Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 131–136 | Cite as

Commentary: the challenge of quantifying susceptibility to drought-related crisis

Review Article

Abstract

This paper is a response to a recent special issue of Regional Environmental Change, “Quantifying vulnerability to drought from different disciplinary perspectives” (vol. 8, number 4, 2008). In this paper, we examine some of the challenges facing efforts to understand vulnerability to drought through quantification as they are manifest in some of the articles in this special issue.

Keywords

Vulnerability Drought Modeling 

References

  1. Acosta-Michlik L, Kumar KSK, Klein RJT, Campe S (2008) Application of fuzzy models to assess susceptibility to droughts from a socio-economic perspective. Reg Environ Change 8(4):151–160. doi:10.1007/s10113-008-0058-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 27(2):249–269. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16(3):268–281. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcamo J (2008) Special issue on “Quantifying vulnerability to drought from different disciplinary perspectives”. Reg Environ Change 8(4):135–136. doi:10.1007/s10113-008-0070-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Carius A, Eierdanz F, Klein R, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2005) A new approach to the assessment of vulnerability to drought. In: Concluding symposium of the German climate research programme (DEKLIM)Google Scholar
  6. Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (2004) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development, and people. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Carney D (ed) (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: what contribution can we make? Department for International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr ER (2006) Postmodern conceptualizations, modernist applications: rethinking the role of society in food security. Food Policy 31(1):14–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr ER (2008) Between structure and agency: livelihoods and adaptation in Ghana’s central region. Glob Environ Change 18(4):689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chambers R, Conway G (1992) Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies, SussexGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis M (2002) Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño famines and the making of the Third World. VersoGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis M (2004) The political ecology of famine: the origins of the Third World. In: Peet R, Watts M (eds) Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 48–63Google Scholar
  13. De Soto H (2000) The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  14. De Waal A (1989) Famine that kills. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Denton F (2002) Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: why does gender matter? Gend Dev 10:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Easterly W (2006) The white man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much Ill and so little good. The Penguin Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Krömker D, Taenzler D (2008) Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought. Reg Environ Change 8(4):197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Escobar A (1995) Encountering development. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Escobar A, Rocheleau D, Kothari S (2002) Environmental social movements and the politics of place. Development 45(1):28–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteva G (1992) Development. In: Sachs W (ed) The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge and power. Zed Books Ltd, London, pp 6–25Google Scholar
  23. Esteva G, Prakash MS (1998) Beyond development, what? Dev Pract 8(3):280–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson-Graham JK (2005) Surplus possibilities: postdevelopment and community economies. Singap J Trop Geogr 26(1):4–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gladwin CH (ed) (1991) Structural adjustment and African women farmers. University of Florida Press, GainsvilleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gladwin CH, Thomson AM, Peterson JS, Anderson AS (2001) Addressing food security in Africa via multiple livelihood strategies of women farmers. Food Policy 26:177–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kotzé DA (2003) Role of women in the household economy, food production and food security. Outlook Agric 32(2):111–121Google Scholar
  29. Krömker D, Eierdanz F, Stolberg A (2008) Who is susceptible and why? An agent-based approach to assessing vulnerability to drought. Reg Environ Change 8(4):173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maxwell S (1996) Food security: a post-modern perspective. Food Policy 21(2):155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maxwell S, Frankenberger T (1992) Household food security: concepts, indicators, measurements. United Nations Children’s Fund - International Fund for Agricultural Development, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxwell S, Smith M (1992) Household food security: a conceptual review. In: Maxwell S, Frankenberger T (eds) Household food security: concepts, indicators, measurements. United Nations Children’s Fund - International Fund for Agricultural Development, New York, pp 1–72Google Scholar
  33. McKinnon K (2007) Postdevelopment, professionalism, and the politics of participation. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 97(4):772–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Change 14(4):303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paracchini ML, Pacini C, Calvo S, Vogt J (2008) Weighting and aggregation of indicators for sustainability impact assessment in the SENSOR context. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer, New York, pp 349–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patt A, Klein RJT, de la Vega-Leinert A (2005) Taking uncertainties in climate change vulnerability assessment seriously. C R Geosci 377:411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Patt A, Schröter D, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Klein RJT (2008) Vulnerability research and assessment to support adaptation and mitigation: common themes from the diversity of approaches. In: Patt A, Schröter D, Klein RJT, de la Vega-Leinert A (eds) Assessing vulnerability to global environmental change: making information useful for adaptation policy and decision-making. Earthscan, London, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  38. Postel S, Vickers A (2004) In: Starke L (ed) State of the world 2004. Norton, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Safriel U, Adeel Z, Niemeijer D, Puigdefabregas J, White R, Lal R, Winslow M, Zielder J, Prince S, Archer E, King C (2005) Drylands. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 623–662Google Scholar
  40. Schroter D, Polsky C, Patt A (2005) Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 10:573–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72 IDS, SussexGoogle Scholar
  42. Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  43. Shriar AJ (2002) Land use, deforestation, and food security in northern Guatemala. Food Policy 27(4):395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller J, Leroy Henry, Chen Z (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Taenzler D, Carius A, Maas A (2008) Assessing the susceptibility of societies to droughts: a political science perspective. Reg Environ Change 8(4):161–172Google Scholar
  47. Watts M (1983) Silent violence: food, famine and peasantry in northern Nigeria. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams G (1994) Why structural adjustment is necessary and why it does not work. Rev Afr Polit Econ 60:214–225Google Scholar
  49. World Bank (1991) World development report 1991: the challenge of development, vol 1. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations