Advertisement

Effects and parameters of the photobiomodulation in experimental models of third-degree burn: systematic review

  • Carlos Alberto Ocon
  • Solange Almeida dos Santos
  • Jheniphe Rocha Caires
  • Marcelo Ferreira Duarte de Oliveira
  • Andrey Jorge Serra
  • Ernesto Cesar Leal-Junior
  • Paulo de Tarso Camillo de CarvalhoEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This systematic review was performed to identify the role of photobiomodulation therapy in experimental models of third-degree burns used to induce oxidative stress. EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL databases were searched for studies published between January 2003 and January 2018 on the topics of photobiomodulation therapy and third-degree burns. Any study that assessed the effects of photobiomodulation therapy in animal models of third-degree burns was included in the analysis. A total of 17 studies were selected from 1182 original articles targeted on photobiomodulation therapy and third-degree burns. Two independent raters with a structured tool for rating the research quality critically assessed the articles. Although the small number of studies limits the conclusions, the current literature research indicates that photobiomodulation therapy can be an effective short-term approach to accelerate the healing process of third-degree burns, to increase and modulate the inflammatory process, to accelerate the proliferation of fibroblasts, and to enhance the quality of the collagen network. However, differences still exist in the terminology used to describe the parameters and the dose of photobiomodulation therapy.

Keywords

Photobiomodulation therapy Wound healing Burns 

Notes

Role of the funding source

This work was supported by grants from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, grant number (2015/13677-4) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological (grant number 309065/2015-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang Y, Beekman J, Hew J, Jackson S, Issler-Fisher AC, Parungao R, Lajevardi SS, Li Z, Maitz PKM (2017) Burn injury: challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring. Adv Drug Deliv Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ye H, De S (2017) Thermal injury of skin and subcutaneous tissues: a review of experimental approaches and numerical models. Burns 43(5):909–932.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Porumb V, Trandabăț AF, Terinte C, Căruntu ID, Porumb-Andrese E, Dimofte MG, Pieptu D (2017) Design and testing of an experimental steam-induced burn model in rats. Biomed Res Int 2017:9878109.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9878109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gomes MT, Campos GRS, Piccolo N, França CM, Guedes GH, Lopes F, Belotto RA, Pavani C, de Lima R d N, da Silva D d FT (2017) Experimental burns: comparison between silver sulfadiazine and photobiomodulation. Rev Assoc Méd Bras 63(1):29–34.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.63.01.29 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fiório FB, Dos Santos SA, de Melo Rambo CS, Dalbosco CG, Serra AJ, de Melo BL, Leal-Junior ECP, de Carvalho PTC (2017) Photobiomodulation therapy action in wound repair skin induced in aged rats old: time course of biomarkers inflammatory and repair. Lasers Med Sci 32:1769–1782.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2254-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N, Hamblin MR (2013) Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg 32:41–52PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bayat M, Vasheghani MM, Razavi N, Taheri S, Rakhshan M (2005) Effect of low-level laser therapy on the healing of second-degree burns in rats: a histological and microbiological study. J Photochem Photobiol B 78:171–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2004.08.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vasheghani MM, Bayat M, Rezaei F, Bayat A, Karimipour M (2008) Effect of low-level laser therapy on mast cells in second-degree burns in ratsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW (2014) SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:43.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-43 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brassolatti P, Bossini PS, Oliveira MC, Kido HW, Tim CR, Almeida-Lopes L, De Avó LR, Araújo-Moreira FM, Parizotto NA (2016) Comparative effects of two different doses of low-level laser therapy on wound healing third-degree burns in rats. Microsc Res Tech 79:313–320.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22632 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trajano ET, Mencalha AL, Monte-Alto-Costa A, Pôrto LC, de Souza da Fonseca A (2014) Expression of DNA repair genes in burned skin exposed to low-level red laser. Lasers Med Sci 29:1953–1957.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1612-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiório FB, Albertini R, Leal-Junior EC, de Carvalho P de TC (2014) Effect of low-level laser therapy on types I and III collagen and inflammatory cells in rats with induced third-degree burns. Lasers Med Sci 29:313–319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1341-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fiório FB, Silveira L Jr, Munin E, de Lima CJ, Fernandes KP, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, de Carvalho P de T, Lopes-Martins RA, Aimbire F, de Carvalho RA (2011) Effect of incoherent LED radiation on third-degree burning wounds in rats. J Cosmet Laser Ther 13:315–322.  https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.630082 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Núñez SC, França CM, Silva DF, Nogueira GE, Prates RA, Ribeiro MS (2013) The influence of red laser irradiation timeline on burn healing in rats. Lasers Med Sci 28:633–641.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1105-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Moraes JM, Eterno de Oliveira Mendonça D, Moura VB, Oliveira MA, Afonso CL, Vinaud MC, Bachion MM, de Souza Lino R Jr (2013) Anti-inflammatory effect of low-intensity laser on the healing of third-degree burn wounds in rats. Lasers Med Sci 28:1169–7116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1213-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khoshvaghti A, Zibamanzarmofrad M, Bayat M (2011) Effect of low-level treatment with an 80-Hz pulsed infrared diode laser on mast-cell numbersand degranulation in a rat model of third-degree burn. Photomed Laser Surg 29:597–604.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2783 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia VG, de Lima MA, Okamoto T, Milanezi LA, Júnior EC, Fernandes LA, de Almeida JM, Theodoro LH (2010) Effect of photodynamic therapy on the healing of cutaneous third-degree-burn: histological study in rats. Lasers Med Sci 25:221–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0694-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meirelles GC, Santos JN, Chagas PO, Moura AP, Pinheiro AL (2008) A comparative study of the effects of laser photobiomodulation on the healing of third-degree burns: a histological study in rats. Photomed Laser Surg 26:159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meireles GC, Santos JN, Chagas PO, Moura AP, Pinheiro AL (2008) Effectiveness of laser photobiomodulation at 660 or 780 nanometers on the repair of third-degree burns in diabetic rats. Photomed Laser Surg 26:47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2051 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bayat M, Vasheghani MM, Razavie N, Jalili MR (2008) Effects of low-level laser therapy on mast cell number and degranulation in third-degree burns of rats. J Rehabil Res Dev 45:931–938.  https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.07.0110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    da Silva D de F, Vidal B de C, Zezell DM, Zorn TM, Núñez SC, Ribeiro MS (2006) Collagen birefringence in skin repair in response to red polarized-laser therapy. J Biomed Opt 11(2):024002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Catão MH, Costa RO, Nonaka CF, Junior RL, Costa IR (2016) Green LED light has anti-inflammatory effects on burns in rats. Burns 42(2):392–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.07.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neves SM, Nicolau RA, Filho AL, Mendes LM, Veloso AM (2014) Digital photogrammetry and histomorphometric assessment of the effect of non-coherent light (light-emitting diode) therapy (λ640 ± 20 nm) on the repair of third-degree burns in rats. Lasers Med Sci 29(1):203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1312-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oliveira PC, Pinheiro AL, Reis Junior JA, de Castro IC, Gurgel C, Noia MP, Meireles GC, Cangussu MC, Ramalho LM (2010) Polarized light (λ400-2000 nm) on third-degree burns in diabetic rats: immunohistochemical study. Photomed Laser Surg 28(5):613–619.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2675 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oliveira PC, Pinheiro AL, de Castro IC, Reis JA Jr, Noia MP, Gurgel C, Teixeira Cangussú MC, Pedreira Ramalho LM (2011) Evaluation of the effects of polarized light (λ400-200 nm) on the healing of third-degree burns in induced diabetic and nondiabetic rats. Photomed Laser Surg 29(9):619–625.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2010.2914 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Enwemeka CS, Parker JC, Dowdy DS, Harkness EE, Harkness LE, Woodruff LD (2004) The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Surg 22:323–329.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2004.22.323 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Toussaint J, Singer AJ (2014) The evaluation and management of thermal injuries: 2014 update. Clin Exp Emerg Med 1:8–18.  https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.14.029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guo HF, Ali RM, Hamid RA, Zaini AA, Khaza’ai H (2017) A new model for studying deep partial-thickness burns in rats. Int J Burns Trauma 7:107–114PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Venter NG, Monte-Alto-Costa A, Marques RG (2015) A new model for the standardization of experimental burn wounds. Burns 41:542–547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.08.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hamblin MR (2017) Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophysics 4:337–361.  https://doi.org/10.3934/biophy.2017.3.337 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rocha JCT, Ferraresi C, Hamblin MR, Damasceno FM, do Nascimento NRF, Driusso P, Parizotto NA (2016) Low-level laser therapy (904 nm) can increase collagen and reduce oxidative and nitrosative stress in diabetic wounded mouse skin. J Photochem Photobiol B 164:96–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.09.017 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oliveira Silva AA, Leal-Junior EC, D'Avila KL, Serra AJ, Albertini R, França CM, Nishida JA, de Carvalho P de TC (2015) Pre-exercise low-level laser therapy improves performance and levels of oxidative stress markers in mdx mice subjected to muscle fatigue by high-intensity exercise. Lasers Med Sci 30:1719–1727.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1777-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dos Santos SA, Serra AJ, Stancker TG, Simões MCB, dos Santos Vieira MA, Leal-Junior EC, Prokic M, Vasconsuelo A, Santos SS, de Carvalho P de TC (2017) Effects of photobiomodulation therapy on oxidative stress in muscle injury animal models: a systematic review. Oxid Med Cell Longev.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5273403 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martins F, Rennó ACM, de Oliveira F, Minatel NP, Bortolin JA, Quintana HT, Aveiro MC (2015) Low-level laser therapy modulates musculoskeletal loss in a skin burn model in rats. Acta Cir Bras 30:94–99.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502015002000002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bjordal JM, Lopes-Martins RA, Joensen J, Couppe C, Ljunggren AE, Stergioulas A, Johnson MI (2008) A systematic review with procedural assessments and meta-analysis of low level laser therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy (tennis elbow). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:75.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-75 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khatib MN, Shankar A, Kirubakaran R, Agho K, Simkhada P, Gaidhane S, Zahiruddin SQ (2015) Effect of ghrelin on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in experimental rat and mice models of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 10(5):e0126697.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126697 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    De Vries RBM, Wever KE, Avey MT, Stephens ML, Sena ES, Leenaars M (2014) The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. ILAR J 55(3):427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilu043 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Alberto Ocon
    • 1
  • Solange Almeida dos Santos
    • 2
  • Jheniphe Rocha Caires
    • 2
  • Marcelo Ferreira Duarte de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Andrey Jorge Serra
    • 1
  • Ernesto Cesar Leal-Junior
    • 2
  • Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Postgraduate Program in Biophotonics Applied to Health SciencesUniversidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation SciencesUniversidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations