Biofeedback as a stress management tool: a systematic review
Inappropriate management of acute stress can negatively affect cognition and task performance. Frequently occurring acute stress encounters can lead to cardiovascular and immunity deficiencies, and psychological disorders such as depression, fatigue, and burnout. Biofeedback can be used as a non-invasive, passive, continuous method of managing stress in real time. A systematic review of biofeedback as a real-time stress management intervention for non-patients was conducted to identify literature between 2000 and 2017, yielding 17 studies evaluating physiological, psychological, and/or performance metrics. Participants represent convenience samples (N = 9 studies) and deliberately selected samples, whose optimal performance under stress is critical for occupational success (N = 8 studies). Various methods to collect data, display biofeedback, induce stress, and measure performance were reported. Overall, biofeedback is an effective intervention that can be used to reduce physiological and subjective stress, and enhance performance. This is especially true among professionals, whose job performance requires appropriate stress management.
KeywordsAcute stress Chronic stress Stress management Biofeedback Performance
This work was supported by an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant (R18HS023465-02) awarded to Sarah Henrickson Parker, PhD.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving animal and human participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Allen RJ (1983) Human stress: its nature and control. Burgess, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
- Bradley RT, McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tomasino D, Daugherty A, Arguelles L (2010) Emotion self-regulation, psychophysiological coherence, and test anxiety: Results from an experiment using electrophysiological measures. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 35(4):261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-010-9134-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Childre D, McCraty R (2010) Coherence: bridging personal, social, and global health. Altern Ther Health Med 16(4):10–24Google Scholar
- Derogatis LR, Melisaratos N (2012). The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report the brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol Med (July 2009), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700048017
- Dziembowska I, Izdebski P, Rasmus A, Brudny J, Grzelczak M, Cysewski P (2016) Effects of heart rate variability biofeedback on EEG alpha asymmetry and anxiety symptoms in male athletes: a pilot study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 41(2):141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-015-9319-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenberg SF, Valletutti PJ (1980) Stress and the helping professions. P.H. Brookes, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Klampfer B, Flin R, Helmreich R, Häusler R, Sexton B, Fletcher G, Amacher A (2001) Enhancing performance in high risk environments: recommendations for the use of behavioural markers. In: Group interaction in high risk environments, pp 6–33. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=oYKwZ2nkO84C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=group+interaction+in+high+risk+environments&ots=Y2OWRiI33Y&sig=oTKcYi95BLFHQKOAS5wwz2RcWks
- Lehrer P (2007) Principles and practice of stress management: advances in the field. Biofeedback 35(3):82–84Google Scholar
- Lehrer P, Vaschillo E (2008) The future of heart rate variability biofeedback. Biofeedback 36(1):11–14Google Scholar
- Marteau TM, Bekker H (1992) The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 31(3):301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tomasino D, Bradley RT (2009a). The coherent heart: heart-brain interactions, psychophysiological coherence, and the emergence of system-wide order. Integral Rev 5(2):10–115. (Publication No. 06–022)Google Scholar
- Raaijmakers SF, Steel FW, de Goede M, van Wouwe NC, van Erp JBF, Brouwer A-M (2013) Heart rate variability and skin conductance biofeedback: a triple-blind randomized controlled study. 2013. In: Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Sept, 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.54
- Rosenstein BAH (2012) Physician stress and burnout: What can we do? Phys Executive J 11/12:22–30Google Scholar
- Sime J-A (2007) Designing emergency response training: seven ways to reduce stress. In: IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, pp 41–48Google Scholar
- Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL (1983) State-trait anxiety inventory for adults: manual, instrument, and scoring guide. Mind Garden, Inc, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
- Tanev G, Saadi DB, Hoppe K, Sorensen HBD (2014). Classification of acute stress using linear and non-linear heart rate variability analysis derived from sternal ECG. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), pp 3386–3389. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944349
- Thayer JF, Hansen AL, Saus-Rose E, Johnsen BH (2009) Heart rate variability, prefrontal neural function, and cognitive performance: the neurovisceral integration perspective on self-regulation, adaptation, and health. Ann Behav Med 37(2):141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9101-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thayer JF, Åhs F, Fredrikson M, Sollers JJ, Wager TD (2012) A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies: implications for heart rate variability as a marker of stress and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36(2):747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vine SJ, Freeman P, Moore LJ, Chandra-Ramanan R, Wilson MR (2013) Evaluating stress as a challenge is associated with superior attentional control and motor skill performance: Testing the predictions of the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat. J Exp Psychol: Appl 19(3):185–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034106 Google Scholar
- Weigl M, Stefan P, Abhari K, Wucherer P, Fallavollita P, Lazarovici M, Catchpole K (2016) Intraoperative disruptions, surgeon’s mental workload, and technical performance in a full-scale simulated procedure. Surg Endos Other Interv Tech 30(2):559–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4239-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhai J, Barreto A (2006) Stress recognition using non-invasive technology. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS), pp 395–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241057