Climate downscaling effects on predictive ecological models: a case study for threatened and endangered vertebrates in the southeastern United States
- 335 Downloads
High-resolution (downscaled) projections of future climate conditions are critical inputs to a wide variety of ecological and socioeconomic models and are created using numerous different approaches. Here, we conduct a sensitivity analysis of spatial predictions from climate envelope models for threatened and endangered vertebrates in the southeastern United States to determine whether two different downscaling approaches (with and without the use of a regional climate model) affect climate envelope model predictions when all other sources of variation are held constant. We found that prediction maps differed spatially between downscaling approaches and that the variation attributable to downscaling technique was comparable to variation between maps generated using different general circulation models (GCMs). Precipitation variables tended to show greater discrepancies between downscaling techniques than temperature variables, and for one GCM, there was evidence that more poorly resolved precipitation variables contributed relatively more to model uncertainty than more well-resolved variables. Our work suggests that ecological modelers requiring high-resolution climate projections should carefully consider the type of downscaling applied to the climate projections prior to their use in predictive ecological modeling. The uncertainty associated with alternative downscaling methods may rival that of other, more widely appreciated sources of variation, such as the general circulation model or emissions scenario with which future climate projections are created.
KeywordsClimate change Climate envelope model Downscaling Species distribution model Florida Endangered species
We thank Lydia Stefanova at COAPS for assisting us with the dynamically downscaled (CLAREnCE10) projections and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Funding for this work was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service (Everglades and Dry Tortugas National Parks) through the South Florida and Caribbean Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, and the U.S. Geological Survey (Greater Everglades Priority Ecosystems Science). Views expressed here do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Use of trade, product, or firm names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
- Cahill AE, Aiello-Lammens ME, Fisher-Reid MC, Hua X, Karanewsky CJ, Ryu HY, Sbeglia GC, Spagnolo F, Waldron JB, Warsi O, Wiens JJ (2012) How does climate change cause extinction? Proc R Soc B, published online 17 Oct 2012. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1890
- Franklin J (2009) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Graham CH, Loiselle BA, Velásquez-Tibatá J, Cuesta FC (2011) Species distribution modeling and the challenge of predicting future distributions. In: Herzog SK, Martínez R, Jørgensen PM, Tiessen H (ed) Climate change and biodiversity in the Tropical Andes, Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment. São José dos Campos, Brazil, pp 295–310. http://www.iai.int
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 433–498Google Scholar
- Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2(3):18–22Google Scholar
- Maraun D, Wetterhall H, Ireson AM, Chandler RE, Kendon EJ, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust HW, Sauter T, Themeßl M, Venema VKC, Chun KP, Goodess CM, Jones RG, Onof C, Vrac M, Thiele-Eich I (2010) Precipitation downscaling under climate change: recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user. Rev Geophys 48:RG3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramirez J, Jarvis A (2008) High resolution statistically downscaled future climate surfaces, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Cali, Colombia. http://www.ccafs-climate.org/statistical_downscaling_delta
- Real R, Márquez AL, Olivero J, Estrada A (2010) Species distribution models in climate change scenarios are still not useful for informing policy planning: an uncertainty assessment using fuzzy logic. Ecography 33:304–314Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org
- Wilby RL, Fowler HJ (2010) Regional climate downscaling. In: Fung F, Lopez A, New M (eds) Modelling the impact of climate change on water resources. Wiley, Chichester, pp 34–85Google Scholar