Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 909–918 | Cite as

Climate proofing the Zuidplaspolder: a guiding model approach to climate adaptation

  • M. A. M. de Groot-Reichwein
  • H. Goosen
  • M. G. N. van Steekelenburg
Original Article

Abstract

Climate change will have an impact on various sectors, such as housing, infrastructure, recreation and agriculture. Climate change may change spatial demands. For example, rising temperatures will increase the need for recreation areas, and areas could be assigned for water storage. There is a growing sense that, especially at the local scale, spatial planning has a key role in addressing the causes and impacts of climate change. This paper promotes an approach to help translate information on climate change impacts into a guiding model for adaptive spatial planning. We describe how guiding models can be used in designing integrated adaptation strategies. The concept of guiding models has been developed in the 1990s by Tjallingii to translate the principles of integrated water management in urban planning. We have integrated information about the present and future climate change and set up a climate adaptation guiding model approach. Making use of climate adaptation guiding models, spatial planners should be able to better cope with complexities of climate change impacts and be able to translate these to implications for spatial planning. The climate adaptation guiding model approach was first applied in the Zuidplaspolder case study, one of the first major attempts in the Netherlands to develop and implement an integrated adaptation strategy. This paper demonstrates how the construction of climate adaptation guiding models requires a participatory approach and how the use of climate adaptation guiding models can contribute to the information needs of spatial planners at the local scale, leading to an increasing sense of urgency and integrated adaptation planning process.

Keywords

Climate change Adaptation Spatial planning Guiding models Participative approach 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was performed by Xplorelab, a laboratory for innovative learning and working established in 2007 as a unit within the council’s Green Space, Water and Environment division of the province of South Holland. The project was funded by the Dutch National Research Program “Climate changes Spatial Planning”. We would like to thank all the consortium partners involved. The comments by two anonymous reviewers were also gratefully received.

References

  1. Aalbers C, Jonkhof J, Klerkx J (2003) Plannen met principes: S2N, de strategie van de twee netwerken revisited= planning on principle: S2N, the strategy of the two networks revisited. ÆneasGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Kodmany K (2001) Bridging the gap between technical and local knowledge: tools for promoting community-based planning and design. J Archit Plann Res 18(2):110–130Google Scholar
  5. Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, van der Knaap WG (2009) The mitigation–adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat Int 33(3):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkmann J, Fleischhauer M (2009) Anpassungsstrategien der raumentwicklung an den klimawandel: climate proofing - konturen eines neuen instruments. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung 67(2):114–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burch S, Sheppard SR, Shaw A, Flanders D (2010) Planning for climate change in a flood-prone community: municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools. J Flood Risk Manag 3(2):126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dauvellier Planadvies (2003a) MIRUP: Handreiking voor milieu in ruimtelijke plannen. Stadsgewest HaaglandenGoogle Scholar
  9. Davoudi S, Crawford J, Mehmood A (2009) Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. de Boer J, Wardekker JA, Sluijs JPVD (2010) Frame-based guide to situated decision-making on climate change. Glob Environ Chang Part A 20(3):502–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, Van Buuren A, Graveland J, de Groot RS, Kuikman PJ, Reinhard S, Roetter RP (2009) Adapting to climate change in the Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Chang 95(1–2):23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Jong TM, van der Voordt DJM (2002) Ways to study and research: urban, architectural, and technical design. IOS Press, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Deltacommissie (2008) Samen werken met water - een land dat leeft, bouwt aan zijn toekomst. Den haag, p 134Google Scholar
  14. Dockerty T, Lovett A, Sünnenberg G, Appleton K, Parry M (2005) Visualising the potential impacts of climate change on rural landscapes. Comput Environ Urban Syst 29(3):297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faludi A, van der Valk AJ (1994) Rule and order: Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. The Geojournal Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Chang 106(2):327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75(3):301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gasparatos A, El-Haram M, Horner M (2008) A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(4):286–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kabat P, van Vierssen W, Veraart J, Vellinga P, Aerts J (2005) Climate proofing the Netherlands. Nature 438(7066):283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein RJ, Nicholls RJ, Mimura N (1999) Coastal adaptation to climate change: can the IPCC technical guidelines be applied? Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 4(3–4):239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein RJ, Huq S, Denton F, Downing TE, Richels RG, Robinson JB, Toth FL (2007) Inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof PJ, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 745–777Google Scholar
  22. Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I, Malone E, Huq S (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies, and measures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Meeus J (2000) How the Dutch city of Tilburg gets to the roots of the agricultural ‘kampen’ landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 48(3):177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meinke H, Nelson R, Kokic P, Stone R, Selvaraju R, Baethgen W (2006) Actionable climate knowledge: from analysis to synthesis. Clim Res 33(1):101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Housing (2002) Making space, sharing space. Fifth memorandum on spatial planning. The HagueGoogle Scholar
  26. Ministerie van VROM, LNV, VenW en EZ (2004) Nota ruimte: Ruimte voor ontwikkeling. Den Haag: SDU UitgeversGoogle Scholar
  27. Munda G (2006) Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23(1):86–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parry ML (2007) Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Pettit CJ, Raymond CM, Bryan BA, Lewis H (2011) Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visualisation for effective communication of future alternatives. Landsc Urban Planning 100(3):231–241Google Scholar
  30. Pijnappels MHJ, Seedee AGJ (2010) Klimaat als kans. Kennis voor KlimaatGoogle Scholar
  31. Runhaar H, Mees H, Wardekker A, van der Sluijs J, Driessen PP (2012) Adaptation to climate change-related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers. Reg Environ Chang 12(4):777–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schrijnen PM (2000) Infrastructure networks and red–green patterns in city regions. Landsc Urban Plan 48(3):191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S (2009) Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Chang 19(4):447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smit B, Pilifosova O (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. Sustain Dev 8(9):9Google Scholar
  35. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sociaal-Economische Raad (2001) Recommendations on the Fifth Policy Document on Spatial Planning (Advies over de Vijfde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening 2000/2020). Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  37. Swart R, Raes F (2007) Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? Clim Policy 7(4):288–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tjallingii SP (1996) Ecological conditions: strategies and structures in environmental planning, IBN-DLO, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  39. Tjallingii SP (2000) Ecology on the edge: landscape and ecology between town and country. Landsc Urban Plan 48(3):103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tjallingii SP (2011) Synergie in stromenbeheer: Meekoppeling van water met andere stromen bij klimaatadaptatie in de stadGoogle Scholar
  41. van de Ven M, Tjallingii S, Baan P, van Eijk P, Rijsberman M (2005) Water in drievoud: Benaderingen voor stedelijke waterplannen. Eburon Uitgeverij BVGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Den Hurk B, Klein Tank A, Lenderink G, Van Ulden A, Van Oldenborgh GJ, Katsman C, Van den Brink H, Keller F, Bessembinder J, Burgers G (2006) KNMI climate change scenarios 2006 for the Netherlands. KNMI De BiltGoogle Scholar
  43. van Drunen M, Leusink A, Lasage R (2009) Towards a climate-proof Netherlands. In: Biswas AK, Tortajada C, Izquierdo R (eds) Water management in 2020 and beyond. Springer, Berlin, pp 165–194Google Scholar
  44. Willows R, Reynard N, Meadowcroft I, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report. UK Climate Impacts ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilson E (2006) Adapting to climate change at the local level: the spatial planning response. Local Environ 11(6):609–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. M. de Groot-Reichwein
    • 1
  • H. Goosen
    • 1
  • M. G. N. van Steekelenburg
    • 2
  1. 1.Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.XplorelabThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations