Mathematical Programming

, Volume 161, Issue 1–2, pp 307–345 | Cite as

Smooth strongly convex interpolation and exact worst-case performance of first-order methods

  • Adrien B. Taylor
  • Julien M. Hendrickx
  • François Glineur
Full Length Paper Series A


We show that the exact worst-case performance of fixed-step first-order methods for unconstrained optimization of smooth (possibly strongly) convex functions can be obtained by solving convex programs. Finding the worst-case performance of a black-box first-order method is formulated as an optimization problem over a set of smooth (strongly) convex functions and initial conditions. We develop closed-form necessary and sufficient conditions for smooth (strongly) convex interpolation, which provide a finite representation for those functions. This allows us to reformulate the worst-case performance estimation problem as an equivalent finite dimension-independent semidefinite optimization problem, whose exact solution can be recovered up to numerical precision. Optimal solutions to this performance estimation problem provide both worst-case performance bounds and explicit functions matching them, as our smooth (strongly) convex interpolation procedure is constructive. Our works build on those of Drori and Teboulle (Math Program 145(1–2):451–482, 2014) who introduced and solved relaxations of the performance estimation problem for smooth convex functions. We apply our approach to different fixed-step first-order methods with several performance criteria, including objective function accuracy and gradient norm. We conjecture several numerically supported worst-case bounds on the performance of the fixed-step gradient, fast gradient and optimized gradient methods, both in the smooth convex and the smooth strongly convex cases, and deduce tight estimates of the optimal step size for the gradient method.


Smooth convex minimization Smooth convex interpolation First-order methods Worst-case analysis Rates of convergence Semidefinite programming 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C25 90C30 90C60 68Q25 90C22 


  1. 1.
    Bauschke, H., Combettes, P.: Convex analysis and monotone operator theory in Hilbert spaces. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, A.: Quadratic matrix programming. SIAM J. Optim. 17(4), 1224–1238 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. Image Process. IEEE Trans. 18(11), 2419–2434 (2009)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beck, A., Teboulle, M.: A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 2(1), 183–202 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ben-Tal, A., Nemirovski, A.: Lectures on modern convex optimization: analysis, algorithms, and engineering applications, vol. 2. SIAM, Philadelphia (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bertsekas, D.P.: Convex optimization theory. Athena Scientific, Belmont (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertsekas, D.P.: Convex optimization algorithms. Athena Scientific, Belmont (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L.: Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devolder, O., Glineur, F., Nesterov, Y.: Double smoothing technique for large-scale linearly constrained convex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 22(2), 702–727 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Drori, Y., Teboulle, M.: Performance of first-order methods for smooth convex minimization: a novel approach. Math. Program. 145(1–2), 451–482 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Härter, V., Jansson, C., Lange, M.: VSDP: A matlab toolbox for verified semidefinite-quadratic-linear programming. Technical report, Institute for Reliable Computing, Hamburg University of Technology (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiriart-Urruty, J.B., Lemaréchal, C.: Convex analysis and minimization algorithms. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). (Two volumes—2nd printing)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, D., Fessler, J.: On the convergence analysis of the optimized gradient methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08573 (2015)
  14. 14.
    Kim, D., Fessler, J.: Optimized first-order methods for smooth convex minimization. Math. Program. (2015). doi: 10.1007/s10107-015-0949-3
  15. 15.
    Lambert, D., Crouzeix, J.P., Nguyen, V., Strodiot, J.J.: Finite convex integration. J. Convex Anal. 11(1), 131–146 (2004)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lessard, L., Recht, B., Packard, A.: Analysis and design of optimization algorithms via integral quadratic constraints. SIAM. J. Optim. 26(1), 57–95 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Löfberg, J.: YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In: Proceedings of the CACSD Conference (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mosek, A.: The MOSEK optimization software, vol. 54. (2010)
  19. 19.
    Nemirovsky, A., Yudin, D.: Problem complexity and method efficiency in optimization. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nesterov, Y.: A method of solving a convex programming problem with convergence rate O(\(1/k^2\))). Sov. Math. Dokl. 27, 372–376 (1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nesterov, Y.: Introductory lectures on convex optimization: a basic course. Applied optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nesterov, Y.: How to make the gradients small. Optima 88, 10–11 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rockafellar, R.T., Wets, R.B.: Variational analysis. Springer, Berlin (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sturm, J.F.: Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim. Methods Softw. 11–12, 625–653 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vandenberghe, L., Boyd, S.: Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev. 38, 49–95 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and Mathematical Optimization Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrien B. Taylor
    • 1
  • Julien M. Hendrickx
    • 1
  • François Glineur
    • 1
  1. 1.ICTEAM Institute/COREUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations