Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 91–107 | Cite as

A spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of ecosystem service change in Europe

  • Marc J. Metzger
  • Dagmar Schröter
  • Rik Leemans
  • Wolfgang Cramer
Original Article

Abstract

Environmental change alters ecosystem functioning and may put the provision of services to human at risk. This paper presents a spatially explicit and quantitative assessment of the corresponding vulnerability for Europe, using a new framework designed to answer multidisciplinary policy relevant questions about the vulnerability of the human-environment system to global change. Scenarios were constructed for a range of possible changes in socio-economic trends, land uses and climate. These scenarios were used as inputs in a range of ecosystem models in order to assess the response of ecosystem function as well as the changes in the services they provide. The framework was used to relate the impacts of changing ecosystem service provision for four sectors in relation to each other, and to combine them with a simple, but generic index for societal adaptive capacity. By allowing analysis of different sectors, regions and development pathways, the vulnerability assessment provides a basis for discussion between stakeholders and policymakers about sustainable management of Europe’s natural resources.

Keywords

Vulnerability assessment Global change Ecosystem services Adaptive capacity Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was carried out as part of the EU funded Fifth Framework project ATEAM (Advanced Terrestrial Ecosystem Assessment and Modelling, Project No. EVK2-2000-00075). Many members in the consortium contributed to the discussions that helped shape the work in this paper.

Supplementary material

10113_2008_44_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3.2 mb)
Supplementary material (PDF 3.21 kb)

References

  1. Alcamo J (2002) Introduction to special issue on regional air pollution and climate change in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 5:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo MB, Williams PH, Fuller R (2002) Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reserves. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1971–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman K, Jenkinson DS (1996) RothC-26.3-a model for the turnover of carbon in soil. In: Powlson DS, Smith P, Smith JU (eds) Evaluation of soil organic matter models using existing, long-term datasets. NATO ASI series I, vol 38. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 237–246Google Scholar
  4. Coleman K, Jenkinson DS, Crocker GJ, Grace PR, Klir J, Körschens M, Poulton PR, Richter DD (1997) Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-term experiments using RothC-26.3. Geoderma 81:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. De la Vega-Leinert AC, Schröter D, Leemans R, Fritsch U, Pluimers J (2008) A stakeholder dialogue on European Vulnerability. Reg Environ Change (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Ewert F, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Metzger MJ, Leemans R (2005) Future scenarios of European agricultural land use. I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galloway JN (2001) Acidification of the world: natural and anthropogenic. Water Air Soil Pollut 130:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IMAGE team (2001) The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios: a comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (2007) Working group II contribution to the intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report, summary for policymakers. http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM13apr07.pdf
  13. Jongman RHG, Bunce RGH, Metzger MJ, Mücher CA, Howard DC, Mateus VL (2006) Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landscape Ecol 21:409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kankaanpää S, Carter TR (2004) Construction of European forest land use scenarios for the 21st century. The Finnish environment 707, Finnish Environment Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  15. Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2001) International workshop on vulnerability and global environmental change, Stockholm. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, pp 36Google Scholar
  16. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber H-J, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Moore III B, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS, Addams CL, Matson PA (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Glob Environ Change 13:255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Metzger MJ, Leemans R, Schröter D, Cramer W, The ATEAM Consortium (2004) The ATEAM vulnerability mapping tool. Quantitative approaches in systems analysis No. 27, CD-ROM publication. Office C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation (PE&RC), WageningenGoogle Scholar
  19. Metzger MJ, Schröter D (2006) Towards a spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of environmental change in Europe. Reg Environ Change 6:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Metzger MJ, Leemans R, Schröter D (2005a) A multidisciplinary multi-scale framework for assessing vulnerability to global change. Int J Appl Geo-inf Earth Observ 7:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Metzger MJ, Bunce RGH, Jongman RHG, Mücher CA, Watkins JW (2005b) A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schröter D (2006) The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:69–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Metzger MJ, Bunce RGH, Leemans R, Viner D (2008) Projected environmental shifts under climate change: European trends and regional impacts. Environ Conserv 35. doi: 10.1017/S0376892908004529
  24. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being; a framework for assessment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  25. Mitchell TD, Carter TR, Jones PD, Hulme M, New M (2004) A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901–2000) and 16 scenarios (2001–2100). Tyndall Centre working paper No. 55. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, Emilio la Rovere E, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner HH, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooyen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios (SRES). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid WV, Mooney HA, Cropper A, Capistrano D, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Dasgupta P, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Hassan R, Kasperson R, Leemans R, May RM, McMichael AJ, Pingali P, Samper C, Scholes R, Watson RT, Zakri AH, Shidong Z, Ash NJ, Bennett E, Kumar P, Lee MJ, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Simons H, Thonell J, Zurek NB (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. Island Press, Washington Google Scholar
  30. Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araújo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Leemans R, Metzger MJ, Schmit C, Smith P, Tuck G (2006) A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sabaté S, Gracia CA, Sánchez A (2002) Likely effects of climate change on growth of Quercus ilex, Pinus halepensis, Pinus pinaster, Pinus sylvestris and Fagus sylvatica forests in the Mediterranean region. For Ecol Manage 162:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schröter D, Acosta-Michlik L, Reidsma P, Metzger MJ, Klein RJT (2003) modelling the vulnerability of eco-social systems to global change: human adaptive capacity to changes in ecosystem service provision. Paper presented at the fifth open meeting of the human dimensions of global environmental change research community, Montreal. Available online at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/openmtg/
  33. Schröter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araújo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Garcia CA, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Ewert F, Glendining M, House JI, Kankaanpää S, Klein RJT, Lavorel S, Lindner M, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell TD, Reginster I, Rounsevell M, Sabaté S, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, Zaehle S, Zierl B (2005a) Ecosystem service supply and human vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310:1333–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schröter D, Polsky C, Patt AG (2005b) Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitigation Adapt Strat Glob Change 10:573–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC, Arneth A, Bondeau A. Cramer W, Kaplan JO, Levis S, Lucht W, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Venevsky S (2003) Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic vegetation model. Glob Change Biol 9(2):161–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith JU, Bradbury NJ, Addiscott TM (1996) SUNDIAL: a PC-based system for simulating nitrogen dynamics in arable land. Agron J 88:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith JB, Schellnhuber H-J, Qader Mirza M, Fankhauser S, Leemans R, Erda L, Ogallo LA, Pittock BA, Richels R, Rosenzweig C, Safriel U, Tol RSJ, Weyant J, Yohe G (2001) Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 913–967Google Scholar
  38. Thuiller W (2003) BIOMOD: optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Glob Change Biol 9:1353–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) GEO-3: global environmental outlook report 3. Earthscan Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Ittersum MK, Leffelaar PA, van Keulen H, Kropff MJ, Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J (2003) On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. Eur J Agron 18:201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Venevsky S, Thonicke K, Sitch S, Cramer W (2002) Simulating fire regimes in human-dominated ecosystems: Iberian Peninsula case study. Glob Change Biol 8:984–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (eds) (2000) Land use, land-use change and forestry. A special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 12:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zaehle S, Bondeau A, Smith P, Sitch S, Schröter D, Erhard M, Cramer W (2004) Europe’s terrestrial carbon sink may last until 2050 and then decline. Geophys Res Abstr 6:3808Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc J. Metzger
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Dagmar Schröter
    • 3
  • Rik Leemans
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Cramer
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Systems Analysis groupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Plant Production Systems groupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Global Change and Natural SystemsPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchPotsdamGermany
  4. 4.School of GeoSciences, University of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations