Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 1363–1370 | Cite as

Laser phototherapy improves early stage of cutaneous wound healing of rats under hyperlipidic diet

  • Virgínia Dias Uzêda-e-Silva
  • Tania Tavares Rodriguez
  • Isadora Almeida Rios Rocha
  • Flávia Calo Aquino Xavier
  • Jean Nunes dos Santos
  • Patrícia Ramos Cury
  • Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho
Original Article


The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of laser photobiomodulation in cutaneous healing of rats under a hyperlipidic diet. Forty-eight Wistar Albinus rats, weaned, received standard diet (SD) or hyperlipidic diet (HD) for 20 weeks. The groups were divided into SD rats and HD rats, SD-irradiated rats (LSD), and HD-irradiated rats (LHD). Standard cutaneous wound (1 cm2) was created on the dorsum of each rat. The irradiation started immediately after surgery and every 48 h for 7 or 14 days (λ660 nm, 40 mW, 6 J/cm2, ϕ 0,04 cm2, CW), when they were killed under deep anesthesia. The specimens were removed, routinely processed, stained with hematoxylin/eosin (H/E), and evaluated by light microscopy. Rats fed with hyperlipidic diet had greater intensity in the inflammatory process and prolonged hyperemia. At day 7, the intensity of inflammation was reduced in LSD and LHD groups when compared to their control groups, SD (p = 0.002) and HD (p = 0.02). There was an increase in fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition, especially in the LHD group. At day 14, the HD group presented more intensive hyperemia than the SD group. It can be concluded that the hyperlipidic diet modified the inflammation pattern in wound healing and that laser light has a positive biomodulative effect on the healing process only in early stages.


Wound healing Photobiomodulation Laser phototherapy Hyperlipidic diet 


Obesity is a metabolic disorder, which reflects an unhealthy accumulation of fat mass. The increased prevalence of obesity and obesity-associated complications is one of the most public health challenges of the twenty-first century [1]. The current definition of obesity is based on the body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2, together with other anthropometrics such as the waist circumference and an assessment of the presence and severity of obesity-related complications [2].

High-fat diet is one of the main causes of obesity development. Interaction between microbiota and high-fat diet causes excessive release of adipocytokines that favor fat deposition [3]. The use of hypercaloric or hyperlipidic diets has been used as a model of obesity induction in animals due to its similarity to the genesis and metabolic responses caused by obesity in humans [4]. Inadequate diet and a sedentary lifestyle are the most common contributing factors to the development of obesity in humans.

Studies have shown that the excess of adipose tissue, mainly in the abdomen, is a closely related risk of cardiovascular complications, such as coronary artery disease and hypertension, and metabolic abnormalities such as dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus type II [3, 4]. In addition to these classical comorbidities, obesity has been identified as a risk factor for infectious and wound complications after a wide variety of surgical procedures which lead the increase of morbidity and prolonged hospitalization [5]. This increased risk has been attributed to immune impairment, ischemia along suture lines, larger wound areas, deficiencies in collagen synthesis, and technical difficulties [6, 7, 8]. At any rate, the decrease of tissue oxygen tension in relatively avascular adipose tissue might play a central role. Therefore, the healing process is a target for the care of this population, and new therapies are needed to facilitate tissue repair in this group.

Wound healing is a dynamic and complex process that presents three phases which have been well described: an inflammatory phase, a proliferative phase, and a remodeling phase. This process starts hours after the injury, when blood components flood the site of injury and inflammatory cells spread out inside the tissue in order to perform the critical task of phagocytosis, which removes foreign materials, bacteria, and damaged tissue. Afterward, wound reepithelialization occurs through migration and proliferation of epithelial cells originated from both margins of the lesion and epidermal appendices on the center of the lesion [9]. Incisional injuries are usually epithelized within 24–48 h after the initial injury; however, excisional wounds can take much longer to re-epithelialize [10]. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been used to treat injuries and may accelerate tissue repair in its different phases. Photobiomodulation can improve both the speed of healing and the quality of scar tissue [11, 12].

The wound healing impairment observed in obese individuals can be attributed, at least in part, to tissue ischemia [7, 8]. In addition, the proinflammatory cytokines expressed by white adipose tissue contribute to the increase of circulating levels of inflammatory molecules [13, 14]. This condition favors the persistence of the inflammatory process, which may disrupt the timing in the phases of the repair process, leading to a delayed wound healing [15].

LLLT has been postulated to have photochemical, photophysical, and photobiological beneficial effects to repair. Different studies using several models of wound healing have been demonstrating that the LLLT increases mitochondrial ATP production, lymphocyte and mast cell activation, and also the proliferation of fibroblasts and other cells. Likewise, LLLT promotes analgesia and anti-inflammatory effects [16, 17, 18].

The hypothesis of this study is that the biomodulatory effects postulated for LLLT on tissue repair could compensate for the shortcomings associated with obesity. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of laser phototherapy during wound healing in rats subjected to a hyperlipidic diet.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Dental School of the Federal University of Bahia under Protocol 02/12.

Forty-eight male Wistar rats weaning at 21 days of age and weighing an average 50 g were included in the study. The rats were housed at the Experimentation Laboratory of the Health Sciences Institute of the Federal University of Bahia in cages containing three rats each. The cages were lined with wood shavings and kept at ambient temperature (23 ± 1 °C) in a 12:12-h day/night light cycle. Water was available ad libitum. The animals were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: standard diet (SD) and hyperlipidic diet (HD). The standard diet group (n = 24) was fed with commercial feed (Nuvital, Nuvilab®, Colombo, PR, Brazil), while the hyperlipidic diet group (n = 24) was fed with a hyperlipidic diet [14]. Rats were divided into two subgroups of 12 animals each: SD—non-irradiated, LSD—laser, HD—non-irradiated, and LHD—laser (Table 1). The body weight was measured with an electronic scale (Filizola®) with a maximum capacity of 5 kg and accuracy of 5 g.
Table 1

Distribution of the experimental groups according to the diet, irradiation protocol, and time of death



Irradiation protocol

Time of death



Standard diet


7 and 14 days



Laser standard diet

GaAlAs laser λ660 nm—24 J/cm2, 40 mW, CW

7 and 14 days



Hyperlipidic diet


7 and 14 days



Laser hyperlipidic diet

GaAlAs Laser λ660nm – 24 J/cm2, 40 mW, CW

7 and 14 days


The hyperlipidic diet consisted of commercial rat feed, roasted peanuts, milk chocolate, and biscuit cornstarch in a 3:2:2:1 proportion [19]. All components were grounded, mixed, and pelletized. This diet was composed of 17 % protein, 23 % fat, and 46 % carbohydrates. The standard diet contained 22 % protein, 4 % fat, and 57 % carbohydrates. The caloric density was about 4.5 kcal/g for the high-fat diet and 3.5 kcal/g for the standard diet.

After 20 weeks of receiving the diet, the rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (80 mg/kg) and xylazine (14 mg/kg). The animals had their dorsal region shaved and, subsequently, antisepsis of the surgical area with 2 % chlorhexidine gluconate (Merthiolate®, Hypermarcas SA, Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil) was performed. A standardized subcutaneous excisional wound (1 × 1 cm) was made in the median dorsal region of each rat with a scalpel (Fig. 1). Hemostasis was obtained by dry gauze compression and the wound was allowed to heal without suturing or dressing. The first laser irradiation was performed immediately after surgery and repeated every 48 h during the trial period of days 7 or 14. The irradiation was performed through contact with the probe positioned perpendicularly to the irradiated tissue without pressure. Spatial average energy fluence (SAEF) from the illuminated area (1 cm2) per session was 24 J/cm2 for the groups irradiated with laser light. The wounds were irradiated with the laser device applied to the wound area, corresponding to the four point wound angles (GaAlAs, λ660 nm, 40 mW, continuous wave (CW), 6 J/cm2 per point, 150 s per point, Φ = 0.04 cm2, Twin Flex Evolution, MMoptics®, São Carlos, SP, Brazil).
Fig. 1

Standardized excisional wound created with a scalpel in the medial dorsal region. Modified surgical scalpel used (a) and clinical aspects of final wound (b)

After the experimental period (7 or 14 days), the animals were killed under general anesthetic overdose, and the specimens were removed for analysis. The retroperitoneal fat was removed as a triangular section extending from a vertex in the inguinal region up to the midline and across the power pole of the kidney, extending laterally as far as fat was visible. After its removal, it was weighed.

After sample collection, the specimens were fixed for 24 h in a 10 % formaldehyde solution and processed for routine histological technique with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Histological sections were analyzed under light microscopy (AxionStar®, Zeiss, Germany) by a single experienced pathologist. Descriptive and semiquantitative analyses were performed according to the table below (Table 2).
Table 2

Criteria used in the histological analysis


Score criterion






Covering <50 % of the wound

Covering >50 % of the wound

Inflammatory Infiltrate

Presence of up to <25 % in the area of inflammatory cells

Presence of 25 to 50 % in the area of inflammatory cells

Presence of more than 50 % in the area of inflammatory cells


Amount of blood vessels dilated and congested lower than the adjacent normal tissue

Amount of blood vessels dilated and congested similar to the adjacent normal tissue

Amount of blood vessels dilated and congested greater than adjacent normal tissue proliferation

Fibroblastic proliferation

Presence of up to 25 % of fibroblasts relative to other cell types of the tissue

Presence of 25 to 50 % of fibroblasts compared to other cell types of the tissue

Presence of more than 50 % of fibroblasts compared to other cell types of the tissue

Collagen deposition

Presence of up to 25 % deposition of collagen fibers in the area

Presence of 25 to 50 % of collagen deposition in the area

Presence of more than 50 % collagen fiber deposition in the area

The body weight and retroperitoneal fat were assessed by Student’s t test. The histological data were analyzed by Fisher’s exact nonparametric test. A 5 % significance level was defined by statistical analysis.


The average final body weight of the groups showed no statistically significant difference between them (p > 0.05). However, as demonstrated in Fig. 2, the retroperitoneal fat deposit was higher in the HD group than in the SD group, demonstrating an increase of about 60 % (Student’s t test, p = 0.000).
Fig. 2

Retroperitoneal fat mass after 20 weeks of diet. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Comparison between SD and HD groups (* p = 0.000) (Student’s t test)

Seven days after the injury, a mild presence of inflammatory cells was observed in the LSD group compared to the SD group, which showed intense inflammation (p = 0.002) (Fig. 3a). When the hyperlipidic diet groups were compared, the group submitted to laser therapy showed a lower degree of intensity in the inflammatory process than the non-irradiated group did (p = 0.02) (Figs. 3b and 5a, b)
Fig. 3

Effects of diet and phototherapy on wound healing at 7 days. a Analysis of inflammatory infiltrate of SD and LSD groups (**p = 0.002). b Effects of laser therapy in the inflammatory infiltrate of the hyperlipidic groups (*p = 0.02). c Effect of laser therapy in the collagen deposition of the hyperlipidic groups (*p = 0.048). d Effect of hyperlipidic diet in the deposition of collagen of LSD and LHD groups (*p = 0.001)

At 7 days evaluation, the deposition of collagen fibers in the LHD group was significantly higher than that in the HD group (p = 0.048) (Figs. 3c and 5e, f). When the irradiated groups were compared, it was observed that the collagen deposition was significantly higher in the LHD group than in the LSD group (p = 0.001) (Fig. 3d).

Fibroblast proliferation was less intense in the LSD group than in the LHD group (p = 0.016) (Figs. 4 and 5c, d).
Fig. 4

Effects of hyperlipidic diet and phototherapy on wound healing at 7 days. Analysis of fibroblast proliferation of LSD and LHD groups (*p = 0.016)

Fig. 5

Histopathological aspects of the healing. At 7 days, a, b moderate inflammatory infiltrate in the LHD group and intense in the HD group, respectively. c, d Moderate fibroblast proliferation in the LSD group and intense in the LHD group, respectively. e, f Discreet collagen deposition in the HD group and moderate in the LHD group, respectively. At 14 days, g, h discreet hyperemia in the SD group and moderate in the HD group, respectively

Additionally, the re-epithelization and hyperemia were not different between the groups (p > 0.05).

Fourteen days after surgery, when hyperemia was analyzed, there was a statistically significant difference between the SD and HD groups. The HD group showed more intense hyperemia than did the SD group (p = 0.01) (Fig. 5g, h). Although the other variables did not show statistically significant differences, the proliferation of fibroblasts was higher in the LHD group compared with LSD group (p > 0.05). The collagen fibers showed less deposition in HD in comparison to the LHD (p > 0.05).


In our study, not all rats exposed to HD became overweight. On the other hand, they had significantly increased retroperitoneal fat mass, which is considered positively correlated with increased overall morbidity and mortality linked to obesity. The risk of developing obesity-associated diseases seems to be more associated with the distribution of fat into specific regional depots than to the total adipose tissue mass [20]. It has been shown that obesity can lead to a reduction in the amount of food consumed in response to the high levels of leptin in obese rats [21]. The leptin, a hormone synthesized and secreted by adipose tissue, is primarily involved in appetite regulation and energy metabolism, in turn indicating to the brain that an adequate intake supply has been reached [22, 23].

A wide variety of studies have demonstrated the benefits of LLLT in various pathological conditions [16, 24, 25, 26, 27]; however, very few studies involve obesity. The choice of the wavelength used in this study was based on the fact that 660 nm has a good superficial absorption [16, 26, 28]. This characteristic is indicated for lesions that affect superficial excisional wounds, since the laser cellular effects are dependent on the wavelength and the doses used, which may influence the healing process, as already well reported in the literature [29, 30, 31].

In this study, we observed that the inflammatory infiltrate was more long-term and intense in the control SD group and HD group compared to their respective irradiated control groups at day 7. During the early stages of a wound, inflammatory cells are important for the debridement of the area and the release of cytokines and growth factors. However, when persistent, these events also increase the production of oxidants, which may lead to oxidative damage to lipids and/or proteins, and consequently, to cellular necrosis, impairing the tissue recovery [29, 30, 31].

Laser light stimulates cells with a functional deficit to proliferate after being irradiated [17, 25]. Thus, in a functional tissue, strong cells grow in an orderly and regular manner, and there is no stimulus for laser action to take place, so the effect on tissue is weak or no therapeutic effect is observed at all. On the other hand, if the tissue is altered, the laser light will act with greater effect on it through cellular function restitution. This could help to explain some results in this study, such as the intensity of inflammation, fibroblast proliferation, and collagen deposition, where better results were found in the irradiated HD group when compared with the irradiated SD groups [32, 33].

When fibroblast proliferation was evaluated in this study, it was observed that increased fibroblast activity was detected within 7 days in the LHD group compared to the LSD group. The laser proliferative action on fibroblasts has been demonstrated previously in the literature [29, 34, 35], and it has been observed that an adequate protocol of the laser can stimulate cellular responses in fibroblasts and promote cell migration and proliferation without causing stress or destruction of the cells [33].

The findings of this study demonstrated that there was no difference in the deposition and distribution of collagen fibers between SD and HD groups at day 7, which is in agreement with results found previously [36]. However, the evaluation of the LHD and HD groups in the same experimental period showed that the laser improved collagen fiber deposition in the LHD group. In this particular study, our results are similar to in vitro [18] and in vivo [37] studies that showed greater promotion of collagen maturation by LLLT during wound healing, which is essential for completion of tissue repair.

The presence of higher intensity and congested vessels in the HD group, compared to the SD group at day 14, was characterized by persistent hyperemia in this group, leading to prolonging of the vascular phase of inflammation. Neovascularization at the beginning of the repair process is crucial to carry oxygen and essential nutrients for tissue formation, with subsequent regression of these vessels in the remodeling stage [5]. The newly formed vessels are responsible for the recruitment of inflammatory cells that allow continuous release of proinflammatory cytokines, which are responsible for the continuation of inflammation. Thus, as seen in previous studies [15, 38], the HD contributed to the accumulation of fat mass and also modified the characteristics of the repair process, extending its inflammatory stage.

It is consistent in the literature that fibroblasts and adipocytes belong to the same cell lineage, as well as chondrocytes, smooth muscle cells, and osteocytes, which are not only correlated but are generally convertible to each other. However, although differentiation of these cell types is frequently irreversible, the transformation of fibroblasts into adipocytes is considered a one-way phenomenon [39]. The evidence of the reverse possibility was presented by De Andrade et al. [40]. Their hypothesis was based on the study periods, which initially showed large adipocytes with multiple fat granules and later on changed into elongated cells, in which the fat granules tended to decrease in size and number as the rough endoplasmic reticulum became increasingly prominent. This fact considered the idea that adipocytes can be transformed into fibroblasts.

The above data could explain this unusual finding in the current study, poorly reported in the literature [37, 41], where the presence of numerous adipocytes in the most superficial portion of the granulation tissue after 7 days of irradiation was found. Numerous works have been using stem cells derived from adipose tissue for wound healing, and due to their pluripotency and ability to differentiate into other cell types, they have been successful [42, 43]. Further studies are needed to clarify this matter.

The effect of LLLT on the proliferation and transdifferentiation of stem cells derived from adipose tissue in neuronal cells has been observed, and although the results have shown that laser therapy did not induce cell proliferation, it accelerated the differentiation of stem cells derived from adipose tissue into neuronal cells [44]. Shen et al. [44] believed that with the adjustment of the dose and time of the laser application and, consequently, achieving optimal parameters, better results could be obtained; hence, new studies in animal models may contribute to the development of cell therapy, which might benefit patients who suffer from stroke.

Since wound healing is a complex process that involves a series of articulated biological events in order to repair tissue, any interference in the organized process can lead to prolongation of tissue repair and thus to numerous health hazards. Research on the use of laser phototherapy LLLT should be encouraged so its parameters could increase standardization and its benefits might expand to various health problems that may interfere with meticulous repair process.

Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that HD prolonged inflammatory response during wound healing and LLLT was able to improve healing during early phase, especially considering the intensity of inflammation. Moreover, LLLT promoted reestablishment of cellular activities and better tissue recovery when it was applied in tissues of rats fed with HD. Further studies are needed to develop appropriate laser therapy protocols as an auxiliary method of wound repair in obesity models.



The authors gratefully acknowledge the CAPES for the financial support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.


  1. 1.
    World Health Organization – WHO (2015) Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet N°311. Acessed 10 Mar 2015
  2. 2.
    American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Consensus Conference on obesity: Building an evidence base for comprehensive action (2014) Endocr Pract 20(9): 957–976Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee CY (2013) The effect of high fat diet induced pathophysiological changes in the gut on obesity: what should be the ideal treatment? Clin Transl Gastroenterol 4, e39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosini TC, Silva ASR, Moraes C (2012) Diet-induced obesity: rodent model for the study of obesity-related disorders. Rev Assoc Med Bras 58(3):383–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wagner J, Szpalski C, Allen RJ Jr, Davidson EH, Canizares O, Saadeh PB, Warren SM (2012) Obesity impairs wound closure through a vasculogenic mechanism. Wound Repair Regen 20:512–522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slavkovsky R, Kohlerova R, Tkacova V, Jiroutova A, Tahmazoglu B, Velebny V, Rezacova M, Sobotka L, Kanta J (2011) Zucker diabetic fatty rat: a new model of impaired cutaneous wound repair with type II diabetes mellitus and obesity. Wound Repair Regen 19:515–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kabon B, Rozum R, Marschalek C, Prager G, Fleischmann E, Chiari A, Kurz A (2010) Supplemental postoperative oxygen and tissue oxygen tension in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 20(7):885–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baker D (2006) Obesity-related factors in the repair and healing of recurrent incisional hernia: a summary of risk factors and perioperative strategies. Bariatric Nurs Surg Patient Care 1(3):179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mendonça RJ, Coutinho-Neto J (2009) Aspectos celulares da cicatrização. An Bras Dermatol 84(3):257–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Monaco JL, Lawrence WT (2003) Acute wound healing: an overview. Clin Plast Surg 30:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rabelo SB, Villaverde AB, Nicolau R, Salgado MC, Melo Mda S, Pacheco MT (2006) Comparison between wound healing in induced diabetic and nondiabetic rats after low-level laser therapy. Photomed Laser Surg 24(4):474–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maiya A, Kumar P, Rao L (2005) Effect of low intensity helium-neon (He-Ne) laser irradiation on diabetic wound healing dynamics. Photomed Laser Surg 23(2):187–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cancello R, Clément K (2006) Is obesity an inflammatory illness? Role of low-grade inflammation and macrophage infiltration in human white adipose tissue. BJOG 113(10):1141–1147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trayhurn P, Wood IS (2004) Adipokines: inflammation and the pleiotropic role of white adipose tissue. Br J Nutr 92:347–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nascimento AP, Costa AMA (2006) Overweight induced by high-fat diet delays rat cutaneous wound healing. Br J Nutr 96:1069–1077CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Castro IC, Rocha CA, Gomes Henriques AC, Cavalcanti de Sousa AP, Lisboa MV, Sotero Dda R, Pinheiro AL, Cury PR, Santos JN (2014) Do laser and led phototherapies influence mast cells and myofibroblasts to produce collagen? Lasers Med Sci 29(4):1405–1410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paraguassú GM, Xavier FCA, Cangussu MCT, Ramalho MJP, Cury PR, Santos JN, Pinheiro ALBP, Ramalho LMP (2014) Effect of laser phototherapy (λ660nm) on type I and III collagen expression during wound healing in hypothyroid rats: an immunohistochemical study in a rodent model. Photomed Laser Surg 32:281–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayuk SM, Tech B, Houreld NN, Tech D, Abrahamse H (2012) Collagen production in diabetic wounded fibroblasts in response to low-intensity laser irradiation at 660 nm. Diabetes Technol Ther 14(12):1110–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Estadella D, Oyama LM, Dâmaso AR, Ribeiro EB, Do Nascimento CMO (2004) Effect of palatable hyperlipidic diet on lipid metabolism of sedentary and exercised rats. Nutrition 20(2):218–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bjørndal B, Burri L, Staalesen V, Skorve J, Berge RK (2012) Different adipose depots: their role in the development of metabolic syndrome and mitochondrial response to hypolipidemic agents. J Obes 2011:490650Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Estadella D, Oyama LM, Bueno AA, Habitante CA, Souza GI, Ribeiro EB, Motoyama CSM, Do Nascimento CMO (2011) A palatable hyperlipidic diet causes obesity and affects brain glucose metabolism in rats. Lipids Health Dis 10(168):1–9Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Buettner R, Scholmerick J, Bolheimer C (2007) High-fat diets: modeling the metabolic disorders of human obesity in rodents. Obesity 15(4):798–808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Scheppera J, Zhoub X, De Bockc S, Smitzc J, Louisd O, Hooghe-Petersb E, Vandenplasa Y (1998) Study of serum leptin in cafeteria-diet-overfed rats: influence of diet, insulin and corticosterone. Horm Res 50:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Jesus VC, Beanes G, Paraguassú GM, Ramalho LM, Pinheiro AL, Ramalho MJ, Rodriguez TT (2015) Influence of laser photobiomodulation (GaAlAs) on salivary flow rate and histomorphometry of the submandibular glands of hypothyroid rats. Lasers Med Sci 30(4):1275–1280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sampaio SCPO, Monteiro JSC, Cangussú MCT, Santos GMP, Dos Santos MAV, Dos Santos JN, Pinheiro ALB (2013) Effect of laser and LED phototherapies on the healing of cutaneous wound on healthy and iron-deficient Wistar rats and their impact on fibroblastic activity during wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 28:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinheiro ALB, Meireles GCS, Carvalho CM, Vieira ALB, Santos JN, Ramalho LMP (2006) Biomodulative effects of polarized light on the healing of cutaneous wounds on nourished and undernourished Wistar rats. Photomed Laser Surg 24(5):616–624CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Al-Watban FAH (2009) Laser therapy converts diabetic wound healing to normal healing. Photomed Laser Surg 27(1):127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Colombo F, Neto Ade A, Sousa AP, Marchionni AM, Pinheiro AL, Reis SR (2013) Effect of low-level laser therapy (660 nm) on angiogenesis in wound healing: a immunohistochemical study in a rodent model. Braz Dent J 24(4):308–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Firat ET, Dag A, Gunay A, Kaya B, Karadede MI, Kanay BE et al (2013) The effects of low-level laser therapy on palatal mucoperiosteal wound healing and oxidative stress status in experimental diabetic rats. Photomed Laser Surg 31(7):315–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silveira PC, Silva LA, Freitas TP, Latini A, Pinho RA (2011) Effects of low-power laser irradiation (LPLI) at different wavelengths and doses on oxidative stress and fibrogenesis parameters in an animal model of wound healing. Lasers Med Sci 26:125–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Serarslan G, Altuğ E, Kontas T, Atik E, Avci G (2007) Caffeic acid phenethyl ester accelerates cutaneous wound healing in a rat model and decreases oxidative stress. Clin Exp Dermatol 32(6):709–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hawkins D, Abrahamse H (2006) Effect of multiple exposures of low-level laser therapy on the cellular responses of wounded human skin fibroblasts. Photomed Laser Surg 24(6):705–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Walker MD, Rumpf S, Baxter GD, Hirst DG, Lowe AS (2000) Effect of low-intensity laser irradiation (660 nm) on a radiation-impaired wound-healing model in murine skin. Lasers Surg Med 26:41–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guirro ECO, Montebelo MIL, Bortot BA, Torres MACB, Polacow MLO (2010) Effect of laser (670 nm) on healing of wounds covered with occlusive dressing: a histologic and biomechanical analysis. Photomed Laser Surg 28(5):629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ramalho LMP, Weyll BMP, Lino MDMC, Ramalho MJP, Pinheiro ALB (2010)Assessment of laser photobiomodulation and polarized light on the healing of cutaneous wounds on euthyroid and hypothyroid induced rats. Proc. of SPIE 7552: 75520P1Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chiarotto GB, Neves LMG, Esquisatto MAM, Do Amaral MEC, Dos Santos GMT, Mendonça FAS (2014) Effects of laser irradiation (670-nm InGaP and 830-nm GaAlAs) on burn of second-degree in rats. Lasers Med Sci 29:1685–1693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mendez TM, Pinheiro AL, Pacheco MT, Nascimento PM, Ramalho LM (2004) Dose and wavelength of laser light have influence on the repair of cutaneous wounds. J Clin Laser Med Surg 22(1):19–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pérez-Echarri N, Pérez-Matute P, Marcos-Gómez B, Baena MJ, Marti A, Martínez JA, Moreno-Aliaga MJ (2008) Differential inflammatory status in rats susceptible or resistant to diet-induced obesity: effects of EPA ethyl ester treatment. Eur J Nutr Oct 47(7):380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brownell HL, Narsimhan RP, Corbley MJ, Mann VM, Whitfield JF, Raptis L (1996) Ras is involved in gap junction closure in proliferating fibroblasts or preadipocytes but not in differentiated adipocytes. DNA Cell Biol 15(6):443–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Andrade ZA, De-Oliveira-Filho J, Fernandes ALM (1998) Interrelationship between adipocytes and fibroblasts during acute damage to the subcutaneous adipose tissue of rats: an ultrastructural study. Braz J Med Biol Res 31(5):659–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meirelles GC, Santos JN, Chagas PO, Moura AP, Pinheiro AL (2008) A comparative study of the effects of laser photobiomodulation on the healing of third-degree burns: a histological study in rats. Photomed Laser Surg 26(2):159–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hassan WU, Greiser U, Wang W (2014) Role of adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 22:313–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Oni G, Lequeux C, Cho M, Zhang D, Lazcano E, Brown SA, Kenkel JM (2013) Transdermal delivery of adipocyte-derived stem cells using a fractional ablative laser. Aesthet Surg J 33(1):109–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shen CC, Yang YC, Chiao MT, Chan SC, Liu BS (2013) Low-level laser stimulation on adipose-tissue-derived stem cell treatments for focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:594906PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virgínia Dias Uzêda-e-Silva
    • 1
  • Tania Tavares Rodriguez
    • 2
  • Isadora Almeida Rios Rocha
    • 1
  • Flávia Calo Aquino Xavier
    • 1
  • Jean Nunes dos Santos
    • 1
  • Patrícia Ramos Cury
    • 1
  • Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho
    • 1
  1. 1.School of DentistryFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Physiology, Health Sciences CenterFederal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations