Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 1119–1129 | Cite as

On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation

  • G. Robbert Biesbroek
  • Judith E. M. Klostermann
  • Catrien J. A. M. Termeer
  • Pavel Kabat
Original Article

Abstract

Considerable barriers can emerge in developing and implementing climate change adaptation strategies. Understanding the nature of barriers to adaptation is important so as to find strategic ways of dealing with them. However, our current understanding is limited and highly fragmented across the academic community. This paper aims to bring some conceptual convergence in these debates by applying a systematic review method to assess the current state of knowledge on barriers to adaptation in the peer-reviewed literature. The review results show that: (1) Barriers to adaptation have hardly been defined in the literature and no clear indicators exist so as to identify and assess them systematically. (2) An impressive number of barriers have been reported, but the list of possible barriers is seemingly endless. (3) The most frequently reported barriers relate to the institutional and social dimensions of adaptation. (4) Barriers are identified as configurations of climate and non-climate factors and conditions that emerge from the actor, the governance system, or the system of concern. (5) Barriers are mainly studied in developed countries with a strong focus on water-related domains. (6) The majority of studies on barriers use small-n inductive case approaches while comparative studies across different contexts are limited. (7) Although interventions to overcome barriers are recommended by most studies, empirical studies on interventions are scarce. We present further conceptual clarification and a more precise definition of barriers to adaptation. We conclude that future research should go beyond asking the questions ‘if’ and ‘which’ barriers to adaptation exist and begin asking ‘how’ and ‘why’ barriers emerge.

Keywords

Barriers to adaptation Climate change adaptation Systematic literature review 

Supplementary material

10113_2013_421_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (161 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 160 kb)

References

  1. Adger WN (2000) Institutional adaptation to environmental risk under the transition in Vietnam. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:738–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Barnett J (2009) Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change. Environ Plan A 41:2800–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743Google Scholar
  5. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009a) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) (2009b) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values and governance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Amundsen H, Berglund F, Westskogh H (2010) Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation-a question of multilevel governance? Environ Plan C 28:276–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnett J (2010) Adapting to climate change: three key challenges for research and policy—an editorial essay. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1:314–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnett J, O’Neill S (2010) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Change 20:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Change 21:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Mela H, Morecroft MD, Rey D (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Change 20:440–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boer H (2010) Policy options for, and constraints on, effective adaptation for rivers and wetlands in northeast Queensland. Aust J Environ Manag 17:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown RR, Farrelly MA (2009) Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face. Water Sci Technol 59:839–846Google Scholar
  14. Bunce M, Brown K, Rosendo S (2010) Policy misfits, climate change and cross-scale vulnerability in coastal Africa: how development projects undermine resilience. Environ Sci Policy 13:485–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burch S (2010a) In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 38:7575–7585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burch S (2010b) Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Change 20:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Checkland K, Harrison S, Marshall M (2007) Is the metaphor of ‘barriers to change’ useful in understanding implementation? Evidence from general medical practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 12:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crabbé P, Robin M (2006) Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in, Eastern Ontario. Clim Change 78:103–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doria MdF, Boyd E, Tompkins EL, Adger WN (2009) Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change. Environ Sci Policy 12:810–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dovers SR, Hezri AA (2010) Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1:212–231Google Scholar
  21. Dupuis J, Biesbroek GR (2012) The dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies in Western European Countries. Second Nordic International Conference on climate change adaptation, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisenack K, Stecker R (2012) A framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 17:243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekstrom JA, Moser SC, Torn M (2011) Barriers to adaptation: a diagnostic framework. Final Project Report for the California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  24. Eriksen S, Lind J (2009) Adaptation as a political process: adjusting to drought and conflict in Kenya’s Drylands. Environ Manag 43:817–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esbjörn-Hargens S (2010) An ontology of climate change integral pluralism and the enactment of multiple objects. J Integral Theory Pract 5:143–174Google Scholar
  26. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Falaleeva M, O’Mahony C, Gray S, Desmond M, Gault J, Cummins V (2011) Towards climate adaptation and coastal governance in Ireland: integrated architecture for effective management? Marine Policy 35:784–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ford JD, Pearce T (2010) What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: a systematic literature review. Environ Res Lett 5(1):014008. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014008 Google Scholar
  29. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, King M, Furgal C (2010a) Vulnerability of aboriginal health systems in Canada to climate change. Glob Enviro Change 20:668–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford JD, Keskitalo ECH, Smith T, Pearce T, Berrang-Ford L, Duerden F, Smit B (2010b) Case study and analogue methodologies in climate change vulnerability research. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1:374–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Change 106:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fünfgeld H (2010) Institutional challenges to climate risk management in cities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gifford R, Kormos C, McIntyre A (2011) Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 2:801–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glaas E, Jonsson A, Hjerpe M, Andersson-Sköld Y (2010) Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environ 15:525–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goggin ML (1986) The “Too Few Cases/Too Many Variables” problem in implementation research. West Polit Q 39:328–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamlet AF (2010) Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest Region of North America. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 7:4437–4471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Head L (2010) Cultural ecology: adaptation—retrofitting a concept? Prog Hum Geogr 34:234–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang C, Vaneckova P, Wang X, Fitzgerald G, Guo Y, Tong S (2011) Constraints and barriers to public health adaptation to climate change: a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 40:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IPCC (ed) (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 976Google Scholar
  40. Jantarasami LC, Lawler JJ, Thomas CW (2010) Institutional barriers to climate change adaptation in U.S. National Parks and Forests. Ecol Soc 15:33Google Scholar
  41. Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory Cult Soc 27:233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Glob Environ Change 21:1262–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lesnikowski AC, Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson JA, Barrera M, Heymann SJ (2011) Adapting to health impacts of climate change: a study of UNFCCC Annex I parties. Environ Res Lett 6:044009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lebel L, Manuta JB, Garden P (2011) Institutional traps and vulnerability to changes in climate and flood regimes in Thailand. Reg Environ Change 11(1):45–58Google Scholar
  45. Marsh D, McConnell A (2010) Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Adm 88:564–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McConnell A (2010) Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. J Public Policy 30:345–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McNeeley SM (2012) Examining barriers and opportunities for sustainable adaptation to climate change in interior Alaska. Clim Change 111:835–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Measham T, Preston B, Smith T, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 16:889–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moser SC (2010) Now more than ever: the need for more societally relevant research on vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Appl Geogr 30:464–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22026–22031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mozumder P, Flugman E, Randhir T (2011) Adaptation behavior in the face of global climate change: survey responses from experts and decision makers serving the Florida Keys. Ocean Coast Manag 54:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Næss LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nielsen JØ, Reenberg A (2010) Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: a case study from Northern Burkina Faso. Glob Environ Change 20:142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Brien K, Hochachka G (2010) Integral adaptation to climate change. J Integral Theory Pract 5:89–102Google Scholar
  55. O’Brien K (2009) Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 164–180Google Scholar
  56. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Sygna L, Naess LO (2006) Questioning complacency: climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. Ambio 35:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88Google Scholar
  58. O’Toole LJJ (1986) Policy recommendations for multi-actor implementation: an assessment of the field. J Public Policy 6:181–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell Publishing, MaldenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rijke J, Brown R, Zevenbergen C, Ashley R, Farrelly M, Morison P, van Herk S (2012) Fit-for-purpose governance: a framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environ Sci Policy 22:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Storbjörk S (2010) ‘It takes more to get a ship to change course’: barriers for organizational learning and local climate adaptation in Sweden. J Environ Plan Policy Manag 12:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Storbjörk S, Hedrén J (2011) Institutional capacity-building for targeting sea-level rise in the climate adaptation of Swedish coastal zone management. Lessons from Coastby. Ocean Coast Manag 54:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sutton SG, Tobin RC (2011) Constraints on community engagement with Great Barrier Reef climate change reduction and mitigation. Glob Environ Change 21:894–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tompkins EL, Adger WN, Boyd E, Nicholson-Cole S, Weatherhead K, Arnell N (2010) Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society. Glob Environ Change 20:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tryhorn LM, Lynch AH (2010) Climate change adaptation in the Alpine Shire of Australia: a decision process appraisal. Policy Sci 43:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Robbert Biesbroek
    • 1
    • 2
  • Judith E. M. Klostermann
    • 3
  • Catrien J. A. M. Termeer
    • 2
  • Pavel Kabat
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Earth System Science GroupWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Public Administration and Policy GroupWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.AlterraWageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)LaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations