Spanish Economic Review

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 159–175 | Cite as

Joint Ventures versus Contractual Agreements: An Empirical Investigation

Regular Article

Abstract

In this paper, we empirically investigate the determinants of the governance form of strategic alliances. We use a database with 1,344 worldwide alliances in several industrial sectors. In contrast with previous empirical studies, we find that alliances undertaking R&D activities are more likely to use loose forms of organization (contractual agreements) than more hierarchical ones (joint ventures), and this result is even stronger when the alliance takes place in technologically sophisticated sectors. Moreover, we show that alliances between rival firms tend also to be organized with forms closer to arm’s length transactions. When the scope of an alliance is multidimensional or the alliance is an international one, however, firms prefer more hierarchical organizations such as joint ventures.

Keywords

Strategic alliances Governance form Joint ventures Transaction costs economics Real option theory 

JEL Classification

D23 L22 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal S, Ramaswami SN (1992) Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. J Int Bus Stud 23:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baughn C, Denekamp J, Stevens J, Osborn R (1997) Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances. J World Bus 32:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleeke J, Ernst D (1992) The way to win cross-border alliances. McKinsey Q 1:113–133Google Scholar
  4. Chen H, Chen T-J (2003) Governance structures in strategic alliances: transaction cost versus resource-based perspective. J World Bus 38:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chi T (2000) Options to acquire or divest a joint venture. Strateg Manage J 21:665–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi T, McGuire D (1996) Collaborative ventures and value of learning: integrating the transaction cost and strategic option perspectives on the choice of market entry modes. Int Bus Stud 27:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiesa V, Manzini R (1998) Organizing for technological collaboration: a managerial perspective. R&D Manage 28:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colombo M (2003) Alliance form: a test of the contractual and competence perspectives. Strateg Manage J 24:1209–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Comino S (2002) Flexibility and commitment when forming alliances. Discussion Paper 28/2002, Department of Economics, University of Padova, vol 28, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  10. Contractor FJ, Lorange P (1988) Competition vs. cooperation: a benefit/cost framework for choosing between fully-owned investments and cooperative relationships. Management International Review, Special IssueGoogle Scholar
  11. Contractor FJ, Lorange P (2002) Cooperative strategies and alliances in international business. Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Das T, Teng B-S (1998) A resource based theory of strategic alliances. J Manage 43:31–61Google Scholar
  13. Doz Y, Hamel G, Prahlad C (1989) Collaborate with your competitors – and win. Harv Bus Rev 67:133–139Google Scholar
  14. Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven C (1996) A resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects of enterpreneurial firms. Organ Sci 7:136–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Folta T (1998) Governance and uncertainty: the trade-off between administrative control and commitment. Strateg Manage J 19:1007–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Canal E (1996) Contractual form in domestic and international strategic alliances. Organ Stud 17:773–794–22Google Scholar
  17. Gomes-Casseres B (1990) Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. J Int Bus Stud 21:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonzalez M (2001) Strategic alliances: the right way to compete in the 21st century. Ivey Bus J pp 47–51Google Scholar
  19. Gray B, Wood DJ (1991) Collaborative alliances: moving from practice to theory. J Appl Behav Sci 27:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad Manage J 38:85–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Adm Sci Q 43:781–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagedoorn J (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technological partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strateg Manage J 14:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hagedoorn J (1996) Trends and patterns in strategic technology partnering since the early seventies. Rev Ind Organ 11:601–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagedoorn J, Narula R (1996) Choosing organizational modes of strategic technology partnering: international and sectoral differences. J Int Bus Stud 27:265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Inkpen A, Ross J (2001) Why do some strategic alliances persist beyond their useful life? Calif Manage Rev 44:132–148Google Scholar
  26. Kogut B (1989) The stability of joint ventures: reciprocity and competitive rivalry. J Ind Econ 28:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morris D, Hergert M (1987) Trends in international cooperative agreements. Columbia J World Bus 22:15–21Google Scholar
  28. OECD (2001) Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborn R, Baughn C (1990) Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Acad Manage J 3:503–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oxley J (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction cost approach. J Law Econ Organ 13:387–409Google Scholar
  31. Pastor M, Sandonís J (2002) Research joint ventures vs. cross licensing agreements: an agency approach. Int J Ind Organ 20:215–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pisano GP (1989) Using equity participation to support exchange: evidence from biotechnology industry. J Law Econ Organ 5:109–126Google Scholar
  33. Pérez-Castrillo D, Sandonís J (1996) Disclosure of know-how in research joint ventures. Int J Ind Organ 15:51–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith KG, Carrol SJ, Ashford SJ (1995) Intra- and interorganizational cooperation: towards a research agenda. Acad Manage J 38:7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tao Z, Wu C (1997) On the organization of cooperative research and development: Theory and evidence. Int J Ind Organ 15:573–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Veugelers R (1995) Alliances and the pattern of comparative advantage: a sectoral analysis. Int Bus Rev 4:231–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williamson O (1975) Markets and hierarchies. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Williamson O (1985) The economics of institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di EconomiaUniversità di TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.Departamento de Econometría y Estadística, Facultad de CC. Economicas y EmpresarialesUniversidad del País VascoBilbaoSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y EmpresarialesUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations