Climate change impacts of legume-grass swards: implications for organic farming in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany

Regional Environmental Change volume 15, pages 405–414 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Multispecies legume-grass swards (LGS) within crop rotations are the primary source for nitrogen and livestock forage in organic farming systems (OFS) in Europe. At the same time, LGS are very susceptible to the effects of climate change on OFS in dryer regions. In order to predict changes in annual and seasonal LGS yields, the number and dates of LGS cuts and drought impact, an empirical statistical yield model based on alfalfa (A) and red clover (B) was applied to two of the driest areas within Germany: the ‘Spreewald’ (SP), with sandy soils only suited for red clover and the ‘Uckermark’ (UM) with sandy loams. Weather data series from 1972 to 2008 and two regional warming scenarios for 2062–2092, namely ‘Dry’ and ‘Wet’, were used to calculate the impacts. Only the scenario ‘Dry’ predicts an annual yield reduction (about 20 %), for both regions. This impact can be attributed to (1) the first cut is early by four weeks (decreasing the yield by 0.5 t ha−1), (2), the third cut is often delayed (caused by water deficiency) and (3) eventual impracticality of a fourth cut. In contrast, the second cut increased by 1 t ha−1 for ‘Wet’. In SP, frequent severe drought impacts are predicted for red clover LGS. This deleterious impact of the ‘Dry’ scenario can be partially compensated only in UM when alfalfa is used, which showed lower susceptibility to drought. Along with the predicted yield reduction, an increased vulnerability of organic farms in both study regions cannot be prevented.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    BBCH code for phenological observations: Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt, Chemische Industrie (Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Federal Office of Plant Varieties, Chemical Industry). Strauß et al. (1994).

References

  1. Addiscott TM, Whitmore AP (1987) Computer simulation of changes in soil mineral nitrogen and crop nitrogen during autumn, winter and spring. J Agr Sci 109:141–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahas R, Aasa A, Menzel A, Fedotova VG, Scheifinger H (2002) Changes in European spring phenology. Int J Climatol 22:1727–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bachinger J, Reining E (2009) An empirical statistical model for predicting the yield of herbage from legume-grass swards within organic crop rotations based on cumulative water balances. Grass Forage Sci 64:144–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Mela H et al (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 20:440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloch R, Bachinger J (2012) Assessing the vulnerability of organic farming systems: a case study from the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. In IFSA 12 (eds) Producing and reproducing farming systems: new modes of organisation for sustainable food systems of tomorrow. Book of Abstracts, Aarhus Denmark, pp 53–54

  6. Chmielewski FM, Müller A, Küchler W (2005) Possible impacts of climate change on natural vegetation in Saxony (Germany). Int J Biometeorol 50:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. DVWK (ed.) (1996) Ermittlung der Verdunstung von Land-und Wasserflächen. DVWK-Merkblätter zur Wasserwirtschaft 238, Wirtschafts-und Verl.-Ges, Bonn, pp. 38–39

  8. Ernst P, Loeper EG (1976) Temperaturentwicklung und vegetationsbeginn auf dem Grünland. Das wirtschaftseigene Futter 22:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gallopin GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerstengarbe F-W, Badeck F-W, Hattermann F, Krysanova V, Lahmer W, Lasch P, Stock M, Suckow F, Wechsung F, Werner PC (2003) Studie zur klimatischen Entwicklung im Land Brandenburg bis 2055 und deren Auswirkungen auf den Wasserhaushalt, die Forst- und Landwirtschaft sowie die Ableitung erster Perspektiven. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany

  11. Geyer J, Strixner L, Kreft S, Ibisch PL (2014) Adapting conservation to climate change: a case study on feasibility and implementation in Brandenburg. Reg Environ Chang, Germany. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0609-9

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gujer H (1997) Futterleguminosen. In: Keller ER, Hanus H, Heyland KU (eds) Grundlagen der landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenproduktion. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany, pp 759–802

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haggenmüller K, Luthardt V (2009) Pflanzenphänologische Veränderungen als Folge von Klimawandel in unterschiedlichen Regionen Brandenburgs. Phänologie-J 33:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hauptvogel P (2003) Strategy of lucerne breeding to abiotic stress. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 39:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haynes RJ (1980) Competitive aspects of the grass-legume association. Adv Agron 33:227–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heß J (1989) Kleegrasumbruch im Organischen Landbau: Stickstoffdynamik im Fruchtfolgeglied Kleegras - Kleegras - Weizen - Roggen. Dissertation, University of Bonn

  17. Hopkins A, Del Prado A (2007) Implications of climate change for grassland in Europe: impacts, adaptations and mitigation options: a review. Grass Forage Sci 62:118–126

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. INKA BB (Innovation Network of Climate Change Adaptation Brandenburg Berlin) (2014) http://www.inka-bb.de/. Accessed 29 May 2014

  19. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland

  20. Jørgensen SE, Kamp-Nielsen L, Christensen T, Windolf-Nielsen J, Westergaard B (1986) Validation of a prognosis based upon a eutrophication model. Ecol Model 32:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khanduri VP, Sharma CM, Singh SP (2008) The effects of climate change on plant phenology. Environmentalist 28:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimball BA, Kobayashi K, Bindi M (2002) Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2-enrichment. Adv Agron 77:293–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LDS (2005) Ernteberichterstattung über Feldfrüchte und Grünland im Land Brandenburg 2004. Landesbetrieb für Datenverarbeitung und Statistik Land Brandenburg (eds). Statistischer Bericht C II 1 - J/04, Potsdam, Germany

  24. Linke C, Grimmert S, Hartmann I, Reinhardt K (2010) Auswertung regionaler Klimamodelle für das Land Brandenburg. LUA (Landesumweltamt), Potsdam, Germany

  25. Lüscher A, Hartwig UA, Suter D, Nösberger J (2000) Direct evidence that symbiotic N2 fixation in fertile grassland is an important trait for a strong response of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2. Glob Change Biol 6:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lütke Entrup N, Oehmichen J (2006) Lehrbuch des pflanzenbaus. Band 1: Grundlagen. AgroConcept. Bonn, Germany

  27. Menzel A (2003) Plant phenological anomalies in Germany and their relation to air temperature and NAO. Clim Change 57:243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Menzel A (2007) Phänologische Modelle. Promet 33:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  29. Menzel A, Spark TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Neubert K, Priebe R (2013) Standort- und Artenkenntnis erleichtert die Mischungswahl für Grünland und ausdauerndes Ackerfutter auf trockenen Standorten. Landesamt für Ländliche Entwicklung Landwirtschaft und Flurneuordnung (LELF). http://lelf.brandenburg.de/sixcms/detail.php/bb1.c.208978.de. Accessed 30 Nov 2013

  31. Olesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron 16:239–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Orlowsky B, Gerstengarbe FW, Werner P (2008) A resampling scheme for regional climate simulations and its performance compared to a dynamical RCM. Theor Appl Climatol 92:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge, UK

  34. Peterson PR, Sheaffer CC, Hall M (1992) Drought effects on perennial forage legume yield and quality. Agron J 84:774–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reyer C, Bachinger J, Bloch R, Hattermann FF, Ibisch PL, Kreft S et al (2012) Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. Reg Environ Chang 12:523–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rogers A, Ainsworth EA, Leakey ADB (2009) Will elevated carbon dioxide concentration amplify the benefits of nitrogen fixation in legumes? Plant Physiol 151:1009–1016

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Soltani A, Sinclair TR (2012) Phenology-Temperature. In: Soltani A, Sinclair TR (eds) Modeling physiology of crop development, growth and yield. CABI, Oxfordshire, pp 55–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Stein-Bachinger K, Fuchs S (2012) Protection strategies for farmland birds in legume-grass leys as trade-offs between nature conservation and farmers’ needs. Organ Agr 2:145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Strauß R, Bleiholder H, van den Bomm T, Buhr L, Hack H, Heß M, Klose R, Meier U, Weber E (1994) Einheitliche Codierung der phänologischen Entwicklungsstadien mono- und dikotyler Pflanzen. Erweiterte BBCH-Skala, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tan DKY, Birch CJ, Wearing AH, Rickert KG (2000) Predicting broccoli development. I. Development is predominantly determined by temperature rather than photoperiod. Sci Hortic Amsterdam 84:227–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Topp CFE, Doyle CJ (2004) Modelling the comparative productivity and profitability of grass and legume systems of silage production in northern Europe. Grass Forage Sci 59:274–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Werner PC, Gerstengarbe FW (1997) Proposal for the development of climate scenarios. Climate Res 8:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zanetti S, Hartwig U, Lüscher A, Hebeisen T, Frehner M, Fischer B et al (1996) Stimulation of symbiotic N2 fixation in Trifolium repens L. under elevated atmospheric pCO2 in a grassland ecosystem. Plant Physiol 112:575–583

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany; the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV), Germany; and the Ministry of Science, Research and Culture (MWFK), Brandenburg.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Land Use Systems, Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Straße 84, 15374, Müncheberg, Germany

    Ralf Bloch & Johann Bachinger

  2. Faculty of Landscape Management and Nature Conservation, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Friedrich-Ebert-Straße 28, 16225, Eberswalde, Germany

    Ralf Bloch

  3. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) e. V., Telegrafenberg A 31, 14473, Potsdam, Germany

    Frank Wechsung

  4. Organic Farming and Cropping Systems, University of Kassel, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213, Witzenhausen, Germany

    Jürgen Heß

Authors
  1. Ralf Bloch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank Wechsung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jürgen Heß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johann Bachinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Bloch.

Additional information

Editor: Will Steffen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bloch, R., Wechsung, F., Heß, J. et al. Climate change impacts of legume-grass swards: implications for organic farming in the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany. Reg Environ Change 15, 405–414 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0656-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Yield modelling
  • Drought impact
  • Vulnerability
  • Cropping systems