Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 235–240 | Cite as

Photobiomodulation with light-emitting diodes improves sperm motility in men with asthenozoospermia

  • Helena Ban Frangez
  • Igor Frangez
  • Ivan Verdenik
  • Vid Jansa
  • Irma Virant Klun
Original Article

Abstract

Sperm motility is an important parameter of male fertility and depends on energy consumption. Photobiomodulation with light-emitting diode (LED) is known to stimulate respiratory chain in mitochondria of different mammalian cells. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation with LED on sperm motility in infertile men with impaired sperm motility—asthenozoospermia. Thirty consecutive men with asthenozoospermia and normal sperm count who visited the infertility clinic of University Medial Centre Ljubljana between September 2011 and February 2012 were included in the study. Semen sample of each man was divided into five parts: one served as a non-treated (native) control and four parts were irradiated with LED of different wavelengths: (1) 850 nm, (2) 625, 660 and 850 nm, (3) 470 nm and (4) 625, 660 and 470 nm. The percentage of motile sperm and kinematic parameters were measured using a Sperm Class Analyser system following the WHO recommendations. In the non-treated semen samples, the average ratio of rapidly progressive sperms was 12 % and of immotile sperm 73 %. Treating with LED significantly increased the proportion of rapidly progressive sperm (mean differences were as follows: 2.83 (1.39–4.28), 3.33 (1.61–5.05), 4.50 (3.00–5.99) and 3.83 (2.31–5.36) for groups 1–4, respectively) and significantly decreased the ratio of immotile sperm (the mean differences and 95 % CI were as follows: 3.50 (1.30–5.70), 4.33 (2.15–6.51), 5.83 (3.81–7.86) and 5.50 (2.98–8.02) for groups 1–4, respectively). All differences were highly statistically significant. This finding confirmed that photobiomodulation using LED improved the sperm motility in asthenozoospermia regardless of the wavelength.

Keywords

Low level light therapy Sperm motility Human sperm 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all patients for their participation, laboratory technicians in the Andrology Laboratory for their additional work that enabled this research, Votan who donated LED for the purpose of this study and Erik Margan for sharing his knowledge of experimental physics with us.

References

  1. 1.
    Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N, Hamblin MR (2013) Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg 32:41–52PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saltmarche AE (2008) Low level laser therapy for healing acute and chronic wounds—the extendicare experience. Int Wound J 5:351–360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Desan PH, Weinstein AJ, Michalak EE, Tam EM, Meesters Y, Ruiter MJ, Horn E, Telner J, Iskandar H, Boivin DB, Lam RW (2007) A controlled trial of the Litebook light-emitting diode (LED) light therapy device for treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD). BMC Psychiatry 7:38PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karu T (1989) Photobiology of low-power laser effects. Health Phys 56:691–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karu TI (2008) Mitochondrial signaling in mammalian cells activated by red and near-IR radiation. Photochem Photobiol 84:1091–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao X, Xing D (2009) Molecular mechanisms of cell proliferation induced by low power laser irradiation. J Biomed Sci 16:4. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-4 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR (2011) Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy—an update. Dose Response 9:602–618PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lane N (2006) Cell biology: power games. Nature 443:901–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen AC-H, Arany PR, Huang Y-Y, Tomkinson EM, Saleem T, Yull FE, Blackwell TS, Hamblin MR (2011) Low level laser therapy activates NF-κB via generation of reactive oxygen species in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 6:e22453PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lubart R, Eichler M, Lavi R, Friedman H, Shainberg A (2005) Low-energy laser irradiation promotes cellular redox activity. Photomed Laser Surg 23:3–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiva S, Gladwin MT (2009) Shining a light on tissue NO stores: near infrared release of NO from nitrite and nitrosylated hemes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 46:1–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lubart R, Friedmann H, Sinyakov M, Cohen N, Breitbart H (1997) Changes in calcium transport in mammalian sperm mitochondria and plasma membranes caused by 780 nm irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 21:493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alasmari W, Barratt CL, Publicover SJ, Whalley KM, Foster E, Kay V, Martins da Silva S, Oxenham SK (2013) The clinical significance of calcium-signalling pathways mediating human sperm hyperactivation. Hum Reprod 28:866–876PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ocaña-Quero JM, Gomez-Villamandos R, Moreno-Millan M, Santisteban-Valenzuela JM (1997) Biological effects of helium-neon (He-Ne) laser irradiation on acrosome reaction in bull sperm cells. J Photochem Photobiol B 40:294–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sato H, Landthaler M, Haina D, Schill WB (1984) The effects of laser light on sperm motility and velocity in vitro. Andrologia 16:23–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenzi A, Claroni F, Gandini L, Lombardo F, Barbieri C, Lino A, Dondero F (1989) Laser radiation and motility patterns of human sperm. Arch Androl 23:229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singer R, Sagiv M, Barnet M, Levinsky H, Segenreich E, Fuchs Y, Mendes E, Yehoshua H (1991) Low energy narrow band non-coherent infrared illumination of human semen and isolated sperm. Andrologia 23:181–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yazdi SR, Bakhshi S, Jannat Alipoor F, Akhoond MR, Borhani S, Farrahi F, Lotfi Panah M, Sadighi Gilani MA (2010) Effect of 830-nm diode laser irradiation on human sperm motility. Fertil Steril 4(Suppl 1):31–32Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Firestone RS, Esfandiari N, Moskovtsev SI, Burstein E, Videna GT, Librach C, Bentov Y, Casper RF (2012) The effects of low-level laser light exposure on sperm motion characteristics and DNA damage. J Androl 33:469–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Corral-Baqués MI, Rivera MM, Rigau T, Rodríguez-Gil JE, Rigau J (2009) The effect of low-level laser irradiation on dog spermatozoa motility is dependent on laser output power. Lasers Med Sci 24:703–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zan-Bar T, Bartoov B, Segal R, Yehuda R, Lavi R, Lubart R, Avtalion RR (2005) Influence of visible light and ultraviolet irradiation on motility and fertility of mammalian and fish sperm. Photomed Laser Surg 23:549–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shahar S, Wiser A, Ickowicz D, Lubart R, Shulman A, Breitbart H (2011) Light-mediated activation reveals a key role for protein kinase A and sarcoma protein kinase in the development of sperm hyper-activated motility. Hum Reprod 26:2274–2282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iaffaldano N, Meluzzi A, Manchisi A, Passarella S (2005) Improvement of stored turkey semen quality as a result of He-Ne laser irradiation. Anim Reprod Sci 85:317–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    World Health Organization (2010) WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. WHO Press, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aitken RJ (1997) Molecular mechanisms regulating human sperm function. Mol Hum Reprod 3:169–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Breitbart H, Spungin B (1997) The biochemistry of the acrosome reaction. Mol Hum Reprod 3:195–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Florman HM, Jungnickel MK, Sutton KA (2008) Regulating the acrosome reaction. Int J Dev Biol 52:503–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karu TI (2012) Lasers in infertility treatment: irradiation of oocytes and spermatozoa. Photomed Laser Surg 30:239–241PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tadir Y, Wright WH, Vafa O, Ord T, Asch R, Berns MW (1991) Micromanipulation of gametes using laser microbeams. Hum Reprod 6:1011–1016PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kanyô K, Konc J (2000) A follow-up study of children born after noncontact laser-assisted hatching of 96 deliveries, 134 babies. Hum Reprod 15:63Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ebner T, Moser M, Tews G (2005) Possible applications of a non-contact 1.48 microm wavelength diode laser in assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod Update 11:425–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    König K, Tadir Y, Patrizio P, Berns MW, Tromberg BJ (1996) Effects of ultraviolet exposure and near infrared laser tweezers on human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 11:2162–2164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harper JC, Wilton L, Traeger-Synodinos J, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB, Pehlivan Budak T, Renwick P, De Rycke M, Geraedts JP, Harton G (2012) The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection. Hum Reprod Update 18:234–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V, Reljic M (2006) Clinical use of pentoxifylline for activation of immotile testicular sperm before ICSI in patients with azoospermia. J Androl 27:45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Ban Frangez
    • 1
  • Igor Frangez
    • 2
  • Ivan Verdenik
    • 3
  • Vid Jansa
    • 4
  • Irma Virant Klun
    • 1
  1. 1.Reproductive Unit, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Department of Traumatology, Surgery ClinicUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations