Cognition, Technology & Work

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 171–185 | Cite as

Managing incidents in a complex system: a railway case study

Original Article

Abstract

The authors of this paper review how complex entities, composed of many interdependent subsystems, such as international rail operators, can improve their ability to recover from incidents through the better management of key interfaces. The principles of Normal Accident Theory and resilience engineering are discussed, and the case study of the Eurostar incident of 18–19 December 2009 is considered in detail. Lessons learnt from resilience engineering are applied to the case study to extract recommendations by which incident management for open access international rail transport may be improved.

Keywords

Crisis management Decompensation fatigue Evacuation drills Interface management Normal accident theory Railway incident response Resilience engineering 

References

  1. BBC (2010) Trapped passengers ‘put at risk’. In: The report. UK, BBC Radio 4Google Scholar
  2. Boer LC (2005) Getting passengers out—evacuation bahaviours. In: Wilson JR, Norris B, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Rail human factors. Supporting the integrated railway. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot, pp 462–472Google Scholar
  3. Collis LM (2000) Inter-discipline interfaces in real-time control—protection of works across infrastructure control boundaries. MSc. Thesis, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  4. Eurostar (2010a) Eurostar independent review. Eurostar, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Eurostar (2010b) Eurostar response to the independent review. Eurostar, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Eurotunnel (2009) Eurotunnel network statement 2010. Folkestone, EurotunnelGoogle Scholar
  7. Eurotunnel (2006) Memorandum from Eurotunnel. In: Commons Select Committee on Transport (ed) HM Parliament, London (online)Google Scholar
  8. Eurotunnel (2010) Eurotunnel organizes 20th major safety exercise in Channel Tunnel. Eurotunnel, FolkestoneGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford R (2012) Rolling stock maintenance modern railways 69(760):37–59. Ian Allen Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Gauyacq D, Lhote A et al. (2005) Outils d'aide à la supervision et à la gestion en opérationnel des circulations. Revue Générale des Chemins de Fer 143Google Scholar
  11. Great Britain Department of Transport (1986) The Channel Fixed Link Concession Agreement. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Haydock D (2008) Eurostar fails again. Today’s Railways-Europe (Issue 150)Google Scholar
  13. Hidden A (1989) Investigation into the Clapham junction railway accident. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods DD et al (eds) (2011) Resilience engineering in practice. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  17. Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies, new edition. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  18. Railway Safety & Standards Board (2008) Guidance on incident response planning & management, 1st edn. RSSB, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Reason J (1995) A systems approach to organizational error. Ergonomics 38(8):1708–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. RSSB (2007) Engineering safety management—the yellow book issue 4. Engineering safety fundamentals & guidance. RSSB, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. RSSB (2008) Incident response planning & management. RSSB, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmid F (ed) (2010) Wheel-rail best practice handbook. A & N Harris, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Weick KE (1990) The vulnerable system: an analysis of the Tenerife air disaster. J Manage 16(3):571Google Scholar
  24. Woods DD, Branlat M (2010) Hollnagel’s test: being ‘in control’ of highly interdependent multi-layered networked systems Cognition. Technol Work 12(2):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woods DD, Branlat M (2011) Basic patterns in how adaptive systems fail. In: Hollnagel E, Paries J, Woods DD, Wreathall J (eds) Resilience engineering in practice. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Letra Engineering LtdLyminge, KentUK
  2. 2.Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and EducationUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations