Two-stage stochastic programming under multivariate risk constraints with an application to humanitarian relief network design

  • Nilay NoyanEmail author
  • Merve Meraklı
  • Simge Küçükyavuz
Full Length Paper Series B


In this study, we consider two classes of multicriteria two-stage stochastic programs in finite probability spaces with multivariate risk constraints. The first-stage problem features multivariate stochastic benchmarking constraints based on a vector-valued random variable representing multiple and possibly conflicting stochastic performance measures associated with the second-stage decisions. In particular, the aim is to ensure that the decision-based random outcome vector of interest is preferable to a specified benchmark with respect to the multivariate polyhedral conditional value-at-risk or a multivariate stochastic order relation. In this case, the classical decomposition methods cannot be used directly due to the complicating multivariate stochastic benchmarking constraints. We propose an exact unified decomposition framework for solving these two classes of optimization problems and show its finite convergence. We apply the proposed approach to a stochastic network design problem in the context of pre-disaster humanitarian logistics and conduct a computational study concerning the threat of hurricanes in the Southeastern part of the United States. The numerical results provide practical insights about our modeling approach and show that the proposed algorithm is computationally scalable.


Stochastic programming Multicriteria optimization Risk-averse two-stage Multivariate risk Conditional value-at-risk Stochastic dominance Benders decomposition Branch-and-cut Network design Pre-disaster Humanitarian relief 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C15 90C11 90C57 



We thank the guest editors and reviewers for their valuable comments that improved the paper. Nilay Noyan acknowledges the support from The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey under Grant #115M560. Simge Küçükyavuz and Merve Meraklı are supported, in part, by National Science Foundation Grant 1907463.


  1. 1.
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. Accessed 08 Dec 2017
  2. 2.
    Ahmed, S.: Convexity and decomposition of mean-risk stochastic programs. Math. Progr. 106(3), 433–446 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Financ. 9(3), 203–228 (1999)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balcik, B., Beamon, B.: Facility location in humanitarian relief. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 11(2), 101–121 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bodur, M., Luedtke, J.R.: Mixed-integer rounding enhanced Benders decomposition for multiclass service-system staffing and scheduling with arrival rate uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 63(7), 2073–2091 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer Series in Operations Research. Springer, New York (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Çelik, M., Ergun, Ö., Johnson, B., Keskinocak, P., Lorca, Á., Pekgün, P., Swann, J.: Humanitarian logistics. In: New Directions in Informatics, Optimization, Logistics, and Production, pp. 18–49. INFORMS (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dentcheva, D., Martinez, G.: Two-stage stochastic optimization problems with stochastic ordering constraints on the recourse. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 219(1), 1–8 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 14(2), 548–566 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Optimization with multivariate stochastic dominance constraints. Math. Program. 117(1), 111–127 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dentcheva, D., Wolfhagen, E.: Optimization with multivariate stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 25(1), 564–588 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dentcheva, D., Wolfhagen, E.: Two-stage optimization problems with multivariate stochastic order constraints. Math. Oper. Res. 41(1), 1–22 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Döyen, A., Aras, N., Barbarosoğlu, G.: A two-echelon stochastic facility location model for humanitarian relief logistics. Optim. Lett. 6(6), 1123–1145 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dupǎcová, J.: Risk objectives in two-stage stochastic programming models. Kybernetika 44(2), 227–242 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elçi, Ö., Noyan, N.: A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic programming model for humanitarian relief network design. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 108, 55–83 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fábián, C.I.: Handling CVaR objectives and constraints in two-stage stochastic models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191(3), 888–911 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gollmer, R., Gotzes, U., Schultz, R.: A note on second-order stochastic dominance constraints induced by mixed-integer linear recourse. Math. Program. 216(1), 179–190 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutjahr, W.J., Nolz, P.C.: Multicriteria optimization in humanitarian aid. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252(2), 351–366 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Homem-de-Mello, T., Mehrotra, S.: A cutting surface method for uncertain linear programs with linear stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 20(3), 1250–1273 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hong, X., Lejeune, M.A., Noyan, N.: Stochastic network design for disaster preparedness. IIE Trans. 47(4), 329–357 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hu, J., Mehrotra, S.: Robust and stochastically weighted multiobjective optimization models and reformulations. Oper. Res. 60(4), 936–953 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu, J., Homem-de Mello, T., Mehrotra, S.: Sample average approximation of stochastic dominance constrained programs. Math. Program. 133(1–2), 171–201 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huang, M., Smilowitz, K., Balcik, B.: Models for relief routing: equity, efficiency and efficacy. Transp. Res. Part E 48(1), 2–18 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Küçükyavuz, S., Noyan, N.: Cut generation for optimization problems with multivariate risk constraints. Math. Program. 159(1), 165–199 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kusuoka, S.: On law invariant coherent risk measures. Adv. Math. Econ. 3, 83–95 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liberatore, F., Pizarro, C., de Blas, C.S., Ortuño, M.: Uncertainty in humanitarian logistics for disaster management. A review. In: Vitoriano, B., Montero, J., Ruan, D. (eds.) Decision aid Models for Disaster Management and Emergencies, pp. 45–74. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu, X., Küçükyavuz, S., Noyan, N.: Robust multicriteria risk-averse stochastic programming models. Ann. Oper. Res. 259(1), 259–294 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Noyan, N.: Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming with an application to disaster management. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(3), 541–559 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Noyan, N., Balcik, B., Atakan, S.: A stochastic optimization model for designing last mile relief networks. Transp. Sci. 50(3), 1092–1113 (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Noyan, N., Rudolf, G.: Optimization with multivariate conditional value-at-risk-constraints. Oper. Res. 61(4), 990–1013 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Noyan, N., Rudolf, G.: Optimization with stochastic preferences based on a general class of scalarization functions. Oper. Res. 66(2), 463–486 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rawls, C.G., Turnquist, M.A.: Pre-positioning of emergency supplies for disaster response. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 44(4), 521–534 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rawls, C.G., Turnquist, M.A.: Pre-positioning planning for emergency response with service quality constraints. OR Spectr. 33(3), 481–498 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2(3), 21–41 (2000)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ruszczyński, A., Shapiro, A. (eds.): Stochastic Programming, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Saaty, T.L.: Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (1990)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salmerón, J., Apte, A.: Stochastic optimization for natural disaster asset prepositioning. Prod. Oper. Manag. 19(5), 561–574 (2010)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van Slyke, R., Wets, R.: L-shaped linear programs with applications to optimal control and stochastic programming. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17(4), 638–663 (1969)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vitoriano, B., Ortuño, M.T., Tirado, G., Montero, J.: A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. J. Glob. Optim. 51(2), 189–208 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and Mathematical Optimization Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nilay Noyan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Merve Meraklı
    • 2
  • Simge Küçükyavuz
    • 2
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering ProgramSabancı UniversityTuzla, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Industrial Engineering and Management SciencesNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations