Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 449–461 | Cite as

The research-policy nexus in climate change adaptation: experience from the urban water sector in South East Queensland, Australia

  • G. LavesEmail author
  • S. Kenway
  • D. Begbie
  • A. Roiko
  • R. W. Carter
  • P. Waterman
Original Article

Abstract

Despite an exponential growth in the volume of adaptation research over the last decade, there is still a research gap in regard to the provision of suitable information to adequately inform climate change adaptation policy makers. Contributing to this gap is a paucity of research reporting on the effectiveness of implemented adaptation strategies. This paper reports on the success, failures and future risks of the responses taken by the South East Queensland (SEQ) water sector during the Millennium Drought. The adaptation strategy employed a portfolio approach mixing ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ adaptations. Strategies included the following: large-scale water manufacturing facilities and distribution networks; the exploitation of local water resources; regulatory instruments; institutional reforms; support for research and training and a range of demand management programmes. The strategies employed were innovative and in many cases required rigorous scientific evidence for their development, implementation and follow-up assessments. However, we show that there has been considerable disparity between anticipated and actual policy outcomes, which points to maladaptive consequences. By revisiting the effectiveness of implemented adaptation strategies in the SEQ water sector, our paper provides evidence for the need for integrative studies with genuine policy integration.

Keywords

Climate change adaptation Water supply Research South East Queensland Millennium Drought Water tanks 

References

  1. ABS (2012) Household water use and conservation in Year Book Australia, 2012Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed W, Gardner T, Toze S (2011) Microbiological quality of roof-harvested rainwater and health risks: a review. J Environ Qual 40:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed W, Hodgers L, Sidhu JPS, Toze S (2012) Fecal indicators and zoonotic pathogens in household drinking water taps fed from rainwater tanks in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(1):219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnell N (2010) Adapting to climate change: an evolving research programme. Clim Change 100:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arpke A, Hutzler N (2006) Domestic water use in the United States: a life-cycle approach. J Ind Ecol 10:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ash A, Stafford Smith M (2013) Adaptation research: community, science or discipline? In: Palutikof J (ed) Climate change adaptation futures. Wiley Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett J, O’Neill S (2009) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Change 20(2):211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (eds) (2008) Climate change and water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. Baynes T, West J, Vitovsky J, Hall M (2009) A framework for modelling the energy and greenhouse implications of water demand and supply scenarios, urban water security research alliance technical report No. 15, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  10. Beal C, Hood B, Gardner T, Lane J, Christiansen C (2008) Energy and water metabolism of a sustainable subdivision in South East Queensland: a reality check. Enviro ‘08. MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  11. Beal C, Stewart R, Spinks A, Fielding K (2011) Using smart meters to identify social and technological impacts on residential water consumption. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 11(5):527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beal CD, Gardner T, Sharma A, Chong M (2012) A desktop analysis of potable water savings from internally plumbed rainwater tanks in south-east Queensland, Australia. Water Resour Manage 26(6):1577–1590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Change 21:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burley J, McAllister RRJ, Collins K, Lovelock C (2012) Integration, synthesis and climate change adaptation: a narrative based on coastal wetlands at the regional scale. Reg Envir Chang 13:581–593. doi: 10.1007/s10113-011-0271-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burton P, Mustelin J (2013) Planning for climate change: is greater public participation the key to success? Urban Policy Res 1–17Google Scholar
  16. Chong M et al (2011) Estimating water savings from mandated rainwater tanks in South East Queensland. Urban Water Security Research Alliance, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook  S, Hal Ml, Gregory A (2012) Energy Use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia: an update. A report prepared for the Water Services Association of Australia. Commonwealth Scientific and Industriazl Research Organisation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  18. Coombes P, Cullen A, White A, McGrath A (2010) Review, conceptual design and economic analysis of integrated water cycle management schemes at Ridges at Peregian Springs. Bonnaci Water, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniels P, Porter M (2011) Externality effects and their monetary values for water servicing options in South East Queensland, in science forum and stakeholder engagement: building linkages. In: Begbie DK, Wakem SL (eds) Collaboration and science quality. Urban Water Security Research Alliance, Brisbane, p 112Google Scholar
  20. de Haas D, Foley J, Lant P (2009) Energy and greenhouse footprints of wastewater treatment plants in south-east Queensland. Australian Water Association, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  21. Eakin HC, Patt A (2011) Are adaptation studies effective, and what can enhance their practical impact? Wiley Interdiscipl Rev Clim Change 2:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Farré MJ, Doederer K, Hearn L, Poussade Y, Keller J, Gernjak W (2011) Understanding the operational parameters affecting NDMA formation at advanced water treatment plants. J Hazard Mater 185:1575–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardner T, Millar G, Christiansen C, Vieritz A, Chapman H (2006) Urban metabolism of an ecosensitive subdivision in Brisbane, Australia Enviro 06 Conference and Exhibition MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  24. Gore A (1993) Earth in the balance: ecology and the human spirit. Plume, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Green M, Price J, Gardner J, Leviston Z, Fielding K (2012) Communication and community responses to recycled water, in science forum and stakeholder engagement: building linkages. In: Begbie DK, Kenway SJ, Biermann SM, Wakem SL (eds) Collaboration and science quality. Urban Water Security Research Alliance, Brisbane, p 102Google Scholar
  26. Hall MR, West J, Sherman B, Lane J, de Haas D (2011) Long-Term trends and opportunities for managing regional water supply and wastewater greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol 45(12):5434–5440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall MR (2013) Review of rainwater tank cost-effectiveness in South East Queensland, 2nd edn. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 105Google Scholar
  28. Head B (2010) Reconsidering evidence-based policy: key issues and challenges. Policy Soc 29(2):77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofmann ME, Hinkel J et al (2011) Classifying knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability in Europe for informing adaptation research and decision-making: a conceptual meta-analysis. Glob Environ Change 21(3):1106–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hood B, Gardner T, Barton R, Gardiner R, Beal C, Hyde R, Walton C (2010) The Ecovillage at currumbin—a model for decentralised development, OZWATER 2010. Australian Water Association, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  31. Hurlimann A, Hemphill E, McKay J, Geursen G (2008) Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. J Environ Manage 88(4):1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. IPCC (2001) In: McCarthy J, Caziani O, Leary N, Dokken D, White K (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaercher JD, Po M, Nancarrow BE (2003) Water recycling community discussion meeting I. Australian Research Centre for Water in Society, Perth, WAGoogle Scholar
  34. Kandulu J, Leviston Z, Wallington T, Ward J (2010) Social, institutional and economic challenges discussion paper prepared for the Australian water Recycling Centre of ExcellenceGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenway SJ, Priestley A, Cook S, Seo S, Inman M, Gregory A (2008) Energy use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia and New Zealand. CSIRO and Water Services Association of Australia, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  36. Kenway SJ, Lant P, Priestley A (2011) Quantifying the links between water and energy in cities. J Water Clim Change 2(4):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kenway SJ, Scheidegger R, Larsen TA, Lant P, Bader HP (2013) Water-related energy in households: a model designed to understand the current state and simulate possible measures. Energy Build 58:378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Keys N, Bussey M, Thomsen DC, Lynam T, Smith TF (2013) Building adaptive capacity in South East Queensland, Australia. Reg Envir Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0394
  39. Kundzewicz ZW, Mata LJ, Arnell NW, Döll P, Kabat P, Jiménez B, Miller KA, Oki T, Sen Z, Shiklomanov IA (2007) Freshwater resources and their management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Lane J, Gardner E (2009) Life cycle assessment of water cycle alternatives, Water. Hallmark Editions, HamptonGoogle Scholar
  41. Lane J, Lant P (2012) Including N2O in ozone depletion models for LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(2):252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lane J, de Haas D, Lant P (2011) Life cycle assessment of the gold coast urban water system (technical report). South East Queensland Urban Water Security Research Alliance, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  43. Langford J, Briscoe J (2011) The Australian water project volume 1 crisis and opportunity lessons of Australian water reform. Committee for Economic Development of Australia, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  44. Laves G, Waterman P, James D, Barr D, Tunbridge A, Wood K, Noble E (2010) A sustainability assessment of a climate change adaptive urban development. University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy DownsGoogle Scholar
  45. Le Corre KS, Ort C, Kateley D, Allen B, Escher BI, Keller J (2012) Consumption-based approach for assessing the contribution of hospitals towards the load of pharmaceutical residues in municipal wastewater. Environ Int 45(1):99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macova M, Escher BI, Reungoat J, Carswell S, Lee Chue K, Keller J, Mueller JF (2010) Monitoring the biological activity of micropollutants during advanced wastewater treatment with ozonation and activated carbon filtration. Water Res 44(2):477–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maheepala S, Coultas E, Neumann L (2013) Quantification of regional scale water quantity and quality implications of domestic rainwater tanks in South East Queensland. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 104Google Scholar
  48. Marsh D (2008) The water-energy nexus: a comprehensive analysis in the context of New South Wales. Doctor of Philosophy (Engineering), University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  49. McAllister RRJ, McCrea R, Lubell M (2013) Policy networks, stakeholder interactions and climate adaptation in the region of South East Queensland, Australia. Reg Envir Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0489-4
  50. Nancarrow BE, Leviston Z, Tucker D, Po-Greenhill M, Price J, Dzidic P (2007) Community acceptability of the indirect potable use of purified recycled water in South East Queensland and preferences for alternative water sources: a baseline study. Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, CSIRO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  51. Nancarrow BE, Leviston Z, Tucker DI (2009) Measuring the predictors of communities’ behavioural decisions for potable reuse of wastewater. Water Sci Technol 60(12):3199–3209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ort C, Lawrence MG, Reungoat J, Eaglesham G, Carter S, Keller J (2010) Determining the fraction of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater originating from a hospital. Water Res 44(2):605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parsons B (2010) Concept design report: ridges at Peregian Springs integrated water cycle management schemes, prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff for Sunshine Coast Regional CouncilGoogle Scholar
  54. Patwardhan A, Downing T, Leary N, Wilbanks T (2009) Towards an integrated agenda for adaptation research: theory, practice and policy: strategy paper. Current Opin Environ Sustain 1(2):219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poulsen A, Chapman H, Leusch F, Escher B (2011) Application of bioanalytical tools for water quality assessment. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 41Google Scholar
  56. Price J, Fielding KS, Leviston Z (2012) Supporters and opponents of potable recycled water: culture and cognition in the Toowoomba referendum. Soc Nat Resour Int J 25(10):980–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quezada G, Grozev G, Seo S, Wang CH (2013) The challenge of adapting centralised electricity systems: Peak demand and maladaptation in South East Queensland, Australia. Reg Envir Chang. doi:  10.1007/s10113-013-0480-0
  58. QWC (Queensland Water Commission) (2010) South East Queensland Water Strategy, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  59. Reungoat J, Macova M, Escher BI, Carswell S, Mueller JF, Keller J (2010) Removal of micropollutants and reduction of biological activity in a full scale reclamation plant using ozonation and activated carbon filtration. Water Res 44(2):625–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reungoat J, Escher BI, Macova M, Argaud FX, Gernjak W, Keller J (2012) Ozonation and biological activated carbon filtration of wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res 46(3):863–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reyer C et al (2011) Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany, Regional Environmental Change (6 December 2011), pp 1–20Google Scholar
  62. Russell S, Fielding K (2010) Water demand management research: a psychological perspective. Water Resour Res 46:5Google Scholar
  63. Serrao-Neumann S, Crick F, Harman B, Sano MS, Sahin O, van Staden R, Schuch G, Baum S, Low Choy D (2013) Improving cross-sectoral climate change adaptation for coastal settlements: insights from South East Queensland, Australia. Reg Environ Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0442-6
  64. Sharma A, Burn S, Gardner T, Gregory A (2010) Role of decentralised systems in the transition of urban water systems. Water Sci Technol: Water Supply 10(4):577–583Google Scholar
  65. Sherman B, Ford P, Hall M, Udy J (2010) Methane emissions from little Nerang and Hinze Dams. In: Begbie DK, Wakem ASL (eds) Science forum and stakeholder engagement: building linkages, collaboration and science quality. Urban Water Security Research Alliance, Brisbane, p 73Google Scholar
  66. Sidhu JPS, Hodgers L, Ahmed W, Chong MN, Toze S (2012) Prevalence of human pathogens and indicators in stormwater runoff in Brisbane, Australia. Water Res 46(20):6652–6660Google Scholar
  67. Taylor BM, McAllister RRJ (2013) Bringing it all together—researcher dialogue to improve synthesis in regional climate adaptation in South East Queensland, Australia. Reg Envir Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0517-4
  68. Thomsen DC, Smith TF, Keys N (2012) Adaptation or manipulation? Unpacking climate change response strategies. Ecol Soc 17. doi:  10.5751/es-04953-170320
  69. Tompkins E et al (2010) Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society. Glob Environ Change 20(4):627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. UWSRA (Urban Water Security Research Alliance) (2010) Science forum and stakeholder engagement: building linkages, collaboration and science quality. In: Begbie DK, Wakem SL (eds) Urban Water Security Research Alliance, Brisbane Google Scholar
  71. UWSRA (Urban Water Security Research Alliance) (2011) Science forum and stakeholder engagement: building linkages, collaboration and science quality. In: Begbie DK, Wakem SL (eds) Urban Water Security Research Alliance, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  72. UWSRA (Urban Water Security Research Alliance) (2012) Science forum and stakeholder engagement: building linkages, collaboration and science quality. In: Begbie DK, Kenway SJ, Biermann SM, Wakem SL (eds) Urban Water Security Research Alliance, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Laves
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Kenway
    • 2
  • D. Begbie
    • 2
  • A. Roiko
    • 1
  • R. W. Carter
    • 3
  • P. Waterman
    • 3
  1. 1.Urban Research ProgramGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.Urban Water Security Research AllianceBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.University of the Sunshine CoastSunshine CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations