Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 34, Issue 8, pp 1723–1723 | Cite as

Letter about outcome differences between recanalized malignant central airway obstruction from endoluminal disease versus extrinsic compression

  • Yahua Li
  • Jianzhuang Ren
  • Jianjian Chen
  • Xinwei HanEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 278 Downloads

We read with great interest the article by Verma [1] and colleagues. They draw the conclusion that malignant central airway obstruction (CAO) from endoluminal lesions recanalized using Nd:YAG laser carries a better prognosis than malignant CAO from extrinsic compression recanalized with a self-expendable metallic stent (SEMS). Here, we have some opinions to share.

The author illustrated that reported median survival in advanced esophageal cancer with CAO is about 2.8 months, while adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid cancer, and carcinoid with longer life expectancy. A total of 10(33.3%) patients are esophageal cancer in the “stent only” group and no one in the “laser only” group (p = 0.0001). It is obvious that a bias exists.

Also, the author pointed out that patients with lobar bronchi stenosis had a better survival compared to those with trachea and bronchi involvement. However, there were 6 (16.67%) patients with lung lobe stenosis in the “laser only” group and no one in the “stent only” group in this study. Although the number of stenosis cases in the trachea and bronchus are the same, the complex (mixed) stenosis cases in the “stent only” group are 5 and only one in the “laser only” group. Usually, the results of complex stenosis cases are not as good as simple stenosis cases [2].

The most common complication about SEMS is granulation tissue hyperplasia, which would also cause endoluminal stenosis and seriously affect the ventilation of the airway. In this situation, other interventions are needed to deal with it. The treatment of “only stent” may not be a good choice, and it will affect the lifespan of patients with a tracheal stent.

Finally, the cause of patients’ death in this study was not mentioned. CAO caused by esophageal cancer sometimes with accompanying fistula would bring infection and deteriorate the health condition of patients. This also brings the poor results of the “stent only” group.

Based on the data mentioned above, the outcome difference of this study needs further investigation.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Verma A, Goh SK, Tai DYH et al (2018) Outcome differences between recanalized malignant central airway obstruction from endoluminal disease versus extrinsic compression [J]. Lasers Med Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-018-2684-5
  2. 2.
    Dalar L, Karasulu L, Abul Y et al (2016) Bronchoscopic treatment in the management of benign tracheal stenosis: choices for simple and complex tracheal stenosis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg 101(4):1310–1317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interventional RadiologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations