Advertisement

Measuring users’ color preferences in CRUD operations across the globe: a new Software Ergonomics Testing Platform

  • Petra TomanováEmail author
  • Jiří Hradil
  • Vilém Sklenák
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

While working with data, we typically utilize four basic operations: Create, Read, Update, and Delete. These functions, used altogether with a persistent storage, are encapsulated into the acronym CRUD. Although the data functions are easy for machines, people have to use them through a user interface and its components. Even though some of these components are standardized (for example, HTML forms), their visual representation is highly customized among devices and technologies. Concerning users, subjective preferences are taken into account as well. As a result, the efficiency of working with data can be affected by choosing appropriate components and their attributes, such as colors. Choosing the right colors, we can work with data faster and more effectively, utilizing users’ expectations, understanding, and perception. We developed a publicly accessible Software Ergonomics Testing Platform. Through running experiments worldwide, we found out that users have a prior expectation about colors used for CRUD operations. Results show that there is a strong consensus on the color preference for the delete operation with color red being voted by 64 % users worldwide. On the other hand, color preferences for update operation strongly differ among continents. The impact of temporary weather conditions to color preference seems to be negligible.

Keywords

Software ergonomics Web application Design User interface Graphical user interface Color CRUD 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper presented ongoing results from the Software Ergonomics Research and one of its domains, Colors. The research has been founded at the Department of Information and Knowledge Engineering at the University of Economics, Prague, and supported by the Grant IGA 33/2018. The authors would like to thank Tomáš Kliegr and Vojtěch Svátek for their feedback when writing the manuscript.

References

  1. Adobe (2018) Adobe Color CC [online]. Adobe Inc. https://color.adobe.com/create/color-wheel/. Accessed 01 Nov 2018
  2. Blanc C (1876) Grammaire des arts du dessin: architecture, sculpture, peinture, jardins, gravure...eau-forte... camaïeu... lithographie... RenouardGoogle Scholar
  3. Boutet C (1708) Traité de la peinture en mignature. Chez Louis & Henry van Dole, HayeGoogle Scholar
  4. Cothran DL, Larsen R (2008) Comparison of inhibition in two timed reaction tasks: the color and emotion stroop tasks. J Psychol 142(4):373–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davison AC, Hinkley DV et al (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ (2006) Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 313(5787):684–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliot AJ, Maier MA (2014) Color psychology: effects of perceiving color on psychological functioning in humans. Ann Rev Psychol 65:95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliot AJ, Fairchild MD, Franklin A (2015) Handbook of color psychology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folgieri R, Lucchiari C, Cameli B (2015) A blue mind: a brain computer interface study on the cognitive effects of text colors. Br J Appl Sci Technol 9(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Google (2018) Google Forms [software]. [online]. https://www.google.cz/intl/cs/forms/about/. Accessed 13 Mar 2018
  11. Greenwood PE, Nikulin MS (1996) A guide to chi-squared testing, vol 280. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hradil J (2014) Software ergonomics testing platform [platform]. [online]. https://jirihradil.com. Accessed 21 Jan 2018
  13. Hradil J (2018) Mapping use cases to colors. [software]. [online]. https://jirihradil.com/use_cases. Accessed 21 Oct 2018
  14. Ivanova K, Stanchev P, Vanhoof K (2010) Automatic tagging of art images with color harmonies and contrasts characteristics in art image collections. Int J Adv Softw 3(3–4):474–484Google Scholar
  15. Keeble R, Macredie RD, Williams D (2000) User environments and individuals: experience with adaptive interface agents. Cognit Technol Work 2(1):16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee HG, Lee SC (2018) Improving performance of repetitive computer-based tasks through visual stimuli tailored to the individual. Cognit Technol Work 20(1):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Löffler D (2014) Happy is pink: designing for intuitive use with color-to-abstract mappings. In: CHI’14 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 323–326Google Scholar
  18. Lowengard S (2007) The Creation of Color in 18th-Century Europe: Number, Order, Form Color Systems and Systematization. [online]. http://www.gutenberg-e.org/lowengard/pdf/A_Chap03.pdf. Accessed 07 Oct 2017
  19. Mathôt S, Schreij D, Theeuwes J (2012) Opensesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav Res Methods 44(2):314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nei (2018) National Eye Institute. Facts About Color Blindness. [online]. https://nei.nih.gov/health/color_blindness/facts_about. Accessed 13 Oct 2018
  21. Newton I (1704). Opticks, plate III. London. Credit: Courtesy Dibner Library, Smithsonian InstitutionGoogle Scholar
  22. Peirce JW (2009) Generating stimuli for neuroscience using psychopy. Front Neuroinf 2:10Google Scholar
  23. Rüping A (2014) Taming the biases: a few patterns on successful decision-making. In: Proceedings of the 19th European conference on pattern languages of programs (EuroPLoP ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, pp 5.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2721956.2721961
  24. Schwartz B (2004) The paradox of choice: why more is less. Ecco, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherman GD, Clore GL (2009) The color of sin: white and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychol Sci 20(8):1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanuwidjaja E, Huynh D, Koa K, Nguyen C, Shao C, Torbett P, Emmenegger C, Weibel N (2014) Chroma: a wearable augmented-reality solution for color blindness. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM, pp 799–810Google Scholar
  27. Valdez P, Mehrabian A (1994) Effects of color on emotions. J Exp Psychol General 123(4):394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Doorn E, Horváth I, Rusák Z (2017) Information engineering for developing and testing coherent, integrated and context-dependent user interfaces. Cognit Technol Work 19(2–3):375–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. von Goethe JW (2004). Smyslově-morální účinek barev, translation: J. Dostal, Hranice: Fabula-Hana JankovskáGoogle Scholar
  30. Watanabe H, Fujii T, Nakamura T, Korenaga T (2015) Color perception difference: white and gold, or black and blue? In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2015 Posters, ACMGoogle Scholar
  31. Wcschools (2018) Colors Wheels [online]. Refsnes Data, 2018. https://www.w3schools.com/colors/colors_wheels.asp. Accessed 01 Nov 2018
  32. Zviran M, Te’eni D, Gross Y (2006) Does color in email make a difference? Commun ACM 49(4):94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Tomanová
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiří Hradil
    • 1
  • Vilém Sklenák
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Economics, PraguePrague 3Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations