disease survey in Central Europe, 10th workshop 20th–23rd Sept 2010, Freiburg, Germany. Berichte Freiburger Forstliche Forschung Heft, FVA:135–140

  33. Pretzsch H, Grote R, Reineking B, Rötzer TH (2008) Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. Ann Bot 101(8):1065–1087

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Read HJ (2000) Veteran trees: a guide to good management. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reif A, Brucker U, Kratzer R, Schmiedinger A, Bauhus J (2010) Forest management in times of climate change-synergies and potential conflicts between forestry and nature conservation. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 42(9):261–266

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roeckner E, Bäuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM-5: model description. Report no. 349, Max-Planck-Institute of Meteorology. Hamburg, Germany

  37. Schulze ED, Bouriaud L, Bussler H, Gossner M, Walentowski H, Hessenmöller D, Bouriaud O, Gadow KV, Klotz S (2014) Opinion paper: forest management and biodiversity. Web Ecol 14:3–10. doi:10.5194/we-14-3-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schumacher S, Bugmann H (2006) The relative importance of climatic effects, wildfires and management for future forest landscape dynamics in the Swiss Alps. Glob Change Biol 12:1435–1450. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01188.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schumacher S, Bugmann H, Mladenoff D (2004) Improving the formulation of tree growth and succession in a spatially explicit landscape model. Ecol Model 180:175–194. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Simonin K, Kolb TE, Montes-Helu M, Koch GW (2007) The influence of thinning on components of stand water balance in a ponderosa pine forest stand during and after extreme drought. Agric For Meteorol 143(3):266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Spiecker H, Hansen J, Klimo E, Skovsgaard JP, Sterba H, von Teuffel K (2004) Norway spruce conversion—options and consequences. European Forest Institute research report

  42. Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C (2012) Adaptive management for competing forest goods and services under climate change. Ecol Appl 22(8):2065–2077. doi:10.1890/12-0210.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C (2013a) Cross-scale interactions among bark beetles, climate change, and wind disturbances: a landscape modeling approach. Ecol Monogr 83:383–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Temperli C, Zell J, Bugmann H, Elkin C (2013b) Sensitivity of ecosystem goods and services projections of a forest landscape model to initialization data. Landsc Ecol 28(7):1337–1352. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9882-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Thornton PE, Running SW, White MA (1997) Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain. J Hydrol 190(3):214–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgley GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes M, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9(3–4):137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Thuiller W, Lavergne S, Roquet C, Boulangeat I, Lafourcade B, Araujo MB (2011) Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe. Nature 470:531–534

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by MOTIVE project within the European commission’s 7th Framework Program (Grant Agreement Number 226544) and by HubForClimate project (Understanding the human behavior role in adapting forest management to climate change), Contract PN-II-RU-TE-2011-2/116/5.10.2011.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University Stefan cel Mare of Suceava, str. Universitatii nr. 13, 720229, Suceava, Romania

    Laura Bouriaud, Olivier Bouriaud, Gabriel Duduman, Ionuţ Barnoaiea & Liviu Nichiforel

  2. Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland

    Ché Elkin, Christian Temperli, Niklaus Zimmermann & Harald Bugmann

  3. Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Guggenheim Geography, Campus Box 260, Boulder, CO, 80309-0260, USA

    Christian Temperli

  4. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, RD II: Climate Impacts and Vulnerabilities, Telegrafenberg, P.O. Box 601203, 14412, Potsdam, Germany

    Christopher Reyer

Authors
  1. Laura Bouriaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olivier Bouriaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ché Elkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Temperli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christopher Reyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gabriel Duduman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ionuţ Barnoaiea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Liviu Nichiforel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Niklaus Zimmermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Harald Bugmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Bouriaud.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1576 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouriaud, L., Bouriaud, O., Elkin, C. et al. Age-class disequilibrium as an opportunity for adaptive forest management in the Carpathian Mountains, Romania. Reg Environ Change 15, 1557–1568 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0717-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adaptive forest management
  • Landscape model
  • Scenario analysis
  • Forest biomass
  • Forest planning