Advertisement

Cognition, Technology & Work

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 393–402 | Cite as

The effect of auditory distraction on the useful field of view in hearing impaired individuals and its implications for driving

  • Nicholas C. Herbert
  • Nicholas J. Thyer
  • Sarah J. Isherwood
  • Natasha Merat
Original Article

Abstract

This study assessed whether the increased demand of listening in hearing impaired individuals exacerbates the detrimental impact of auditory distraction on a visual task (useful field of view test), relative to normally hearing listeners. Auditory distraction negatively affects this visual task, which is linked with various driving performance outcomes. Hearing impaired and normally hearing participants performed useful field of view testing with and without a simultaneous listening task. They also undertook a cognitive test battery. For all participants, performing the visual and auditory tasks together reduced performance on each respective test. For a number of subtests, hearing impaired participants showed poorer visual task performance, though not to a statistically significant extent. Hearing impaired participants were significantly poorer at a reading span task than normally hearing participants and tended to score lower on the most visually complex subtest of the visual task in the absence of auditory task engagement. Useful field of view performance is negatively affected by auditory distraction, and hearing loss may present further problems, given the reductions in visual and cognitive task performance suggested in this study. Suggestions are made for future work to extend this study, given the practical importance of the findings.

Keywords

Useful field of view (UFOV) Distraction Hearing loss Listening effort Attention Driving 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support from the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s Higher Education Innovation Funding and the Economic and Social Research Council is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank VTI, Linköping and Linköping University Hospital, Sweden, and in particular Mrs. Birgitta Thorslund, for their help with the recruitment for, and running of, this experiment.

References

  1. Arlinger S (2003) Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss—a review. Int J Audiol 42(suppl 2):S17–S20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atchley P, Dressel J (2004) Conversation limits the functional field of view. Hum Factors 46(4):664–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball K, Owsley C (1993) The useful field of view test: a new technique for evaluating age-related declines in visual function. J Am Optom Assoc 64(1):71–79Google Scholar
  4. Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR (1993) Visual-attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34(11):3110–3123Google Scholar
  5. Barreto SM, Swerdlow AJ, Smith PG, Higgins CD (1997) Risk of death from motor-vehicle injury in Brazilian steelworkers: a nested case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 26(4):814–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bavelier D, Tomann A, Hutton C, Mitchell T, Corina D, Liu G, Neville H (2000) Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. J Neurosci 20(17):RC93Google Scholar
  7. Bédard M, Weaver B, Darzins P, Porter MM (2008) Predicting driving performance in older adults: we are not there yet! Traffic Inj Prev 9(4):336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borg E, Bergkvist C, Olsson IS, Wikstrom C, Borg B (2008) Communication as an ecological system. Int J Audiol 47(suppl 2):S131–S138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. British Society of Audiology (2011) Recommended procedure: pure-tone air-conduction and bone-conduction threshold with and without masking. British Society of Audiology, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  10. Classen S, Mccarthy DP, Shechtman O, Awadzi KD, Lanford DN, Okun MS, Rodriguez RL, Romrell J, Bridges S, Kluger B, Fernandez HH (2009) Useful field of view as a reliable screening measure of driving performance in people with Parkinson’s disease: results of a pilot study. Traffic Inj Prev 10(6):593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clay OJ, Wadley VG, Edwards JD, Roth DL, Roenker DL, Ball KK (2005) Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: current and future implications. Optom Vis Sci 82(8):724–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conway ARA, Kane MJ, Bunting MF, Zach Hambrick D, Wilheim O, Engle RW (2005) Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and users guide. Psychon Bull Rev 12(5):769–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards JD, Vance DE, Wadley VG, Cissell GM, Roenker D, Ball KK (2005) Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 27(5):529–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards JD, Ross LA, Wadley VG, Clay OJ, Crowe M, Roenker DL, Ball KK (2006) The useful field of view test: normative data for older adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 21(4):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engle RW (2002) Working memory capacity as executive attention. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11(1):19–23MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilhotra JS, Mitchell P, Ivers R, Cumming RG (2001) Impaired vision and other factors associated with driving cessation in the elderly: the blue mountains eye study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 29(3):104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green KA, McGwin G, Owsley C (2013) Associations between visual, hearing, and dual sensory impairments and history of motor vehicle collision involvement of older drivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 61(2):252–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hällgren M, Johansson M, Larsby B, Arlinger S (1998) Dichotic speech tests. Scand Audiol 27(suppl 49):35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hällgren M, Larsby B, Lyxell B, Arlinger S (2001) Cognitive effects in dichotic speech testing in elderly persons. Ear Hear 22(2):120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hick CB, Tharpe AM (2002) Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45(3):573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hickson L, Wood J, Chaparro A, Lacherez P, Marszalek R (2010) Hearing impairment affects older people’s ability to drive in the presence of distracters. J Am Geriatr Soc 58(6):1097–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ho C, Tan HZ, Spence C (2006) The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention. Ergonomics 49(7):724–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hogan CA, Turner CW (1998) High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 104(1):432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivers RQ, Mitchell P, Cumming RG (1999) Sensory impairment and driving: the blue mountains eye study. Am J Public Health 89(1):85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loke WH, Song SR (1991) Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals. Bull Psychon Soc 29(5):437–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyxell B, Andersson J, Andersson U, Arlinger S, Bredberg G, Harder H (1998) Phonological representation and speech understanding with cochlear implants in deafened adults. Scand J Psychol 39(3):175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCloskey LW, Koepsell TD, Wolf ME, Buchner DM (1994) Motor-vehicle collision injuries and sensory impairments of older drivers. Age Ageing 23(4):267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mccoy SL, Tun PA, Cox LC, Colangelo ML, Stewart RA, Wingfield A (2005) Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Q J Exp Psychol A 58(1):22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell TV, Maslin MT (2007) How vision matters for individuals with hearing loss. Int J Audiol 46(9):500–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Owsley C (1994) Vision and driving in the elderly. Optom Vis Sci 71(12):727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Owsley C, Ball K, Mcgwin G, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, White MF, Overley ET (1998) Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc 279(14):1083–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Picard M, Girard SA, Courteau M, Leroux T, Larocque R, Turcotte F, Lavoie M, Simard M (2008) Could driving safety be compromised by noise exposure at work and noise-induced hearing loss? Traffic Inj Prev 9(5):489–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pomplun M, Reingold EM, Shen JY (2001) Investigating the visual span in comparative search: the effects of task difficulty and divided attention. Cognition 81(2):B57–B67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabbitt PMA (1968) Channel-capacity intelligibility and immediate memory. Q J Exp Psychol 20(3):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rabbitt PMA (1991) Mild hearing-loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngol 476:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rantanen EM, Goldberg JH (1999) The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. Ergonomics 42(6):816–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shinn-Cunningham BG, Best V (2008) Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends Amplif 12(4):283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sims RV, McGwin G Jr, Allman RM, Ball K, Owsley C (2000) Exploratory study of incident vehicle crashes among older drivers. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci 55(1):M22–M27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thorslund B, Peters B, Herbert N, Holmqvist K, Lidestam B, Black A, Lyxell B (2013a) Hearing loss and a supportive tactile signal in a navigation system: effects on driving behavior and eye movements. J Eye Mov Res 5(6):1–9Google Scholar
  40. Thorslund B, Peters B, Lidestam B, Lyxell B (2013b) Cognitive workload and driving behavior in persons with hearing loss. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 21:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thorslund B, Ahlström C, Peters B, Eriksson O, Lidestam B, Lyxell B (2014) Cognitive workload and visual behavior in elderly drivers with hearing loss. Eur Transp Res Rev 6:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Unsworth CA, Wells Y, Browning C, Thomas SA, Kendig H (2007) To continue, modify or relinquish driving: findings from a longitudinal study of healthy ageing. Gerontology 53(6):423–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams LJ (1982) Cognitive load and the functional field of view. Hum Factors 24(6):683–692Google Scholar
  44. Williams LJ, Lefton LA (1981) Processing of alphabetic information presented in the fovea or the periphery—functional visual-field and cognitive load. Perception 10(6):645–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wingfield A, Tun PA, McCoy SL (2005) Hearing loss in older adulthood: what it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14(3):144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wood J, Chaparro A, Hickson L, Thyer N, Carter P, Hancock J, Hoe A, Le I, Sahetapy L, Ybarzabal F (2006) The effect of auditory and visual distracters on the useful field of view: implications for the driving task. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(10):4646–4650CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Transport StudiesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.School of MedicineUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations