Advertisement

Regional Environmental Change

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 59–71 | Cite as

Culture as trigger for sustainability transition in the water domain: the case of the Spanish water policy and the Ebro river basin

  • J. David TàbaraEmail author
  • Akgun Ilhan
Original Article

Abstract

There is a mounting body of literature dealing generally with the dynamics of transitions of human systems towards sustainability and specifically with the different stages and processes of transitions. However, the question of why transition processes occur in the first place remains largely unexplained. This paper explores the concept of transition triggers, such as culture or material resource scarcity, and provides a theoretical framework to explain the emergence of a transition and its relation to recent developments in Spanish water policy. We adapt the general framework provided by current transition theory and gather empirical evidence and insights from processes occurring within the Spanish policy context and the Ebro river basin in particular. Our results show that the sole existence of biophysical limits to water use or development cannot explain the start of a possible sustainability transition in this domain in Spain. Changes in the existing water policies in the direction of sustainability were not ignited by people directly affected by water scarcities but by a coalition of sensitive agents, mostly from academia, NGOs and local constituencies, who managed to articulate new identities, integrate multiple sources of policy relevant knowledge, and develop new values under the umbrella of the new water culture movement.

Keywords

Culture Sustainability Transition modelling Triggers The new water culture (NWC) movement Spain and the Ebro river basin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded and has benefit from discussions within EU project MATISSE (Methods and Tools for Integrated Sustainability Assessment) for the domain of water (Contract 004059-GOCE-MATISSE; 1/4/2005–31/3/2008). Authors would like to thank Jill Jager and Paul Weaver for their helpful comments on the manuscript. An early version of this paper was presented at the fifth Iberian Congress of Water Planning and Management, Faro, Portugal, 4–6 December 2006.

References

  1. Arrojo P (2003) El Plan Hidrológico Nacional. Una cita frustrada con la historia. Barcelona: IntegralGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas AK, Tortajada C (2003) An assessment of the Spanish national hydrological plan. Water Res Dev 19(3):377–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boudon (1986) Theories of social change. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Boulding K (1975) Ecodynamics. A new theory of societal evolution. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Douglas M, Wildasky A (1982) Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  6. Embid A (2002) The evolution of water law and policy in Spain. Water Res Dev 18(2):261–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estevan A, Prat N (2006) Alternativas para La Gestión del Agua en Cataluña. Una Visión Desde la Perspectiva de la Nueva Cultura del Agua. Fundación Nueva Cultura del AguaGoogle Scholar
  8. Fundación Nueva Cultura del Agua (FNCA) (2005) Declaración Europea por una Nueva Cultura del Agua. Madrid: FNCAGoogle Scholar
  9. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31(8/9):1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geels FW (2005) Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary and multi-level perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change 72:681–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Getches DH (2003) Spain’s Ebro river transfers: test case for water policy in the European Union. Water Res Dev 19(3):501–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare MP, Barreteau O, Beck B, Letcher RA, Mostert E, Tàbara JD, Ridder D, Cogan V, Pahl-Wostl C (2006) Methods for stakeholder participation in water management. In: Giupponi C, Jakeman JJ, Karssenberg D, Hare MP (eds) Sustainable management of water resources. Edward Elgar, Northamptom, pp 177–225Google Scholar
  14. Howitt RE (2003) Some economic lessons from past hydrological projects and applications to the Ebro river transfer proposal. Water Res Dev 19(3):471–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoekstra AY (1998) Appreciation of water: four perspectives. Water Policy 1:605–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jantsch E (1975) Design for evolution. self-organisation in the life of human systems. George Braziller, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasemir B, Jäger J, Jaeger C, Gardner MT (eds) (2003) Public participation in sustainability science. A handbook. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Llamas MR (2003) Jornadas Sobre el Año Internacional del Agua: Transición Hacia Nuevos Paradigmas en la Gobernanza del Agua en España. Real Academia de Ciencias: 18–20 November 2003Google Scholar
  20. Milbrath LW (1989) Envisioning a sustainable society. Learning our way out. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  21. O’Riordan T, Voisey H (1998) The transition to sustainability. The politics of agenda 21 in Europe. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Pahl-Wostl C, Tàbara D, Bouwen R, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Ridder D, Taillieu T (2007) The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable resources management. Accepted in Ecol Eco. Available on-line at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/
  23. Pons M (2006) A contracorriente. Documentary. DVD production by Producciones a Salto de Mata. Barcelona: Reg-B2274-06Google Scholar
  24. Rotmans J (2005) Societal innovation. Between dream and reality lies complexity. Drift: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at http://www.drift.eur.nl
  25. Rotmans J (2006) Tools for integrated sustainability assessment: a two-track approach. Matisse Working Paper, 4Google Scholar
  26. Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sauri D, del Moral L (2001) Recent developments in Spanish water policy. Alternatives and conflicts at the end of the hyrdaulic age. Geoforum 32:351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sabatier PA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci 21(2–3):129–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swyngedouw E (1999) Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of Spanish landscape, 1890–1930. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 89(3):443–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Swyndegouw E (2005) Geographical revolutions—scalar politics and the creation of a fascist socio-nature: Franco’s wet dream for Spain. Paper presented at the Aesop 2005 conference, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  31. Tàbara JD (2002) Sustainability culture. In governance for sustainable development, Barcelona: advisory council for sustainable development, International Institute on Governance and Government of Catalonia. Papers de Sostenibilitat, 2:53–85. http://www.iigov.org/gds/23/63-85.pdf
  32. Tàbara JD, Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Sustainability learning in natural resource use and management. Ecol Soc 12(2):3. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/viewissue.php?sf=28 Google Scholar
  33. Tàbara JD, Costejà M, Van Woerden F (2004) Las culturas del agua en la prensa española. Los marcos culturales en la comunicación sobre el plan hidrológico nacional. (Water cultures in the Spanish Press. The cultural frameworks in the communication of the National Hydrological Plan). Papers, Revista de Sociologia 73:155–181Google Scholar
  34. Tàbara JD, Wallman P, Elmqvist C, Madrid M, Schilperoord P, Valkering P, Weaver P (2006) Participatory Modelling for the Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Water: The World Cellular Model and The Matisse Project. Proceedings of the I International Conference on Sustainability Measuring and Modelling. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Terrassa (Barcelona). Available at http://www.matisse-project.net
  35. Tàbara JD, Roca E, Madrid C, Valkering P, Wallman P, Weaver P (2008) Participatory integrated sustainability assessment of water systems. Lessons from the Ebro river basin. Int J Innov Sus Dev (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Torrecilla NJ, Martinez-Gil J (2005) The new culture of water in Spain: a philosophy towards a sustainable development. Official publication of the European Water Association E-WaterGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  38. Van der Brugge R, Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2005) The Transition in Dutch Water Management. Reg Environ Change. Available at http://www.drift.eur.nl
  39. Weaver PM, Rotmans J (2006) Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it, and how? Int J Innov Sus Dev 1(4):283–303Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Science and TechnologyAutonomous University of BarcelonaCataloniaSpain

Personalised recommendations