Mathematical Programming

, Volume 165, Issue 1, pp 291–330 | Cite as

On the existence of solutions to stochastic quasi-variational inequality and complementarity problems

  • Uma Ravat
  • Uday V. ShanbhagEmail author
Full Length Paper Series B


Variational inequality problems allow for capturing an expansive class of problems, including convex optimization problems, convex Nash games and economic equilibrium problems, amongst others. Yet in most practical settings, such problems are complicated by uncertainty, motivating the examination of a stochastic generalization of the variational inequality problem and its extensions in which the components of the mapping contain expectations. When the associated sets are unbounded, ascertaining existence requires having access to analytical forms of the expectations. Naturally, in practical settings, such expressions are often difficult to derive, severely limiting the applicability of such an approach. Consequently, our goal lies in developing techniques that obviate the need for integration and our emphasis lies in developing tractable and verifiable sufficiency conditions for claiming existence. We begin by recapping almost-sure sufficiency conditions for stochastic variational inequality problems with single-valued maps provided in our prior work Ravat and Shanbhag (in: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), 2010), Ravat and Shanbhag (SIAM J Optim 21: 1168–1199, 2011) and provide extensions to multi-valued mappings. Next, we extend these statements to quasi-variational regimes where maps can be either single or set-valued. Finally, we refine the obtained results to accommodate stochastic complementarity problems where the maps are either general or co-coercive. The applicability of our results is demonstrated on practically occuring instances of stochastic quasi-variational inequality problems and stochastic complementarity problems, arising as nonsmooth generalized Nash-Cournot games and power markets, respectively.

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C15 90C33 


  1. 1.
    Aubin, J., Frankowska, H.: Set-Valued Analysis, vol. 2 of Systems and Control: Foundations and Applications, Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aumann, R.J.: Integrals of set-valued functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 12, 1–12 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., Nemirovski, A.: Robust optimization, Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birge, J.R., Louveaux, F.: Introduction to Stochastic Programming, Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, D., Pang, J.S.: The generalized quasivariational inequality problem. Math. Oper. Res. 7, 211–222 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, X., Fukushima, M.: Expected residual minimization method for stochastic linear complementarity problems. Math. Oper. Res. 30, 1022–1038 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, X., Wets, R.J.-B., Zhang, Y.: Stochastic variational inequalities: residual minimization smoothing sample average approximations. SIAM J. Optim. 22, 649–673 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cottle, R.W., Pang, J.-S., Stone, R.E.: The Linear Complementarity Problem. Academic Press Inc, Boston (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Facchinei, F., Pang, J.: Nash Equilibria: The Variational Approach, Convex Optimization in Signal Processing and Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Facchinei, F., Pang, J.-S.: Finite Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems: vols. I and II, Springer, NY (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fang, H., Chen, X., Fukushima, M.: Stochastic \(\text{ r }_0\) matrix linear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim. 18, 482–506 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gurkan, G., Ozge, A., Robinson, S.: Sample-path solution of stochastic variational inequalities. Math. Program. 84, 313–333 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gwinner, J., Raciti, F.: Random equilibrium problems on networks. Math. Comput. Model. 43, 880–891 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gwinner, J., Raciti, F.: Some equilibrium problems under uncertainty and random variational inequalities. Ann. OR 200, 299–319 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harker, P., Pang, J.-S.: Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math. Program. 48, 161–220 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harker, P.T.: Generalized nash games and quasi-variational inequalities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 54, 81–94 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hartman, P., Stampacchia, G.: On some nonlinear elliptic differential functional equations. Acta Math. 115, 153–188 (1966)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hobbs, B.F.: Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and poolco power markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 16, 194–202 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hobbs, B.F., Helman, U.: Complementarity-based equilibrium modeling for electric power markets. In: Bunn, D. (ed.) Modelling Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets. Wiley, Londlon (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hobbs, B.F., Pang, J.S.: Nash-Cournot equilibria in electric power markets with piecewise linear demand functions and joint constraints. Oper. Res. 55, 113–127 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang, H., Xu, H.: Stochastic approximation approaches to the stochastic variational inequality problem. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 53, 1462–1475 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Juditsky, A., Nemirovski, A., Tauvel, C.: Solving variational inequalities with stochastic mirror-prox algorithm. Stoch. Syst. 1, 17–58 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Karamardian, S.: Generalized complementarity problem. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 8, 161–168 (1971)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kien, B.T., Yao, J.-C., Yen, N.D.: On the solution existence of pseudomonotone variational inequalities. J. Glob. Optim. 41, 135–145 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    King, A., Rockafellar, R.: Asymptotic theory for solutions in statistical estimation and stochastic programming. Math. Oper. Res. 18, 148–162 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Konnov, I.V.: Equilibrium Models and Variational Inequalities, vol. 210 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koshal, J., N., A., Shanbhag, U.V.: Regularized iterative stochastic approximation methods for stochastic variational inequality problems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 58, 594–609 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koshal, J., Nedić, A., Shanbhag, U.V.: Single timescale regularized stochastic approximation schemes for monotone Nash games under uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 231–236 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koshal, J., Nedić, A., Shanbhag, U.V.: Single timescale stochastic approximation for stochastic Nash games in cognitive radio systems. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), pp. 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kushner, H.J., Yin, G.G.: Stochastic approximation and recursive algorithms and applications, vol. 35 of Applications of Mathematics (New York), Springer, New York, second ed., 2003. Stochastic Modelling and Applied ProbabilityGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lin, G., Fukushima, M.: Stochastic equilibrium problems and stochastic mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints: a survey. Pac. J. Optim. 6, 455–482 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu, Y., Romisch, W., Xu, H.: Quantitative stability analysis of stochastic generalized equations, submitted, (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lu, S., Budhiraja, A.: Confidence regions for stochastic variational inequalities. Math. Oper. Res. 38, 545–568 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Luo, M.-J., Lin, G.H.: Convergence results of the ERM method for nonlinear stochastic variational inequality problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 142, 569–581 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luo, M.-J., Lu, Y.: Properties of expected residual minimization model for a class of stochastic complementarity problems, J. Appl. Math., pp. Art. ID 497586, 7 (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Luo, M.-J., Wu, O.: Convergence results of the ERM method for stochastic Nash equilibrium problems. Far East J. Math. Sci. 70, 309–320 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLean, R.P.: Approximation theory for stochastic variational and Ky Fan inequalities in finite dimensions. Ann. Oper. Res. 44, 43–61 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pang, J.S., Scutari, G.: Joint sensing and power allocation in nonconvex cognitive radio games: Quasi-Nash equilibria. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 61, 2366–2382 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pang, J.S., Trinkle, J.C.: Complementarity formulations and existence of solutions of dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with coulomb friction. Math. Program. 73, 199–226 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pang, J.S., Trinkle, J.C.: Stability characterizations of fixtured rigid bodies with coulomb friction. In: Robotics and Automation, 2000. Proceedings. ICRA ’00. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 1, pp. 361–368 (2000)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ralph, D., Xu, H.: Convergence of stationary points of sample average two-stage stochastic programs: a generalized equation approach. Math. Oper. Res. 36, 568–592 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ravat, U., Shanbhag, U.V.: On the characterization of solution sets of smooth and nonsmooth stochastic Nash games. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 5632–5637 (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ravat, U., Shanbhag, U.V.: On the characterization of solution sets of smooth and nonsmooth convex stochastic Nash games. SIAM J. Optim. 21, 1168–1199 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Robinson, S.: Generalized equations and their solutions. I. Basic theory. Math. Program. Study 10, 128–141 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robinson, S.: Strongly regular generalized equations. Math. Oper. Res. 5, 43–62 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Finance Stoch. 10(1), 51–74 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Optimality conditions in portfolio analysis with general deviation measures. Math. Program. 108(2–3), 515–540 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Scutari, G., Facchinei, F., Pang, J.-S., Palomar, D.: Monotone games in communications: theory, algorithms, and models, to appear. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory (2010)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shanbhag, U.V.: Stochastic variational inequality problems: applications, analysis, and algorithms, TUTORIALS in Operations Research, pp. 71–107 (2013)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shanbhag, U.V., Infanger, G., Glynn, P.W.: A complementarity framework for forward contracting under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 59, 7–49 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shapiro, A.: Monte carlo sampling methods. In: Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 10, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 353–426 (2003)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Lectures on stochastic programming, vol. 9 of MPS/SIAM Series on Optimization, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2009. Modeling and theoryGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wang, M., Lin, G.-H., Gao, Y., Ali, M.M.: Sample average approximation method for a class of stochastic variational inequality problems. J. Syst. Sci. Complex. 24, 1143–1153 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Xu, H.: Sample average approximation methods for a class of stochastic variational inequality problems. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 27, 103–119 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu, H., Zhang, D.: Stochastic Nash equilibrium problems: sample average approximation and applications, To appear in Computational Optimization and Applications (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yin, H., Shanbhag, U.V., Mehta, P.G.: Nash equilibrium problems with scaled congestion costs and shared constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 56, 1702–1708 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yousefian, F., Nedić, A., Shanbhag, U.V.: A regularized adaptive steplength stochastic approximation scheme for monotone stochastic variational inequalities. In: Jain, S., Himmelspach, J., White, K.P., Fu, M.C. (eds.) Winter Simulation Conference, WSC, 2011, pp. 4115–4126Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yousefian, F., Nedić, A., Shanbhag, U.V.: A distributed adaptive steplength stochastic approximation method for monotone stochastic Nash games. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference (ACC), Baltimore, pp. 4772–4777 (2013)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yousefian, F., Nedić, A., Shanbhag, U.V.: A regularized smoothing stochastic approximation (RSSA) algorithm for stochastic variational inequality problems. In: Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, 2013, pp. 933–944Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany and Mathematical Optimization Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations