Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for face and neck rejuvenation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is widely used for skin rejuvenation and tightening. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of HIFU for face and neck rejuvenation. A systematic search of peer reviewed articles published before December 2017 was performed using Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Retrieved studies were screened, and clinical trials or follow-up studies which were evaluated the effect of HIFU on rejuvenation treatments of face and neck area were included. Risk of bias for each study was assessed and was reported. Safety and efficacy variables, which were reported more often in papers, were included in meta-analysis. Seventeen studies involving 477 participants were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis showed moderate improvement as scores of 2.74 (95% CI 2.06–3.43) and 2.68 (95% CI 1.92–3.45), out of 5 maximum score, for objective improvement score and subjective satisfaction score, respectively. Meta-analysis of mean pain score, assessed by a 0–10 Likert score, was 4.2 (95% CI 4.27–5.19). Edema and erythema showed considerable heterogeneity, and no hyperpigmentation was reported by included studies. Included studies used multiple and different outcome variables with different scoring at various time points. Long follow-up was not reported by majority of studies. HIFU is safe procedure in short term and has a moderate effect on rejuvenation of face and neck areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Juhász M, Korta D, Atanaskova Mesinkovska N (2018) A review of the use of ultrasound for skin tightening, body contouring, and cellulite reduction in dermatology. Dermatol Surg 44(7):949–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. White WM, Makin IR, Barthe PG, Slayton MH, Gliklich RE (2007) Selective creation of thermal injury zones in the superficial musculoaponeurotic system using intense ultrasound therapy: a new target for noninvasive facial rejuvenation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Suh DH, Shin MK, Lee SJ, Rho JH, Lee MH, Kim NI et al (2011) Intense focused ultrasound tightening in Asian skin: clinical and pathologic results. Dermatol Surg 37:1595–1602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Park H, Kim E, Kim J et al (2015) High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of wrinkles and skin laxity in seven different facial areas. Ann Dermatol 27(6):688–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pak CS, Lee YK, Jeong JH, Kim JH, Seo JD, Heo CY (2014) Safety and efficacy of Ulthera in the rejuvenation of aging lower eyelids: a pivotal clinical trial. Aesthet Plast Surg 38(5):861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris MO, Sundaram HA (2015) Safety of microfocused ultrasound with visualization in patients with Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III to VI. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17(5):355–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee HS, Jang WS, Cha YJ et al (2012) Multiple pass ultrasound tightening of skin laxity of the lower face and neck. Dermatol Surg 38:20–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones IT, Guiha I, Goldman MP, Wu DC (2017) A randomized evaluator-blinded trial comparing subsurface monopolar radiofrequency with microfocused ultrasound for lifting and tightening of the neck. Dermatol Surg 43(12):1441–1447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasaki GH, Abelev N, Papadopoulos L (2017) A Split face study to determine the significance of adding increased energy and treatment levels at the marionette folds. Aesthet Surg J 37(8):947–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP (2010) Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol 62:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fabi SG, Goldman MP (2014) Retrospective evaluation of micro-focused ultrasound for lifting and tightening the face and neck. Dermatol Surg 40(5):569–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oni G, Hoxworth R, Teotia S, Brown S, Kenkel JM (2014) Evaluation of a microfocused ultrasound system for improving skin laxity and tightening in the lower face. Aesthet Surg J 34(7):1099–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saket P, Shobeihi S, Mehrdadi S (2017) Study of efficacy of esthetic high-intensity focused ultrasound system on Iranian skin for reducing the laxity and wrinkles of aging. J Cosmet Dermatol 16(3):336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baumann L, Zelickson B (2016 May 1) Evaluation of micro-focused ultrasound for lifting and tightening neck laxity. J Drugs Dermatol 15(5):607–614

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu PH, Yang CH, Chang YC (2017) Quantitative analysis of face and neck skin tightening by microfocused ultrasound with visualization in Asians. Dermatol Surg 43(11):1332–1338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Werschler WP, Werschler PS (2016 Feb) Long-term efficacy of micro-focused ultrasound with visualization for lifting and tightening lax facial and neck skin using a customized vectoring treatment method. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 9(2):27–33

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Suh DH, Oh YJ, Lee SJ et al (2012 Dec) A intense-focused ultrasound tightening for the treatment of infraorbital laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther 14(6):290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Suh DH, So BJ, Lee SJ et al (2015) Intense focused ultrasound for facial tightening: histologic changes in 11 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther 17(4):200–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung HJ, Min J, Seo HM, Kim WS (2016 Oct) Comparison of effect between high intense focused ultrasound devices for facial tightening: evaluator-blinded, split-face study. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(5):252–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by research grant number 36562-34-03-96 from Undersecretary of Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Firooz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics

This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Undersecretary of Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1396.4144.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 2 Main findings of included studies and assessment of risk of bias

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayatollahi, A., Gholami, J., Saberi, M. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for face and neck rejuvenation. Lasers Med Sci 35, 1007–1024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02957-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-02957-9

Keywords

Navigation