Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 575–584 | Cite as

Photodynamic therapy disinfection of carious tissue mediated by aluminum-chloride-phthalocyanine entrapped in cationic liposomes: an in vitro and clinical study

  • João Paulo F. Longo
  • Soraya C. Leal
  • Andreza R. Simioni
  • Maria de Fátima Menezes Almeida-Santos
  • Antônio C. Tedesco
  • Ricardo B. Azevedo
Original Article

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a technique employed in the treatment of several superficial infections, such as caries. PDT uses a non-toxic drug termed photosensitizer (PS) followed by light irradiation. The cytotoxic effects of the therapy are related to the production of reactive species produced after light activation of a photosensitizer, which reacts with surrounding molecules and disrupts several of the cell's functions. Within this context, this study aimed to develop a clinical protocol involving PDT application mediated by aluminum-chloride-phthalocyanine (AlClPc) entrapped in cationic liposomes against cariogenic bacteria in caries lesions. Cationic liposomes were used to delivery AlClPc preferentially to bacterial cells due to the strong anionic superficial charges of these cell types. The results are represented in two fundamental steps: (1) in vitro evaluation of AlClPc delivery to cariogenic bacteria and pulp cells, as well as its potential phototoxicity; (2) a clinical study involving volunteer patients that were treated with the PDT protocol mediated by AlClPc-cationic liposome. The main results showed that the AlClPc-cationic liposome was preferentially absorbed by bacterial cells compared to eukaryotic dental pulp cells, and it was efficient in the reduction of microbial load from bacterial cultures. In addition, the clinical study showed a mean reduction of 82% of total bacterial in the treated cavities after PDT application. Taken together, the results presented in this study showed that the antimicrobial PDT protocol mediated by cationic liposomes containing AlClPc is safety for clinical application and is efficient in the reduction of bacterial load in caries lesions.

Keywords

Caries Photodynamic therapy Cationic liposome Bacteria 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the following Brazilian agencies: MCT; FINEP; CNPq; INCT Nanobiotechnology; FAP-DF and CAPES.

References

  1. 1.
    Maisch T (2007) Anti-microbial photodynamic therapy: useful in the future? Lasers Med Sci 22(2):83–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Konopka K, Goslinski T (2007) Photodynamic therapy in dentistry. J Dent Res 86:694–707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen R, Loebel N, Hammond D, Wilson M (2007) Treatment of periodontal disease by photodisinfection compared to scaling and root planing. J Clin Dent 18:34–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin Z, Wang Y, Zhang X, Ding X et al (2007) Clinical efficacy of a new photodynamic treatment for periodontal diseases. J Dent Res 86:1196–1196Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson M, Dobson J, Harvey W (1992) Sensitization of oral bacteria to killing by low-power laser radiation. Curr Microbiol 25:77–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bevilacqua IM, Nicolau RA, Khouri S, Brugnera A Jr, Teodoro GR, Zângaro RA, Pacheco MT (2007) The impact of photodynamic therapy on the viability of Streptococcus mutans in a planktonic culture. Photomed Laser Surg 25:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zanin IC, Gonçalves RB, Junior AB, Hope CK, Pratten J (2005) Susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans biofilms to photodynamic therapy: an in vitro study. Br Soc Antimicrob Chemo 56:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kidd EAM (2010) Clinical threshold for carious tissue removal. Dent Clin North Am 54:541–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayashi M, Fujitani M, Yamaki C, Momoi Y (2011) Ways of enhancing pulp preservation by stepwise excavation-A systematic review. J Dent 39:95–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hahn CL, Liewehr FR (2007) Relationships between caries bacteria, host responses, and clinical signs and symptoms of pulpitis. J Endod 33:213–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Azarpazhooh A, Shah PS, Tenenbaum HC, Goldberg MB (2010) The effect of photodynamic therapy for periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 81:4–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tardivoa JP, Giglioa AD, de Oliveira CS, Gabrielli DS, Junqueira HJ et al (2005) Methylene blue in photodynamic therapy: from basic mechanisms to clinical applications. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wood S, Nattress B, Kirkham J, Shore R, Brookes S, Griffiths J, Robinson C (1999) An in vitro study of the use of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of natural oral plaque biofilms formed in vivo. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biology 50:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Séguier S, Souza SL, Sverzut AC, Simioni AR, Primo FL, Bodineau A, Corrêa VM, Coulomb B, Tedesco AC (2010) Impact of photodynamic therapy on inflammatory cells during human chronic periodontitis. J Photochem Photobiol B: Biology 101:348–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nunes SMT, Sguilla FS, Tedesco AC (2004) Photophysical studies of zinc phthalocyanine and chloroaluminum phthalocyanine incorporated into liposomes in the presence of additives. Braz J Med Biol Res 37:273–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sibata MN, Tedesco AC, Marchetti JM (2004) Photophysicals and photochemicals studies of zinc (II) phthalocyanine in long time circulation micelles for photodynamic therapy use. Eur J Pharm Sci 23:131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Derycke ASL, de Witte PAM (2004) Liposomes for photodynamic therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:17–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bombelli C, Bordi F, Ferro S, Giansanti L, Jori G, Mancini G, Mazzuca C, Monti D, Ricchelli F, Sennato S, Venanzi M (2008) New cationic liposomes as vehicles of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin in photodynamic therapy of infectious diseases. Mol Pharm 5:672–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ferro S, Ricchelli F, Monti D, Mancini G, Jori G (2007) Efficient photoinactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a novel porphyrin incorporated into a poly-cationic liposome. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39:1026–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simioni AR, Pelisson MM, Beltrame M Jr, Tedesco AC (2008) Photophysical and photobiological studies of a silicon tribenzonaphthoporphyrazinato incorporated into liposomes for photodynamic therapy use. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 8:3208–3215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li LC, Tian Y (2002) Zeta potential. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology, 2nd edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc, 3020.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, Robey PG, Shi S (2000) Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Nat Acad Sci 97:13625–13630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P (1996) Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 56:135–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, Ebisu S, Frencken JE, Tay FR (2006) Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 22:647–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bönecker M, Toi C, Cleaton-Jones P (2003) Mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in carious dentine before and after atraumatic restorative treatment. J Dent 31:423–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    de Oliveira RR, Schwartz-Filho HO, Novaes AB, Taba M (2007) Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the non-surgical treatment of aggressive periodontitis: a preliminary randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 78:965–973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meisel P, Kocher T (2005) Photodynamic therapy for periodontal diseases: state of the art. J Photochem Photobiol, B: Biology 79:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braun A, Dehn C, Krause F, Jepsen S (2008) Short-term clinical effects of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in periodontal treatment: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 35:877–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garcez AS, Nuñez SC, Hamblin MR, Ribeiro MS (2008) Antimicrobial effects of photodynamic therapy on patients with necrotic pulps and periapical lesion. J Endod 34:138–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pinheiro SL, Schenka AA, Neto AA, de Souza CP, Rodriguez HM, Ribeiro MC (2009) Photodynamic therapy in endodontic treatment of deciduous teeth. Lasers Med Sci 24:521–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams JA, Pearson GJ, Colles MJ, Wilson M (2004) The photo-activated antibacterial action of toluidine blue O in a collagen matrix and in carious dentine. Caries Res 38:530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lima JP, Sampaio de Melo MA, Borges FM, Teixeira AH, Steiner-Oliveira C, Nobre Dos Santos M, Rodrigues LK, Zanin IC (2009) Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of photodynamic antimicrobial therapy in an in situ model of dentine caries. Eur J Oral Sci 117:568–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frencken JE (2010) The ART approach using glass-ionomers in relation to global oral health care. Dent Mater 26:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nishikawara F, Nomura Y, Imai S, Senda A, Hanada N (2007) Evaluation of cariogenic bacteria. Eur J Dent 1:31–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Genet S, Costalat R, Burger J (2001) The influence of plasma membrane electrostatic properties on the stability of cell ionic composition. Biophys J 81:2442–2457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    George S, Hamblin MR, Kishen A (2009) Uptake pathways of anionic and cationic photosensitizers into bacteria. Photochem Photobiol Sci 8:788–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Filoche S, Wong L, Sissons CH (2010) Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res 89:8–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kleinberg I (2002) A mixed-bacteria ecological approach to understanding the role of the oral bacteria in dental caries causation: an alternative to Streptococcus mutans and the specific-plaque hypothesis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:108–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Takahashi N, Nyvad B (2008) Caries ecology revisited: microbial dynamics and the caries process. Caries Res 42:409–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    ten Cate JMB (2009) The need for antibacterial approaches to improve caries control. Adv Dent Res 21:8–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Paulo F. Longo
    • 1
  • Soraya C. Leal
    • 2
  • Andreza R. Simioni
    • 3
  • Maria de Fátima Menezes Almeida-Santos
    • 1
  • Antônio C. Tedesco
    • 3
  • Ricardo B. Azevedo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Morphology, Institute of BiologyUniversity of BrasíliaBrasiliaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of DentistryUniversity of BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil
  3. 3.Center of Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineers, Photobiology and Photomedicine research GroupFFCLRP- São Paulo UniversityRibeirão Preto, São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations