Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 373–378 | Cite as

Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs

  • Azin Ayatollahi
  • Aniseh Samadi
  • Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi
  • Somayeh Yadangi
  • Keyvan Nouri
  • Alireza FiroozEmail author
Original Article
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel diode system emitting 755 nm wavelength with conventional 755 nm alexandrite laser in skin types III and IV. It was a randomized, right-left comparison, assessor-blind, clinical study. Sixteen female volunteers age 29.52 ± 9.52 were randomly assigned to receive six treatment sessions using 755 nm diode laser on one axilla and 755 nm alexandrite on the opposite axilla. Efficacy was assessed by counting of hairs per square centimeter, 6 months after the last treatment. Treatment outcome was also evaluated by blind reviewing of before and after pictures, using Physician Global Assessment scale (GAS). Subject satisfaction was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS), pain level and adverse effects were recorded. Skin biophysical parameters (transepidermal water loss, skin sebum, and erythema index) were also measured. Significant reduction in hair count was observed, 6 months after the last treatment session, for both devices (− 33% for 755 nm diode and − 35% for 755 nm alexandrite; p value = 0.85). The mean GAS score was 2.66 for alexandrite treated side vs. 2.00 for diode treated side (p value = 0.036). No severe adverse events were reported. The subject satisfaction score was significantly higher after treatment with alexandrite laser. No significant changes were detected in none of skin biophysical parameters. 755 nm diode laser is suitable for hair removal procedures and it is as effective and safe as the 755 nm alexandrite laser in skin types III–IV.

Keywords

755 nm Diode laser Alexandrite laser Hair removal 

Notes

Funding information

This study was supported by research grant number 943717 from National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD), Ministry of Health, Iran.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, Flotte T, Anderson RR (1996) Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol 35(6):889–894CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibrahimi OA, Avram MM, Hanke CW, Kilmer SL, Anderson RR (2011) Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther 24:94–107CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 220:524–527CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ (2001) Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 29:416–432CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y (2004) Laser hair removal: comparison of long-pulsed Nd:YAG, long-pulsed alexandrite, and long-pulsed diode lasers. Dermatol Surg 30(4 Pt 1):498–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y (2005) Hair removal using an 800-nm diode laser: comparison at different treatment intervals of 45, 60, and 90 days. Int J Dermatol 44(1):50–53CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davoudi SM, Behnia F, Gorouhi F, Keshavarz S, Nassiri Kashani M, Rashighi Firoozabadi M, Firooz A (2008) Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up. Arch Dermatol 144(10):1323–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grunewald S, Bodendorf MO, Zygouris A, Simon JC, Paasch U (2013) Long-term efficacy of linear-scanning 808nm diode laser for hair removal compared to a scanned alexandrite laser. J Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 46(1):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eremia S, Li C, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal with alexandrite versus diode laser using four treatment sessions: 1-year results. Dermatol Surg 27(11):925–929 discussion 929-30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rao J, Goldman MP (2005) Prospective, comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg 31:1671–1676PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Handrick C, Alster TS (2001) Comparison of long-pulsed diode and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long-term clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg 27:622–626PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khoury JG, Saluja R, Goldman MP (2008) Comparative evaluation of long-pulse alexandrite and long-pulse Nd: YAG laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg 34:665–670PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaafar FHMMS, Ismail AH, Mutter KN (2014) Comparison of alexandrite and diode lasers for hair removal in dark and medium skin: which is better? J Lasers Med Sci 5(4):188–193PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pai G S, Bhat P S, Mallya H , Gold M (2011 ) Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high repetition rate versus high-flounce, lower petition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal - a split-face comparison study . J Cosmet Laser Ther. 13 :134–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haedersdal M, Wulf HC (2006) Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 20(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paasch U, Wagner JA, Paasch HW (2015) Novel 755-nm diode laser vs. conventional 755-nm scanned alexandrite laser: side-by-side comparison pilot study for thorax and axillary hair removal. J Cosmet Laser Ther 17(4):189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nistico SP, Del Duca E, Farnetani F, Guida S, Pellacani G, Rajabi-Estarabadi, Nouri K (2018 ) Removal of unwanted hair: efficacy, tolerability, and safety of long-pulsed 755-nm alexandrite laser equipped with a sapphire handpiece. Lasers Med Sci13. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valéria Campos (2018) Innovative 755 nm diode laser hair removal for Brazilian skin type. 2016. Available from: http://www.almalasersmedica.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/White_Paper_Soprano_755_web.pdf Accessed April 24
  19. 19.
    Royo J, Moreno-Moraga J, Trelles MA (2017) Clinical assessment of a new 755 nm diode laser for hair removal: efficacy, safety and practicality in 56 patients. Lasers Surg Med 49(4):355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li W, Liu C, Chen Z, Cai L, Zhou C, Xu Q, Li H, Zhang J (2016) Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women. J Cosmet Laser Ther 18(7):393–339CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldberg DJ, Ahkami R (1999) Evaluation comparing multiple treatments with a 2-msec and 10-msec alexandrite laser for hair removal. Lasers Surg Med 25:223–228CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eremia S, Li CY, Umar SH, Newman N (2001) Laser hair removal: long-term results with a 755 nm alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg 27(11):920–924PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nasrollahi SA, Hassanzade H, Moradi A, Sabouri M, Samadi A, Kashani MN, Firooz A (2017) Safety assessment of Tretinoin loaded Nano emulsion and nanostructured lipid carriers: a non-invasive trial on human volunteers. Curr Drug Deliv 14(4):575–580CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alavi S, Abolhasani E, Nilforoushzadeh M (2016) Effects of hair removal alexandrite laser on biometric parameters of the skin. Lasers Med Sci 31(3):481–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azin Ayatollahi
    • 1
  • Aniseh Samadi
    • 1
  • Ali Rajabi-Estarabadi
    • 2
  • Somayeh Yadangi
    • 1
  • Keyvan Nouri
    • 2
  • Alireza Firooz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for Research & Training in Skin Diseases and LeprosyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Dermatology and Cutaneous SurgeryUniversity of Miami School of MedicineMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations