Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 1035–1048 | Cite as

Climate Adaptation Services for the Netherlands: an operational approach to support spatial adaptation planning

  • H. Goosen
  • M. A. M. de Groot-Reichwein
  • L. Masselink
  • A. Koekoek
  • R. Swart
  • J. Bessembinder
  • J. M. P. Witte
  • L. Stuyt
  • G. Blom-Zandstra
  • W. Immerzeel
Original Article

Abstract

There is a growing availability of climate change information, offered to scientists and policy makers through climate services. However, climate services are not well taken up by the policy-making and planning community. Climate services focus on primary impacts of climate change, e.g., the disclosure of precipitation and temperature data, and this seems insufficient in meeting their needs. In this paper, we argue that, in order to reach the spatial planning community, climate services should take on a wider perspective by translating climate data to policy-relevant indicators and by offering support in the design of adaptation strategies. We argue there should be more focus on translating consequences of climate change to land-use claims and subsequently discuss the validity, consequences and implications of these claims with stakeholders, so they can play a role in spatial planning processes where much of the climate adaptation takes place. The term Climate Adaptation Services is introduced as being a stepwise approach supporting the assessment of vulnerability in a wider perspective and include the design and appraisal of adaptation strategies in a multi-stakeholder setting. We developed the Climate Adaptation Atlas and the Climate Ateliers as tools within the Climate Adaptation Services approach to support decision-making and planning processes. In this paper, we describe the different steps of our approach and report how some of the challenges were addressed.

Keywords

Climate services Adaptation Spatial planning Climate impacts Visualisation 

References

  1. Al-Kodmany K (2001) Bridging the gap between technical and local knowledge: tools for promoting community-based planning and design. J Archit Plann Res 18(2):110–130Google Scholar
  2. Arciniegas G, Janssen R (2012) Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops. Landsc Urban Plann 107:332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertin J (1983) Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps. University of Wisconsin Press, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessembinder J (2009) Klimaatschetsboek nederland—het huidige en toekomstige klimaat. KNMI, De BiltGoogle Scholar
  5. Burch S, Sheppard SR, Shaw A, Flanders D (2010) Planning for climate change in a flood-prone community: municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools. J Flood Risk Manag 3(2):126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crampton JW (2001) Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization. Prog Hum Geogr 25(2):235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crampton JW, Krygier J (2005) An introduction to critical cartography. ACME Int E-J Crit Geogr 4(1):11–33Google Scholar
  8. De Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, Van Buuren A, Graveland J, de Groot RS, Kuikna PJ, Reinhard S, Roetter RP (2009) Adapting to climate change in the Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Change 95(1–2):23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiBiase D, MacEachren AM, Krygier JB, Reeves C (1992) Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 19(4):201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dockerty T, Lovett A, Sünnenberg G, Appleton K, Parry M (2005) Visualising the potential impacts of climate change on rural landscapes. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29(3):297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dühr S (2006) The visual language of spatial planning: exploring cartographic representations for spatial planning in Europe. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutton JA (2002) Opportunities and priorities in a new era for weather and climate services. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83(9):1303–1311Google Scholar
  13. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Change 106(2):327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75(3):301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goosen H (2006) Spatial water management: supporting participatory planning and decision making. Techne Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. Goosen H, Janssen R, Vermaat JE (2007) Decision support for participatory wetland decision-making. Ecol Eng 30(2):187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harley JB (1989) Deconstructing the map. Cartogr Int J Geogr Inf Geovis 26(2):1–20Google Scholar
  18. Harley JB (1990) Cartography, ethics and social theory. Cartogr Int J Geogr Inf Geovis 27(2):1–23Google Scholar
  19. Harrower M, Brewer C (2003) Colorbrewer. Org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. Cartogr J 40(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horn RE (1999) Information design: emergence of a new profession. In: Jacobson RE (ed) Information design, MIT press, Cambridge, pp 15–33Google Scholar
  21. Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurlimann AC, March AP (2012) The role of spatial planning in adapting to climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 3(5):477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobson R (2000) Information design. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Kazmierczak ET (2003) Design as meaning making: from making things to the design of thinking. Design Issues 19(2):45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keller PR, Keller MM (1993) Visual cues: practical data visualization. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CAGoogle Scholar
  26. KNMI (2011) Bosatlas van het klimaat. Noordhoff Uitgevers B.V, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  27. Mastrandrea MD, Heller NE, Root TL, Schneider SH (2010) Bridging the gap: linking climate-impacts research with adaptation planning and management. Clim Change 100(1):87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meinke H, Howden SM, Struik PC, Nelson R, Rodriguez D, Chapman SC (2009) Adaptation science for agriculture and natural resource management—urgency and theoretical basis. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(1):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moser SC, Luers AL (2008) Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change. Clim Change 87(1):309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parry ML (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, vol 4. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Pettit CJ, Raymond CM, Bryan BA, Lewis H (2011) Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives. Landsc Urban Plann 100(3):231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pickles J (1995) Ground truth: the social implications of geographic information systems. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Pittock A (2009) Climate change: the science, impacts and solutions. Csiro Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  34. Romsdahl RJ (2011) Decision support for climate change adaptation planning in the US: why it needs a coordinated internet-based practitioners’ network. Clim Change 106(4):507–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S (2009) Making local futures tangible: synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environ Change 19(4):447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swart R, Raes F (2007) Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? Clim Policy 7(4):288–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Termeer C, Dewulf A, van Rijswick H, van Buuren A, Huitema D, Meijerink S, Rayner T, Wiering M (2011) The regional governance of climate adaptation: a framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements. Clim Law 2(2):159–179Google Scholar
  38. Tjallingii, S. P. (1996). Ecological conditions: Strategies and structures in environmental planning Google Scholar
  39. Tufte ER (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CTGoogle Scholar
  40. Tufte ER (1991) Envisioning information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CTGoogle Scholar
  41. Tufte ER, Weise Moeller E (1997) Visual explanations: images and quantities, evidence and narrative. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CTGoogle Scholar
  42. US National Research Council (2009) Restructuring federal climate research to meet the challenges of climate change. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. van Ark R (2006) Planning, contract and commitment: Naar een relationeel perspectief op gebiedscontracten in de ruimtelijke planning. Eburon Uitgeverij BV, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Den Hurk B, Klein Tank A, Lenderink G, Van Ulden A, Van Oldenborgh GJ, Katsman C, Van den Brink H, Keller F, Bessembinder J, Burgers G (2006) KNMI climate change scenarios 2006 for the Netherlands. KNMI, De BiltGoogle Scholar
  45. Veregin H (1995) Developing and testing of an error propagation model for GIS overlay operations. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(6):595–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Visbeck M (2007) From climate assessment to climate services. Nat Geosci 1(1):2–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wardekker JA, de Jong A, Knoop JM, van der Sluijs JP (2010) Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(6):987–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Willows R, Reynard N, Meadowcroft I, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report, UK Climate Impacts ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wolfe JM, Horowitz TS (2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nat Rev Neurosci 5(6):495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wood D, Fels J (1992) The power of maps. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. World Meteorological Organization (2011) Climate knowledge for action: a global framework for climate services—empowering the most vulnerable (the report of the high-level taskforce for the global framework for climate services)Google Scholar
  53. Wurman RS (1989) Information anxiety: what to do when information doesn’t tell you what you want to know. Bantam Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Goosen
    • 1
  • M. A. M. de Groot-Reichwein
    • 1
  • L. Masselink
    • 2
  • A. Koekoek
    • 3
  • R. Swart
    • 1
  • J. Bessembinder
    • 4
  • J. M. P. Witte
    • 5
  • L. Stuyt
    • 1
  • G. Blom-Zandstra
    • 6
  • W. Immerzeel
    • 7
  1. 1.Alterra, Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Geodan B.VAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.KNMIDe BiltThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Vrije UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Plant Research InternationalWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  7. 7.FutureWaterWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations