Cognition, Technology & Work

, 11:267 | Cite as

User interface specification with sequence diagrams: an application to the AIRBUS A380 Datalink system

Original Article


The development of user interfaces for safety critical systems is driven by requirements specifications. Because user interface specifications are typically embedded within complex systems requirements specifications, they can be intractable to manage. Proprietary requirements specification tools do not support the user interface designer in modelling and specifying the user interface. In this paper, a new way of working with embedded user interface specifications is proposed, exploiting sequence diagrams with a hypertext structure for representing and retrieving use cases. This new tool concept is assessed through an application to the requirements specification for the Airbus A380 air traffic control Datalink system; engineers involved in the development of the Airbus cockpit used a prototype of the tool concept to resolve a set of user interface design anomalies in the requirements specification. The results of the study are positive and indicate the user interface to requirements specification tools which user interface designers themselves need.


Requirements Sequence diagrams Use cases Safety critical software Information retrieval 


  1. Amyot D, Mussbacher G (2001) Bridging the requirements/design gap in dynamic systems with use case maps (UCMs). In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on software engineering (ICSE’01). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Benyon D, Turner P, Turner S (2005) Designing interactive systems. Addison-Wesley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Buhr RJA (1998) Use case maps as architectural entities for complex systems. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24:1131–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fowler M (2004) UML distilled: a brief guide to the standard modeling language. Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Helleberg JR, Wickens CD (2003) Effects of datalink modality and display redundancy on pilot performance: an attentional perspective. Int J Aviat Psychol 13(3):189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kovitz BL (1999) Practical software requirements: a manual of contents and style. Manning, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  7. Papadopoulos Y, McDermid JA (1999) The potential of a generic approach to certification of safety-critical systems in the transportation sector. J Reliab Eng Syst Saf 63:47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Potts C (2006) Re-framing requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international requirements engineering conference (RE’06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 285–290Google Scholar
  9. Wickens CD, Goh J, Heeleberg J, Horrey WJ, Talleur DA (2003) Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Hum Factors 45:360–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wieringa R (1998) A survey of structured and object-oriented software specification methods and techniques. ACM Comput Surv 30(4):459–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AIRBUSToulouse Cedex 03France
  2. 2.Computer ScienceUCLLondonUK

Personalised recommendations