Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 897–909 | Cite as

What motivates coastal households to adapt pro-actively to sea-level rise and increasing flood risk?

  • Jana KoerthEmail author
  • Athanasios T. Vafeidis
  • Jochen Hinkel
  • Horst Sterr
Original Article

Abstract

Individuals are able to contribute in reducing vulnerability to climate change and extreme events. This study addresses the question of what motivates coastal dwellers to adapt proactively to rising sea-levels and associated flood events. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey that was carried out in Germany and Denmark. Two elements based on variables of the Protection Motivation Theory were constructed, which depict the perceptions of flood risk and household-level adaptation. In addition, individual and residence-related characteristics were included. First, descriptive statistical analysis on adaptation behaviour and the two elements was conducted. Then, multiple regression analysis was applied to determine which variables influence the total number of implemented adaptation measures. Finally, the implementation of single adaptation measures was investigated using binary logistic regression analysis. Results indicate that personal experience is the main explanatory factor for adaptation behaviour while cognitive variables and personal history are also important. The independent variables that we used can, to a large extent, predict the implementation of measures that require small investments in terms of efforts and costs. However, the implementation of high-investment measures cannot be explained based on these variables. Our findings suggest that risk communication in coastal management should also integrate variables related to adaptation behaviour, and further research is needed to better understand the implementation of high-investment adaptation measures.

Keywords

Household-level adaptation Coastal flooding Protection Motivation Theory Self-efficacy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded by the Cluster of Excellence 80 “The Future Ocean”. “The Future Ocean” is funded within the framework of the Excellence Initiative by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) on behalf of the German federal and state governments. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which have helped in improving the manuscript.

References

  1. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tomkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93(3–4):335–354. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett J, O′Neill S (2010) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Change 20:211–213. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassett SF, Prapavessis H (2011) A test of an adherence-enhancing adjunct to physiotherapy steeped in the Protection Motivation Theory. Physiother Theory Pract 27(5):360–372. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2010.507238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botzen WJW, Aerts JCJH, van den Bergh JCJM (2012) Individual preferences for reducing flood risk to near zero through elevation. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, Published online. doi: 10.1007/s11027-012-9359-5
  6. Cismaru M, Cismaru R, Ono T, Nelson K (2011) “Act on Climate Change”: an application of Protection Motivation Theory. Soc Mark Q 17(3):62–84. doi: 10.1080/15245004.2011.595539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW (2000) A meta-analysis of research on Protection Motivation Theory. J App Soc Psychol 30:407–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friesinger S, Bernatchez P (2010) Perceptions of Gulf of St. Lawrence coastal communities confronting environmental change: hazards and adaptation, Québec, Canada. Ocean Coast Manag 53:669–678. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaston A, Prapavessis H (2009) Maternal-fetal disease information as a source of exercise motivation during pregnancy. Health Psychol 28(6):726–733. doi: 10.1037/a0016702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall PA, Fong GT, Epp LJ, Elias LJ (2008) Executive function moderates the intention behaviour link for physical activity and dietary behaviour. Psychol Health 23(3):309–326. doi: 10.1080/14768320701212099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helmes A (2002) Application of the Protection Motivation Theory to genetic testing for breast cancer risk. Prev Med 35:453–462. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hinkel J, Nicholls RJ, Vafeidis AT, Tol RSJ, Avagianou T (2010) Assessing risk of and adaptation to sea-level rise in the European Union: an application of DIVA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15(7):703–719. doi: 10.1007/s11027-010-9237-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howe PD (2011) Hurricane preparedness as anticipatory adaptation: a case study of community businesses. Glob Environ Change 21(2):711–720. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.02.001
  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Kellens W, Zaalberg R, Neutens T, Vanneuville W, De Maeyer P (2011) An analysis of the public perception of flood risk on the Belgian Coast. Risk Anal 31(7):1055–1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koerth J, Vafeidis AT, Sterr H, Hinkel J, Daschkeit A, Carretero S (2012) Anticipatory adaptation: how are coastal dwellers preparing for sea-level rise and climate-related changes in storm surges? Working paperGoogle Scholar
  18. Maddux JE, Rogers RW (1983) Protection motivation and self-efficacy: a revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Exp Soc Psychol 19(5):469–479. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McClendon BT, Prentice-Dunn S (2001) Reducing skin cancer risk: an intervention based on Protection Motivation Theory. J Health Psychol 6(3):321–328. doi: 10.1177/135910530100600305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health related behavior: a meta-analytic review of Protection-Motivation Theory. J Appl Psychol 30:106–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x Google Scholar
  21. Nicholls R, Cazenave A (2010) Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328:1517–1520. doi: 10.1126/science.1185782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Norman P, Searle A, Harrad R, Vedhara K (2003) Predicting adherence to eye patching in children with amblyopia: an application of Protection Motivation Theory. Br J Health Psychol 8(1):67–82. doi: 10.1348/135910703762879219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Otto-Banaszak I, Matczak P, Wesseler J, Wechsung F (2010) Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: a mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert interviews. Reg Environ Change 11:217–228. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0144-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Peacock WG, Brody SD, Highfield W (2005) Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida′s single family homeowners. Landsc Urban Plann 73:120–135. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Trinh L, Courneya KS, Birkett N, Sigal RJ (2010) Protection Motivation Theory and the prediction of physical activity among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in a large population sample. Br J Health Psychol 15(2):643–661. doi: 10.1348/135910709X478826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rahmstorf S, Cazenave A, Church JA, Hansen JE, Keeling RF, Parker DE, Somerville RCJ (2007) Recent climate observations compared to projections. Science 316(5825):709. doi: 10.1126/science.1136843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers RW (1975) Protection Motivation Theory of fear appeals and attitude change. J Psychol 91:93–114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers RW (1983) Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. In: Cacioppo JR, Petty RE (eds) Social psychophysiology: a sourcebook. Guilford Press, New York, pp 153–176Google Scholar
  29. Stewart AE (2009) Psychological perspectives on adaptation to weather and climate. In: Ebi KL, Burton I, McGregor GR (eds) Biometeorology for adaptation to climate variability and change, vol 1, no. 1, pp 211–232. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8921-3
  30. Terpstra T (2011) Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behaviour. Risk Anal 31(10):1658–1675. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Terpstra T, Gutteling JM, Geldorf GD, Kappe B (2005) The perception of flood risk and water nuisance. In: 45th European congress of the regional science association, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 23–27 Aug 2005. http://www.feweb.vu.nl/ersa2005/final_papers/760.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2012
  32. Tol RS, Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (2008) Towards successful adaptation to sea-level rise along Europe’s coasts. J Coast Res 24(2):432–442. doi: 10.2112/07A-0016.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Webb TL, Sheeran P (2006) Does changing behavioural intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 132(2):249–268. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Koerth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Athanasios T. Vafeidis
    • 1
  • Jochen Hinkel
    • 2
    • 3
  • Horst Sterr
    • 1
  1. 1.“Coastal Risks and Sea-Level Rise” Research Group, Future Ocean Excellence Cluster, Department of GeographyChristian-Albrechts-University KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)PotsdamGermany
  3. 3.European Climate Forum e.V. (ECF)Research Process: Adaptation and Social LearningPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations