Advertisement

Journal of Geographical Systems

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 207–226 | Cite as

Allocation using a heterogeneous space Voronoi diagram

  • Xin Feng
  • Alan T. Murray
Original Article

Abstract

Spatial allocation is a fundamentally important process reflecting customer behavior, efficient service assignment, districting, etc., and is at the heart of many spatial analytical methods and processes. The Voronoi diagram has proven to be an important mathematical and geometric construct and has been widely applied in various fields because it is intuitive and efficient in the allocation and/or partitioning of space. However, existing Voronoi diagram approaches rely on the assumption that the attribute(s) of continuous space (non-generator points) is homogenous, which often is not the case for many application contexts. This paper introduces the concept of spatial heterogeneity in allocation. A new Voronoi diagram is defined—the heterogeneous Voronoi diagram. A geographic information system-based method is developed to derive the heterogeneous Voronoi diagram using discretized spatial allocation properties. Application of the heterogeneous Voronoi diagram is reported for a planning problem involving emergency drone delivery. Results show that response potential is over- and underestimated when heterogeneity and travel obstacles are disregarded. Further, feasibility, usefulness, and significance are demonstrated for incorporating geographic heterogeneity in the allocation process.

Keywords

Spatial heterogeneity Voronoi diagram Allocation 

JEL Classification

R4 Transportation Economics 

References

  1. Anselin L (1988) Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geogr Anal 20(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (2013) Spatial econometrics: methods and models, vol 4. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakolas E, Tsiotras P (2010) The Zermelo–Voronoi diagram: a dynamic partition problem. Automatica 46(12):2059–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bogue DJ (1949) The structure of the metropolitan community: a study of dominance and subdominance. Horace M. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  5. Boots BN (1974) Delaunay triangles: an alternative approach to point pattern analysis. Process Assoc Am Geogr 6:26–29Google Scholar
  6. Boots BN (1980) Weighting thiessen polygons. Econ Geogr 56(3):248–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boots B, South R (1997) Modeling retail trade areas using higher-order, multiplicatively weighted Voronoi diagrams. J Retail 73(4):519–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cachon GP (2014) Retail store density and the cost of greenhouse gas emissions. Manag Sci 60(8):1907–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caffrey SL, Willoughby PJ, Pepe PE, Becker LB (2002) Public use of automated external defibrillators. N Engl J Med 347(16):1242–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen J (1999) A raster-based method for computing Voronoi diagrams of spatial objects using dynamic distance transformation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13(3):209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Church RL, Cohon JL (1976) Multiobjective location analysis of regional energy facility siting problems (No. BNL-50567). Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (USA)Google Scholar
  12. Church RL, Murray AT (2009) Business site selection, location analysis, and GIS. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke K (2011) Getting started with geographic information systems, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke R (2014) Understanding the drone epidemic. Comput Law Secur Rev 30(3):230–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Communication W (2014) TU Delf’s ambulance drone drastically increases changes of survival of cardiac arrest patients. The Netherlands: DelftGoogle Scholar
  16. Cressie N, Wikle CK (2015) Statistics for spatio-temporal data. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins R, Bergner L, Eisenberg M, Murray J (1984) Sensitivity, accuracy, and safety of an automatic external defibrillator: report of a field evaluation. Lancet 324(8398):318–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dacey MF (1965) The geometry of central place theory. Geografiska Ann Ser B Human Geogr 47(2):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahl KP, Thompson DR, McLaren D, Chao Y, Chien S (2011) Current-sensitive path planning for an underactuated free-floating ocean sensorweb. In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS), pp 3140–3146. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  20. Dao THD, Zhou Y, Thill JC, Delmelle E (2012) Spatio-temporal location modeling in a 3D indoor environment: the case of AEDs as emergency medical devices. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26(3):469–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finn RL, Wright D (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems: surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Comput Law Secur Rev 28(2):184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerrard RA, Church RL (1996) Closest assignment constraints and location models: properties and structure. Locat Sci 4(4):251–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gold CM (1992) The meaning of “Neighbour”. In: Frank AE, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 220–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gold CM, Condal AR (1995) A spatial data structure integrating GIS and simulation in a marine environment. Mar Geodesy 18(3):213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodchild MF (1992) Geographical data modeling. Comput Geosci 18(4):401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodchild MF, Gopal S (eds) (1989) The accuracy of spatial databases. CRC Press, Baca RatonGoogle Scholar
  27. Hakimi SL (1964) Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Oper Res 12(3):450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hakimi SL (1965) Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Oper Res 13(3):462–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanjoul P, Peeters D (1987) A facility location problem with clients’ preference orderings. Reg Sci Urban Econ 17(3):451–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hern A (2014) DHL launches first commercial drone ‘parcelcopter’ delivery service. The GuardianGoogle Scholar
  31. Heuvelink GB (1998) Error propagation in environmental modelling with GIS. CRC Press, Baca RatonGoogle Scholar
  32. Huff DL, Lutz JM (1979) Ireland’s urban system. Econ Geogr 55(3):196–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Z, Zhu C, Gold C (2004) Digital terrain modeling: principles and methodology. CRC Press, Baca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lugo JJ, Zell A (2014) Framework for autonomous on-board navigation with the AR. Drone. J Intell Rob Syst 73(1–4):401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meijering JL (1953) Interface area, edge length, and number of vertices in crystal aggregates with random nucleation. Philips Res Rep 8:270–290Google Scholar
  36. Mendes AB, Themido IH (2004) Multi-outlet retail site location assessment. Int Trans Oper Res 11(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mu L, Wang X (2006) Population landscape: a geometric approach to studying spatial patterns of the US urban hierarchy. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(6):649–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murray AT, Matisziw TC, Wei H, Tong D (2008) A geocomputational heuristic for coverage maximization in service facility siting. Trans GIS 12(6):757–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Novaes AG, de Cursi JS, da Silva AC, Souza JC (2009) Solving continuous location–districting problems with Voronoi diagrams. Comput Oper Res 36(1):40–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Okabe A, Suzuki A (1997) Locational optimization problems solved through Voronoi diagrams. Eur J Oper Res 98(3):445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Okabe A, Boots B, Sugihara K, Chiu SN (1992) Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams. Wiley, New York, p 1992Google Scholar
  42. Okabe A, Satoh T, Furuta T, Suzuki A, Okano K (2008) Generalized network Voronoi diagrams: concepts, computational methods, and applications. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(9):965–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickett ST, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269(5222):331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pulver A, Wei R, Mann C (2016) Locating AED enabled medical drones to enhance cardiac arrest response times. Prehospital Emerg Care 20(3):378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ReVelle CS, Swain RW (1970) Central facilities location. Geogr Anal 2(1):30–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rojeski P, ReVelle C (1970) Central facilities location under an investment constraint. Geogr Anal 2(4):343–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scaparra MP, Church RL, Medrano FA (2014) Corridor location: the multi-gateway shortest path model. J Geogr Syst 16:287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selecky M, Vana P, Rollo M, Meiser T (2013) Wind corrections in flight path planning. Int J Adv Rob Syst 10:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharifzadeh M, Shahabi C (2008) Processing optimal sequenced route queries using voronoi diagrams. GeoInformatica 12(4):411–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaver GR (2005) Spatial heterogeneity: past, present, and future. In: Ecosystem function in heterogeneous landscapes. Springer, New York, pp 443–449Google Scholar
  51. Shieh YN (1985) KH Rau and the economic law of market areas. J Reg Sci 25(2):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh S, Woo M, Raghavendra CS (1998) Power-aware routing in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking. ACM, pp 181–190Google Scholar
  53. Snyder D (1962) Hierarchy Spacing and Interconnections of Urban Places in Uruguay. Festschr CF Jones Northwest Univ Stud Geogr 6:29–46Google Scholar
  54. Thiels CA, Aho JM, Zietlow SP, Jenkins DH (2015) Use of unmanned aerial vehicles for medical product transport. Air Med J 34(2):104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thiessen AH (1911) Precipitation averages for large areas. Mon Weather Rev 39(7):1082–1089Google Scholar
  56. Tong D, Murray AT (2009) Maximizing coverage of spatial demand for service. Papers Reg Sci 88(1):85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Toregas C, Swain R, ReVelle C, Bergman L (1971) The location of emergency service facilities. Oper Res 19(6):1363–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wagner JL, Falkson LM (1975) The optimal nodal location of public facilities with price-sensitive demand. Geogr Anal 7(1):69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wei H, Murray AT, Xiao N (2006) Solving the continuous space p-centre problem: planning application issues. IMA J Manag Math 17(4):413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Welch A (2015) A cost-benefit analysis of Amazon Prime air. University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, ChattanoogaGoogle Scholar
  61. Wigner E, Seitz F (1933) On the constitution of metallic sodium. Phys Rev 43(10):804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Winston WL, Goldberg JB (2004) Operations research: applications and algorithms, vol 3. Thomson Brooks/Cole, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  63. Witt J, Dunbabin M (2008) Go with the flow: optimal AUV path planning in coastal environments. In: Australian conference on robotics and automation, vol 2008(2)Google Scholar
  64. Yao J, Murray AT (2013) Continuous surface representation and approximation: spatial analytical implications. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 27(5):883–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yao J, Murray AT (2014) Serving regional demand in facility location. Papers Reg Sci 93(3):643–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of California at Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations