Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 393–404 | Cite as

How will subalpine conifer distributions be affected by climate change? Impact assessment for spatial conservation planning

  • Ikutaro Tsuyama
  • Motoki Higa
  • Katsuhiro Nakao
  • Tetsuya Matsui
  • Masahiro Horikawa
  • Nobuyuki Tanaka
Original Article

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of climate change on keystone subalpine conifers, Tsuga diversifolia and Abies veitchii, incorporating the uncertainties of general circulation models (GCMs) for spatial conservation planning in Japan. Potential habitats for T. diversifolia and A. veitchii under current and 20 GCMs in 2080–2100 were predicted using generalized additive models. We counted the number of GCMs under which current potential habitat was predicted to lose by a spatial unit and used them as indices of vulnerability and prediction uncertainty. Gaps between protected areas and potential habitats under the future climates were identified. Reasonably accurate models revealed that T. diversifolia and A. veitchii require cool and wet summers with low winter precipitation. Only less than 1 % of current potential habitats for the species were predicted to be sustainable with low GCMs-related uncertainties. Most of these certainly sustainable habitats were designated as protected areas. Of current potential habitats for T. diversifolia and A. veitchii, 88 and 97 % were predicted to be non-habitats under future climates with low GCMs-related uncertainties. These certainly vulnerable habitats included the southern and low elevated northern range limits of the species, of which 70 % were designated as protected areas. These results suggest that subalpine conifers are vulnerable to the climate change irrespective of GCMs variation. Strengthening of monitoring may be necessary, especially at unprotected and certainly vulnerable habitats in lower subalpine areas where influences of the climate change will appear first. Active management including assisted regeneration may be necessary for preserving the vulnerable and genetically endemic populations.

Keywords

Tsuga diversifolia Abies veitchii Potential habitat Adaptation measures Natural parks and reserves Gap analysis 

Supplementary material

10113_2014_641_MOESM1_ESM.eps (392 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (eps 392 KB)
10113_2014_641_MOESM2_ESM.eps (354 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (eps 353 KB)
10113_2014_641_MOESM3_ESM.eps (270 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (eps 270 KB)
10113_2014_641_MOESM4_ESM.eps (240 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (eps 239 KB)
10113_2014_641_MOESM5_ESM.eps (846 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (eps 846 KB)
10113_2014_641_MOESM6_ESM.eps (825 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (eps 824 KB)
10113_2014_641_MOESM7_ESM.eps (885 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (eps 884 KB)

References

  1. Aizawa M (2005) Reconfirmation of localities recorded up to today by examination of voucher specimens and by investigation in the habitats-Case study of the five subalpine conifer species in Honshu, Japan. J Phytogeogr Taxon 53:13–42 (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  2. Beaumont LJ, Hughes L, Pitman AJ (2008) Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? Ecol Lett 11:1135–1146. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01231.x Google Scholar
  3. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford 1068 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie, 3 Aufl. Springer, WienCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buisson L, Thuiller W, Casajus N, Lek S, Grenouillet G (2010) Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution. Glob Change Biol 16:1145–1157. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02000.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caro T (2010) Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and other surrogate species. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I (2005) Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 360:443–455. doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujii S, Moriguchi Y, Uchiyama K, Suzuki S, Tsumura Y (2012) Genetic structure and population history of three Japanese Abies species revealed by chloroplast DNA and EST-SSR markers. 5th East Asian Fed Ecol Soc, JpnGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamann A, Wang T (2006) Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87:2773–2786. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069297
  11. Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araújo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R, Williams P (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 5:131–138. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20440608
  12. Hannah L, Midgley GF, Millar D (2002) Climate change-integrated conservation strategies. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:485–495. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2002.00306.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayashi Y (1951) The natural distribution of important trees, indigenous to Japan. Conifers report I. Bull Gov For Exp Sta 47:1–240 (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  14. IPCC (2001). In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007). In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate chage, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Iverson LR, Prasad AM (1998) Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol Monogr 68:465–485. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068
  17. Japan Meteorological Agency (1996) Climatic normals for Japan. Japan Meteorological Business Support Center, Tokyo. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  18. Kanzaki M (1984) Regeneration in subalpine coniferous forests I. Mosaic structure and regeneration process in a Tsuga diversifolia forest. Bot Mag Tokyo 97:297–311. doi:10.1007/BF02488663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kira T (1948) On the altitudinal arrangement of climatic zones in Japan. Kanti-Nougaku 2:143–173 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  20. Lemieux CJ, Scott DJ (2005) Climate change, biodiversity conservation and protected area planning in Canada. Can Geogr 49:384–397. doi:10.5558/tfc81696-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenoir J, Gegout JC, Marquet PA, de Ruffray P, Brisse H (2008) A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science 320:1768–1771. doi:10.1126/science.1156831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lepage B (2003) A new species of Tsuga (Pinaceae) from the middle Eocene of Axel Heiberg Island, Canada, and an assessment of the evolution and biogeographical history of the genus. Bot J Linn Soc 141:257–296. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00131.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsui T, Takahashi K, Tanaka N, Hijioka Y, Horikawa M, Yagihashi T, Harasawa H (2009) Evaluation of habitat sustainability and vulnerability for beech (Fagus crenata) forests under 110 hypothetical climatic change scenarios in Japan. Appl Veg Sci 12:328–339. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01027.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meehl G, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, McAvaney B, Mitchell J, Stouffer R, Taylor K (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1383–1394. doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383
  25. Metz C (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283–298. doi:10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2
  26. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. doi:10.1038/nature01286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 27:285–298. doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03740.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R Development Core Team (2011) R version 2.12.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M et al (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643. doi:10.1038/nature02422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saruki S, Inoue S, Shiiba Y, Nagasawa H, Ohosaki S, Kubota K (2004) Distribution and growth situation of Suzutake (Sasamorpha borealis) damaged by grazing of Sika deer (Cervus nippon nippon) in Miyazaki Forest of Kyushu University: case study in 2003. Bull Kyushu Univ For 85:47–54 (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  32. Scott D, Lemieux C (2005) Climate change and protected area policy and planning in Canada. For Chron 81:696–703. doi:10.5558/tfc81696-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sohma K, Tsuji S (1987) Shokusei (Vegetation). In: JA for Quaternary Research (ed) Explanatory text for quaternary maps of Japan. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 80–86 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  34. Sugita H (2002) Akouzantairin no Haifukusei to sono Seiritsukikou (Factors for differences in subalpine forest vegetations between Sea of Japan side and Pacific Ocean side). In: Kajimoto T, Daimaru H, Sugita H (eds) Snow environment and plant ecology of Japanese northern mountains. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 74–88 (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  35. Swets J (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:1285–1293. doi:10.1126/science.3287615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takatsuki S (2009) Effects of sika deer on vegetation in Japan: a review. Biol Conserv 142:1922–1929. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.011
  37. Tanaka N (2012) Phytosociological Relevé Database of Japan (PRDB). In: Dengler J, Oldeland J, Jansen F, Chytrý M, Ewald J, Finckh M, Glöckler F, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Peet R, Schaminée J (eds) Vegetation databases for the 21st century, Biodivers Ecol 4, pp 308–308. doi:10.7809/b-e.00104
  38. Tanaka N, Nakazono E, Tsuyama I, Matsui T (2009) Assessing impact of climate warming on potential habitats of ten conifer species in Japan. Glob Environ Res 14:153–164 (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  39. Tatewaki M, Ito K, Tohyama M (1964) Phytosociological study on the forests of Japanese Hemlock (Tsuga diversifolia). Res Bull Coll Exp For Hokkaido Univ 23:83–146 (In Japanese with English summary)Google Scholar
  40. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo M, Sykes M, Prentice I (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:8245–8250. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409902102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Sykes MT, Araújo MB (2006) Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Divers Distrib 12:49–60. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00216.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsuyama I, Horikawa M, Nakao K, Matsui T, Kominami Y, Tanaka N (2012) Factors controlling the distribution of a keystone understory taxon, dwarf bamboo of the section Crassinodi, at a national scale: application to impact assessment of climate change in Japan. J For Res 17:137–148. doi:10.1007/s10310-011-0283-4 Google Scholar
  43. Tsuyama I, Nakao K, Higa M, Matsui T, Shichi K, Tanaka N (2014) What controls the distribution of the Japanese endemic hemlock, Tsuga diversifolia? Footprint of climate in the glacial period on current habitat occupancy. J For Res 19:154–165. doi:10.1007/s10310-013-0399-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tsuyama I, Nakao K, Matsui T, Higa M, Horikawa M, Kominami Y, Tanaka N (2011) Climatic controls of a keystone understory species, Sasamorpha borealis, and an impact assessment of climate change in Japan. Ann For Sci 68:689–699. doi:10.1007/s13595-011-0086-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  46. Woodward FI (1996) Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Yokoyama S, Maeji I, Ueda T, Ando M, Shibata E (2001) Impact of bark stripping by sika deer, Cervus nippon, on subalpine coniferous forests in central Japan. For Ecol Manag 140:93–99. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00279-6

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ikutaro Tsuyama
    • 1
  • Motoki Higa
    • 2
  • Katsuhiro Nakao
    • 3
  • Tetsuya Matsui
    • 3
  • Masahiro Horikawa
    • 4
  • Nobuyuki Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.Hokkaido Research CenterForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteSapporoJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Faculty of ScienceKochi UniversityKochiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Plant EcologyForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Toyota Biotechnology and Afforestation LaboratoryToyota Motor CorporationNishikamo-gunJapan

Personalised recommendations