Spanish Economic Review

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 139–160

Mixed Oligopoly and Environmental Policy

  • Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz
  • María Begoña Garzón
Regular Article

Abstract

We show in this paper that when there are both public and private firms in product markets (a mixed oligopoly) the decision whether to privatize a public firm interacts with the environmental policy of governments. Therefore, the outcome of the decision whether to privatize a public firm may be different if the government internalizes the environmental damage than if the government ignores it. When the government sets a tax to protect the environment, the tax is lower in the mixed oligopoly than in the private one even though the environmental damage is greater. In the mixed oligopoly the marginal cost of the public firm is lower than the market price.

Keywords

Environmental tax Mixed oligopoly Privatization 

JEL Classification

L33 Q28 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2003a) Strategic environmental standards, wage incomes and the location of polluting firms. Environ Resource Econ 24:121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2003b) Mixed duopoly, merger and multiproduct firms. J Econ 80:27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2005) Economic integration and privatisation under diseconomies of scale. Eur J Polit Econ 21:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett AH (1980) The Pigouvian tax rule under monopoly. Am Econ Rev 70:1037–1041Google Scholar
  5. Barrett S (1994) Strategic environmental policy and international trade. J Pub Econ 54:325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bluffstone R, Panayotou T (2000) Environmental liability in central and eastern Europe: toward an optimal policy. Environ Resource Econ 17:335–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. d’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Am Econ Rev 78:1133–1137Google Scholar
  8. De Fraja G, Delbono F (1989) Alternatives strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Econ Pap 41:302–311Google Scholar
  9. De Fraja G, Delbono F (1990) Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. J Econ Surv 4:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Environment Agency (1996) Environmental taxes. Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness. Environmental Issues Series No 1Google Scholar
  11. European Environment Agency (2000) Environmental taxes: recent developments in tools for integration. Environmental Issues Series No 18Google Scholar
  12. Fjell K, Pal D (1996) A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Can J Econ 29:737–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoel M (1997) Environmental policy with endogenous plant locations. Scand J Econ 99:241–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katsoulakos Y, Xepapadeas A (1996a) Emission taxes and market structure. In: Carraro C, Katsoulakos Y, Xepapadeas A (eds) Environmental policy and market structure. Kluwer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. Katsoulakos Y, Xepapadeas A (1996b) Environmental innovation, spillovers and optimal policy rules. In: Carraro C, Katsoulacos Y, Xepapadeas A (eds) Environmental policy and market structure. Kluwer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy P (1994) Equilibrium pollution taxes in open economies with imperfect competition. J Environ Econ Manag 27:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Markusen JR (1997) Costly pollution abatement, competitiveness and plant location decisions. Resource Energy Econ 19:299–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Markusen JR, Morey ER, Olewiler N (1995) Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous. J Pub Econ 56:55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsumura T (1998) Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. J Pub Econ 70:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGowan F (1993) Ownership and competition in community markets. In: Clarke T, Pitelis C (eds) The political economy of privatization. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Misiolek SW (1980) Effluent taxation in monopoly markets. J Environ Econ Manag 7:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Montes V, Petitbó A (1998) The privatisation of state enterprises in the Spanish Economy. In: Parker D (eds) Privatisation in the European Union. Theory and policy perspectives. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Parker D (1998) Privatisation in the European Union. Theory and policy perspectives. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Ulph A (1996) Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically. J Environ Econ Manag 30:256–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. van der Ploeg F, de Zeeuw AJ (1992) International aspects of pollution control. Environ Resource Econ 2:117–139Google Scholar
  26. Willner J (2001) Ownership, efficiency and political inference. Eur J Polit Econ 17:723–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Carlos Bárcena-Ruiz
    • 1
  • María Begoña Garzón
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico IUniversidad del País VascoBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations