Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 421–428 | Cite as

Evaluation of different laser wavelengths on ablation lesion and residual thermal injury in intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine

  • Hélio Plapler
  • Marília W. Mancini
  • Valéria R. G. Sella
  • Fernando R. C. Bomfim
Original Article


Laser discectomy or nucleotomy is an increasingly important method for less invasive procedures of column, but the ideal kind of laser is still not established. As the wavelength is an important parameter for water absorption, this study was performed to investigate the action of the laser emission in the near infrared (808 to 1908 nm) region in the context of surgical procedures for percutaneous intervertebral disc decompression (nucleotomy). Forty intervertebral discs from pigs lumbar spines were irradiated with laser (λ = 808, 980, 1470 and 1908 nm), 1-s on/off time cycles, for 120 cycles and 10 W of power (808, 980, and 1470 nm) or 240 cycles and 5 W of power (1908 nm), with total power of 1200 J, and subjected to microscopic evaluation through hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining in order to measure the ablation lesions and the residual thermal injury. Ten other discs were not irradiated and worked as controls. The ablation lesions were measured (in mm) at 1.08 ± 1.25, 1.70 ± 0.63, 2.23 ± 1.02, 1.37 ± 0.39, and 0.94 ± 0.41 (median ± SD) for the control, 808, 980, 1470, and 1908 nm groups, respectively. The difference between 1908 nm and all the other groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The residual thermal injury was less evident in 1908 nm laser and sharper in 980 nm laser wavelengths. The laser at a wavelength of 1908 nm was considered the most efficient for the vaporization of the nucleus pulposus, followed by the laser wavelengths of 1470, 808, and 980 nm, and proved to be useful for laser nucleotomy procedure.


Intervertebral disc Nucleotomy Percutaneous discectomy Laser surgery 


Compliance with ethical standards

This research was approved by the Committee of Animal Rights of the Federal University of São Paulo (CEUA—#4530240314)


This research has received a grant from São Paulo State Research Fund (FAPESP), process number 2010/12607-9.


  1. 1.
    Choy DSJ (2004) Percutaneous laser disc decompression: a 17-year experience. Photomed Laser Surg 22:407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choy DSJ, Hellinger J, Hellinger S, Tassi GP, Lee SH (2009) 23rd anniversary of percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD). Photomed Laser Surg 27(4):535–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choy DSJ, Michelsen J, Getrajdman D (1992) Percutaneous laser disc decompression: an update—Spring 1992. J Clin Laser Med Surg 10:177–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choy D (2003) Percutaneous laser disc decompression: a practical guide. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta AK, Bodhey NK, Jayasree RS, Kapilamoorthy T, Kesavadas C, Krishnamoorthy T (2006) Percutaneous laser disc decompression: Clinical experience at SCTIMST and long term follow up. Neurol India 54:164–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schenk B, Brouwer PA, Peul WC, van Buchem MA (2006) Percutaneous laser disc decompression: a review of the literature. Am J Neuroradiol 27:232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schenk B, Brouwer PA, Peul WC, van Buchem MA (2006) Experimental basis of percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): a review of literature. Lasers Med Sci 21:245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morelet A, Boyer F, Vitry F, Ackah-Miezan S, Berquet R, Langlois S (2007) Efficacy of percutaneous laser disc decompression for lumbar disc hernia due to radiculalgia (149 patients). Presse Med 36(11 Pt 1):1527–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menchetti P, Bini W, Canero G, Menotti F (2008) Diode laser Percutaneous Discectomy: Multicenter study at 4 years follow up. Int J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol Suppl I-to IJMIST [serial on the Internet] 1 (2)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siebert W (1999) Percutaneous nucleotomy procedures in lumbar intervertebral disk displacement. Curr Status Orthop 28(7):598–608Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choy D, Case R, Fielding W, Hughes J, Liebler WPA (1987) Percutaneous laser lumbar disks nucleolysis. N Engl J Med 317:771–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nachemson A (1961) The influence of spinal movements on the lumbar intradiscal pressure and on the tensile stresses in the annulus annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 33:183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nachemson A (1965) In vivo discometry in lumbar discs with irregular nucleograms. Some differences in stress distribution between normal and moderately degenerated discs. Acta Orthop Scand 36(4):418–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siebert W (1993) Percutaneous laser disc decompression: the European experience. Spine State Arts Rev 7:37–42Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Casper GD, Hartman VL, Mullins LL (1996) Results of a clinical trial of the holmium: YAG laser in disc decompression utilizing the side-firing fiber: a two-year follow-up. Lasers Surg Med 19(1):90–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jayasree RS, Gupta AK, Bodhey NK, Mohanty M (2009) Effect of 980-nm Diode laser and 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser on the intervertebral disc in vitro and in vivo studies. Photomed Laser Surg 27(4):547–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gevargez A, Groenemeyer D, Czerwinsky F (2000) CT-guided percutaneous laser disc decompression with Ceralas D, the diode laser with 980-nm wavelength and 200-μm fiber optics. Eur Radiol 10:1239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iwatsuki K, Yoshimine, TI, Awazu, K (2007) Percutaneous laser disc decompression for lumbar disc hernia: indications based on Lasegue’s Sign. Photomed Laser Surg 25 (40).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iwatsuki K, Yoshimine TI, Umegaki M, Yoshimura K, Ohnishi Y, Ishihara M, Moriwaki T (2011) Percutaneous diode laser irradiation for lumbar discogenic pain: a clinical study. Photomed Laser Surg 29(7):459–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao XL, Fu ZJ, Xu YG, Zhao XJ, Song WG, Zheng H (2012) Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation using C-Arm fluoroscopy guided percutaneous laser disc decopmpression. Photomed Laser Surg 30(2):92–5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adam D, Pevzner, Gepstein A (2013) Comparison of percutaneous nucleoplasty and open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc protrusions. Chirurgia (Bucur) 108(1):94–8Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fukuda TY, Tanji MM, Sb SR, Sato MN, Plapler H (2013) Low-level infrared diode laser on inflammatory process modulation in mice: pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Lasers med sci 28(5):1305–13. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1231-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kasch R, Mensel B, Florian S, Ruetten S, Barz T, Froehlich S et al (2012) Percutaneous nucleoplasty volume reduction with disc in an animal model. PLoS ONE [Internet] 7(11):e50211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kasch R, Mensel B, Schmidt F, Drescher W, Pfuhl R, Ruetten S et al (2012) Percutaneous disc decompression with nucleoplasty-volumetry of the nucleus pulposus using ultrahigh-field MRI. PLoS ONE [Internet] 7(7):e41497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren L, Guo B, Zhang T, Bai Q, Wang X-h, Zhang L et al (2013) Medium-term follow-up findings in imaging after percutaneous laser disc decompression manifestation. Photomed Laser Surg 31(6):247–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Choy D, Diwan S (1992) In vitro and in vivo fall of intradiscal pressure with laser disc decompression. J Clin Laser Med Surg 10:435–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Min K, Read H, Parties K (1996) Quantitative determination of radiofrequency ablation in weight of lumbar intervertebral discs with holmium: YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 18:187–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manni J (1992) Surgical diode lasers. J Clin Laser Med Surg 10(5):377–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cselik Z, Aradi M, von Jako RA, Lelovics Z, Juhasz I, Egyhazi Z et al (2012) Impact of infrared laser light at different wavelengths-induced ablation on intervertebral disc bovine ex vivo: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Lasers Surg Med 44:406–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Choy D, Altman P, Trokel S (1995) Efficiency of disc radiofrequency ablation with lasers of various wavelengths. J Clin Laser Med Surg 13(3):153–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldman MP, Fitzpatrick RE (1994) Cutaneous laser surgery: the art and science of selective photothermolysis, 1st edn. Mosby, San Diego, 336 p Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Niemz M (2007) Thermal interaction. Laser-tissue interactions: Fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, p 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jacques N (1998) Continuous laser ablation of carbonized tissue: simple rules Oregon Medical Laser Center [cited 2013 10/20/2013]. Available from:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hélio Plapler
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marília W. Mancini
    • 2
  • Valéria R. G. Sella
    • 1
  • Fernando R. C. Bomfim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryFederal University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.DMC, LtdSão CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations