Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 133–144 | Cite as

Ecological monitoring of wetlands in semi-arid region of Konya closed Basin, Turkey

  • Jay Krishna Thakur
  • P. K. Srivastava
  • S. K. Singh
  • Zoltán Vekerdy
Original Article

Abstract

Wetland ecosystems are of global significance having productive, regulatory and informative function. These wetlands are crucial for the long-term protection of water sources, as well as the survival of its unique biodiversity. Most of the wetlands of Turkey are now facing serious threat from the anthropogenic sources and now near to the verge of extinction. This study has been carried out to monitor vegetation dynamics and ecological status of wetlands of Koyna basin at spatial and temporal scale. This study has involved MODerate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images of the year 2000, 2004 and 2008 on daily basis with spatial resolution of 1 km. The MODIS 16 days composite NDVI time series products of 250-m spatial resolution from year 2000 to 2008 has been utilized to monitor the ecological status of the wetlands. The European Nature Information System habitat classification map, meteorological data (precipitation, temperature) coupled with field data has been utilized to validate NDVI values of nine habitats in the wetlands. The time series analyses of NDVI data values have been correlated with the groundwater level depth from 1996 to 2004. The overall analysis has shown a declining trend of NDVI over the year 2000 to 2008, indicated a degraded wetland condition in span of 9 years.

Keywords

Wetlands MODIS NDVI Time series analysis Turkey 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author (JKT) is highly thankful to Gabriel Norberto Parodi for the support and guidance throughout the research period, Mustafa Gokmen for preprocessed MODIS NDVI 16 days composite time series product, field visit arrangements and valuable advices at Water resources department, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Universiteit Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. The author (JKT) is also thankful to DSI Konya Regional Directorate for the data availability and field visit arrangements.

References

  1. AFCEE (2006) Final long-term monitoring optimization guide. Brooks City-Base, TX, HQ Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, Environmental Restoration Division (AFCEE/TDE)Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal R, Garg JK (2009) Methane emission modelling from wetlands and waterlogged areas using MODIS data. Curr Sci 96(1):36–40Google Scholar
  3. Asefa T, Kemblowski MW, Urroz G, McKee M, Khalil A (2004) Support vectors–based groundwater head observation networks design. Water Resour Res 40(11):W11509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baret F, Guyot G (1991) Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sens Env 35:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best RG, Moore DG (1979) Landsat interpretation of Prairie lakes and wetlands of eastern South Dakota. Paper presented at the proceedings of the fifth annual William T. Pecora memorial symposium on remote sensing, satellite hydrology, 10–15 June, Sioux Falls, North DakotaGoogle Scholar
  6. Breunig FM, Galvão LS, Formaggio AR, Epiphanio JCN (2010) Directional effects on NDVI and LAI retrievals from MODIS: a case study in Brazil with soybean. Int J Appl Earth Observ Geoinf 13(1):34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Çal kan V (2008) Human-induced wetland degradation: a case study of Lake Amik (Southern Turkey). Paper presented at the BALWOIS 2008Google Scholar
  8. Cui B, Yang Q, Yang Z, Zhang K (2009) Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecol Eng 35(7):1090–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delory GT, Laver C, de Pater I, Pitman J, Duncan A (2010) High resolution remote sensing observations for missions to the Jovian system: Io as a case study. Planet Space Sci 58(13):1699–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dial G, Bowen H, Gerlach F, Grodecki J, Oleszczuk R (2003) IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products. Remote Sens Env 88(1–2):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. du Plessis WP (1999) Linear regression relationships between NDVI, vegetation and rainfall in Etosha National Park, Namibia. J Arid Environ 42(4):235–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durduran S (2010) Coastline change assessment on water reservoirs located in the Konya Basin Area, Turkey, using multitemporal landsat imagery. Environ Monit Assess 164(1):453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EEA (2009) Code and classifications of habitat types. Retrieved 5 Dec 2009, from http://www.eunis.eea.europa.eu/habitats-code.jsp
  14. Gammon PT, Rohde WG, Carter V (1979) Accuracy evaluation of Landsat digital classification of vegetation in the Great Dismal Swamp. Paper presented at the proceedings of the fifth annual William T. Pecora memorial symposium on remote sensing, satellite hydrology, 10–15 June, Sioux Falls, North DakotaGoogle Scholar
  15. Gitelson AA, Viña A, Verma SB, Rundquist DC, Arkebauer TJ, Keydan G et al (2006) Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity. J Geophys Res 111(D8):D08S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gökmen M, Vekerdy Z, Verhoef W (2009) Earth observation for quantifying ecohydrological fluxes. Paper presented at the European Geosciences Union (EGU) ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu J, Li X, Huang C, Okin GS (2009) A simplified data assimilation method for reconstructing time-series MODIS NDVI data. Adv Space Res 44(4):501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guyot G, Gugon D, Riom J (1989) Factors affecting the spectral response of forest canopies: a review. Geocarta Int 3:43–60Google Scholar
  19. Hjortsø CN, Stræde S, Helles F (2006) Applying multi-criteria decision-making to protected areas and buffer zone management: a case study in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. J For Econ 12(2):91–108Google Scholar
  20. Jin X, Wan L, Zhang Y, Xue Z, Yin Y (2007) A study of the relationship between vegetation growth and groundwater in the Yinchuan Plain. Earth Sci Front 14(3):197–203. doi: 10.1016/s1872-5791(07)60026-8 Google Scholar
  21. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2002) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, vol 5. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones K, Lanthier Y, van der Voet P, van Valkengoed E, Taylor D, Fernández-Prieto D (2009) Monitoring and assessment of wetlands using earth observation: the GlobWetland project. J Environ Manag 90(7):2154–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Obioma Nze KE (2010) Assessing the groundwater dynamics in a semi-arid region (Konya Closed Basin, Turkey). Water Resources Management. Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, p 54Google Scholar
  24. Kileshye Onema J-M, Taigbenu A (2009) NDVI-rainfall relationship in the Semliki watershed of the equatorial Nile. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 34(13–16):711–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar NV, Mathew S, Swaminathan G (2010) A hybrid approach towards the assessment of groundwater quality for potability: a fuzzy logic and GIS based case study of Tiruchirappalli City, India. J Geogr Inf Syst 2:152–162Google Scholar
  26. Loaiciga HA, Charbeneau RJ, Everett LG, Fogg GE, Hobbs BF, Rouhani S (1992) Review of ground-water quality monitoring network design. J Hydraul Eng 118(1):11–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacMillan DK, Splichal DE (2005) A review of field technologies for long-term monitoring of ordnance-related compounds in groundwater. Environmental Chemistry Branch, Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, OmahaGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (eds) (1993) Wetlands, 2nd edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Muukkonen P, Heiskanen J (2007) Biomass estimation over a large area based on standwise forest inventory data and ASTER and MODIS satellite data: a possibility to verify carbon inventories. Remote Sens Env 107(4):617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Narasimhan R, Stow D (2010) Daily MODIS products for analyzing early season vegetation dynamics across the North Slope of Alaska. Remote Sens Env 114(6):1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ndirima ZK (2007) Mapping and monitoring wetland vegetation used by wattled cranes using remote sensing: case of Kafue flats, Zambia. Unpublished MSc Thesis, ITC, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  32. Özkaymak A (2009) Turkey: Lake Tuz basin undergoing desertification, says activist, Forest Protection Portal. Retrieved 22 July 2009, from http://www.forests.org/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=129102&keybold=water%20AND%20%20irrigation
  33. Peters J (2008) Ecohydrology of wetlands: monitoring and modelling interactions between groundwater, soil and vegetation. Ghent University, GentGoogle Scholar
  34. Peters AJ, Walter-Shea EA, Ji L, Vina A, Hayes M, Svoboda MD (2002) Drought monitoring with NDVI-based standardized vegetation index. Photogramm Eng Rem S 68:71–75Google Scholar
  35. Sabins FF (1996) Remote sensing: principles and interpretation. W.H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Shoshany M, Kutiel P, Lavee H (1996) Monitoring temporal vegetation cover changes in Mediterranean and arid ecosystems using a remote sensing technique: case study of the Judean Mountain and the Judean Desert. J Arid Environ 33(1):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tektas A (2007) Determination of biological diversity. Corporate head office of special environmental protection, Biyolojik Çeşitliliğin Tespiti/Tuz Gölü ProjesiGoogle Scholar
  38. Thakur JK (2010) Eco-hydrological wetland monitoring in a semi-arid region (a case study of Konya Closed Basin, Turkey). International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  39. Tong X, Liu S, Weng Q (2010) Bias-corrected rational polynomial coefficients for high accuracy geo-positioning of QuickBird stereo imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65(2):218–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Töyrä J, Pietroniro A (2005) Towards operational monitoring of a northern wetland using geomatics-based techniques. Remote Sens Env 97(2):174–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wickware GM (1978) Wetland mapping and environmental monitoring using Landsat data. In: Proceedings of the 5th Canadian symposium on remote sensing, August 1978, Victoria, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  42. Wickware GM, Howarth PJ (1981) Change detection in the Peace Athabasca Delta using digital Landsat data. Remote Sens Env 1:19–25Google Scholar
  43. Yan C, Wang T, Han Z (2005) Using MODIS data to asses land desertification in Ordos Plateau-Mu Us Sandy Land case study. Paper presented at the geoscience and remote sensing symposium, 2005. IGARSS’05Google Scholar
  44. Yi Y, Yang D, Huang J, Chen D (2008) Evaluation of MODIS surface reflectance products for wheat leaf area index (LAI) retrieval. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 63(6):661–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao B, Yan Y, Guo H, He M, Gu Y, Li B (2009) Monitoring rapid vegetation succession in estuarine wetland using time series MODIS-based indicators: an application in the Yangtze River Delta area. Ecol Indic 9(2):346–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou D, Gong H, Liu Z (2008) Integrated ecological assessment of biophysical wetland habitat in water catchments: linking hydro-ecological modelling with geo-information techniques. Ecol Modell 214(2–4):411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay Krishna Thakur
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. K. Srivastava
    • 3
  • S. K. Singh
    • 4
  • Zoltán Vekerdy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Institute of GeosciencesMartin Luther UniversityHalle (Saale)Germany
  2. 2.Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth ObservationTwente UniversityEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Civil Engineering, Water and Environment Management Research CenterUniversity of BristolBristolUnited Kingdom
  4. 4.Centre of Atmospheric and Ocean ScienceKBCAOS, IIDS, University of AllahabadAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations