Cognition, Technology & Work

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 25–31 | Cite as

Information flow during crisis management: challenges to coordination in the emergency operations center

  • Laura G. Militello
  • Emily S. Patterson
  • Lynn Bowman
  • Robert Wears
Original Article

Abstract

This paper discusses challenges to coordination in the emergency operations center (EOC). A county-level EOC is made up of representatives from a range of organizations including local government, fire, police, hospital, utility, and Red Cross representatives. These ad hoc teams are tasked with coming together during an emergency to obtain and deliver resources to first responders on the scene of the disaster, as well coordinating transportation of casualties, tracking of fatalities, and establishment of shelters. Two county-level exercises were observed. Themes were identified across the two exercises. Recommendations for better supporting coordination in crisis management are offered.

Keywords

Emergency operations center Crisis management Team decision making Team coordination Cross agency collaboration 

References

  1. Aubrey L (2002) The hard lessons of September. Mod Healthc 32(4):50Google Scholar
  2. Endsley MR, Garland DJ (2000) Situation awareness analysis and measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  3. Grudin J (1994) Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus. IEEE Comput 27(5):19–27Google Scholar
  4. Hackman JR (1990) Groups that work (and those that don’t): creating conditions for effective teamwork. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  5. McEntire DA (2002) Coordinating multi-organizational responses to disaster: lessons from the March 28, 2000, Fort Worth tornado. Disaster Prev Manag 11(5):369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Patterson ES, Watts-Perotti J, Woods DD (1999) Voice loops as coordination aids in space shuttle mission control. Comput Support Coop Work 8(4):353–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Perry RW (2003) Emergency operations centers in an era of terrorism: policy and management functions. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 11(4):151–159CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Salas E, Fiore SM (2004) Team cognition: understanding the factors that drive process and performance. American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. The 9/11 Commission (2004) Final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States. Retrieved September 2004 from http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/Google Scholar
  10. Tierney KJ, Lindell MK, Perry RW (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura G. Militello
    • 1
  • Emily S. Patterson
    • 2
  • Lynn Bowman
    • 1
  • Robert Wears
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Dayton Research InstituteDaytonUSA
  2. 2.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.University of FloridaJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations