Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 399–411 | Cite as

Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies

  • Caroline J. Uittenbroek
  • Leonie B. Janssen-Jansen
  • Hens A. C. Runhaar
Original Article

Abstract

With cities facing climate change, climate adaptation is necessary to reduce risks such as heat stress and flooding and maintain the goals of sustainable urban development. In climate change literature, the focus has been on developing a new dedicated policy domain for climate adaptation. Yet, empirical evidence shows that in practice actors are searching for solutions that not only serve climate adaptation, but integrate the adaptation objective in existing policy domains (e.g., urban planning, water management, public health). The integration of adaptation in other policy domains, also called “mainstreaming climate adaptation,” can stimulate the effectiveness of policy making through combining objectives, increase efficient use of human and financial resources and ensure long-term sustainable investments. A better understanding of the process of mainstreaming is, however, lacking. The article introduces a conceptual model for mainstreaming climate adaptation to enhance our understanding of the concept as well as the barriers and opportunities that influence these integration processes and to explore strategies for overcoming barriers and creating opportunities. Two Dutch case studies—related to urban planning—are used to illustrate the value of the model. The cases demonstrate the dynamic process of mainstreaming and raise discussion of the appropriate criteria for evaluating mainstreaming in relation to the aims of climate adaptation. The paper concludes with an exploration of specific strategies to facilitate the mainstreaming of adaptation in existing and new policy domains.

Keywords

Urban planning Climate adaptation Mainstreaming The Netherlands Policy process 

References

  1. Adger N, Barnett J (2009) Four reasons for concern about adaptation to climate change commentary. Environ PlanA 41(12):2800–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger N, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. CR Geoscience 337:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, OBrien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Hanson CE, van der Linden PJ (eds) Climate change 2007 impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 719–743Google Scholar
  4. Adger N, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson D, Neass A, Woolf J, Wrefold A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93(3):335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bassett E, Shandas V (2010) Innovation and climate action planning. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):435–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bedsworth L, Hanak E (2010) California transportation: planning for a better future. Public Policy Institute of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Change 21(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, van der Knaap WGM (2009) The mitigation–adaptation dichotomy and the role of spatial planning. Habitat Int 33(3):230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanco H, Alberti M, Forsyth A, Krizek K, Rodrígues D, Talen E, Ellis C (2009) Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: emerging research agendas in planning. Prog in Plan 71(4):153–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouwer L, Aerts J (2006) Financing climate change adaptation. Disasters 30(1):49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulkeley H (2009) Planning and governance of climate change. In: Davoudi S, Crawford J, Mehmood A (eds) Planning for climate change. Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. Earthscan, London, pp 284–296Google Scholar
  12. Bulkeley H (2010) Cities and the governing of climate change. Annu Rev Environ Res 35(1):229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CROW (2010) Aanpassen openbare ruimte aan klimaatverandering. Gemeenten aan de slag met klimaatadaptatie. CROW, EdeGoogle Scholar
  14. Faludi A (2000) The performance of spatial planning. Plan Pract Res 15:299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer F (1997) Evaluating public policy. Nelson-Hall Publishers, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Res 30:441–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2004) Conceptual frameworks of adaptation to climate change and their applicability to human health. PIK report no. 91, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  18. Governmental platform, Bestuurlijk Overleg Westflank Haarlemmermeer (2010) Ontwerp Programma van Eisen. Parels in de Polder. Gebiedsontwikkeling Westflank Haarlemmermeer. Januari 2010. Province of North-Holland, HaarlemGoogle Scholar
  19. Grontmij, NIROV, EUR (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (2011) Evaluatie watertoets 2011, Rapportage Casus Westflank Haarlemmermeer, Grondmij, NIROV & EUR. Rijksoverheid, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  20. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heinrichs D, Aggarwal R, Barton J, Bharucha E, Butsch C, Fragkiasm M, Johnston P, Kraas F, Krellenberg K, Lampis A, Giok Ling (2009) Adapting cities to climate change: opportunities and constraints. Paper prepared for the Worlds Bank’s 5th urban research symposium cities and climate change: responding to an Urgent Agenda Marseille, France June 28–30, 2009Google Scholar
  22. Herrfahrdt-Pähle E (2012) Integrated and adaptive governance of water resources: the case of South Africa. Reg Environ Change (in press)Google Scholar
  23. Hoogheemraadschap van Delfland (2005) Beleidsnota normering wateroverlast. Resultaten NBW toetsing wateroverlast en uitgangspunten ABC-bergingsnormen, November 2005Google Scholar
  24. Hunt A, Watkiss P (2007) Literature review on climate change impacts on urban city centres: initial findings. Working Party on Global and Structural Policies, OECD JT03237644Google Scholar
  25. Huq S, Reid H (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation in development. Inst Dev Stud Bull 35:15–21Google Scholar
  26. Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCS). International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. IPCC (2007) In: Parry MI, Canziani OF, Patulikof JP, Van der Linden PA, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Jordan A, Huitema D, Van Asselt H, Rayner T, Berkhout F (2010) Climate change policy in the European Union. Cambridge University press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kabat P, Van Vierssen W, Veraart J, Vellinga P, Aerts J (2005) Climate proofing the Netherlands. Nature 438(7066):283–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kern K, Alber, G (2008) Governing climate change in cities: modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. competitive cities and climate change. OECD conference proceedings, Milan, Italy, 9–10 October 2008, Chapter 8, Paris: OECD, pp 171–196Google Scholar
  31. Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P (2006) The challenge of greening technologies: environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Res Policy 35(5):729–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Mimura N (1999) Coastal adaptation to climate change: can the IPCC technical guidelines be applied? Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 4(3–4):239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein RJT, Eriksen SEH, Naess LO, Hammill A, Tanner TM, Robledo C, O’Brien KL (2007) Portfolio screening to support the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change into development assistance. Clim Change 84:23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kok MTJ, De Coninck HC (2007) Widening the scope of policies to address climate change: directions for mainstreaming. Environ Sci Policy 10:587–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lafferty WM, Hovden E (2003) Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ Politics 12(3):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larsen SV (2011) Risk as a challenge in practice: investigating climate change in water management. Reg Environ Change 11:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lorenzoni I, Hulme M (2009) Believing is seeing: laypeople’s views of future socio-economic and climate change in England and in Italy. Public Underst Sci 18(4):383–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mastop H, Faludi A (1997) Evaluation of strategic plans: the performance principle. Environ PlanB 24:815–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matzarakis A, Endler C (2010) Climate change and thermal bioclimate in cities: impacts and options for adaptation in Freiburg, Germany. Int J Biometeorol 54(4):479–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mees HLP, Driessen P (2011) Adaptation to climate change in urban areas: climate-greening London, Rotterdam, and Toronto. Clim Law 2:251–280Google Scholar
  41. Miller D, de Roo G (2004) Introduction: integrating environmental quality improvement and city planning In: Miller D, de Roo G (eds) Integrating city planning and environmental improvement: practicable strategies for sustainable urban development. Ashgate Publishers, Aldershot, Hants, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  42. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. PNAS, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Otto-Banaszak I, Matczak P, Wesseler J, Wechsung F (2010) Different perceptions of adaptation to climate change: a mental model approach applied to the evidence from expert interviews. Reg Environ Change 11(2):217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. PBL (2009) Wegen naar een klimaatbestendig Nederland. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  45. PBL (2010) CPB Notitie. Beoordeling Westflank Haarlemmermeer. 26 januari 2010. PBL, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  46. Provinces North- and South-Holland (2006) Gebiedsuitwerking Haarlemmermeer-Bollenstreek. May 2006. Province of North Holland, HaarlemGoogle Scholar
  47. Randstad Urgent (2009) 48 miljoen voor Westflank Haarlemmermeer. Nieuwsflits december 2009. Nummer 22. Randstad Urgent programme, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  48. Rauschmayer F, Berghöfer A, Omann I, Zikos D (2009) Examining processes or/and outcomes? Evaluation concepts in European governance of natural resources Environ Pol Gov 19(3):159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rijksoverheid (2007) Urgentieprogramma Randstad. Naar een duurzame en concurrerende topregio. Definitieve versie 26 juni 2007. Ministry of Traffic and Water management, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  50. Rijksoverheid (2009a) Tweede jaar raportage Randstad Urgent: Westflank Haarlemmermeer, 20 September 2009. Rijksoverheid, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  51. Rijksoverheid (2009b) Randstad Urgent: Westflank Haarlemmermeer. Overeenkomst minister LNV en gedeputeerde RO, Schiphol en Grondzaken Provincie Noord-Holland. 29 November 2009. Rijksoverheid, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  52. RIONED (2007) Climate change, heavier rainstorms and the urban drainage system. RIONED Foundation, EdeGoogle Scholar
  53. Risbey J, Kandlikar M, Graetz D, Dowlatabadi H (1999) Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and change. Mitig Adapt Strat Global Change 4(2):137–165Google Scholar
  54. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE (2004) Evaluation, a systematic approach, 7th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  55. Runhaar H, Driessen P, Snoer L (2009) Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: an assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environ PlanB 36(3):417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Runhaar H, Mees H, Wardekker A, van der Sluijs J, Driessen PPJ (2012) Adaptation to climate change-related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers. Reg Environ Change. doi: 10.1007/s10113-012-0292-7 Google Scholar
  57. Schipper L (2007) Climate change adaptation and development: exploring the linkages. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Working paper 107Google Scholar
  58. Schipper L, Pelling M (2006) Disaster risk, climate change and international development: scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 10(1):19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sterman JD (2011) Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Clim Change 108:811–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Susskind L (2010) Policy and practice responding to the risks posed by climate change; cities have no choice but to adapt. TPR 81(3):217–235Google Scholar
  62. Swart RR, Bernstein L, Ha-Duong M, Petersen A (2009) Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Clim Change 92:1–2Google Scholar
  63. Swart R, Raes F (2007) Making integration of adaptation and mitigation work: mainstreaming into sustainable development policies? Clim Policy 7(4):288–303Google Scholar
  64. Tompkins EL, Adger WN, Boyd E, Nicholson-Cole S, Weatherhead K, Arnell N (2010) Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapted society. Glob Environ Change 20(4):627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van den Brink M (2009) Rijkswaterstaat on the horns of a dilemma. Delft: Eburon. PhD thesis. Radboud University NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  66. Wheeler SM, Beatley T (2004) The sustainable urban development reader. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Wheeler SM, Randolph J, London JB (2009) Chapter 3. Planning and climate change: an emerging research agenda. Prog in Plan 72:195–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline J. Uittenbroek
    • 1
  • Leonie B. Janssen-Jansen
    • 2
  • Hens A. C. Runhaar
    • 3
  1. 1.Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Human Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Innovation and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations