Cognition, Technology & Work

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 88–100 | Cite as

Information practices and cognitive artifacts in scientific research

Original Article

Abstract

A cognitive ethnography study investigates information practices in experimental life sciences research. Activity analysis of collaborative research projects and cognitive artifacts revealed a series of seven cognitive information tasks performed in the lifecycle of the research project. Life scientists exhibited habituated patterns of search behavior in the institutional information ecology. Scientists have widely adopted the transparent search interfaces of PubMed and Google, rarely employing full text or specialized services for searching publications. An activity theory approach suggests explanations for interface and information use. Individual researchers in the research project context perform information tasks to locate information objects, mediated by the printed article as a primary cognitive artifact. A cycle of use shows that interface transparency mediates the pursuit of information objects through locating “opaque” cognitive artifacts. Such simple, transparent information tasks become routinized operations. Individual attention becomes focused on the artifact and information object, not the user interface.

Keywords

Information behavior Cognitive ethnography Scientific collaboration Information ecology Cognitive artifacts Information objects 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper reports findings from a research program conducted by Redesign Research for Elsevier. I acknowledge Dr. David Marques, the Elsevier research sponsor, for supporting this research and review of the manuscript, and Andrea Kravetz, for her support and coordination of the research. Chris Jasek of Elsevier’s User-Centered Design group is acknowledged for his collaboration in field data collection and analysis, and review of the article. I also thank Erik Hollnagel, Alan Dix and Erik Andriessen for their thoughtful reviews.

References

  1. Agre PE (2001) Commodity and community: institutional design for the networked university. Planning for Higher Education 29(2):5–14Google Scholar
  2. Ball LJ and Ormerod TC (2000) Putting ethnography to work: the case for a cognitive ethnography of design. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 53(1):147–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry CA (1997) The research activity timeline: a qualitative tool for information research. Lib Inform Sci Res 19 (2):153–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole M, Engeström Y (1991) A cultural historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Salamon G (ed) Distributed cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–47Google Scholar
  5. Crane D (1972) Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Covi LM (1999) Material mastery: situating digital library use in university research practices. Inform Process Manage 35:293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunbar K (2000) How scientists think in the real world: Implications for science education. J Appl Dev Psychol 21(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hollan J, Hutchins E, and Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for Human Computer Interaction research. ACM Transact Comput-Hum Interact 7(2):174–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones PH, Nemeth CN (2004) Cognitive artifacts in complex work. Lecture Notes Artif Intell 3345:161–194Google Scholar
  11. Kuutti K (1996) Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Nardi BA (ed) Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press Cambridge, pp 17–44Google Scholar
  12. Marchionini G (1995) Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Nardi BA, O’Day VL (1999) Information ecologies. MIT Press, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Nardi BA (ed) (1996) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Star SL (1995) Ecologies of knowledge: work and politics in science and technology. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  16. Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Redesign ResearchDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations