Advertisement

Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia treated with carbon dioxide laser: a meta-analysis

  • Yunmei Dong
  • Yuxin Chen
  • Yan Tao
  • Yilong Hao
  • Lu Jiang
  • Hongxia Dan
  • Xin Zeng
  • Qianming Chen
  • Yu Zhou
Review Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

A series of studies are dedicated to research the clinical outcomes of oral leukoplakia (OLK) treated with carbon dioxide laser (CO2 laser); however, the results vary from studies especially related to recurrence and malignant transformation. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis to precisely evaluate the malignant transformation of OLK dealt with CO2 laser and investigate the association between its malignant transformation and kinds of related risk factors, such as gender, clinical classification, long duration of leukoplakia, and degree of epithelial dysplasia and lesion regions. We performed a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Pubmed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS. Single-arm rate of the overall risk of malignant transformation in OLK treated with CO2 laser was calculated using the Der-Simonian Liard method. We applied subgroup analysis to compare the risk of malignant transformation according to the degree of epithelial dysplasia, clinical type, and region of OLK. Moreover, a pooled odds ratio (OR) is calculated, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI), to compare the risk of malignant transformation according to patients’ gender, tobacco, and alcohol consumption. We used the meta package of R software for quantitative data synthesis and analysis. The rate of malignant transformation of OLK treated with carbon dioxide laser ranged from 0 to 15.38% in included studies. The overall rate of malignant transformation of OLK treated with CO2 laser is 4.50% under the random effect model [95% CI 0.0305–0.0659]. A systematic review of observational studies of OLK reported that the estimated overall (mean) malignant transformation rate was 3.5%, with a wide range between 0.13 and 34.0%. Interestingly, our result revealed that it was the male, homogeneous type, no tobacco consumption, and without alcohol-use who had a higher tendency of malignancy after laser surgery. However, this result lack statistically significant data. Generally speaking, whether oral leukoplakia patients underwent laser surgical treatment or not, it may have little effect on malignant transformation. In addition, we strongly advise that it had better not to perform CO2 laser intervention on OLK patients with the following clinical characteristics: homogeneous type, male, no tobacco consumption, and without alcohol-use. Evidence is still lacking in terms of relationship between malignant transformation and risk factors among OLK patients managed with CO2 laser. Thus, these associations should be further investigated.

Keywords

Meta-analysis Oral leukoplakia Carbon dioxide laser Malignant transformation Oral dysplasia Oral potentially malignant disorders 

Notes

Funding sources

This work was supported by grants from the Nonprofit Industry Research Specific Fund of the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (No. 201502018), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81771086, 81470747, 81472533, and 81102060), and International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (No. 2012DFA31370). The funding agencies had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Warna Kulasuriya S, Johnson NW, Van der Waal I (2010) Nomenclature and classification of potentially malignant disorders of the oral mucosa. J Oral Pathol Med 36(10):575–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petti S (2003) Pooled estimate of world leukoplakia prevalence: a systematic review. Oral Oncol 39:770–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouquot JE, Gorlin RJ (1986) Leukoplakia, lichen planus, and other oral keratoses in 23,616 white Americans over the age of 35 years. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 61(4):373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charles A, Waldron DDS, William G, Shafer DDS (1975) Leukoplakia revisited. A clinicopathologic study 3256 oral leukoplakias. Cancer 36(4):1386–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silverman S Jr, Gorsky M, Lozada F (1984) Oral leukoplakia and malignant transformation. A follow-up study of 257 patients. Cancer 53(3):563–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schepman KP, Meij EHVD, Smeele LE et al (1998) Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: a follow-up study of a hospital-based population of 166 patients with oral leukoplakia from The Netherlands. Oral Oncol 34(4):270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Warnakulasuriya S, Ariyawardana A (2016) Malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia: a systematic review of observational studies. J Oral Pathol Med 45(3):155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lodi G, Sardella A, Bez C et al (2016) Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7(4):CD001829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ben-Bassat M, Kaplan I, Shindel Y et al (1978) The CO2 laser in surgery of the tongue. Br J Plast Surg 31(2):155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F (2013) Comparison of pain and swelling after removal of oral leukoplakia with CO2 laser and cold knife: a randomized clinical trial. Medicina oral, patología oral y cirugíabucal 18(1):38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chee M, Sasaki C (2013) CO2 laser fiber for the excision of oral leukoplakia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 122(9):547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tambuwala A, Sangle A, Khan A et al (2014) Excision of oral leukoplakia by CO2 lasers versus traditional scalpel: a comparative study. J Maxillofacial Oral Surgery 13(3):320–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White JM, Chaudhry SI, Kudler JJ et al (1998) Nd:YAG and CO2 laser therapy of oral mucosal lesions. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16(6):299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frame JW (1985) Removal of oral soft tissue pathology with the CO2 laser. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(11):850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MOOSE guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews of observational studies. 2008Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Slim K, Nini ED, Kwiatkowski F et al (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25:603–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roodenburg J, Panders AK, Vermey A (1991) Carbon dioxide laser surgery of oral leukoplakia. Oral Surgery Oral Med Oral Pathol 71(6):670–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamadah O, Thomson PJ (2009) Factors affecting carbon dioxide laser treatment for oral precancer: a patient cohort study. Lasers Surg Med 41(1):17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lim B, Smith AA (2010) Treatment of oral leukoplakia with carbon dioxide and potassium-titanyl-phosphate lasers: a comparison. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(3):597–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chu FW, Silverman S Jr, Dedo HH (1988) CO2 laser treatment of oral leukoplakia. Laryngoscope 98(2):125e130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schoelch ML, Sekandari N, Regezi JA, Silverman S Jr (1999) Laser management of oral leukoplakias: a follow-up study of 70 patients. Laryngoscope 109(6):949e953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chiesa F, Boracchi P, Tradati N, Rossi N, Costa L, Giardini R et al (1993) Risk of preneoplastic and neoplastic events in operated oral leukoplakias. Oral Oncol Eur J Cancer 29(1):23e28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dunsche A, Härle F (2000) Precancer stages of the oral mucosa: a review. Laryngorhinootologie 79(7):423e427Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pedrosa A, Santos A, Ferreira M et al (2015) Is carbon dioxide laser vaporization a valuable tool in the management of oral leukoplakia? A survey at an oncology hospital. Lasers Med Sci 30(5):1629–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomson PJ, Wylie J (2002) Interventional laser surgery: an effective surgical and diagnostic tool in oral precancer management. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31(2):145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Galletta V, Azevedo L, Lodi G et al (2017) Factors affecting clinical outcomes after treatment of oral leukoplakia with CO2 and diode laser. J Contemp Dent Pract 18(9):775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Deppe H, Mücke T, Hohlweg-Majert B, Hauck W, Wagenpfeil S, Hölzle F (2011) Different CO2 laser vaporization protocols for the therapy of oral precancerous lesions and precancerous conditions: a 10 year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 27:59e63Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jerjes W, Upile T, Hamdoon Z et al (2012) CO2 laser of oral dysplasia: clinicopathological features of recurrence and malignant transformation. Lasers Med Sci 27(1):169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Matsumoto K, Suzuki H, Asai T et al (2015) Clinical investigation of carbon dioxide laser treatment for lingual leukoplakia. J Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Med Pathol 27(4):493–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gooris PJ, Roodenburg JL, Vermey A et al (1999) Carbon dioxide laser evaporation of leukoplakia of the lower lip: a retrospective evaluation. Oral Oncol 35(5):490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Corso GD, Gissi DB, Tarsitano A et al (2015) Laser evaporation versus laser excision of oral leukoplakia: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(6):763–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ishii J, Fujita K, Munemoto S et al (2004) Management of oral leukoplakia by laser surgery: relation between recurrence and malignant transformation and clinicopathological features. J Clin Laser Med Surg 22(1):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ps VDH, Nauta JM, Je VDW et al (2005) The results of CO2 laser surgery in patients with oral leukoplakia: a 25 year follow up. Oral Oncol 41(1):31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mogedas-Vegara A, Hueto-Madrid JA, Chimenos-Küstner E et al (2015) The treatment of oral leukoplakia with the CO2 laser: a retrospective study of 65 patients. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 43(5):677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chandu A, Smith AC (2005) The use of CO2 laser in the treatment of oral white patches: outcomes and factors affecting recurrence. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(4):396–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang SW, Tsai CN, Lee YS et al (2011) Treatment outcome of dysplastic oral leukoplakia with carbon dioxide laser--emphasis on the factors affecting recurrence. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 69(6):e78–e87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brouns EREA, Baart JA, Karagozoglu KH et al (2013) Treatment results of CO2 laser vaporisation in a cohort of 35 patients with oral leukoplakia. Oral Dis 19(2):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Monteiro L, Barbieri C, Warnakulasuriya S, et al. (2017) Type of surgical treatment and recurrence of oral leukoplakia: a retrospective clinical study. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral Y CirugiaBucal 22(5)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lodi G, Sardella A, Bez C et al (2002) Systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of oral leukoplakia. J Dent Educ 66:896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    van der Waal I (2009) Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa; terminology, classification and present concepts of management. Oral Oncol 45:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kuribayashi Y, Tsushima F, Morita KI et al (2015) Long-term outcome of non-surgical treatment in patients with oral leukoplakia. Oral Oncol 51(11):1020–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Holmstrup P, Dabelsteen E (2016) Oral leukoplakia - to treat or not to treat. Oral Dis 22(6):494–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Holmstrup P, Vedtofte P, Reibel J, Stoltze K (2007) Oral premalignant lesions: is a biopsy reliable? J Oral Pathol Med 36:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vannucci L (2015) Stroma as an active player in the development of the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron 8:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Arduino PG, Surace A, Carbone M et al (2010) Outcome of oral dysplasia: a retrospective hospital-based study of 207 patients with a long follow-up. J Oral Pathol Med 38(6):540–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nammour S, Zeinoun T, Namour A, et al. (2017) Evaluation of different laser-supported surgical protocols for the treatment of oral leukoplakia: a long-term follow-up. Photomed Laser SurgeryGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunmei Dong
    • 1
  • Yuxin Chen
    • 1
  • Yan Tao
    • 1
  • Yilong Hao
    • 1
  • Lu Jiang
    • 1
  • Hongxia Dan
    • 1
  • Xin Zeng
    • 1
  • Qianming Chen
    • 1
  • Yu Zhou
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of StomatologySichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations