Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 437–447 | Cite as

Determinants of adaptation practices to climate change by Chepang households in the rural Mid-Hills of Nepal

  • Luni Piya
  • Keshav Lall Maharjan
  • Niraj Prakash Joshi
Original Article


This study analyzes the factors influencing the adoption of various adaptation practices by a highly marginalized indigenous community in the remote rural Mid-Hills of Nepal. The analysis is based on a household survey conducted among 221 Chepang households selected randomly. A multivariate probit model was used to analyze five categories of adaptation choices against a set of socio-economic, institutional, infrastructural, and perception variables. Perception of rainfall changes, size of landholding, status of land tenure, distance to motor road, access to productive credit, information, extension services, and skill development trainings are all influential to enable households to deviate away from traditional coping strategies and adopt suitable practices to adapt to climate vagaries. Policies and development activities should be geared to address these determinants in order to facilitate adaptation.


Adaptation choices Climate change and extremes Chepang Multivariate probit 



The authors acknowledge the Global Environmental Leaders (GELs) Education Program for Designing a Low-Carbon World, and the Hiroshima International Center for Environmental Cooperation (HICEC) at the Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC), Hiroshima University, Japan, for providing research grant to conduct this study. We also owe thanks to Nepal Chepang Association (NCA) for facilitating the fieldwork and all the respondents for their cooperation. Finally, the authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments to improve the paper.


  1. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27(2):249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Agrawal S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp 717–743Google Scholar
  3. Barbier B, Yacouba H, Karambiri H, Zoromé M (2009) Human vulnerability to climate variability in the Sahel: farmers’ adaptation strategies in northern Burkina Faso. Environ Manag 43:790–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Below TB, Mutabazi KD, Kirschke D, Franke C, Sieber S, Siebert R, Tscherning K (2012) Can farmers’ adaptation to climate change be explained by socio-economic household-level variables? Glob Env Chang 22:223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouma DJ, Chu EKW, Mack CB, Parry PA (2009) Institutional capacity and market accessibility as determinants of the effectiveness of climate change adaptation strategies. University of Michigan, The case of three middle-hill communities in NepalGoogle Scholar
  6. Cappellari L, Jenkins SP (2003) Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood. The Stata J 3(3):278–294Google Scholar
  7. Deressa TT, Hassan RM, Ringler C, Alemu T, Yesuf M (2009) Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. Glob Env Chang 19:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deressa TT, Hassan RM, Ringler C (2011) Perception of and adaptation to climate change by farmers in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. J Agric Sci 149:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. FORWARD (2001) Formulation of a comprehensive Praja development programme, Part II, program development. Prepared for ministry of local development, Kathmandu, and SNV-Nepal. Forum for rural welfare and agricultural reform for development, Chitwan, NepalGoogle Scholar
  10. Gbetibouo GA (2009) Understanding farmers’ perceptions and adaptations to climate change and variability. The case of the Limpopo basin, South Africa. IFPRI discussion paper 00849. International food policy research institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Golob TF, Regan AC (2002) Trucking industry adoption of information technology: a structural multivariate discrete choice model. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol 10:205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hassan R, Nhemachena C (2008) Determinants of African farmers’ strategies for adapting to climate change: multinomial choice analysis. Afr J Agric Resour Econ 2(1):83–104Google Scholar
  13. Hodgson BH (1874) On the Chepang and Kusunda tribes of Nepal. In: Essays on the languages, literature and religion of Nepal and Tibet. Manjushri Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 45–54Google Scholar
  14. Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Glob Environ Chang 21:1262–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurukulasuriya P, Mendelsohn R (2008) Crop switching as a strategy for adapting to climate change. Afric J Agric Resour Econ 2(1):105–126Google Scholar
  16. Maddison D (2007) The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. Policy research working paper 4308. The World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Maharjan KL, Piya L, Joshi NP (2010) Annual subsistence cycle of Chepangs in the Mid-Hills of Nepal: an integration of farming and gathering. Himal J Sociol Anthr 4:105–133Google Scholar
  18. Mertz O, Halsnæs K, Olesen JE, Rasmussen K (2009a) Adaptation to climate change in developing countries. Environ Manag 43:743–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mertz O, Mbow C, Reenberg A, Diouf A (2009b) Farmers’ perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation strategies in rural Sahel. Environ Manag 43:804–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nhemachena C, Hassan R (2007) Micro-level analysis of farmers’ adaptation to climate change in southern Africa. IFPRI discussion paper 00714. International food policy research institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  21. NIRS (2006) Socio-economic status of indigenous peoples (based on Nepal living standards survey—2003/04 data set). Nepal integrated research system pvt. ltd., KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  22. Onta N, Resurreccion BP (2011) The role of gender and caste in climate adaptation strategies in Nepal. Mt Res Dev 31(4):351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piya L (2012) Vulnerability, impact, and adaptation to climate change: livelihoods of Chepang community in the rural Mid-Hills of Nepal. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Hiroshima University, HiroshimaGoogle Scholar
  24. Piya L, Maharjan KL, Joshi NP (2011a) Forest and food security of indigenous people: a case of Chepangs in Nepal. J Int Dev Coop 17(1):113–135Google Scholar
  25. Piya L, Maharjan KL, Joshi NP (2011b) Livelihood strategies of indigenous nationalities in Nepal: a case of Chepangs. J Int Dev Coop 17(2):99–114Google Scholar
  26. Piya L, Maharjan KL, Joshi NP (2012a) Perceptions and realities of climate change among the Chepang communities in rural Mid-Hills of Nepal. J Contemp India Stud: Space Soc 2:35–50Google Scholar
  27. Piya L, Maharjan KL, Joshi NP (2012b) Comparison of adaptive capacity and adaptation practices in response to climate change and extremes among the Chepang households in rural Mid-Hills of Nepal. J Int Dev Coop 18(4):55–75Google Scholar
  28. Rai NK (1985) People of the stones: The Chepangs of central Nepal. Centre for Nepal and Asian studies, Tribhuvan University, KirtipurGoogle Scholar
  29. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2006) Climate change adaptation in Africa: a microeconomic analysis of livestock choice. CEEPA discussion paper No. 19. Center for environmental economics and policy in Africa, University of PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  30. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008a) An analysis of crop choice: adapting to climate change in South American farms. Ecol Econ 67:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R (2008b) Animal husbandry in Africa: climate change impacts and adaptations. Afric J Agric Res Econ 2(1):65–82Google Scholar
  32. Seo SN, Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Kurukulasuriya P (2009) Adapting to climate change mosaically: an analysis of African livestock management by agro-ecological zones. The B.E. J Econ. Policy 9(2):1–35Google Scholar
  33. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Env Chang 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabet A (2007) Bayesian inference in the multivariate probit model. The University of British Columbia, Estimation of the Correlation Matrix. DissertationGoogle Scholar
  35. UNFCCC (2009) Climate change: impacts, vulnerabilities and adaptation in developing countries. Retrieved 24 Feb 2011, from
  36. Wall E, Smit B (2005) Climate change adaptation in light of sustainable agriculture. J Sustain Agric 27(1):113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wooldridge JM (2006) Introductory econometrics, A modern approach. Thomson South Western, Mason, OHGoogle Scholar
  38. Young G, Valdez EA, Kohn R (2009) Multivariate probit models for conditional claim-types. Insur Math Econ 44:214–228Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luni Piya
    • 1
  • Keshav Lall Maharjan
    • 1
  • Niraj Prakash Joshi
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School for International Development and CooperationHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations